RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy (PEG) is considered a safe and effective method for nutritional support in patients with malnutrition and swallowing impairment with an estimated survival of over two months. Some indications, such as advanced cognitive decline, contraindicate the technique. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients who underwent PEG placement between January 2001 and May 2019 were included. Clinical data, indication, complications, and mortality were retrospectively analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 648 patients (46.5% male, mean age 70±18.5 years) were included. The most common indications for PEG were advanced cognitive decline (31.5%) and cerebrovascular disease (18.8%). The mean follow-up was 12.07 months (IQR 3.27-34.73). 39.5% of patients experienced complications (systemic 17.9%, local 28.5%). The most frequent were bronchoaspiration (9.7%) and rupture/dysfunction (13.9%), respectively. The presence of early complications (HR 1.63 [1.20-2.21]) and age (HR 1.02 [1.01-1.02]) were associated with shorter survival time, while female sex was a protective factor (HR 0.78 [0.66-0.94]). CONCLUSIONS: PEG is not without complications, with 39.5% of patients experiencing them. Patients with advanced dementia, male sex, older age, and systemic complications have lower survival following PEG placement.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: the risk of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) after eradication of the hepatitis C virus (HCV) is highly variable in patients with advanced fibrosis (F3). Long-term surveillance for HCC after sustained virological response (SVR) is controversial in these patients. The objective of this study was to describe the post-SVR follow-up in clinical practice in patients with F3 and determine the predictive factors for the development of HCC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: a multicenter, observational and retrospective study was performed, which included HCV-monoinfected patients with F3 fibrosis determined by transient elastography who achieved SVR between 2015 and 2022, with follow-up until May 2023. Clinical-demographic, laboratory, elastography, and ultrasound variables were recorded before and after treatment. A descriptive and inferential analysis, Cox regression analysis and survival analysis were carried out with the R statistical software. RESULTS: two hundred and nineteen patients were included in the study (65.3 % males, median age 57 years), and 175 (79.9 %) received ultrasound screening after SVR for 62 (6-90) months. The prescribing service was the only independent variable related to performing ultrasound surveillance (p = 0.004). Eight patients developed HCC. In multivariate analysis adjusted for sex, age, presence of diabetes and alcohol consumption, a post-SVR FIB-4 ≥ 3.25 was associated with a 12-fold increase in HCC risk. The cumulative probability of HCC was higher in the group of patients with FIB-4 ≥ 3.25 after SVR (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: post-SVR follow-up of patients with F3 fibrosis is variable in clinical practice. Using the FIB-4 after SVR allows us to identify those patients with a higher risk of HCC who benefit from biannual ultrasound screening.