Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Saudi Heart Assoc ; 36(2): 70-78, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38919507

RESUMEN

Background: Incidence and outcomes of acute kidney injury (AKI) among neonates who underwent open-heart surgery are not well highlighted in the literature. We aim to assess the incidence, risk factors, and outcome of AKI among neonates undergoing open-heart surgery. Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study between 2016 and 2021 for all neonates requiring open heart surgery. The cases were divided into 2 groups: the AKI (index) group and the non-AKI (control) group. The two groups were statistically compared for risk factors, needs for dialysis, and outcomes. Results: 100 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Among them, 74 (74%) developed AKI, including 41 (55%), 15 (21%), and 18 (24%) patients in KDIGO stages 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Multivariate analysis comparing both groups demonstrated that low pre-operative creatinine (p = 0.01), prolonged bypass time (p = 0.0004) and high vasoactive inotropic score (VIS), (p = 0.0008) were risk factors for developing AKI post-operatively. Furthermore, in the AKI group, 17 (23%) neonates required renal replacement therapy in the form of peritoneal dialysis. The length of stay was higher in the AKI index group (p = 0.015). Patients who had AKI recovered their kidney function at discharge. There was no difference in mortality between both groups. Conclusion: The AKI occurred in 74% of neonates undergoing open-heart surgery, with 23% of them needing peritoneal dialysis. Low pre-operative creatinine, high VIS score, and prolonged bypass time are potential risk factors for AKI development after neonatal open-heart surgery. AKI may lead to prolonged hospitalization, though most affected patients recovered their normal kidney function at discharge.

2.
Cureus ; 15(4): e37382, 2023 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37182070

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Inguinal hernia repair is one of the most common general surgical procedures. It has been performed under local, regional, or general anesthesia. We hypothesized that using regional plus general anesthesia rather than general anesthesia alone would improve outcomes in neonates and pediatric patients undergoing hernia repair. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study, including all pediatric patients who underwent inguinal hernia repair from 2015-2021. We divided patients into two groups. The first group was labeled "general anesthesia" (GA), while the second group was labeled "combined general and regional anesthesia" (GA+RA). We compared both groups in terms of demographic data, intraoperative outcome variables, and postoperative outcome variables. RESULTS:  212 children fulfilled the study criteria, with 57 in the GA group and 155 in the GA+RA group. Demographic and preoperative data were comparable between both groups except for age, which was 60.3±49.4 months in the GA group versus 26.7±33.13 months in the GA+RA group (p<.0001). Outcome variables demonstrated statistically significant improvement in postoperative pain occurrence, length of hospital stay, incidence of bradycardia, and need for mechanical ventilation in the GA+RA group in comparison to the GA group with P values of 0.031, 0.02, 0.005, and 0.02, respectively. CONCLUSION: Using regional and general anesthesia techniques rather than general anesthesia alone is associated with a decrease in postoperative pain, length of hospital stay, incidence of bradycardia, and need for mechanical ventilation. Further studies are still warranted to validate our conclusions.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA