RESUMEN
Nonhepatic hyperammonemia syndrome is a rare cause of neurologic dysfunction and cerebral edema and has most commonly been reported in posttransplant patients. Only recently has opportunistic infection with Ureaplasma species and Mycoplasma hominis been found to be key to the pathogenesis. We describe the cases of 3 immunosuppressed patients who developed hyperammonemia syndrome with new-onset refractory status epilepticus and diffuse cerebral edema. PCR was positive for M hominis in 1 patient and Ureaplasma parvum in the other 2. Despite early diagnostic suspicion and aggressive management with empirical antibiotics, seizure control, hypertonic saline, and ammonia elimination, none of our patients survived this life-threatening infection. Nonhepatic hyperammonemia and new-onset seizures can be presenting features of disseminated Ureaplasma species and M hominis infections in posttransplant patients. Immunosuppression in the absence of organ transplantation is likely sufficient to trigger this entity, as was the case in our third patient. When suspected, empiric combination antibiotics should be used due to high likelihood of resistance. The diagnostic test of choice is PCR. Patients with hyperammonemia syndrome associated with these infections typically have a poor prognosis. Early recognition and aggressive multimodal interventions may be key to ameliorating the high mortality and severe neurologic sequelae from this entity.
Asunto(s)
Edema Encefálico , Hiperamonemia , Mycoplasma , Estado Epiléptico , Humanos , Ureaplasma , Edema Encefálico/terapia , Edema Encefálico/complicaciones , Hiperamonemia/complicaciones , Hiperamonemia/terapia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Estado Epiléptico/terapia , Estado Epiléptico/complicacionesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Severity of illness in COVID-19 is consistently lower in women. A focus on sex as a biological factor may suggest a potential therapeutic intervention for this disease. We assessed whether adding progesterone to standard of care (SOC) would improve clinical outcomes of hospitalized men with moderate to severe COVID-19. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does short-term subcutaneous administration of progesterone safely improve clinical outcome in hypoxemic men hospitalized with COVID-19? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: We conducted a pilot, randomized, open-label, controlled trial of subcutaneous progesterone in men hospitalized with confirmed moderate to severe COVID-19. Patients were randomly assigned to receive SOC plus progesterone (100 mg subcutaneously twice daily for up to 5 days) or SOC alone. In addition to assessment of safety, the primary outcome was change in clinical status on day 7. Length of hospital stay and number of days on supplemental oxygen were key secondary outcomes. RESULTS: Forty-two patients were enrolled from April 2020 to August 2020; 22 were randomized to the control group and 20 to the progesterone group. Two patients from the progesterone group withdrew from the study before receiving progesterone. There was a 1.5-point overall improvement in median clinical status score on a seven-point ordinal scale from baseline to day 7 in patients in the progesterone group as compared with control subjects (95% CI, 0.0-2.0; P = .024). There were no serious adverse events attributable to progesterone. Patients treated with progesterone required three fewer days of supplemental oxygen (median, 4.5 vs 7.5 days) and were hospitalized for 2.5 fewer days (median, 7.0 vs 9.5 days) as compared with control subjects. INTERPRETATION: Progesterone at a dose of 100 mg, twice daily by subcutaneous injection in addition to SOC, may represent a safe and effective approach for treatment in hypoxemic men with moderate to severe COVID-19. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT04365127; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.