Systane iLux Thermal Pulsation System in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Post-Hoc Analysis of a 12-Month, Randomized, Multicenter Study.

Purpose: This study aimed to demonstrate the effectiveness of Systane iLux, a thermal pulsation device, in patients with MGD, over 12 months post-single treatment. Methods: This is a post-hoc analysis of a previous prospective, assessor-masked, parallel-group, multicenter study (NCT03956225) that compared the effectiveness and safety of iLux with LipiFlow in subjects with MGD. The original study included subjects with meibomian gland score (MGS) ≤12 in lower eyelids, Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life-Symptom Bother (IDEEL-SB) module score >16, and non-invasive tear break-up time (NITBUT) <10 seconds. Subjects were randomized (1:1) to receive a single bilateral treatment of iLux or LipiFlow. In this post-hoc analysis, mean changes in MGS, NITBUT (first break-up; seconds), IDEEL-SB module score, and corneal staining, from baseline to 12 months were analyzed post-single treatment with iLux. Results: Data from 119 patients (n=238 eyes) treated with iLux were analyzed. The mean±SD age of the subjects was 58.4±13.4 years, with majority being female (79.0%). MGS (mean±SD) for both eyes improved significantly from baseline to 12 months (OD [baseline: 6.9±3.69; month 12: 22.8±11.31; change: 15.9±11.57, p<0.0001]; OS [baseline: 6.4±3.66; month 12: 23.0±11.33; change: 16.7±11.40, p<0.0001]). Similarly, significant improvements were observed in NITBUT (OD [baseline: 5.2±1.97; month 12: 7.0±3.68; change: 1.9±3.69, p<0.0001]; OS [baseline: 5.6±1.96; month 12: 7.9±4.58; change: 2.3±4.59, p<0.0001]) and IDEEL-SB score (p<0.0001). Corneal staining reduced significantly from baseline to 12 months (OD [baseline: 2.1±2.96; month 12: 0.7±1.56; change: -1.4±2.65, p<0.0001]; OS [baseline: 2.1±2.94; month 12: 0.7±1.44; change: -1.4±2.75, p<0.0001]). Improvements in MGS, NITBUT, IDEEL-SB module score, and corneal staining were seen as early as week 2, and at months 1, 3, 6, and 9 (all p<0.001). Conclusion: A single treatment with iLux significantly improved clinical parameters of MGS, NITBUT, and corneal staining, and patient-reported symptom assessment with IDEEL-SB in patients with MGD over 12 months.

Comparison of Two Thermal Pulsation Systems in the Treatment of Meibomian Gland Dysfunction: A Randomized, Multicenter Study.

SIGNIFICANCE: Given the significance of meibomian gland dysfunction subjects in evaporative dry eye, its chronic and progressive nature, limited promising treatment options, and novel treatment techniques are important. This randomized clinical study evaluated the noninferiority of SYSTANE iLux with LipiFlow in meibomian gland dysfunction treatment at 12 months. PURPOSE: This study aimed to demonstrate noninferiority of SYSTANE iLux compared with LipiFlow at 12 months after single treatment in meibomian gland dysfunction subjects with evaporative dry eye. METHODS: In this prospective, randomized, multicenter, assessor-masked, parallel-group trial, subjects (N = 236; aged ≥18 years) with meibomian gland score (MGS) of ≤12 in lower eyelids, noninvasive tear breakup time (NITBUT; first breakup) of <10 seconds, and Impact of Dry Eye on Everyday Life-Symptom Bother (IDEEL-SB) module score of >16 were randomized (1:1) to receive SYSTANE iLux (n = 119) or LipiFlow (n = 117). Subjects attended a total of eight visits, including screening, treatment, and follow-up visits at 2 weeks and at 1, 3, 6, 9, and 12 months/exit, to evaluate change from baseline in MGS, NITBUT, IDEEL-SB module score, and safety outcomes. RESULTS: A total of 227 subjects completed the study (mean ± standard deviation age, 57.3 ± 13.8 years). At 12 months, least squares mean change from baseline in MGS was similar between iLux and LipiFlow (17.4 ± 1.97 vs. 17.8 ± 1.98). Noninferiority of SYSTANE iLux compared with LipiFlow in change from baseline in MGS (95% lower confidence limit of least squares mean difference, >-5), NITBUT (>-2.5 seconds), and IDEEL-SB score (95% upper confidence limit, <12) was achieved at all post-treatment visits. No other serious ocular or device-related adverse events were reported. CONCLUSIONS: The treatment outcomes with SYSTANE iLux were noninferior to LipiFlow during the 12-month follow-up in subjects with dry eye-associated meibomian gland dysfunction.

Novel Extranasal Tear Stimulation: Pivotal Study Results.

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of iTEAR, a novel, portable, sonic external neuromodulation device, for the treatment of dry eye disease (DED). Methods: This was a multicenter, open-label, single-arm clinical trial that included adult patients with DED with a Schirmer score of ≤10 mm in at least one eye. Enrolled subjects were instructed to apply the study device at least twice per day for 30 seconds bilaterally to the external nasal nerve. After the initial baseline visit, patients were followed up at days 3, 14, 30, 90, and 180. The primary efficacy endpoint was the Schirmer index (change from unstimulated to stimulated tear production as measured by the Schirmer test) at day 30. The major secondary endpoint was the change in symptoms of DED at day 30 evaluated using the Ocular Surface Disease Index (OSDI). Results: A total of 101 subjects evaluated at day 30 had a mean Schirmer index of 9.4 mm (95% confidence interval [CI], 7.4-11.3), and the baseline OSDI improved by an average of 14.4 (95% CI, 11.1-17.7). Both endpoints were highly statistically and clinically significant at all time points. There were two mild unanticipated adverse events definitely related to the device. Conclusions: The safety and efficacy of the iTEAR device observed in this study support its indication for treating DED. Translational Relevance: Neurostimulation has the potential to improve signs and symptoms of DED.

A single vectored thermal pulsation treatment for meibomian gland dysfunction increases mean comfortable contact lens wearing time by approximately 4 hours per day.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of a single vectored thermal pulsation (VTP) treatment in contact lens wearers with meibomian gland dysfunction (MGD) and dry eye symptoms. METHODS: The prospective, nonsignificant risk, open-label, randomized, multi-center clinical trial included 55 soft contact lens (SCL) wearers with MGD and evaporative dry eye. Subjects were randomized to the single VTP treatment group or an untreated control. The controls received a crossover VTP treatment at 3 months (crossover treatment group). Primary effectiveness measures were meibomian gland secretion (MGS) score and Standard Patient Evaluation of Eye Dryness (SPEED) that were evaluated at baseline, at 1 and 3 months post-VTP treatment, and at 1 month post-VTP treatment in the crossover treatment group. Exploratory variables included fluorescein tear break-up time (TBUT), lid wiper epitheliopathy (LWE), lid parallel conjunctival folds (LIPCOF), ocular surface staining, frequency of over-the-counter (OTC) drop use, and hours of comfortable contact lens wear. RESULTS: At 3 months, the treatment group showed significantly greater mean change from baseline in MGS (12.4±9.1 vs 1.4±6.4, p<0.0001), SPEED (-8.4±4.7 vs -0.7±4.4, p<0.0001) and significantly greater improvement in exploratory variables (TBUT, LWE, and frequency of OTC drop use) relative to the controls. Mean comfortable contact lens wearing time increased by 4.0±3.9 hours at 1 month. This was sustained for 3 months with no change in the control group. The crossover treatment group demonstrated similar results to the treatment group at 1 month post-VTP. CONCLUSION: In SCL wearers with MGD, a single VTP treatment significantly improved mean meibomian gland function and significantly reduced dry eye signs and symptoms compared to an untreated control. The treatment increased mean comfortable lens wearing time by 4 hours (approximately doubling the pretreatment findings). This was sustained for up to 3 months post-treatment on average.

A two-week clinical evaluation of the safety of Systane Ultra in contact lens-wearing patients.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of Systane((R)) Ultra Lubricant Eye Drops (test solution) in contact lens wearers. A currently marketed contact lens rewetting drop was the control solution. PARTICIPANTS: This investigator- and patient-masked, single-site, randomized, and prospective study involved 45 successful contact lens wearers. METHODS: Eligible subjects' baseline biomicroscopy findings, visual acuity, and corneal staining score were recorded. Subjects received either the test or control solution with masked labeling. Subjects were instructed to instill their assigned solution in both eyes: 15 minutes prior to lens insertion, at least one drop during lens wear and another drop immediately following lens removal. After 14 days, biomicroscopy results, visual acuity, and corneal staining score were recorded. RESULTS: No adverse events were documented for either the test or the control solution. For subjects using Systane((R)) Ultra, no statistically significant change was detected in visual acuity (= 0.7667) or corneal staining score (P = 1.000). For subjects using the control solution, the change in visual acuity (P = 0.0011, mean difference = 1.70 +/- 3.22 standard deviation) was not clinically relevant and there was no significant change in corneal staining score (P = 0.5413). CONCLUSIONS: This clinical study provided evidence of safety and compatibility of Systane Ultra Lubricant Eye Drops in contact lens wearers.