Macrophage polarization in kidney transplant patients.

BACKGROUND: Macrophages can oscillate between two functionally distinct states: proinflammatory M1 and anti-inflammatory M2. Classically- activated M1 macrophages produce proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-Æ´, and IL-6), which ares associated with graft dysfunction/rejections. In contrast, alternatively-activated macrophages M2 produce anti-inflammatory cytokines (IL-10) that are involved in host defense, tissue repair/remodeling, debris scavenging, and immune regulation, thereby helps to improve long-term graft survival. METHODS: In this study, we have identified graft dysfunction or rejection by biopsies using immunohistochemistry. Flow cytometry was used to detect M1 (CD163+, CD206+, and CD200R+) and M2 (CD86+, CD80+, and CD68+) macrophages. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) was used to measure a panel of cytokines. RESULTS: Histological analysis of the kidney transplants (n = 30) was used to distinguish those with acute/chronic allograft rejection (n = 15) from those with stable kidney function (n = 15). Flow cytometry results showed that patients with graft rejection exhibited macrophages with decreased expression (33.28%) of M2 macrophage markers (CD163+, CD206+, and CD200R+) and reduced production of IL-10 (as detected using ELISA). However, 71.33% of the macrophages were found to have M1 markers (CD86+, CD80+, and CD68+; p = 0.002) and produced proinflammatory cytokines (TNF-α, IFN-Æ´, and IL-6) by ELISA (p = 0.001) when compared with the healthy control group. In contrast, stable kidney transplants had 65.58% M2 and 27.66% M1 macrophages (p = 0.03) and produced IL-10. These findings suggest that M1 macrophages dominate in kidney grafts with dysfunction or rejection, whereas M2 macrophages dominate in kidney grafts with stable function. CONCLUSION: Our observations implicate a major shift towards M2 macrophages in stable kidney transplants, which are markedly downregulated in patients with graft dysfunction or rejection. In contrast, an increased frequency of M1 macrophages remained dominant in the pathophysiology of kidney transplants undergoing active dysfunction or rejection.

Anti-glomerular basement membrane disease: A clinicomorphological study of 16 cases.

INTRODUCTION: Antiglomerular basement membrane disease manifests as rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis and alveolar hemorrhage. It encompasses 10-15% of crescentic glomerulonephritis and is associated with poor outcome. In this study, we have elaborated on the clinical details, morphological features, and outcome of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis. MATERIALS AND METHODS: All the consecutive biopsy-proven cases of anti-GBM glomerulonephritis over a period of 4½ years were analyzed, retrospectively. RESULTS: Sixteen cases were diagnosed as anti-GBM glomerulonephritis during the study period. Twelve patients presented with rapidly progressive renal failure of which four patients required hemodialysis at the time of presentation. Goodpasture's syndrome was noted in two patients. Thirteen cases were positive for circulating anti-GBM antibodies and two patients showed double positivity for both anti-GBM antibodies and ANCA. Fifteen biopsies revealed crescentic glomerulonephritis with linear deposition of IgG along the glomerular basement membrane in all the 16 cases. CONCLUSION: Renal biopsy analysis is important in the diagnosis of Anti GBM nephritis. Morphology is an important predictor of disease progression.

Revisiting renal amyloidosis with clinicopathological characteristics, grading, and scoring: A single-institutional experience.

INTRODUCTION: Kidney involvement is a major cause of mortality in systemic amyloidosis. Glomerulus is the most common site of deposition in renal amyloidosis, and nephrotic syndrome is the most common presentation. Distinction between AA and AL is done using immunofluorescence (IF) and immunohistochemistry (IHC). Renal biopsy helps in diagnosis and also predicting the clinical course by applying scoring and grading to the biopsy findings. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The study includes all cases of biopsy-proven renal amyloidosis from January 2008 to May 2017. Light microscopic analysis; Congo red with polarization; IF; IHC for Amyloid A, kappa, and lambda; and bone marrow evaluation were done. Classification of glomerular amyloid deposition and scoring and grading are done as per the guidelines of Sen S et al. RESULTS: There are 40 cases of biopsy-proven renal amyloidosis with 12 primary and 23 secondary cases. Mean age at presentation was 42.5 years. Edema was the most common presenting feature. Secondary amyloidosis cases were predominant. Tuberculosis was the most common secondary cause. Multiple myeloma was detected in four primary cases. Grading of renal biopsy features showed a good correlation with the class of glomerular involvement. CONCLUSION: Clinical history, IF, and IHC are essential in amyloid typing. Grading helps provide a subtle guide regarding the severity of disease in the background of a wide range of morphological features and biochemical values. Typing of amyloid is also essential for choosing the appropriate treatment.