Persistent Atrial Fibrillation Phenotypes and Ablation Outcomes: Persistent From Outset vs Progression From Paroxysmal AF.

BACKGROUND: Many patients with persistent atrial fibrillation (PsAF) have progressed from an initial paroxysmal phenotype; however, there are patients in whom atrial fibrillation (AF) is persistent at diagnosis. Relatively little is known about this subgroup, but prior observational studies have suggested these patients have worse outcomes with ablation. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to: 1) assess demographic and electrophysiologic characteristics of patients with PsAF at first diagnosis compared with those with who have progressed from paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF); and 2) assess the impact of pattern of AF at diagnosis on recurrence post ablation. METHODS: CAPLA (Catheter Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A Multicentre randomised trial of Pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] vs PVI with posterior Left Atrial wall isolation [PWI]) was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with PsAF to PVI plus PWI or PVI alone. Follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: A total of 334 patients were included (median age 65.6 years, 23.1% female), 194 (58.1%) had PsAF at first AF diagnosis and 140 (41.9%) had PAF. Patients with PsAF at diagnosis were younger (age 64.0 vs 67.7 years, P = 0.005), had higher rates of heart failure (P < 0.001), and lower left ventricular ejection fraction (54.5% IQR: 40-60 vs 60% IQR: 50-61, P = 0.007). AF recurrence occurred in 85 (43.8%) with PsAF at diagnosis and 70 (50%) with PAF at diagnosis. PsAF at diagnosis was not associated with risk of recurrence on univariable (HR: 0.802; 95% CI: 0.585-1.101; P = 0.173) or multivariable analysis (HR: 0.922; 95% CI: 0.647-1.312; P = 0.650). Median AF burden was 0% in both groups (P = 0.125). There was no difference in left atrial size (P = 0.337) or bipolar voltage (P = 0.579) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: In the CAPLA cohort of patients, pattern of AF at first diagnosis did not influence post-ablation rate of AF recurrence or AF burden. (Catheter Ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: A Multicentre randomised trial of Pulmonary vein isolation [PVI] vs PVI with posterior Left Atrial wall isolation [PWI]; ACTRN12616001436460).

Sinoatrial node function and the role of sinoatrial conduction in the typical atrial flutter substrate.

BACKGROUND: Sinoatrial node (SAN) activation and sinoatrial conduction pathways (SACPs) have been assessed in animals but not in humans. OBJECTIVES: We used ultrahigh-density mapping and simulated models to characterize the SAN and to investigate whether slowed SAN conduction may contribute to the atrial flutter (AFL) substrate. METHODS: Twenty-seven patients undergoing electrophysiologic procedures had right atrial mapping. SAN activation patterns and conduction block were analyzed. The interaction between the SAN and the intercaval line of block (LOB) was analyzed, and right atrial simulations with different degrees of block were created to investigate arrhythmia mechanisms. RESULTS: Fifteen AFL patients and 12 reference patients were enrolled. SACPs were identified in all patients with sinus rhythm maps. An SAN-adjacent LOB was observed in AFL patients. SAN conduction velocity was slower in AFL vs reference (0.60 m/s [0.56-0.78 m/s] vs 1.13 m/s [1.00-1.21 m/s]; P = .0021). Coronary sinus paced maps displayed an intercaval LOB in AFL patients but not in reference patients, which was completed superiorly by the SAN-adjacent LOB. Corrected sinus node recovery time was longer in AFL patients (552.3 ± 182.9 ms vs 325.4 ± 138.3 ms; P < .006) and correlated with degree of intercaval block (r = 0.7236; P = .0003). Computer modeling supported an important role of SAN-associated block in the flutter substrate. CONCLUSION: Ultrahigh-density mapping accurately identifies SAN activation and SACPs. The LOB important for typical AFL was longer in AFL patients, and when partial, it was always present inferiorly and completed superiorly because of slowed conduction across the SAN. Corrected sinus node recovery time correlated with intercaval block, suggesting a role for SAN disease in the genesis of the typical AFL substrate.

Coronary Sinus Isolation for High-Burden Atrial Fibrillation: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: The coronary sinus is an arrhythmogenic structure that can initiate and maintain atrial fibrillation (AF). Coronary sinus ablation has been shown to be effective in prolonging the AF cycle length and terminating AF in patients with both paroxysmal and persistent AF who have persistent AF after pulmonary vein isolation (PVI). OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to undertake a randomized controlled trial to investigate the efficacy of coronary sinus isolation (CSI) as an adjunctive ablation strategy for the treatment of high-burden AF. METHODS: Consecutive patients presenting with symptomatic long episodes of paroxysmal AF (≥48 h but ≤7 days) or persistent AF (>7 days and ≤12 months) referred for first-time ablation were enrolled. Participants were randomized to either PVI, roofline ablation, and CSI (CSI group) or PVI and roofline ablation only (non-CSI group). Participants were assessed postprocedurally via clinical follow-up and 7-day Holter monitoring at regular intervals. The primary outcome was single-procedure drug-free atrial arrhythmia-free survival at 2 years. RESULTS: One hundred participants were recruited to the study; 48 were randomized to the CSI group and 52 to the non-CSI group. Acutely successful CSI was achieved in 45 of the 48 patients in the CSI group. At 2 years follow up, 30 of 48 patients (62.5%) in the CSI group and 33 of 52 (63.4%) in the non-CSI group were free from arrhythmia recurrence. Single-procedure drug-free survival at 2 years was no different between groups (P = 0.91). Similarly, multiple procedure drug assisted survival at 5 years was not different between groups (P = 0.80). Complication rates were not significantly different between groups (P = 0.19). CONCLUSIONS: Adjunctive CSI as part of a de novo ablation strategy does not confer any additional benefit greater than PVI and roofline for the treatment of high-burden AF.

Research Priorities for Atrial Fibrillation in Australia: A Statement From the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance Clinical Arrhythmia Theme.

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is highly prevalent in the Australian community, ranking amongst the highest globally. The consequences of AF are significant. Stroke, dementia and heart failure risk are increased substantially, hospitalisations are amongst the highest for all cardiovascular causes, and Australians living with AF suffer from substantial symptoms that impact quality of life. Australian research has made a significant impact at the global level in advancing the care of patients living with AF. However, new strategies are required to reduce the growing incidence of AF and its associated healthcare demand. The Australian Cardiovascular Alliance (ACvA) has led the development of an arrhythmia clinical theme with the objective of tackling major research priorities to achieve a reduction in AF burden across Australia. In this summary, we highlight these research priorities with particular focus on the strengths of Australian research and the strategies needed to move forward in reducing incident AF and improving outcomes for those who live with this chronic condition.

Prognostic impact of diagnosis-to-ablation time on outcomes following catheter ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation and left ventricular systolic dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: The optimal timing of catheter ablation in individuals with atrial fibrillation (AF) and left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) remains uncertain. OBJECTIVE: We examined whether AF diagnosis to ablation time (DAT) influences outcomes following catheter ablation (CA) in patients with persistent AF (PsAF) and LVSD from the CAMERA-MRI and CAPLA randomized studies. METHODS: We evaluated clinical outcomes according to DAT < 1 year ("shorter DAT") and ≥1 year ("longer DAT"), comparing AF recurrence, AF burden, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), and LV recovery (LVEF ≥ 50%) at 12 months. DAT was also compared according to the median (24 months). RESULTS: Two hundred and ten individuals with AF and LVSD were identified, with a median DAT of 24 months. Shorter DAT was associated with lower LA global and posterior wall scar (<0.05 mV; both P < .05). At 12 months, 69.4% with shorter DAT (<1year) were free from recurrent atrial arrhythmias vs 53.6% in longer DAT (hazard ratio [HR] 1.63, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.65, P = .040). Median AF burden was 0% in both groups (shorter DAT: interquartile range [IQR] 0.0-2.0% vs longer DAT: IQR 0.0-7.3%, P = .017). At 12 months, shorter DAT was associated with higher LVEF (55.3% vs 51.0%, P = .009), greater LVEF improvement (+20.8 ± 13.0% vs +13.9 ± 13.2% longer DAT, P < .001) and LV recovery (75.0% vs longer DAT: 57.2%, P = .011). Shorter DAT was associated with fewer hospitalizations and electrical cardioversions at 12 months. CONCLUSION: In individuals with AF and LVSD, shorter DAT was associated with greater LVEF improvement and arrhythmia-free survival with lower AF burden and rehospitalization at 12 months, highlighting the prognostic benefit of early CA in AF and LVSD.

Atrial cardiomyopathy revisited-evolution of a concept: a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS).

AIMS: The concept of "atrial cardiomyopathy" (AtCM) had been percolating through the literature since its first mention in 1972. Since then, publications using the term were sporadic until the decision was made to convene an expert working group with representation from four multinational arrhythmia organizations to prepare a consensus document on atrial cardiomyopathy in 2016 (EHRA/HRS/APHRS/SOLAECE expert consensus on atrial cardiomyopathies: definition, characterization, and clinical implication). Subsequently, publications on AtCM have increased progressively. METHODS AND RESULTS: The present consensus document elaborates the 2016 AtCM document further to implement a simple AtCM staging system (AtCM stages 1-3) by integrating biomarkers, atrial geometry, and electrophysiological changes. However, the proposed AtCM staging needs clinical validation. Importantly, it is clearly stated that the presence of AtCM might serve as a substrate for the development of atrial fibrillation (AF) and AF may accelerates AtCM substantially, but AtCM per se needs to be viewed as a separate entity. CONCLUSION: Thus, the present document serves as a clinical consensus statement of the European Heart Rhythm Association (EHRA) of the ESC, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asian Pacific Heart Rhythm Society (APHRS), and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society (LAHRS) to contribute to the evolution of the AtCM concept.

Diagnosis to Ablation in Persistent AF: Any Time Can Be a Good Time to Ablate.

BACKGROUND: Nonrandomized data suggest that longer diagnosis-to-ablation time (DAT) is associated with poorer outcomes; however, a recent randomized trial found no difference in recurrences when ablation was delayed by 12 months. OBJECTIVES: This study sought to assess the impact of DAT on atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence in patients undergoing catheter ablation for persistent AF. METHODS: CAPLA (Effect of Catheter Ablation Using Pulmonary Vein Isolation With vs Without Posterior Left Atrial Wall Isolation on Atrial Arrhythmia Recurrence in Patients With Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: The CAPLA randomized clinical trial) was a multicenter trial that randomized patients with persistent AF to pulmonary vein isolation + posterior wall isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Follow-up was 12 months. Outcomes were assessed after a 3-month blanking period. RESULTS: Median DAT in the 334 patients was 28 months (Q1-Q3: 12-66 months). Patients were divided into quartile groups: Q1 was DAT 0 to 12 months (n = 84, median DAT 7 months), Q2 was DAT 13 to 28 months (n = 85, median DAT 20 months), Q3 was DAT 29 to 66 months (n = 84, median DAT 41 months), and Q4 was DAT ≥67 months (n = 81, median DAT 119 months). AF recurrence rate was 36.9% for Q1, 44.7% for Q2, 47.6% for Q3, and 56.8% for Q4 (P = 0.082). On multivariable analysis, DAT Q4 was the only factor significantly associated with risk of recurrence (HR: 1.607; 95% CI: 1.005-2.570; P = 0.048). Median AF burden was 0% (Q1-Q3: 0%-0.47%) in Q1 and 0.33% (Q1-Q3: 0%-4.6%) in Q4 (P = 0.002). Quality of life (assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life questionnaire) improved markedly in all quartiles (Q1: Δ28.8 ± 24, Q2: Δ24.4 ± 23.4, Q3: Δ21.7 ± 26.6, Q4: Δ24.6 ± 21.4; P = 0.331). CONCLUSIONS: In a cohort of patients with persistent AF undergoing ablation in a prospective trial with standardized entry criteria and intensive electrocardiogram monitoring, those with shorter DAT had lower rates of AF recurrence. However, differences were modest, and all quartiles demonstrated very low AF burden and improvements in quality of life.

Predictors of Late Atrial Fibrillation Recurrence After Cardiac Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Although postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) frequently occurs early after cardiac surgery, there is a paucity of data evaluating predictors and timing of late atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence. OBJECTIVES: The authors sought to evaluate predictors of late AF recurrence in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed cardiac surgery patients from 2010 to 2018 with no preoperative diagnosis of AF or atrial flutter. We recorded incidence and timing of late AF recurrence, defined as occurring ≥12 months following surgery. RESULTS: 1,031 patients were included (mean age at surgery 64 ± 12 years, 74% male). Early POAF was recorded in 445 patients (43%). POAF was usually transient, with total AF duration <48 hours in 72% and reversion to sinus rhythm at discharge in 91%. At 4.7 ± 2.4 years follow-up, late AF occurred in 139 patients (14%). Median time to AF recurrence was 4.4 years post-surgery (Q1-Q3: 2.6-6.2 years). Late AF was significantly more likely among patients with early POAF than those without (23% vs 6%; P < 0.001), with highest incidence (38%) in those with POAF duration >48 hours. In a multivariable analysis, early POAF duration >48 hours was a significant predictor of late AF recurrence (HR: 5.9). Surgery type and CHA2DS2-VASc score were not predictive of late AF events. CONCLUSIONS: Post-operative AF episodes of duration ≥48 hours predict recurrent AF episodes over long-term follow-up after cardiac surgery. Implications for arrhythmia surveillance and anticoagulation in patients with longer duration POAF episodes require further study.

The impact of lifestyle factors on atrial fibrillation.

Atrial fibrillation (AF), with its significant associated morbidity and mortality contributes to significant healthcare utilisation and expenditure. Given its progressively rising incidence, strategies to limit AF development and progression are urgently needed. Lifestyle modification is a potentially potent but underutilised weapon against the AF epidemic. The purpose of this article is to review the role of lifestyle factors as risk factors for AF, outline potential mechanisms of pathogenesis and examine the available evidence for lifestyle intervention in primary and secondary AF prevention. It will also highlight the need for investment by physicians, researchers, health services and governments in order to facilitate delivery of the comprehensive, multidisciplinary AF care that is required to manage this complex and multifactorial disease.

Aberrancy masquerading as ventricular tachycardia: Importance of invasive electrophysiology study for diagnosis of wide complex tachycardias.

BACKGROUND: Differentiation between ventricular tachycardia (VT) and supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) with aberrancy based on the 12­lead ECG alone can be imprecise. Implantable cardiac defibrillators (ICD) may be inserted for presumed VT, particularly in patients with syncopal presentation or atypical aberrancy patterns. Accurate diagnosis of these patients facilitated by an electrophysiology study (EPS) may alter diagnosis and management. METHODS: We present a prospective collection of cases across 3 cardiac centers of consecutive patients with WCT presumed to be VT who were referred for consideration of an ICD, and in whom further evaluation including an EPS ultimately demonstrated SVT with aberrancy as the culprit arrhythmia. RESULTS: 22 patients were identified (17 male, mean age 50±13 years. Available rhythm data at the time of referral was presumptively diagnosed as monomorphic VT in 16 patients and polymorphic VT in 6 patients. Underlying structural heart disease was present in 20 (91%). EPS resulted in a diagnosis of SVT with aberrancy in all cases: comprising AV nodal re-entry tachycardia (n=10), orthodromic reciprocating tachycardia (n=3), focal atrial tachycardia (n=3), AF/AFL (n=3) and 'double fire' tachycardia (n=2). 21 (95%) patients underwent successful ablation. All patients remained free of arrhythmia recurrence at a median of 3.4 years of follow-up. ICD insertion was obviated in 18 (82%) patients, with 1 patient proceeding to ICD extraction. CONCLUSION: SVT with atypical aberrancy may mimic monomorphic or polymorphic VT. Careful examination of all available rhythm data and consideration of an EPS can confirm SVT and obviate the need for ICD therapy.

Pulmonary Veins Function as Echo Chambers in Persistent Atrial Fibrillation: Circuitous Re-Entry Generates Outgoing Wavefronts.

BACKGROUND: Although the substrate in persistent atrial fibrillation (PeAF) is not limited to the pulmonary veins (PVs), PV isolation (PVI) remains the cornerstone ablation strategy. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the mechanism of outgoing wavefronts (WFs) originating in the PV sleeves during PeAF. METHODS: Eleven patients presenting for first-time PeAF ablation were recruited (mean age 63.1 ± 10.9 years, 91% men). A 64-electrode catheter (Constellation; 38 mm) was positioned within the PV under fluoroscopic guidance. An inverse mapping technique was used to reconstruct unipolar atrial electrograms on the PV surface, and the resulting phase maps were used to identify incoming and outgoing WFs at the PV junction and to classify focal and re-entrant activity within the PV sleeves. RESULTS: During PeAF, the PVs gave rise to outgoing WFs with a frequency of 3.7 s-1 (Q1-Q3: 3.4-5.4 s-1) compared with 3.6 s-1 (Q1-Q3: 2.8-4.2 s-1) for incoming WFs. Circuitous macroscopic re-entry was the dominant mechanism driving outgoing WFs (frequency of re-entry 2.7 s-1 [Q1-Q3: 2.0-3.3 s-1] compared with focal activity 1.4 s-1 [Q1-Q3: 1.1-1.5 s-1]; P < 0.006). This was initiated by incoming WFs in 80% of cases. Consecutive focal activation from the same location was infrequent (10.0% ± 6.6%, n = 10). Rotors ≥360° were never observed. The median ratio (R) of outgoing to incoming WF frequency was 1.14 (Q1-Q3: 0.84-1.75), with R > 1 in 6 of 11 PVs. CONCLUSIONS: Electric activity generated by PV sleeves during PeAF is due mainly to circuitous re-entry initiated by incoming waves, frequently with R > 1. That is, the PVs act less as drivers of atrial fibrillation than as "echo chambers" that sustain and amplify fibrillatory activity.

Impact of Posterior Wall Isolation During AF Ablation on the Incidence of Left Atrial Flutter.

BACKGROUND: Linear and complex electrogram ablation (LCEA) beyond pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) is associated with an increase in left atrial macro-re-entrant tachycardias (LAMTs). Posterior wall isolation (PWI) is increasingly performed to improve AF ablation outcomes. However, the impact of PWI on the incidence of LAMT is unknown. OBJECTIVES: The purpose of this study was to establish the incidence of LAMT following PVI alone vs PVI + PWI vs PVI + PWI + LCEA. METHODS: Consecutive patients undergoing catheter ablation for AF or LAMT post-AF ablation between 2008 and 2022 from 4 electrophysiology centers were reviewed with a minimum follow-up of 12 months. RESULTS: In total, 5,619 (4,419 index, 1,100 redo) AF ablation procedures were performed in 4,783 patients (mean age 60.9 ± 10.6 years, 70.7% men). Over a mean follow-up of 6.4 ± 3.8 years, 246 procedures for LAMT were performed in 214 patients at a mean of 2.6 ± 0.6 years post-AF ablation. Perimitral (52.8% of patients), roof-dependent (27.1%), PV gap-related (17.3%), and anterior circuits (8.9%) were most common, with 16.4% demonstrating multiple circuits. The incidence of LAMT was significantly higher following PVI + PWI (6.2%) vs PVI alone (3.0%; P < 0.0001) and following PVI + PWI + LCEA vs PVI + PWI (12.5%; P = 0.019). Conduction gaps in previous ablation lines were responsible for LAMT in 28.4% post-PVI alone, 35.3% post-PVI + PWI (P = 0.386), and 81.8% post-PVI + PWI + LCEA (P < 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of LAMT following PVI + PWI is higher than with PVI alone but significantly lower than with more extensive atrial substrate modification. Given a low frequency of LAMT following PWI, empiric mitral isthmus ablation is not justified and may be proarrhythmic.

Catheter ablation for persistent atrial fibrillation: patterns of recurrence and impact on quality of life and health care utilization.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Patterns of atrial fibrillation (AF) recurrence post-catheter ablation for persistent AF (PsAF) are not well described. This study aimed to describe the pattern of AF recurrence seen following catheter ablation for PsAF and the implications for healthcare utilization and quality of life (QoL). METHODS: This was a post-hoc analysis of the CAPLA study, an international, multicentre study that randomized patients with symptomatic PsAF to pulmonary vein isolation plus posterior wall isolation or pulmonary vein isolation alone. Patients underwent twice daily single lead ECG, implantable device monitoring or three monthly Holter monitoring. RESULTS: 154 of 333 (46.2%) patients (median age 67.3 years, 28% female) experienced AF recurrence at 12-month follow-up. Recurrence was paroxysmal in 97 (63%) patients and persistent in 57 (37%). Recurrence type did not differ between randomization groups (P = .508). Median AF burden was 27.4% in PsAF recurrence and .9% in paroxysmal AF (PAF) recurrence (P < .001). Patients with PsAF recurrence had lower baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (PsAF 50% vs. PAF 60%, P < .001) and larger left atrial volume (PsAF 54.2 ± 19.3 mL/m² vs. PAF 44.8 ± 11.6 mL/m², P = .008). Healthcare utilization was significantly higher in PsAF (45 patients [78.9%]) vs. PAF recurrence (45 patients [46.4%], P < .001) and lowest in those without recurrence (17 patients [9.5%], P < .001). Patients without AF recurrence had greater improvements in QoL as assessed by the Atrial Fibrillation Effect on Quality-of-Life (AFEQT) questionnaire (Δ33.3 ± 25.2 points) compared to those with PAF (Δ24.0 ± 25.0 points, P = .012) or PsAF (Δ13.4 ± 22.9 points, P < .001) recurrence. CONCLUSIONS: AF recurrence is more often paroxysmal after catheter ablation for PsAF irrespective of ablation strategy. Recurrent PsAF was associated with higher AF burden, increased healthcare utilization and antiarrhythmic drug use. The type of AF recurrence and AF burden may be considered important endpoints in clinical trials investigating ablation of PsAF.

2023 Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation.

Catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) has increased exponentially in many developed countries, including Australia and New Zealand. This Expert Position Statement on Catheter and Surgical Ablation for Atrial Fibrillation from the Cardiac Society of Australia and New Zealand (CSANZ) recognises healthcare factors, expertise and expenditure relevant to the Australian and New Zealand healthcare environments including considerations of potential implications for First Nations Peoples. The statement is cognisant of international advice but tailored to local conditions and populations, and is intended to be used by electrophysiologists, cardiologists and general physicians across all disciplines caring for patients with AF. They are also intended to provide guidance to healthcare facilities seeking to establish or maintain catheter ablation for AF.

Initial clinical experience with the balloon-in-basket pulsed field ablation system: acute results of the VOLT CE mark feasibility study.

AIMS: Pulsed field ablation (PFA) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) potentially offers improved safety and procedural efficiencies compared with thermal ablation. Opportunities remain to improve effective circumferential lesion delivery, safety, and workflow of first-generation PFA systems. In this study, we aim to evaluate the initial clinical experience with a balloon-in-basket, 3D integrated PFA system with a purpose-built form factor for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation. METHODS AND RESULTS: The VOLT CE Mark Study is a pre-market, prospective, multi-centre, single-arm study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of the Volt™ PFA system for the treatment of paroxysmal (PAF) or persistent AF (PersAF). Feasibility sub-study subjects underwent phrenic nerve evaluation, endoscopy, chest computed tomography, and cerebral magnetic resonance imaging. Study endpoints were the rate of primary serious adverse event within 7 days and acute procedural effectiveness. A total of 32 subjects (age 61.6 ± 9.6 years, 65.6% male, 84.4% PAF) were enrolled and treated in the feasibility sub-study and completed a 30-day follow-up. Acute effectiveness was achieved in 99.2% (127/128) of treated PVs (96.9% of subjects, 31/32) with 23.8 ± 4.2 PFA applications/subject. Procedure, fluoroscopy, LA dwell, and transpired ablation times were 124.6 ± 28.1, 19.8 ± 8.9, 53.0 ± 21.0, and 48.0 ± 19.9 min, respectively. Systematic assessments of initial safety revealed no phrenic nerve injury, pulmonary vein stenosis, or oesophageal lesions causally related to the PFA system and three subjects with silent cerebral lesions (9.4%). There were no primary serious adverse events. CONCLUSION: The initial clinical use of the Volt PFA System demonstrates acute safety and effectiveness in the treatment of symptomatic, drug refractory AF.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society .

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society, the Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society, and the Latin American Heart Rhythm Society.

2024 European Heart Rhythm Association/Heart Rhythm Society/Asia Pacific Heart Rhythm Society/Latin American Heart Rhythm Society expert consensus statement on catheter and surgical ablation of atrial fibrillation.

In the last three decades, ablation of atrial fibrillation (AF) has become an evidence-based safe and efficacious treatment for managing the most common cardiac arrhythmia. In 2007, the first joint expert consensus document was issued, guiding healthcare professionals involved in catheter or surgical AF ablation. Mounting research evidence and technological advances have resulted in a rapidly changing landscape in the field of catheter and surgical AF ablation, thus stressing the need for regularly updated versions of this partnership which were issued in 2012 and 2017. Seven years after the last consensus, an updated document was considered necessary to define a contemporary framework for selection and management of patients considered for or undergoing catheter or surgical AF ablation. This consensus is a joint effort from collaborating cardiac electrophysiology societies, namely the European Heart Rhythm Association, the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS), the Asia Pacific HRS, and the Latin American HRS.