Microaggressions in European versus American Workplace Environments of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery.

Objective: To compare the workplace experience of European and U.S. members of the otolaryngology community. Methods: European and U.S. otolaryngologists-head and neck surgeons (OTO-HNS) were surveyed through three otorhinolaryngological societies. We inquired about personal and observed experiences of differential treatment in the workplace related to age, biological sex, ethnicity, disability, gender identity, political belief, and sexual orientation. Results were compared according to the world region. Differential treatment was used as a proxy for microaggressions. Results: A total of 348 practitioners participated in the survey: 148 American and 230 European OTO-HNS. European OTO-HNS reported significantly higher proportions of observed or personal experiences of differential treatment based on age (p = .049), language proficiency (p = .027), citizenship (p = .001), hair texture (p = .017), height/weight (p = .002), clothing (p = .011), and professionalism (p = .002) compared with U.S. OTO-HNS. Differential treatment related to political belief (p = .043), socioeconomic status (p = .018), and ethnicity (p = .001) were higher in the United States compared with Europe. Feelings of exclusion (p = .027) and consideration of leaving their position (p = .001) were significantly higher in the United States compared with Europe. In both the United States and Europe, female OTO-HNS reported more frequent differential treatment related to biological sex than males. Conclusion: Differential treatment, or microaggressions, related to personal characteristics or behavior varied in the United States and Europe with more ethnicity-based microaggressions in the United States and physical characteristic-based microaggressions in Europe. In both regions, females were more subject to microaggressions than males. More efforts are needed to tackle microaggressions and discrimination in the clinical and academic workplace of the Western otolaryngology community. Level of Evidence: 4.

The Home Program Advantage in the Otolaryngology Residency Match.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the effect of home residency programs on outcomes in the otolaryngology residency match DESIGN: A retrospective online survey study during the 2015, 2018, 2019, 2020, and 2021 match cycles was conducted. All available otolaryngology residency positions listed by the National Resident Matching Program were compared with publicly available spreadsheets containing the following information: matriculated applicant name, medical school, whether the final match institution was the matriculated applicant's home program (HP), whether the matriculated applicant had completed an away rotation at their final matched institution (designated away institution, AI), or neither (designated Other Institution, OI). SETTING: Nonclinical survey study using publicly available spreadsheets containing The Match data from 2015 to 2021 located online at Otomatch.com. PARTICIPANTS: Newly matched United States otolaryngology-head and neck surgery residents completing the Otomatch.com survey RESULTS: A total of 1771 matched OHNS applicants were identified. Fifty-one percent of students were affiliated with their matched institution, with 25% of students matching at HPs, and 26% matching at AIs. Students with home programs had an increased likelihood of remaining in the same geographic region compared to students without home programs (OR 1.742 95% CI [1.21-2.506], p = 0.003). Applicants with HPs matched at significantly larger residency programs (p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: This study found that a majority of residents match at an institution with which they were affiliated, either their home program or away institution. Applicants with HPs are more likely to remain in the same geographic region as their medical school, and to match into larger residency programs compared to applicants without HPs.

Workplace Environment Microaggressions in Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery: An International Survey.

OBJECTIVE: To survey members of the otolaryngology community about their personal and observed experiences of being treated differently because of one's physical attributes, cultural norms, or preferences in the workplace. STUDY DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey. SETTING: International Electronic Survey. METHODS: We invited members of the international otolaryngology community including 3 European or American otorhinolaryngological Societies to complete a survey about personal/observed experience of differential treatment in the workplace related to age, biological sex; disability, gender identity, language proficiency, military experience, citizenship, ethnicity/race, political belief, and sexual orientation. Results were analyzed according to participant ethnicity/race (white vs non-white) and gender (male vs female) RESULTS: Four hundred seven participants completed the evaluations: 301 white (74%) and 106 non-white (26%) participants. Non-white participants reported significantly more experiences of differential treatment (microaggressions) than white participants (p < .05). Non-white participants more frequently felt that they needed to work harder for the same opportunities as their peers and were more likely to consider leaving a position because of an unsupportive environment. In general, females reported more frequent experiences with differential treatment related to sexual orientation, biological sex, and gender identity than males. CONCLUSION: We recognized reports of differential treatment as a proxy for microaggressions. Non-white members of the otolaryngology community self-report experiencing or observing more microaggressions than white members in the workplace. Acknowledging the existence and impact of microaggressions in the field of Otolaryngology is the first step towards cultivating an inclusive, diverse workforce where all members feel supported, validated, and welcomed.

Use of tongue base palpation among oral healthcare providers: Cross-sectional survey.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the use of tongue base palpation during cancer screening exams by Oral Healthcare Providers (OHPs) and explore attitudes about (1) the usefulness of oral cancer screening (OCS) in detecting early, asymptomatic lesions and (2) routine OCS of the general population. STUDY DESIGN: Survey study. SETTING: Private and hospital-based clinical practices of OHPs located in Massachusetts and Connecticut, United States. METHODS: An anonymous, online 9-item survey assessing beliefs and practice patterns about cancer screening exams was distributed to OHPs with practices in Massachusetts and Connecticut from August 2020 to June 2021. Data were analyzed using chi-square tests and Pearson correlations. Statistically significant levels were established at P < .050. RESULTS: One hundred seventy-one responses were analyzed (response rate 17 %). Tongue base palpation was performed as part of a routine cancer screening exam by 55 % of otolaryngologists, 34 % of dentists and 29 % of OMFS (P = .030). Providers who palpated the tongue base were also more likely to use palpation as an exam technique in the tonsils (r = 0.52 [95 % CI 0.40-0.62]; P < .001) among other intra-and extra-oral anatomical subsites. Almost all dentists (92 %) and OMFS (98 %) but only 58 % of otolaryngologists considered OCS useful for detection of early, asymptomatic malignant lesions in the oral cavity (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: While tongue base palpation can detect oropharyngeal cancers in a pre-symptomatic stage, it is underutilized during routine cancer screening exams. Considering the rising incidence of oropharyngeal cancer, tongue base palpation should be established as a routine part of cancer screening by OHPs.

Historical Review and Modern Case of Spontaneous Laryngeal Abscess.

OBJECTIVE: Laryngeal abscesses are rare in the modern antibiotic era. Historically, they were associated with systemic infections including typhoid fever, measles, gonorrhea, syphilis, and tuberculosis. More recent authors have described cases resulting from iatrogenic injury and immunosuppression. This report presents a novel case of laryngeal abscess in the setting of uncontrolled diabetes and a detailed review of modern, reported cases of spontaneous laryngeal abscess. METHODS: Report of a single case. Also, PubMed was queried for cases of laryngeal abscess since 1985. CASE REPORT: A 58-year-old male with poorly controlled diabetes presented with odynophagia, dysphagia, and dyspnea. He had biphasic stridor, and flexible laryngoscopy showed reduced mobility of bilateral vocal folds and narrowed glottic airway. He was taken urgently for awake tracheostomy and microdirect laryngoscopy. Laryngoscopy demonstrated fullness and fluctuance of the right hemilarynx. The abscess cavity was entered endoscopically via paraglottic incision extending into the subglottis. The patient was treated with an 8-week course of ampicillin-sulbactam with resolution of infection. RESULTS: Seven additional cases of spontaneous laryngeal abscesses published after 1985 were identified. In total, 6 of 8 had some form of immunodeficiency (75%). The most common presenting symptoms were dysphonia (8/8, 100%), odynophagia (5/8, 62.5%), and dyspnea/stridor (4/8, 50%). All cases were treated with surgical incision and drainage. CONCLUSIONS: Laryngeal abscesses are rare in the era of modern antibiotics. This review confirms that the majority of recent episodes occurred in the setting of immunodeficiency and are caused by non-tubercular bacteria. These infections are commonly associated with impaired vocal fold mobility which may contribute to dyspnea, stridor, and airway compromise. Surgical intervention is necessary for treatment and culture-directed antimicrobial therapy. Poorly controlled diabetes is a newly described context for development of spontaneous laryngeal abscess.

PGY1 Resident-Led Mock Virtual Interviews to Prepare for the 2022 Otolaryngology Residency Virtual Interviews.

Due to the ongoing coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, virtual interviews are planned for the 2021-2022 residency application cycle. The virtual interview will remain novel to applicants for each match cycle until the graduating medical student class has experience from virtual interviews during their medical school admissions. The virtual interview poses unique challenges that are unique from in-person formats. Given the lack of experience of applicants in the 2022 match, practicing interviewing skills prior to the actual date is vital to success. We describe a postgraduate year 1 (PGY1)-run mock interview session for applicants preparing for the 2021-2022 otolaryngology interview cycle and discuss the methodology. Deliberate practice with PGY1 residents who have just recently undergone the virtual interview process can better prepare applicants for their virtual interviews, improve on-camera behaviors, and ameliorate mental health challenges unique to the virtual format.

Socioeconomic variables as a predictor of indication for pediatric adenotonsillectomy.

OBJECTIVES: Adenotonsillectomy (AT) is a common pediatric procedure performed for sleep disordered breathing (SDB) or chronic/recurrent tonsillitis. A better understanding of factors associated with clinical indications for AT would positively contribute to patient-centered care of these conditions. Our objective is to assess the relationships between race, ethnicity, and socioeconomic status (SES) and indications for adenotonsillectomy in pediatric patients. METHODS: A retrospective chart review was conducted for pediatric patients between the ages 0-18 years who underwent adenotonsillectomy between October 2012 and October 2017 at Boston Medical Center. Indication for surgery was categorized as sleep disordered breathing (SDB), tonsillitis, or other. Age, race, ethnicity, gender, language, distance to hospital and insurance type were collected as demographic variables. 9-Digit patient zip codes were matched to a corresponding area deprivation index (ADI) which combines 17 neighborhood level socioeconomic markers. Logistic regression analysis was performed to assess for association between demographic variables and indication for adenotonsillectomy. RESULTS: 1315 children were included in this study (mean age = 6.4 years, 0-18 years). African American (OR = 3.90, p-value <0.0001), Latino (OR = 2.602, p-value < 0.0001), and Asian American (OR = 4.439, p-value = 0.0146) patients were more likely to have SDB as an indication than Caucasian patients. Among children undergoing AT for SDB, patients who received pre-operative polysomnogram were more likely to be under 2 years old, African American, Asian American, or of Hispanic ethnicity and have higher BMI than patients who were diagnosed clinically prior to surgery. There was no statistically significant association between indications for adenotonsillectomy and ADI, distance to hospital, insurance status or language. Males were more likely have to have SDB as an indication than females (OR = 1.67, p-value = 0.0014). Younger patients under two years of age were more likely to have SDB as an indication for surgery when compared to older patients. CONCLUSION: We found significant relationships between indications for adenotonsillectomy and race and ethnicity as well as gender and age. Additionally, our study showed that indication for AT was not associated with either ADI or insurance status. This suggests that race and ethnicity are predictors of indication independent of SES. Knowledge of predictive factors of adenotonsillectomy indications may help to improve patient centered care.

Identifying an Optimal Cutoff of the Montreal Cognitive Assessment to Predict Amyloid-PET Positivity in a Referral Memory Clinic.

BACKGROUND: Brain amyloid- positron emission tomography (PET) imaging is highly sensitive for identifying Alzheimer disease. Currently, there is a lack of insight on the association between amyloid-PET status and the widely used Montreal cognitive assessment (MoCA). Studying this relationship may optimize the clinical use of amyloid-PET imaging. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the relationship between amyloid-PET status and MoCA scores and to identify a MoCA score cutoff that translates to amyloid-PET positivity. METHODS: Using retrospective chart review, patients from 2010 to 2017 with amyloid-PET scans (positive or negative) and MoCA test scores were included. We studied the relationship between amyloid-PET status and MoCA scores and the influence of age, sex, education, and race. A MoCA score cutoff for amyloid-PET positivity was estimated. RESULTS: Among the 684 clinic patients with dementia, 99 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Amyloid-PET positivity was associated significantly with lower MoCA scores (median=19, U=847, P=0.01). The MoCA score cutoff (25) used for minimal cognitive impairment (MCI) predicted amyloid-PET positivity suboptimally (sensitivity=94.6%, specificity=13.9%). A MoCA score cutoff of 20 patients had optimal sensitivity (64.2%) and specificity (67.4%). CONCLUSIONS: Amyloid-PET positivity is associated with lower MoCA scores. Clinical utility of amyloid-PET scan is likely to be suboptimal at the MoCA score cutoff for minimal cognitive impairment.