The effect of body mass index on mortality, peritonitis, technique proficiency and residual renal function in peritoneal dialysis patients.

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of obesity is increasing worldwide. Obesity is also increasing in the chronic kidney disease (CKD) population. There are conflicting data on complications such as mortality, peritonitis, and technique proficiency of peritoneal dialysis (PD) in underweight and obese patients according to body mass index (BMI). We aimed to present the data in our region to the literature by comparing the residual renal function (RRF), peritonitis, technique proficiency, and mortality rates of the patients we grouped according to BMI. METHODS: The data of 404 patients who were started and followed up in our clinic between March 2005 and November 2021 were evaluated retrospectively. They were grouped as underweight, normal weight, overweight, and obese according to BMI. RRF, mortality, technique proficiency and peritonitis data of the groups were compared. RESULTS: Of the 404 patients, 44 were underweight, 199 were normal weight, 110 were overweight, and 55 were obese. No difference was found between the groups in the technique survey and in the time to first peritonitis with Kaplan-Meier analysis (respectively; p = 0.610, p = 0.445). Multivariate Cox regression analysis showed that BMI did not affect mortality (HR 1.196 [95% CI 0.722-1.981] (p = 0.488)). CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we report that BMI has no effect on RRF, peritonitis, technique proficiency, and mortality in patients undergoing PD, and that mortality may depend on additional factors such as mean albumin, time to first peritonitis, and loss of RRF.

Investigation of small fiber neuropathy in patients with diabetes mellitus by corneal confocal microscopy.

OBJECTIVES: Corneal confocal microscopy (CCM) is a non-invasive technique that examines the corneal cellular structure. Its use in the detection of small fiber neuropathy is being researched. In our study, we examined the role of CCM in the detection of small fiber neuropathy in diabetic patients, as well as the differences between CCM findings in diabetic patients with and without overt polyneuropathy with neuropathic symptoms. METHODS: 56 Diabetes Mellitus (DM) patients and 18 healthy controls were included in the study. The individuals included in the study were divided into three groups. Patients with diabetes who were found to have polyneuropathy according to electrophysiological diagnostic criteria were classified as Group 1, patients with diabetes and neuropathic symptoms without overt polyneuropathy according to electrophysiological diagnostic criteria were classified as Group 2, and healthy individuals were classified as Group 3. Electrophysiological examination and corneal imaging with CCM were performed in all groups. RESULTS: The CNFD and CNFL values of individuals in the diabetic group were discovered to be lower. CNFD values differ statistically between the groups (p = 0.047). Group 1-Group 3 differs from Group 2-Group 3 (respectively; p = 0.018, p = 0.048). CONCLUSION: Our study demonstrates that CCM can be used in patients with neuropathic symptoms and no polyneuropathy detected in EMG and thought to have small fiber neuropathy. CCM provides an opportunity for early diagnosis in small fiber neuropathy.