Implementation of the infection prevention and control core components at the national level: a global situational analysis.

BACKGROUND: Strengthening infection prevention and control (IPC) is essential to combat healthcare-associated infections, antimicrobial resistance, and to prevent and respond to outbreaks. AIM: To assess national IPC programmes worldwide according to the World Health Organization (WHO) IPC core components. METHODS: Between June 1st, 2017 and November 30th, 2018, a multi-country, cross-sectional study was conducted, based on semi-structured interviews with national IPC focal points of countries that pledged to the WHO 'Clean Care is Safer Care' challenge. Results and differences between regions and national income levels were summarized using descriptive statistics. FINDINGS: Eighty-eight of 103 (85.4%) eligible countries participated; 22.7% were low-income, 19.3% lower-middle-income, 23.9% upper-middle-income, and 34.1% high-income economies. A national IPC programme existed in 62.5%, but only 26.1% had a dedicated budget. National guidelines were available in 67.0%, but only 36.4% and 21.6% of countries had an implementation strategy and evaluated compliance with guidelines, respectively. Undergraduate IPC curriculum and in-service and postgraduate IPC training were reported by 35.2%, 54.5%, and 42% of countries, respectively. Healthcare-associated infection surveillance was reported by 46.6% of countries, with significant differences ranging from 83.3% (high-income) to zero (low-income) (P < 0.001); monitoring and feedback of IPC indicators was reported by 65.9%. Only 12.5% of countries had all core components in place. CONCLUSION: Most countries have IPC programme and guidelines, but many less have invested adequate resources and translated them in implementation and monitoring, particularly in low-income countries. Leadership support at the national and global level is needed to achieve implementation of the core components in all countries.

[HIV, only the tip of the iceberg in Burundi]. / Le Burundi au-delà du VIH.

In Burundi, like in many other resource-limited settings, HIV sector is mainly financed by international funding (IF). Through this way, HIV-infected people may have access to care, antiretroviral therapy and opportunistic infections medications free of charge. In addition, IF can also contribute to major the HIV-health care professionals (HCP) salary. Indeed, because of dramatically low incomes, public sector HCP move frequently through the country or migrate towards foreign countries, attracted by higher salaries and better working environment. To date, relatively large funding became available in some settings for HIV-care. Through illustrative examples from the field in Burundi, we are discussing why consequences are, in many cases, a worsening of inequities and disorganization of the public health sector, instead of leading this latter one towards a global improvement. Furthermore, we are suggesting that HIV-programs per se are not sufficient to provide a proper management of the epidemic at a global scale.