A purified reconstituted bilayer matrix shows improved outcomes in treatment of non-healing diabetic foot ulcers when compared to the standard of care: Final results and analysis of a prospective, randomized, controlled, multi-centre clinical trial.

As the incidence of diabetic foot ulcers (DFU) increases, better treatments that improve healing should reduce complications of these ulcers including infections and amputations. We conducted a randomized controlled trial comparing outcomes between a novel purified reconstituted bilayer membrane (PRBM) to the standard of care (SOC) in the treatment of non-healing DFUs. This study included 105 patients who were randomized to either of two treatment groups (n = 54 PRBM; n = 51 SOC) in the intent to treat (ITT) group and 80 who completed the study per protocol (PP) (n = 47 PRBM; n = 33 SOC). The primary endpoint was the percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included percent area reduction, time to healing, quality of life, and cost to closure. The DFUs that had been treated with PRBM healed at a higher rate than those treated with SOC (ITT: 83% vs. 45%, p = 0.00004, PP: 92% vs. 67%, p = 0.005). Wounds treated with PRBM also healed significantly faster than those treated with SOC with a mean of 42 versus 62 days for SOC (p = 0.00074) and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 94% versus 51% for SOC (p = 0.0023). There were no adverse events or serious adverse events that were related to either the PRBM or the SOC. In comparison to the SOC, DFUs healed faster when treated with PRBM. Thus, the use of this PRBM is an effective option for the treatment of chronic DFUs.

The Use of Active Coagulation Whole Blood-An Innovative Treatment Strategy for Hard-To-Heal Wounds.

BACKGROUND: Deep and tunneling wounds are a challenge to apply and maintain most advanced wound dressings to promote effective healing. An autologous whole blood clot is a topical treatment and has been found to be safe and effective in healing cutaneous wounds. The active coagulation whole blood (ACWB) clot treatment, using the patient's own blood, is used to treat deep and tunneling wounds, by mixing the blood with coagulation components and applying it into the wound cavity allowing the clot to re-form inside the wound. We aimed to explore ACWB treatment in hard-to-heal wounds. METHODS: 5 patients with multiple comorbidities, exhibiting surgical abdominal wound, chronic pilonidal sinus, stage 4 sacral pressure ulcer with exposed bone, post-amputation surgical site wound, and non-healing wound dehiscence at the site of a prior hip replacement, were all treated with the ACWB clot treatment. RESULTS: Complete wound healing was observed in 4/5 cases. In the fifth case, there was a 70% reduction in the depth and surface area of the abdominal surgical wound. DISCUSSION: The ACWB treatment was found to be effective in deep wounds with cavities and exposed structures. ACWB, in its flowable form, can effectively provide coverage of the deepest interstices of the wound's cavities by virtue of its liquid properties, forming a fibrin matrix, mimicking the role of the extracellular matrix. The flowable formulation of ACWB treatment safely and efficiently provides coverage of the entirety of the wound surface to improve the time and process of complex wound surface healing.

Topical autologous blood clot therapy: consensus panel recommendations to guide use in the treatment of complex wound types.

The etiology of acute and chronic wounds goes beyond those often reported in the literature, including those with exposed structures, those in which the entire wound bed cannot be visualized, and patients who are not candidates for typical standard of care. Treatment options for these patients may be limited. TABCT is a viable option for these complex wound types and is not hindered by logistical, procedural, or patient factors. A consensus panel of providers with extensive experience in treatment of these wound types was convened to develop consensus recommendations on the use of TABCT in specific complex wound types. Four consensus statements were defined for TABCT use in patients who cannot undergo sharp or extensive debridement, as a protective barrier to prevent further bacterial ingress, in patients with wounds in which the entire wound bed cannot be safely visualized, and in wounds with exposed tendon and/or bone. Consensus panel recommendations show that TABCT application assists in maintenance of a moist wound healing environment, autolytic debridement, recruitment and delivery of factors essential for wound healing, prevention of pathogen entry, and ability to completely fill wound voids that cannot be fully visualized. Additional advantages of TABCT use are its cost-effectiveness, ease of access, minimal related complications, and proven clinical efficacy.

Topical autologous blood clot therapy: an introduction and development of consensus panel to guide use in the treatment of complex wound types.

Complex or hard-to-heal wounds can be acute or chronic; the complexity is based on patient-specific local, systemic, and psychosocial factors. Use of autologous tissue can be a significant adjunct to wound closure. Grafts and flaps are the most common autologous tissue used in wound reconstruction. However, patient factors, wound size, and exposed structures may preclude using these methods as primary or even secondary closure techniques. Alternative autologous tissue therapies include those derived from adipose, epidermis or dermis, bone marrow, and blood. Limitations of these treatment modalities include access-related difficulty, cost, creation of a secondary donor site, use of singular or limited cell types, and sparse or contradictory evidence basis of their efficacy of use. A panel of providers experienced in wound care and surgical wound management was convened to create a series of publications on the use of topical autologous blood clot therapy (TABCT) in the treatment of complex wounds. This publication, the first in a series, provides an evidence basis of the gap between definition and treatment of complex wounds, an overview of the use of autologous therapies in these wounds, and the science behind TABCT. The development of a consensus panel for decision pathways and recommendations for TABCT use in specific complex wound types are also discussed. Subsequent articles will provide consensus recommendations on the use of TABCT in full-thickness wounds with exposed tendon and/or bone and undermining or tunneling wounds, in wounds in patients who are nonsurgical candidates, in those who cannot undergo sharp debridement, in patients with arterial wounds who have been maximally revascularized, and in those with transsphincteric anal fistula. This article provides a foundation of knowledge and describes the plan for consensus panel decision pathways and recommendation development of use of TABCT in the treatment of specific complex wound types.

A Multicenter, Randomized, Controlled, Clinical Trial Evaluating Dehydrated Human Amniotic Membrane in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers.

BACKGROUND: This randomized controlled trial evaluated the safety and effectiveness of weekly and biweekly applications of dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) plus standard of care compared to standard of care alone on chronic venous leg ulcers. METHODS: This open-label randomized controlled trial included patients with chronic venous leg ulcers at eight wound care centers across the United States. The primary endpoint was the proportion of healed ulcers at 12 weeks. Secondary endpoints included the proportion of ulcers achieving 40 percent closure at 4 weeks and the incidence of adverse events. RESULTS: Among 101 patients screened for eligibility, 60 were eligible and enrolled. At 12 weeks, significantly more venous leg ulcers healed in the two dHACA-treated groups (75 percent) than in the standard-of-care group (30 percent) ( p = 0.001) even after adjustment for wound area ( p = 0.002), with an odds ratio of 8.7 (95 percent CI, 2.2 to 33.6). There were no significant differences in the proportion of wounds with percentage area reduction greater than or equal to 40 percent at 4 weeks among all groups. The adverse event rate was 63.5 percent. Among the 38 adverse events, none were graft or procedure related, and all were resolved with appropriate treatment. CONCLUSIONS: dHACA and standard of care, either applied weekly or biweekly, significantly healed more venous leg ulcers than standard of care alone, suggesting that the use of aseptically processed dHACA is advantageous and a safe and effective treatment option in the healing of chronic venous leg ulcers. CLINICAL QUESTION/LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Therapeutic, I.

Use of a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix in the management of chronic diabetic foot ulcers improves patient outcomes vs standard of care: Results of a prospective randomised controlled multi-centre clinical trial.

Diabetic foot infections continue to be a major challenge for health care delivery systems. Following encouraging results from a pilot study using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs), we designed a prospective, multi-centre randomised trial comparing outcomes of PRBM at 12 weeks compared with a standard of care (SOC) using a collagen alginate dressing. The primary endpoint was percentage of wounds closed after 12 weeks. Secondary outcomes included assessments of complications, healing time, quality of life, and cost to closure. Forty patients were included in an intent-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analysis, with 39 completing the study protocol (n = 19 PRBM, n = 20 SOC). Wounds treated with PRBM were significantly more likely to close than wounds treated with SOC (ITT: 85% vs 30%, P = .0004, PP: 94% vs 30% P = .00008), healed significantly faster (mean 37 days vs 67 days for SOC, P = .002), and achieved a mean wound area reduction within 12 weeks of 96% vs 8.9% for SOC. No adverse events (AEs) directly related to PRBM treatment were reported. Mean PRBM cost of healing was $1731. Use of PRBM was safe and effective for treatment of chronic DFUs.

Functional Properties of a Purified Reconstituted Bilayer Matrix Design Support Natural Wound Healing Activities.

Biomaterial engineering has produced numerous matrices for use in tissue repair, utilizing various materials and processing methods, which can impact the ability of the products to encourage wound healing. Recently, we observed favorable clinical outcomes, using a novel purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM; Geistlich Derma-Gide) to treat chronic diabetic foot ulcers. METHODS: Evaluations of the structural and functional characteristics of PRBM in vitro were performed to assess how this biomaterial may affect the favorable clinical results observed by influencing the wound environment and key physiologic mechanisms necessary for the healing process. Investigations included scanning electron microscopy, cell culture analyses, gene expression assays, matrix metalloproteinase activity assessment, and pH measurement. RESULTS: Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy demonstrated a distinct bilayer structure with porous and compact layers. The PRBM structure allowed cell types involved in wound healing to bind and proliferate. Expression analysis of growth factor-responsive genes demonstrated binding and preservation of bioactive growth factors TGF-ß1, bFGF, and VEGF by PRBM. Boyden chamber migration assays revealed increased cellular migration compared with controls. In the presence of PRBM, the activity of MMP-1, MMP-2, and MMP-9 was significantly lower compared with control samples. pH of the PRBM in solution was slightly acidic. CONCLUSIONS: Based on in vitro evaluations, it appears that the PRBM processing without deleterious chemical crosslinking results in a suitable ECM possessing characteristics to aid natural wound healing, including cell attachment, migration, proliferation, differentiation, and angiogenesis. These in vitro data support the promising healing rate observed clinically when chronic DFUs are treated with PRBM.

An observational pilot study using a purified reconstituted bilayer matrix to treat non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) have significant clinical impact and carry a substantial economic burden. Patients with DFUs that are refractory to standard wound care are at risk for major complications, including infection and amputation and have an increased risk of mortality. This study evaluated the safety and preliminary efficacy of a novel decellularised purified reconstituted bilayer matrix (PRBM) in treating DFUs. Ten diabetic patients with refractory wounds that failed to heal after at least 4 weeks of standard wound care were studied in this Institutional Review Board approved trial. Ten consecutive wounds were treated weekly with the PRBM for up to 12 weeks. At each weekly visit, the wound was evaluated, photographed, and cleaned, followed by application of new graft if not completely epithelialised. Assessment included measurement of the wound area and inspection of the wound site for signs of complications. The primary outcome measure was wound closure, as adjudicated by independent reviewers. Secondary outcomes included assessment of overall adverse events, time to closure, percent area reduction, and the cost of product(s) used. Nine of 10 patients achieved complete wound closure within 4 weeks, and 1 did not heal completely within 12 weeks. The mean time to heal was 2.7 weeks. The mean wound area reduction at 12 weeks was 99%. No adverse events nor wound complications were observed. These early clinical findings suggest that the PRBM may be an effective tool in the treatment of diabetic foot ulcers.

Placental Membrane Provides Improved Healing Efficacy and Lower Cost Versus a Tissue-Engineered Human Skin in the Treatment of Diabetic Foot Ulcerations.

Aseptically processed dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) (AmnioBand) has shown great promise in the treatment of recalcitrant diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) when compared with standard wound care but has not yet been compared to any other tissue forms used in treating DFUs. The hypothesis was to conduct a randomized controlled trial in which dHACA was compared to one of the earliest and most commonly accepted tissue-engineered skin substitutes (TESS) (Apligraf) in the treatment of nonhealing DFUs over a period of 12 weeks to assess the superiority of healing. METHODS: Following a 2-week screening period during which subjects with DFUs were treated with collagen alginate dressing, 60 subjects were randomized at 5 sites to receive either dHACA or TESS applied weekly, with weekly follow-up for up to 12 weeks. RESULTS: The mean time to heal within 6-week time period for the dHACA group was 24 days (95% CI, 18.9-29.2) versus 39 days (95% CI, 36.4-41.9) for the TESS group; the mean time to heal at 12 weeks was 32 days (95% CI, 22.3-41.0) for dHACA-treated wounds versus 63 days (95% CI, 54.1-72.6) for TESS-treated wounds. The proportion of wounds healed at study completion (12 weeks) was 90% (27/30) for the dHACA group versus 40% (12/30) for the TESS group. The mean product cost for the dHACA group was significantly lower than that for the TESS group [dHACA: $2,200 (median: $1,300); TESS: $7,900 (median: $6,500)]. The mean wastage (%) at 12 weeks was also significantly lower for the dHACA group than that for the TESS group (36% vs 95%). CONCLUSIONS: It was concluded that aseptically processed dHACA heals diabetic foot wounds more reliably, statistically significantly faster than and at significantly lower cost than TESS.

Evaluating the Impact of Technique and Mesh Type in Complicated Ventral Hernia Repair: A Prospective Randomized Multicenter Controlled Trial.

BACKGROUND: To our knowledge, there is an absence of prospective randomized multicenter controlled trials evaluating both the impact of technique and mesh type on outcomes in complicated ventral hernia repair. STUDY DESIGN: A prospective randomized multicenter controlled trial of 120 patients at 3 sites was conducted in which patients were randomized to either overlay (anterior component separation) or underlay mesh placement (posterior component separation) and mesh type (human acellular dermis [HADM] vs porcine acellular dermis [PADM]). Key inclusion criteria included hernia size (>200 cm2), BMI < 40 kg/m2, hemoglobin A1C < 7%, tobacco free > 6 weeks and primary fascial closure. Primary outcome was hernia recurrence at 1 year, determined by independent examiner/imaging. Secondary outcomes included complications and patient satisfaction (short form [SF]-36v2). Standardized investigator training included a porcine model followed by a proctored first case by the lead investigator. RESULTS: There were no significant differences in demographics between the 4 groups (age 60 ±12 years, BMI 32 ± 5 kg/m2, 51% female). The overall 1-year recurrence rate was 10.8%. There was no significant difference in recurrence rate by location of mesh placement (overlay 9.8%, underlay 11.9%) or mesh type (HADM 10.3%, PADM 11.3%). Overlay patients had a significantly lower surgical site infection rate (1.6% vs 11.9% p = 0.03), reported better physical functioning (p = 0.001) and role limitation scores (p = 0.04) in the early postoperative period, and achieved the highest physical functioning score during the 12-month period (p < 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: Recurrence rates were not affected by either anatomic location or type of mesh used. To our knowledge, this represents the first prospective randomized multicenter controlled trial that demonstrates similar clinical outcomes using HADM vs PADM (not inferiority, contrary to previously published literature), with several advantages identified using the overlay technique.

Use of an aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion membrane improves likelihood and rate of healing in chronic diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, multi-centre clinical trial in 80 patients.

Amnion and chorion allografts have shown great promise in healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). Results from an interim analysis of 40 patients have demonstrated the accelerated healing ability of a novel aseptically processed, dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA). The goal of this study was to report on the full trial results of 80 patients where dHACA was compared with standard of care (SOC) in achieving wound closure in non-healing DFUs. After a 2-week screening period, during which patients with DFUs were unsuccessfully treated with SOC, patients were randomised to either SOC alone or SOC with dHACA applied weekly for up to 12 weeks. At 12 weeks, 85% (34/40) of the dHACA-treated DFUs healed, compared with 33% (13/40) treated with SOC alone. Mean time to heal within 12 weeks was significantly faster for the dHACA- treated group compared with SOC, 37 days vs 67 days in the SOC group (P = .000006). Mean number of grafts used per healed wound during the same time period was 4.0, and mean cost of the tissue to heal a DFU was $1771. The authors concluded that aseptically processed dHACA heals DFUs significantly faster than SOC at 12 weeks.

An aseptically processed, acellular, reticular, allogenic human dermis improves healing in diabetic foot ulcers: A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre follow-up trial.

Aseptically processed human reticular acellular dermal matrix (HR-ADM) has been previously shown to improve wound closure in 40 diabetic patients with non-healing foot ulcers. The study was extended to 40 additional patients (80 in total) to validate and extend the original findings. The entire cohort of 80 patients underwent appropriate offloading and standard of care (SOC) during a 2-week screening period and, after meeting eligibility criteria, were randomised to receive weekly applications of HR-ADM plus SOC or SOC alone for up to 12 weeks. The primary outcome was the proportion of wounds closed at 6 weeks. Sixty-eight percent (27/40) in the HR-ADM group were completely healed at 6 weeks compared with 15% (6/40) in the SOC group. The proportions of wounds healed at 12 weeks were 80% (34/40) and 30% (12/40), respectively. The mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 38 days for the HR-ADM group and 72 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any graft-related adverse events. The mean and median HR-ADM product costs at 12 weeks were $1200 and $680, respectively. HR-ADM is clinically superior to SOC, is cost effective relative to other comparable treatment modalities, and is an efficacious treatment for chronic non-healing diabetic foot ulcers.

Human Reticular Acellular Dermal Matrix in the Healing of Chronic Diabetic Foot Ulcerations that Failed Standard Conservative Treatment: A Retrospective Crossover Study.

BACKGROUND: Acellular matrices have been successfully used to heal indolent diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs). These tissues include allogenic dermis as well as xenograft dermis, pericardium, and small intestine submucosa. While all of these tissues show promise for healing DFUs, dermal-derived matrices have shown considerable potential. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The authors retrospectively reviewed healing in patients with DFUs that failed the standard of care (SOC) treatment from a previous prospective randomized, controlled trial (RCT). That trial compared the efficacy of human reticular acellular dermal matrices (HR-ADMs) with the SOC. Of the 16 out of 20 patients who did not heal in the SOC group, 12 were eligible for crossover treatment with the HR-ADM. The authors studied the rate of complete healing in that specific cohort after 12 weeks of crossover treatment. RESULTS: Of the 12 patients who were eligible for the HR-ADM, 10 (83%) achieved complete wound healing, with a mean healing time of 21 days to closure. The corresponding wound area reduction was from 1.7 cm2 to 0.6 cm2. The mean product cost to closure was $800/patient. CONCLUSION: This study further demonstrates the effectiveness of the HR-ADM in facilitating the closure of nonhealing DFUs refractory to SOC.

A prospective, randomised, controlled, multicentre clinical trial examining healing rates, safety and cost to closure of an acellular reticular allogenic human dermis versus standard of care in the treatment of chronic diabetic foot ulcers.

Acellular dermal matrices can successfully heal wounds. This study's goal was to compare clinical outcomes of a novel, open-structure human reticular acellular dermis matrix (HR-ADM) to facilitate wound closure in non-healing diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) versus DFUs treated with standard of care (SOC). Following a 2-week screening period in which DFUs were treated with offloading and moist wound care, patients were randomised to either SOC alone or HR-ADM plus SOC applied weekly for up to 12 weeks. At 6 weeks, the primary outcome time, 65% of the HR-ADM-treated DFUs healed (13/20) compared with 5% (1/20) of DFUs that received SOC alone. At 12 weeks, the proportions of DFUs healed were 80% and 20%, respectively. Mean time to heal within 12 weeks was 40 days for the HR-ADM group compared with 77 days for the SOC group. There was no incidence of increased adverse or serious adverse events between groups or any adverse events related to the graft. Mean and median graft costs to closure per healed wound in the HR-ADM group were $1475 and $963, respectively. Weekly application of HR-ADM is an effective intervention for promoting closure of non-healing DFUs.

Aseptically Processed Placental Membrane Improves Healing of Diabetic Foot Ulcerations: Prospective, Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Allogeneic grafts derived from amnion/chorion are known to be efficacious in healing chronic diabetic foot ulcerations (DFUs). The goal of this study was to compare aseptically processed dehydrated human amnion and chorion allograft (dHACA) versus standard of care (SOC) in facilitating wound closure in nonhealing DFUs. METHODS: Patients with DFUs treated with SOC (off-loading, appropriate debridement, and moist wound care) after a 2-week screening period were randomized to either SOC or wound-size-specific dHACA (AmnioBand, Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation, Edison, N.J.) applied weekly for up to 12 weeks plus SOC. Primary endpoint was the percentage of wounds healed at 6 weeks between groups. RESULTS: At 6 weeks, 70% (14/20) of the dHACA-treated DFUs healed compared with 15% (3/20) treated with SOC alone. Furthermore, at 12 weeks, 85% (17/20) of the DFUs in the dHACA group healed compared with 25% (5/20) in the SOC group, with a corresponding mean time to heal of 36 and 70 days, respectively. At 12 weeks, the mean number of grafts used per healed wound for the dHACA group was 3.8 (median 3.0), and mean cost of the tissue to heal a DFU was $1400. The mean wastage at 12 weeks was 40%. One adverse event and 1 serious adverse event occurred in the dHACA group; neither was graft related. Three adverse events and 1 serious adverse event occurred in the SOC group. CONCLUSION: Aseptically processed dHACA heals diabetic foot wounds significantly faster than SOC at 6 and 12 weeks with minimal graft wastage.