FtsN maintains active septal cell wall synthesis by forming a processive complex with the septum-specific peptidoglycan synthases in E. coli.

FtsN plays an essential role in promoting the inward synthesis of septal peptidoglycan (sPG) by the FtsWI complex during bacterial cell division. How it achieves this role is unclear. Here we use single-molecule tracking to investigate FtsN's dynamics during sPG synthesis in E. coli. We show that septal FtsN molecules move processively at ~9 nm s-1, the same as FtsWI molecules engaged in sPG synthesis (termed sPG-track), but much slower than the ~30 nm s-1 speed of inactive FtsWI molecules coupled to FtsZ's treadmilling dynamics (termed FtsZ-track). Importantly, processive movement of FtsN is exclusively coupled to sPG synthesis and is required to maintain active sPG synthesis by FtsWI. Our findings indicate that FtsN is part of the FtsWI sPG synthesis complex, and that while FtsN is often described as a "trigger" for the initiation for cell wall constriction, it must remain part of the processive FtsWI complex to maintain sPG synthesis activity.

Comparative Study of Bacterial SPOR Domains Identifies Functionally Important Differences in Glycan Binding Affinity.

Bacterial SPOR domains target proteins to the divisome by binding septal peptidoglycan (PG) at sites where cell wall amidases have removed stem peptides. These PG structures are referred to as denuded glycans. Although all characterized SPOR domains bind denuded glycans, whether there are differences in affinity is not known. Here, we use isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC) to determine the relative PG glycan binding affinity (<i>K</i>_d) of four Escherichia coli SPOR domains and one Cytophaga hutchinsonii SPOR domain. We found that the <i>K</i>_d values ranged from approximately 1 µM for E. coli DamX^SPOR and <i>C. hutchinsonii</i> CHU2221^SPOR to about 10 µM for E. coli FtsN^SPOR. To investigate whether these differences in PG binding affinity are important for SPOR domain protein function, we constructed and characterized a set of DamX and FtsN "swap" proteins. As expected, all SPOR domain swap proteins localized to the division site, and, in the case of FtsN, all of the heterologous SPOR domains supported cell division. However, for DamX, only the high-affinity SPOR domain from CHU2221 supported normal function in cell division. In summary, different SPOR domains bind denuded PG glycans with different affinities, which appears to be important for the functions of some SPOR domain proteins (e.g., DamX) but not for the functions of others (e.g., FtsN). <b>IMPORTANCE</b> SPOR domain proteins are prominent components of the cell division apparatus in a wide variety of bacteria. The primary function of SPOR domains is targeting proteins to the division site, which they accomplish by binding to septal peptidoglycan. However, whether SPOR domains have any functions beyond septal targeting is unknown. Here, we show that SPOR domains vary in their PG binding affinities and that, at least in the case of the E. coli cell division protein DamX, having a high-affinity SPOR domain contributes to proper function.

Lysozyme Resistance in Clostridioides difficile Is Dependent on Two Peptidoglycan Deacetylases.

Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile is a major cause of hospital-acquired infections leading to antibiotic-associated diarrhea. C. difficile exhibits a very high level of resistance to lysozyme. Bacteria commonly resist lysozyme through modification of the cell wall. In C. difficile, σV is required for lysozyme resistance, and σV is activated in response to lysozyme. Once activated, σV, encoded by csfV, directs transcription of genes necessary for lysozyme resistance. Here, we analyze the contribution of individual genes in the σV regulon to lysozyme resistance. Using CRISPR-Cas9-mediated mutagenesis we constructed in-frame deletions of single genes in the csfV operon. We find that pdaV, which encodes a peptidoglycan deacetylase, is partially responsible for lysozyme resistance. We then performed CRISPR inhibition (CRISPRi) to identify a second peptidoglycan deacetylase, encoded by pgdA, that is important for lysozyme resistance. Deletion of either pgdA or pdaV resulted in modest decreases in lysozyme resistance. However, deletion of both pgdA and pdaV resulted in a 1,000-fold decrease in lysozyme resistance. Further, muropeptide analysis revealed that loss of either PgdA or PdaV had modest effects on peptidoglycan deacetylation but that loss of both PgdA and PdaV resulted in almost complete loss of peptidoglycan deacetylation. This suggests that PgdA and PdaV are redundant peptidoglycan deacetylases. We also used CRISPRi to compare other lysozyme resistance mechanisms and conclude that peptidoglycan deacetylation is the major mechanism of lysozyme resistance in C. difficileIMPORTANCEClostridioides difficile is the leading cause of hospital-acquired diarrhea. C. difficile is highly resistant to lysozyme. We previously showed that the csfV operon is required for lysozyme resistance. Here, we used CRISPR-Cas9 mediated mutagenesis and CRISPRi knockdown to show that peptidoglycan deacetylation is necessary for lysozyme resistance and is the major lysozyme resistance mechanism in C. difficile We show that two peptidoglycan deacetylases in C. difficile are partially redundant and are required for lysozyme resistance. PgdA provides an intrinsic level of deacetylation, and PdaV, encoded by a part of the csfV operon, provides lysozyme-induced peptidoglycan deacetylation.

Glycerol Monolaurate (GML) and a Nonaqueous Five-Percent GML Gel Kill Bacillus and Clostridium Spores.

Glycerol monolaurate is a broadly antimicrobial fatty acid monoester, killing bacteria, fungi, and enveloped viruses. The compound kills stationary-phase cultures of Bacillus anthracis, suggesting that the molecule may kill spores. In this study, we examined the ability of glycerol monolaurate alone or solubilized in a nonaqueous gel to kill vegetative cells and spores of aerobic B. anthracis, B. subtilis, and B. cereus and anaerobic Clostridium perfringens and Clostridium (Clostridioides) difficile. Glycerol monolaurate alone was bactericidal for all five organisms tested. Glycerol monolaurate alone was effective in killing spores. When solubilized in a nonaqueous gel, the glycerol monolaurate gel was bactericidal for all spores tested. The data suggest that glycerol monolaurate nonaqueous gel could be effective in decontaminating environmental and body surfaces, such as skin.IMPORTANCEBacillus and Clostridium spores are known to be highly resistant to killing, persisting on environmental and human body surfaces for long periods of time. In favorable environments, these spores may germinate and cause human diseases. It is thus important to identify agents that can be used on both environmental and human skin and mucosal surfaces and that are effective in killing spores. We previously showed that the fatty acid monoester glycerol monolaurate (GML) kills stationary-phase cultures of Bacillus anthracis Since such cultures are likely to contain spores, it is possible that GML and a human-use-approved GML nonaqueous gel would kill Bacillus and Clostridium spores. The significance of our studies is that we have identified GML, and, to a greater extent, GML solubilized in a nonaqueous gel, as effective in killing spores from both bacterial genera.

Multiple factors contribute to bimodal toxin gene expression in Clostridioides (Clostridium) difficile.

Clostridioides (formerly Clostridium) difficile produces two major toxins, TcdA and TcdB, upon entry into stationary phase. Transcription of tcdA and tcdB requires the specialized sigma factor, σTcdR , which also directs RNA Polymerase to transcribe tcdR itself. We fused a gene for a red fluorescent protein to the tcdA promoter to study toxin gene expression at the level of individual C. difficile cells. Surprisingly, only a subset of cells became red fluorescent upon entry into stationary phase. Breaking the positive feedback loop that controls σTcdR production by engineering cells to express tcdR from a tetracycline-inducible promoter resulted in uniform fluorescence across the population. Experiments with two regulators of tcdR expression, σD and CodY, revealed neither is required for bimodal toxin gene expression. However, σD biased cells toward the Toxin-ON state, while CodY biased cells toward the Toxin-OFF state. Finally, toxin gene expression was observed in sporulating cells. We conclude that (i) toxin production is regulated by a bistable switch governed by σTcdR , which only accumulates to high enough levels to trigger toxin gene expression in a subset of cells, and (ii) toxin production and sporulation are not mutually exclusive developmental programs.