Ictal-Interictal Continuum in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit.

BACKGROUND: The ictal-interictal continuum (IIC) consists of several electroencephalogram (EEG) patterns that are common in critically ill adults. Studies focused on the IIC are limited in critically ill children and have focused primarily on associations with electrographic seizures (ESs). We report the incidence of the IIC in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU). We then compare IIC patterns to rhythmic and periodic patterns (RPP) not meeting IIC criteria looking for associations with acute cerebral abnormalities, ES, and in-hospital mortality. METHODS: This was a retrospective review of prospectively collected data for patients admitted to the PICU at Children's National Hospital from July 2021 to January 2023 with continuous EEG. We excluded patients with known epilepsy and cerebral injury prior to presentation. All patients were screened for RPP. The American Clinical Neurophysiology Society standardized Critical Care EEG terminology for the IIC was applied to each RPP. Associations between IIC and RPP not meeting IIC criteria, with clinical and EEG variables, were calculated using odds ratios (ORs). RESULTS: Of 201 patients, 21% (42/201) had RPP and 12% (24/201) met IIC criteria. Among patients with an IIC pattern, the median age was 3.4 years (interquartile range (IQR) 0.6-12 years). Sixty-seven percent (16/24) of patients met a single IIC criterion, whereas the remainder met two criteria. ESs were identified in 83% (20/24) of patients and cerebral injury was identified in 96% (23/24) of patients with IIC patterns. When comparing patients with IIC patterns with those with RPP not qualifying as an IIC pattern, both patterns were associated with acute cerebral abnormalities (IIC OR 26 [95% confidence interval {CI} 3.4-197], p = 0.0016 vs. RPP OR 3.5 [95% CI 1.1-11], p = 0.03), however, only the IIC was associated with ES (OR 121 [95% CI 33-451], p < 0.0001) versus RPP (OR 1.3 [0.4-5], p = 0.7). CONCLUSIONS: Rhythmic and periodic patterns and subsequently the IIC are commonly seen in the PICU and carry a high association with cerebral injury. Additionally, the IIC, seen in more than 10% of critically ill children, is associated with ES. The independent impact of RPP and IIC patterns on secondary brain injury and need for treatment of these patterns independent of ES requires further study.

Implementing e-learning and e-tools for care home staff supporting residents with dementia and challenging behaviour: A process evaluation of the ResCare study using normalisation process theory.

Dementia-related symptoms, sometimes termed challenging or distressing behaviour, can give rise to significant distress in care homes. Individualised formulation-led interventions show promise in reducing these behaviours. ResCare, a cluster randomised controlled trial in England, tested an online individualised intervention, comprising e-learning and decision support e-tools, designed to enable staff to better support residents with such symptoms. Normalisation process theory was used to understand the implementation processes. We analysed contextual process data for all 27 'intervention' care homes and identified three implementation mechanisms. These were examined for four illustrative case study homes. Seven qualitative interviews with care home staff and one interview with two research therapists informed this understanding. The main barrier to implementation was difficulty in conveying a sustained understanding of the value of individually tailored interventions. Emphasis was placed on training rather than practice change. Implementation seemed easier in smaller homes and in those with flexible managerial styles where transfer of knowledge and skill might have been easier to achieve. Take up of e-learning and e-tools proved hard. There may be a need to continually promote 'buy-in' of the potential benefits of individualised formulation-led interventions, and this would have to be congruent with other priorities. Interventions within care homes need to consider organisational readiness, capacity for innovation and ongoing appraisal and adjustment to maintain changes in practice.

'We're passengers sailing in the same ship, but we have our own berths to sleep in': Evaluating patient and public involvement within a regional research programme: An action research project informed by Normalisation Process Theory.

BACKGROUND: Patient and public involvement (PPI) is a requirement for UK health and social care research funding. Evidence for how best to implement PPI in research programmes, such as National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaborations for Applied Health Research and Care (CLAHRCs), remains limited. This paper reports findings from an action research (AR) project called IMPRESS, which aims to strengthen PPI within CLAHRC East of England (EoE). IMPRESS combines AR with Normalisation Process Theory (NPT) to explore PPI within diverse case study projects, identifying actions to implement, test and refine to further embed PPI. METHODS: We purposively selected CLAHRC EoE case study projects for in-depth analysis of PPI using NPT. Data were generated from project PPI documentation, semi-structured qualitative interviews with researchers and PPI contributors and focus groups. Transcripts and documents were subjected to abductive thematic analysis and triangulation within case. Systematic across case comparison of themes was undertaken with findings and implications refined through stakeholder consultation. RESULTS: We interviewed 24 researchers and 13 PPI contributors and analysed 28 documents from 10 case studies. Three focus groups were held: two with researchers (n = 4 and n = 6) and one with PPI contributors (n = 5). Findings detail to what extent projects made sense of PPI, bought in to PPI, operationalised PPI and appraised it, thus identifying barriers and enablers to fully embedded PPI. CONCLUSION: Combining NPT with AR allows us to assess the embeddedness of PPI within projects and programme, to inform specific local action and report broader conceptual lessons for PPI knowledge and practice informing the development of an action framework for embedding PPI in research programmes. To embed PPI within similar programmes teams, professionals, disciplines and institutions should be recognised as variably networked into existing PPI support. Further focus and research is needed on sharing PPI learning and supporting innovation in PPI.

How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation.

Objectives To explore how embedded patient and public involvement is within mainstream health research following two decades of policy-driven work to underpin health research with patient and public involvement in England. Methods Realist evaluation using Normalization Process Theory as a programme theory to understand what enabled patient and public involvement to be embedded as normal practice. Data were collected through a national scoping and survey, and qualitative methods to track patient and public involvement processes and impact over time within 22 nationally funded research projects. Results In research studies that were able to create reciprocal working relationships and to embed patient and public involvement this was contingent on: the purpose of patient and public involvement being clear; public contributors reflecting research end-beneficiaries; researchers understanding the value of patient and public involvement; patient and public involvement opportunities being provided throughout the research and ongoing evaluation of patient and public involvement. Key contested areas included: whether to measure patient and public involvement impact; seeking public contributors to maintain a balance between being research-aware and an outsider standpoint seen as 'authentically' lay; scaling-up patient and public involvement embedded within a research infrastructure rather than risk token presence and whether patient and public involvement can have a place within basic science. Conclusions While patient and public involvement can be well-integrated within all types of research, policy makers should take account of tensions that must be navigated in balancing moral and methodological imperatives.