RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Measures of neighborhood disadvantage demonstrate correlations to health outcomes in children. We compared differing indices of neighborhood disadvantage with emergency medical services (EMS) interventions in children. METHODS: We performed a retrospective study of EMS encounters for children (<18 years) from approximately 2000 US EMS agencies between 2021 and 2022. Our exposures were the Child Opportunity Index (COI; v2.0), 2021 Area Deprivation Index (ADI), and 2018 Social Vulnerability Index (SVI). We evaluated the agreement in how children were classified with each index using the intraclass correlation coefficient. We used logistic regression to evaluate the association of each index with transport status, presence of cardiac arrest, and condition-specific interventions and assessments. RESULTS: We included 738,892 encounters. The correlation between the indices indicated good agreement (intraclass correlation coefficient=0.75). There was overlap in relationships between the COI, ADI, and SVI for each of the study outcomes, both when visualized as a splined predictor and when using representative odds ratios (OR) comparing the third quartile of each index to the lower quartile (most disadvantaged). For example, the OR of non-transport was 1.12 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.10-1.14) for COI, 1.18 (95% CI: 1.16-1.20) for ADI, and 1.22 (95% CI: 1.20-1.23) for SVI. CONCLUSION: The COI, ADI, and SVI had good correlation and demonstrated similar effect size estimates for a variety of clinical outcomes. While investigators should consider potential causal pathways for outcomes when selecting an index for neighborhood disadvantage, the relative strength of association between each index and all outcomes was similar.
RESUMEN
This cohort study describes the rate of emergency department (ED) encounters, reasons for these visits, and characteristics of the children and adolescents who seek this care.
Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Conducta Autodestructiva , Humanos , Conducta Autodestructiva/psicología , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Masculino , Femenino , Niño , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
Importance: Classifying hospitals across a wide range of pediatric capabilities, including medical, surgical, and specialty services, would improve understanding of access and outcomes. Objective: To develop a classification system for hospitals' pediatric capabilities. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study included data from 2019 on all acute care hospitals with emergency departments in 10 US states that treated at least 1 child per day. Statistical analysis was performed from September 2023 to February 2024. Exposure: Pediatric hospital capability level, defined using latent class analysis. The latent class model parameters were the presence or absence of 26 functional capabilities, which ranged from performing laceration repairs to performing organ transplants. A simplified approach to categorization was derived and externally validated by comparing each hospital's latent class model classification with its simplified classification using data from 3 additional states. Main Outcomes and Measures: Health care utilization and structural characteristics, including inpatient beds, pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) beds, and referral rates (proportion of patients transferred among patients unable to be discharged). Results: Using data from 1061 hospitals (716 metropolitan [67.5%]) with a median of 2934 pediatric ED encounters per year (IQR, 1367-5996), the latent class model revealed 4 pediatric levels, with a median confidence of hospital assignment to level of 100% (IQR, 99%-100%). Of 26 functional capabilities, level 1 hospitals had a median of 24 capabilities (IQR, 21-25), level 2 hospitals had a median of 13 (IQR, 11-15), level 3 hospitals had a median of 8 (IQR, 6-9), and level 4 hospitals had a median of 3 (IQR, 2-3). Pediatric level 1 hospitals had a median of 66 inpatient beds (IQR, 42-86), level 2 hospitals had a median of 16 (IQR, 9-22), level 3 hospitals had a median of 0 (IQR, 0-6), and level 4 hospitals had a median of 0 (IQR, 0-0) (P < .001). Level 1 hospitals had a median of 19 PICU beds (IQR, 10-28), level 2 hospitals had a median of 0 (IQR, 0-5), level 3 hospitals had a median of 0 (IQR, 0-0), and level 4 hospitals had a median of 0 (IQR, 0-0) (P < .001). Level 1 hospitals had a median referral rate of 1% (IQR, 1%-3%), level 2 hospitals had a median of 25% (IQR, 9%-45%), level 3 hospitals had a median of 70% (IQR, 52%-84%), and level 4 hospitals had a median of 100% (IQR, 98%-100%) (P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of hospitals from 10 US states, a system to classify hospitals' pediatric capabilities in 4 levels was developed and was associated with structural and health care utilization characteristics. This system can be used to understand and track national pediatric acute care access and outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Hospitales Pediátricos , Humanos , Estados Unidos , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Pediátricos/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Clases LatentesRESUMEN
Firearm carriage and possession predicts youth firearm violence victimization and perpetration. This study describes self-reported factors associated with firearm access, carriage, and possession among justice-involved youth. We conducted an exploratory, mixed-methods study. Participants were recruited from May 2022 to February 2023 from the Juvenile Justice Collaborative, a diversion program for justice-involved youth. We used online anonymous surveys to investigate exposures related to firearm access, carriage, and possession. We performed semi-structured interviews using the phenomenology framework. We used descriptive statistics to examine firearm exposures by participant demographics. We performed qualitative analyses using an iterative approach with constant comparison to identify key themes. We completed 28 surveys and 5 interviews. Most survey participants identified as male (57%) and Black (61%) with a median age of 18 years. Interview participants described the socialization and cultural normalization of firearms, most prominently among peers. Survey participants reported whether they had ever carried (25%) or possessed (21%) a firearm. Survey and interview participants endorsed protection in the context of increasing violence exposure over time as the primary motivation for firearm possession. Interview participants describe accessing firearms primarily through social networks while survey participants also reported access from strangers (25%) and licensed sellers/gun dealers (18%). In conclusion, justice-involved youth believe firearm carriage and possession may be needed for protection due to increasing violence exposure. Further investigation is necessary to determine interventions that may decrease firearm access, carriage, and possession among justice-involved youth.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Humanos , Masculino , Adolescente , Femenino , Armas de Fuego/estadística & datos numéricos , Delincuencia Juvenil/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Entrevistas como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Approximately half of youth suicides involve firearms. The promotion of safe firearm storage in the home through lethal means counseling reduces suicide risk. We aimed to increase the documentation of firearm access and storage among children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with suicidal ideation or self-injury to 80% within 13 months. METHODS: We conducted a multidisciplinary quality improvement initiative to improve the documentation of firearm access and storage among children <18 years old seen in the ED for suicidal ideation or self-injury. The baseline period was February 2020 to September 2021, and interventions occurred through October 2022. Interventions included adding a templated phrase about firearm access to psychiatric social work consult notes and the subsequent modification of the note to include all firearm storage elements (ie, locked, unloaded, separate from ammunition). Statistical process control and run charts were generated monthly to monitor the documentation of firearm access and storage, which was measured through a review of keyword snippets extracted from note text. RESULTS: We identified 2158 ED encounters for suicidal ideation or self-injury during the baseline and intervention periods. Documentation of firearm access increased from 37.8% to 81.6%, resulting in a centerline shift. Among families who endorsed firearm access, the documentation of firearm storage practices increased from 50.0% to 78.0%, resulting in a centerline shift. CONCLUSIONS: The modification of note templates facilitated increased documentation of firearm access and storage practices for children with suicidal ideation in the ED. Future studies should assess whether improved documentation is associated with improved storage practices and reductions in firearm suicides after ED encounters.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Suicidio , Adolescente , Humanos , Niño , Ideación Suicida , Documentación , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe how often Chicago children are exposed to firearm violence, the types of exposure, and the parent-reported impact of these exposures on child mental health symptoms. METHODS: Data were collected in May-July 2022 using the Voices of Child Health in Chicago Parent Panel Survey, administered to parents with children aged 2-17 years from all 77 Chicago neighborhoods. Firearm violence exposure was characterized as indirect (hearing gunshots or knowing someone who was shot) or direct (witnessing a shooting, being threatened with a firearm, being shot at but not injured, or being shot and injured). Parents indicated if children in their household had any of the following mental health symptoms associated with firearm violence exposure: fear, anxiety, sadness, isolation, difficulty concentrating, difficulty in school, or aggression. Chi-squared tests and multivariable logistic regression models were used for statistical analysis. RESULTS: Responses were received from 989 Chicago parents. More than one third (37%) of children were exposed to firearm violence with an indirect exposure prevalence of 32% and a direct exposure prevalence of 10%. Mental health symptoms associated with firearm violence exposure were reported for 20% of children. Mental health symptoms were reported for 7% of children without firearm violence exposure compared to 31% with indirect exposure (aOR 6.2, 95% CI: 3.7, 10.6) and 68% with direct exposure (aOR 36.1, 95% CI: 16.6, 78.6) CONCLUSIONS: Chicago children with indirect and direct exposure to firearm violence had more parent-reported mental health symptoms than unexposed children. Trauma informed care approaches to mitigate the negative mental health effects of both direct and indirect firearm violence exposure are critical.
Asunto(s)
Exposición a la Violencia , Armas de Fuego , Salud Mental , Humanos , Chicago/epidemiología , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Adolescente , Preescolar , Exposición a la Violencia/psicología , Exposición a la Violencia/estadística & datos numéricos , Padres/psicología , Modelos Logísticos , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/epidemiología , Heridas por Arma de Fuego/psicología , Ansiedad/epidemiología , Violencia con Armas/psicología , Violencia con Armas/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Miedo/psicología , Prevalencia , AdultoRESUMEN
This article examines the complex interplay between mental health and violence among children. Although children with mental illness are more likely to be victims of violence than perpetrators, this article describes the few mental health conditions associated with increased violent behavior among children. Next, the authors examine the spectrum of mental health sequelae among children following exposure to various forms of violence. Lastly, the authors discuss the underutilization of mental health services in this population and highlight screening and intervention tools available to pediatric clinicians caring for children exposed to violence.
Asunto(s)
Víctimas de Crimen , Trastornos Mentales , Humanos , Adolescente , Niño , Salud Mental , Violencia/psicología , Trastornos Mentales/diagnóstico , Trastornos Mentales/epidemiología , Trastornos Mentales/etiología , AgresiónRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The role of traumatic injuries in fatal and nonfatal drownings is poorly described. We sought to characterize the incidence of traumatic injuries and diagnostic imaging performed among children who received pediatric hospital care for drowning. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of children (≤18 years) with drowning encounters at 45 pediatric hospitals, October 2015 through December 2020. We described the presence of clinically important traumatic injuries to the following body regions: brain, spinal cord, thoracic and intra-abdominal organs, axial skeleton, pelvis, and long bones, and major vessels. We described patient characteristics and radiographic testing. We compared patients with and without traumatic injuries using the Fisher's exact and Wilcoxon signed rank tests. RESULTS: We identified 10,397 children with a drowning encounter. Most (83.4%) were treated in the emergency department and 52.8% were admitted. There were 238 (2.3%) encounters with clinically important traumatic injuries. Intracranial injury was the most common (1.0%) with other traumatic injuries occurring in ≤0.5%. Less than 2% of children had a moderate or severe injury severity score and approximately half of these children had a clinically important traumatic injury. Among children with traumatic injuries, a higher proportion were 10 to 14 or 15 to 18 years old and from ZIP codes with lower median household income. Computerized tomography imaging was performed in the following proportions: brain (11.4%), cervical spine (3.7%), abdomen/pelvis (1.2%), chest (0.5%) and face/orbits (0.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Clinically important traumatic injuries in children with drowning are rare. Further studies are needed to guide the optimal utilization of radiographic studies in this population.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study compares current suicidal ideation, prior suicide attempt and associated self-reported risk factors in adolescents with and without access to firearms. METHODS: Using data from a clinically applied behavioral health assessment completed by adolescents presenting to a tertiary children's hospital emergency department (ED; N = 15,806), we evaluated the association between firearm access (ie, firearm in the home or ability to obtain one within 24 hours), each of the included suicide risk factors (ie, depressive symptoms, trauma victimization, bullying victimization), and our primary outcomes (ie, current suicidal ideation and prior suicide attempt). We performed regression analyses on 3 groups: 1) The overall population; 2) Only the participants with firearm access; and 3) Only the participants without firearm access. RESULTS: Fourteen percent (2179/15,806) of the sample reported a firearm in the home or ability to access one within 24 hours. Overall, 6.8% of participants reported current suicidal ideation and 9.1% reported prior suicide attempt. Youth with firearm access had 1.52 times higher odds of current suicidal ideation and 1.61 times higher odds of prior suicide attempt compared to youth without firearm access. All included suicide risk factors were found to significantly increase the odds of current suicidal ideation and prior suicide attempt in the overall sample; this increase was similar in the groups with and without firearm access. CONCLUSIONS: Adolescents with firearm access have higher odds of suicidal ideation and prior attempt compared to those without firearm access, highlighting the need for universal ED-based screening for suicidality and lethal means.
Asunto(s)
Armas de Fuego , Niño , Humanos , Adolescente , Intento de Suicidio , Ideación Suicida , Violencia , Servicio de Urgencia en HospitalRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study evaluated trends and risk factors over time for self-reported gun carrying among freshman and sophomore public school students in Chicago, New York City and Los Angeles, chosen as high profile cities with different levels of firearm violence. METHODS: The study used four biennial waves (2007-2013) of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS), an anonymous, voluntary survey of public high school students. Analyses were restricted to freshman and sophomores given significant high school dropout rates among older students. School population weighted results are presented based on the YRBS complex survey design, including comparisons of reported gun carrying across survey waves and cities. A violence index was created from eight survey items that capture students' perceived threat level. Chi square tests and multivariable Poisson regression analyses were used to test the significance of differences across cities and over time in the likelihood of gun carrying controlling for sociodemographic characteristics, mental health risk factors and behavioral risk factors. RESULTS: The study included a total weighted population estimate of 1,137,449 students across the three cities and four survey waves. Mean self-reported gun carrying across all survey waves was 8.89% in Chicago, 4.09% in New York City, and 6.03% in Los Angeles (p < 0.001). There were no significant changes in gun carrying prevalence within each individual city over the survey waves. Multivariable Poisson regression estimates showed increased likelihood for gun carrying among males (IRR 1.41, CI 1.27-1.58), among non-Hispanic Blacks (IRR 1.26, CI 1.07-1.48), and among those who reported a higher violence index. Each additional violence index count increase was associated with a 1.74 times (CI 1.70-1.78) increased likelihood for gun carrying. CONCLUSIONS: There was a much higher self-reported rate of gun carrying and a higher burden of violence exposure in Chicago as compared to New York City and Los Angeles. Students' exposure to violence extended to other stressors illuminated by the YRBS including fighting, perceptions of safety, and other high-risk behaviors. Through the violence index we created, we are better able to categorize the most high-risk individuals and describe the magnitude of their increased likelihood to carry a gun.