Elevated plasma fibrinogen and diabetes mellitus are associated with lower inhibition of platelet reactivity with clopidogrel.

OBJECTIVES: The goal of this study was to identify factors associated with lower platelet inhibition (PI) with clopidogrel in subjects with cardiovascular disease (CVD). BACKGROUND: A heterogeneous platelet reactivity response to clopidogrel exists, and the clinical or biochemical predictors of suboptimal PI with clopidogrel remain unclear. METHODS: This study prospectively enrolled subjects with CVD requiring treatment with clopidogrel (75 mg daily for > or =7 days or 600-mg bolus > or =24 h before recruitment). A bedside rapid platelet function assay (VerifyNow, Acccumetrics, San Diego, California) to measure maximal and clopidogrel-mediated platelet reactivity was utilized, and factors associated with lower PI were identified. RESULTS: A heterogeneous, normally distributed PI (mean 40.8 +/- 26.2%) response to clopidogrel was observed in 157 subjects (age 67.2 +/- 12.2 years; 59.9% men). Multiple variable analysis of clinical and biochemical factors known to affect platelet reactivity revealed lower PI in patients with an elevated plasma fibrinogen level (> or =375 mg/dl), diabetes mellitus, and increased body mass index (BMI) (> or =25 kg/m(2)). On testing for interaction, elevated fibrinogen level was associated with diabetic status, resulting in lower PI in diabetic patients (23.9 +/- 3.9% vs. 45.1 +/- 4.5%, p < 0.001), but not nondiabetic patients (44.7 +/- 4.4% vs. 46.3 +/- 4.8%, p = 0.244). Increased BMI remained independently associated with lower PI after clopidogrel therapy regardless of diabetic status or fibrinogen level (36.8 +/- 9.0% vs. 49.0 +/- 7.0%, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma fibrinogen (> or =375 mg/dl) in the presence of diabetes mellitus and increased BMI (> or =25 kg/m(2)) are associated with lower PI with clopidogrel in patients with CVD.

Successful percutaneous treatment of acute bilateral lower limb ischemia.

Acute limb ischemia is a surgical emergency as a delay in reperfusion is associated with a high risk of irreversible tissue infarction potentially leading to limb loss and death. However, in medically compromised patients, perioperative morbidity and mortality remain high. An elderly woman with multiple comorbidities developed acute bilateral lower limb ischemia and was not felt to have a surgical revascularization option. Percutaneous restoration of reperfusion was successfully achieved by obtaining bilateral antegrade femoral arterial access followed by local infusion of fibrinolytic therapy and adjunctive thrombectomy resulting in bilateral lower extremity salvage.

Renal frame count and renal blush grade: quantitative measures that predict the success of renal stenting in hypertensive patients with renal artery stenosis.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to identify angiographic parameters of favorable clinical response to renal artery stenting. BACKGROUND: Stenting improves blood pressure (BP) control in patients with renal artery stenosis (RAS), but markers predicting a favorable clinical response are limited. METHODS: Renal perfusion was quantified in hypertensive patients (BP >or=140/90 mm Hg) without RAS by determining renal frame count (RFC) (angiographic frames [30 frames/s] for contrast to reach distal renal parenchyma after initial renal artery opacification) and renal blush grade (RBG) (0: none, 1: minimal, 2: normal, 3: hyperemic parenchymal blush). It was hypothesized that stenting unilateral RAS in hypertensive patients would result in decreased RFC and increased RBG, which might predict BP reduction. RESULTS: The RFC in 17 consecutive hypertensive patients without RAS (control group) (64.4 +/- 14.2 years, 12 male, 22 kidneys) was 20.1 +/- 5.4, whereas RBG was 2.33 +/- 0.66. In 24 consecutive hypertensive patients with unilateral RAS (study group) (72.7 +/- 11.3 years, 8 male), reduced RFC (26.6 +/- 9.1 to 21.4 +/- 6.7, p < 0.001) and increased RBG (1.63 +/- 0.71 to 2.13 +/- 0.85, p = 0.03) were observed after renal stenting. At 6 months, reduced BP (systolic BP 150.6 +/- 15.6 mm Hg to 128.6 +/- 15.5 mm Hg, p < 0.001; diastolic BP 77.2 +/- 15.6 mm Hg to 68.3 +/- 10.4 mm Hg, p = 0.022) without change in number of hypertensive medications was observed. Clinical responders (systolic BP reduction >15 mm Hg) had a greater decrease in RFC (7.7 +/- 4.6 vs. 1.7 +/- 5.1, p = 0.009) and 78.6% of patients with >4 RFC decrease were responders (p = 0.024). CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that quantitative indices of renal perfusion (RFC and RBG) are impaired in patients with RAS and improve after stenting, and that RFC reduction is associated with BP reduction.

Elevated plasma fibrinogen level predicts suboptimal response to therapy with both single- and double-bolus eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention.

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to determine the factors associated with suboptimal platelet inhibition (PI) with single- and double-bolus eptifibatide during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). BACKGROUND: Although PI > or = 95% measured 10 min after glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitor therapy is associated with improved outcomes following PCI, this level of PI often is not achieved. METHODS: We prospectively studied 150 patients undergoing PCI with single-bolus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg) (n = 100) and double-bolus eptifibatide (180 microg/kg administered 10 min apart) (n = 50) followed by standard infusion (2 microg/kg/min). Measuring platelet aggregation at baseline and at 10 min and 30 to 45 min after eptifibatide bolus, patients were classified as optimal responders (OPT) (> or =95% PI) or suboptimal responders (sub-OPT) (<95% PI) based on 10-min PI after final bolus. RESULTS: Suboptimal PI was achieved in 61% of patients with single-bolus eptifibatide and in 36% with double-bolus eptifibatide. In the single-bolus group, sub-OPT had higher fibrinogen levels (324 +/- 85 mg/dl vs. 259 +/- 49 mg/dl, p = 0.0002), platelet counts (221 +/- 70 vs. 186 +/- 47, p = 0.008), and white blood cell counts (7.7 +/- 2.3 vs. 6.6 +/- 1.9, p = 0.02). In the double-bolus group, sub-OPT also had higher fibrinogen levels (324 +/- 68 mg/dl vs. 278 +/- 53 mg/dl, p = 0.01) and were more likely to be smokers (38.9% vs. 9.4%, p = 0.01). Multivariable analysis showed that fibrinogen level was the only independent predictor of suboptimal PI, with fibrinogen cutoffs at 375 and 325 mg/dl predicting suboptimal PI (single-bolus: 100% and 90.0%, respectively; double-bolus: 100% and 60%, respectively) with both doses. CONCLUSIONS: During PCI, both single- and double-bolus eptifibatide provide suboptimal PI in a substantial proportion of patients. A fibrinogen level >375 mg/dl is a strong predictor of suboptimal PI.

Expanded applications of rotational atherectomy in contemporary coronary and peripheral interventional practice.

Percutaneous rotational atherectomy is mainly utilized in contemporary interventional practice to alter lesion compliance, facilitating stent delivery and antirestenotic drug delivery at the site of the underlying lesion. This enables a percutaneous revascularization strategy in a group of patients who would otherwise require a surgical revascularization. We identify and present three novel uses for this device in percutaneous coronary and peripheral interventional procedures, which further expands the applications of rotational atherectomy.

Severe ostial saphenous vein graft disease leading to acute coronary syndromes following proximal aorto-saphenous anastomoses with the symmetry bypass connector device: is it a suture device or a "stent"?

The Symmetry Bypass Connector (St. Jude Medical, St. Paul, Minnesota) is a nitinol, star-shaped device that was designed to facilitate placement of sutureless aorto-saphenous anastomoses during off-pump coronary artery bypass graft surgery (CABG). Although the device is approved for clinical use in Europe and the U.S., its short- and long-term safety and efficacy are not established. We report on 5 of 121 patients undergoing CABG who presented with an acute coronary syndrome two to five months following placement of this device. In each patient, all saphenous vein grafts (SVGs) placed (n = 11) with the device were totally occluded (n = 6) or compromised by ostial stenoses (n = 5). Treatment consisted of repeat CABG in one patient and percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in four patients with cutting balloon atherotomy and stenting. Following PCI, two of four patients presented again within two months with near-occlusive ostial restenosis in all stents placed. Intracoronary ultrasound showed severe neointimal hyperplasia, but only at the proximal interface of the device and stent. One patient was treated with brachytherapy in two SVGs but had a recurrence four months later and was treated with drug-eluting stents in both restenotic segments. Recalcitrant neointimal hyperplasia is postulated to be involved in the pathogenesis of anastomotic device stenosis, possibly similar to in-stent restenosis. Prospective randomized clinical trials are needed to assess the clinical safety and efficacy of this device. Pending such studies, consideration should be given in limiting its use to cases of unacceptably high risk of stroke during aortic cross-clamping. Dual antiplatelet agents, evaluation for ischemia, and close follow-up are warranted in patients that have already received the device.