Clinical feasibility of a commercially available MRI-only method for radiotherapy treatment planning of the brain.

BACKGROUND: Advancements in deep-learning based synthetic computed tomography (sCT) image conversion methods have enabled the development of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only based radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) of the brain. PURPOSE: This study evaluates the clinical feasibility of a commercial, deep-learning based MRI-only RTP method with respect to dose calculation and patient positioning verification performance in RTP of the brain. METHODS: Clinical validation of dose calculation accuracy was performed by a retrospective evaluation for 25 glioma and 25 brain metastasis patients. Dosimetric and image quality of the studied MRI-only RTP method was evaluated by a direct comparison of the sCT-based and computed tomography (CT)-based external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) images and treatment plans. Patient positioning verification accuracy of sCT images was evaluated retrospectively for 10 glioma and 10 brain metastasis patients based on clinical cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) imaging. RESULTS: An average mean dose difference of Dmean = 0.1% for planning target volume (PTV) and 0.6% for normal tissue (NT) structures were obtained for glioma patients. Respective results for brain metastasis patients were Dmean = 0.5% for PTVs and Dmean =1.0% for NTs. Global three-dimensional (3D) gamma pass rates using 2%/2 mm dose difference and distance-to-agreement (DTA) criterion were 98.0% for the glioma subgroup, and 95.2% for the brain metastasis subgroup using 1%/1 mm criterion. Mean distance differences of <1.0 mm were observed in all Cartesian directions between CT-based and sCT-based CBCT patient positioning in both subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: In terms of dose calculation and patient positioning accuracy, the studied MRI-only method demonstrated its clinical feasibility for RTP of the brain. The results encourage the use of the studied method as part of a routine clinical workflow.

Validation of HDR brachytherapy doses in the treatment of keloid scars using the egs_brachy Monte Carlo application.

Objective. Radiotherapy is a well-known alternative in the treatment of keloid scars to reduce the recurrence of scars. The purpose of this study was to investigate the feasibility and accuracy of dose delivered from a high-dose-rate (HDR) afterloaders in keloid scar brachytherapy using Monte Carlo (MC) simulations and measurements.Approach. Treatment doses and central axis dose profiles were measured using radiophotoluminescence dosimeters and radiochromic films, respectively, with two HDR afterloaders, both using an Ir-192 source, in a phantom made of solid water and polycarbonate sheets. The nominal treatment dose calculated by the AAPM Task Group No. 43 (TG-43) dose model was set to 8.5 Gy at a distance of 0.5 cm laterally from the middle of the source line located in a plastic applicator simulating a 15 cm long surgically removed scar treatment with 30 equally spaced (0.5 cm) source positions. The dose profiles were measured at three different distances from the applicator and the absolute doses at four points at different distances. MC simulations were performed using the egs_brachy, which is based on EGSnrc code system.Main results. The measured and simulated dose profiles match well, especially at 10.0 mm (difference <1%) and 15.0 mm depths (difference <4%), and with a small dose difference at 5.0 mm depth (difference <4%). Point dose measurements agreed well in the dose maximum area (difference <7%) with the simulated dose profiles, although the largest difference near the edge of the profile was <30%. The dose differences between the TG-43 dose model and the MC simulation were small (differences <4%).Significance. Simulated and measured dose levels at a depth of 0.5 cm showed that the nominal treatment dose can be achieved with the utilized setup. The measurement results of the absolute dose agree well with the corresponding simulation results.

Properties of IBA Razor Nano Chamber in small-field radiation therapy using 6 MV FF, 6 MV FFF, and 10 MV FFF photon beams.

BACKGROUND: Small megavoltage photon fields are increasingly used in modern radiotherapy techniques such as stereotactic radiotherapy. Therefore, it is important to study the reliability of dosimetry in the small-field conditions. The IBA Razor Nano Chamber (Nano chamber) ionization chamber is particularly intended for small-field measurements. In this work, properties of the Nano chamber were studied with both measurements and Monte Carlo (MC) simulations. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The measurements and MC simulations were performed with 6 MV, 6 MV FFF and 10 MV FFF photon beams from the Varian TrueBeam linear accelerator. The source-to-surface distance was fixed at 100 cm. The measurements and MC simulations included profiles, percentage depth doses (PDD), and output factors (OF) in square jaw-collimated fields. The MC simulations were performed with the EGSnrc software system in a large water phantom. RESULTS: The measured profiles and PDDs obtained with the Nano chamber were compared against IBA Razor Diode, PTW microDiamond and the PTW Semiflex ionization chamber. These results indicate that the Nano chamber is a high-resolution detector and thus suitable for small field profile measurements down to field sizes 2 × 2 cm2 and appropriate for the PDD measurements. The field output correction factors kQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr and field OFs ΩQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr were determined according to TRS-483 protocol In the 6 MV FF and FFF beams, the determined correction factors kQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr were within 1.2% for the field sizes of 1 × 1 cm2-3 × 3 cm2 and the experimental and MC defined field output factors ΩQclin,Qmsrfclin,fmsr showed good agreement. CONCLUSION: The Nano chamber with its small cavity volume is a potential detector for the small-field dosimetry. In this study, the properties of this detector were characterized with measurements and MC simulations. The determined correction factors kQclin, Qmsrfclin, fmsr are novel results for the NC in the TrueBeam fields.

Clinical experience and cost evaluation of magnetic resonance imaging -only workflow in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: In radiation therapy (RT), significant improvements have been made recently particularly in the practices of planning imaging. This study aimed to conduct a cost evaluation between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) -only and combined computed tomography (CT) and MRI workflows. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The time-driven activity-based costing (TDABC) model was used to conduct a cost evaluation between the two workflows in those steps, where cost differences were expected. Costs were divided into capital costs and operational costs. The former consisted of fixed, one-time expenses, e.g. the purchase of a scanner, whereas the latter were partially based on the amount of activity consumed i.e. time required for image acquisition, image registration and structure contouring. RESULTS: In a review over a period of 10 years for 300 annual prostate cancer patients, the total cost of the workflow steps included in the study for an individual patient applying the MRI-only workflow was 903 € (100%), comprised of 537 € (59%) capital costs and 366 € (41%) operational costs. The corresponding total cost for an individual patient applying the CT + MRI workflow was 922 € (100%), comprised of 197 € (21%) capital costs and 726 € (79%) operational costs. In 10 years for 3000 patients, a total saving of 58,544 € (2%) was achieved with the MRI-only workflow compared with the dual imaging workflow. CONCLUSIONS: MRI-only workflow is a feasible and economic way to perform clinical RT for localized prostate cancer, in particular for medium- and large-sized departments treating a sufficient number of patients.

Dose-area product ratio in external small-beam radiotherapy: beam shape, size and energy dependencies in clinical photon beams.

In small-field radiotherapy (RT), a significant challenge is to define the amount of radiation dose absorbed in the patient where the quality of the beam has to be measured with high accuracy. The properties of a proposed new beam quality specifier, namely the dose-area-product ratio at 20 and 10 cm depths in water or DAPR20,10, were studied to yield more information on its feasibility over the conventional quality specifier tissue-phantom ratio or TPR20,10. The DAPR20,10may be measured with a large-area ionization chamber (LAC) instead of small volume chambers or semi-conductors where detector, beam and water phantom positioning and beam perturbations introduce uncertainties. The effects of beam shape, size and energy on the DAPR20,10were studied and it was shown that the DAPR20,10increases with increasing beam energy similarly to TPR20,10but in contrast exhibits a small beam size and shape dependence. The beam profile outside the beam limiting devices has been shown to have a large contribution to the DAPR20,10. There is potential in large area chambers to be used in DAPR measurement and its use in dosimetry of small-beam RT for beam quality measurements.

A multi-institutional analysis of a general pelvis continuous Hounsfield unit synthetic CT software for radiotherapy.

PURPOSE: To validate a synthetic computed tomography (sCT) software with continuous HUs and large field-of-view (FOV) coverage for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-only workflow of general pelvis anatomy in radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: An sCT software for general pelvis anatomy (prostate, rectum, and female pelvis) has been developed by Philips Healthcare and includes continuous HUs assignment along with large FOV coverage. General pelvis sCTs were generated using a two-stack T1-weighted mDixon fast-field echo (FFE) sequence with a superior-inferior coverage of 36 cm. Seventy-seven prostate, 43 rectum, and 27 gynecological cases were scanned by three different institutions. mDixon image quality and sCTs were evaluated for soft tissue contrast by using a confidence level scale from 1 to 5 for bladder, prostate/rectum interface, mesorectum, and fiducial maker visibility. Dosimetric comparison was performed by recalculating the RT plans on the sCT after rigid registration. For 12 randomly selected cases, the mean absolute error (MAE) between sCT and CT was calculated to evaluate HU similarity, and the Pearson correlation coefficients (PCC) between the CT- and sCT-generated digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) were obtained for quantitative comparison. To examine geometric accuracy of sCT as a reference for cone beam CT (CBCT), the difference between bone-based alignment of CBCT to CT and CBCT to sCT was obtained for 19 online-acquired CBCTs from three patients. RESULTS: Two-stack mDixon scans with large FOV did not show any image inhomogeneity or fat-water swap artifact. Fiducials, Foley catheter, and even rectal spacer were visible as dark signal on the sCT. Average visibility confidence level (average ± standard deviation) on the sCT was 5.0 ± 0.0, 4.6 ± 0.5, 3.8 ± 0.4, and 4.0 ± 1.1 for bladder, prostate/rectum interface, mesorectum and fiducial markers. Dosimetric accuracy showed on average < 1% difference with the CT-based plans for target and normal structures. The MAE of bone and soft tissue between the sCT and CT are 120.9 ± 15.4 HU, 33.4 ± 4.1 HU, respectively. Average PCC of all evaluated DRR pairs was 0.975. The average offset between CT and sCT as reference was (LR, AP, SI) = (0.19 ± 0.35, 0.14 ± 0.60, 0.44 ± 0.54) mm. CONCLUSIONS: The continuous HU sCT software-generated realistic sCTs and DRRs to enable MRI-only planning for general pelvis anatomy.

A Deep Learning-Based Automated CT Segmentation of Prostate Cancer Anatomy for Radiation Therapy Planning-A Retrospective Multicenter Study.

A commercial deep learning (DL)-based automated segmentation tool (AST) for computed tomography (CT) is evaluated for accuracy and efficiency gain within prostate cancer patients. Thirty patients from six clinics were reviewed with manual- (MC), automated- (AC) and automated and edited (AEC) contouring methods. In the AEC group, created contours (prostate, seminal vesicles, bladder, rectum, femoral heads and penile bulb) were edited, whereas the MC group included empty datasets for MC. In one clinic, lymph node CTV delineations were evaluated for interobserver variability. Compared to MC, the mean time saved using the AST was 12 min for the whole data set (46%) and 12 min for the lymph node CTV (60%), respectively. The delineation consistency between MC and AEC groups according to the Dice similarity coefficient (DSC) improved from 0.78 to 0.94 for the whole data set and from 0.76 to 0.91 for the lymph nodes. The mean DSCs between MC and AC for all six clinics were 0.82 for prostate, 0.72 for seminal vesicles, 0.93 for bladder, 0.84 for rectum, 0.69 for femoral heads and 0.51 for penile bulb. This study proves that using a general DL-based AST for CT images saves time and improves consistency.

Assessment of MRI-Based Attenuation Correction for MRI-Only Radiotherapy Treatment Planning of the Brain.

Magnetic resonance imaging-only radiotherapy treatment planning (MRI-only RTP) and positron emission tomography (PET)-MRI imaging require generation of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images from MRI images. In this study, initial dosimetric evaluation was performed for a previously developed MRI-based attenuation correction (MRAC) method for use in MRI-only RTP of the brain. MRAC-based sCT images were retrospectively generated from Dixon MR images of 20 patients who had previously received external beam radiation therapy (EBRT). Bone segmentation performance and Dice similarity coefficient of the sCT conversion method were evaluated for bone volumes on CT images. Dose calculation accuracy was assessed by recalculating the CT-based EBRT plans using the sCT images as the base attenuation data. Dose comparison was done for the sCT- and CT-based EBRT plans in planning target volume (PTV) and organs at risk (OAR). Parametric dose comparison showed mean relative differences of <0.4% for PTV and <1.0% for OARs. Mean gamma index pass rates of 95.7% with the 2%/2 mm agreement criterion and 96.5% with the 1%/1 mm agreement criterion were determined for glioma and metastasis patients, respectively. Based on the results, MRI-only RTP using sCT images generated from MRAC images can be a feasible alternative for radiotherapy of the brain.

Validation of automated magnetic resonance image segmentation for radiation therapy planning in prostate cancer.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in radiation therapy planning of prostate cancer (PC) to reduce target volume delineation uncertainty. This study aimed to assess and validate the performance of a fully automated segmentation tool (AST) in MRI based radiation therapy planning of PC. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Pelvic structures of 65 PC patients delineated in an MRI-only workflow according to established guidelines were included in the analysis. Automatic vs manual segmentation by an experienced oncologist was compared with geometrical parameters, such as the dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Fifteen patients had a second MRI within 15 days to assess repeatability of the AST for prostate and seminal vesicles. Furthermore, we investigated whether hormonal therapy or body mass index (BMI) affected the AST results. RESULTS: The AST showed high agreement with manual segmentation expressed as DSC (mean, SD) for delineating prostate (0.84, 0.04), bladder (0.92, 0.04) and rectum (0.86, 0.04). For seminal vesicles (0.56, 0.17) and penile bulb (0.69, 0.12) the respective agreement was moderate. Performance of AST was not influenced by neoadjuvant hormonal therapy, although those on treatment had significantly smaller prostates than the hormone-naïve patients (p < 0.0001). In repeat assessment, consistency of prostate delineation resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, (SD 0.03) between the paired MRI scans for AST, while mean DSC of manual delineation was 0.82, (SD 0.05). CONCLUSION: Fully automated MRI segmentation tool showed good agreement and repeatability compared with manual segmentation and was found clinically robust in patients with PC. However, manual review and adjustment of some structures in individual cases remain important in clinical use.

MRI-based IMPT planning for prostate cancer.

PURPOSE: Treatment planning for proton therapy requires the relative proton stopping power ratio (RSP) information of the patient for accurate dose calculations. RSP are conventionally obtained after mapping of the Hounsfield units (HU) from a calibrated patient computed tomography (CT). One or multiple CT are needed for a given treatment which represents additional, undesired dose to the patient. For prostate cancer, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans are the gold standard for segmentation while offering dose-less imaging. We here quantify the clinical applicability of converted MR images as a substitute for intensity modulated proton therapy (IMPT) treatment of the prostate. METHODS: MRCAT (Magnetic Resonance for Calculating ATtenuation) is a Philips-developed technology which produces a synthetic CT image consisting of five HU from a specific set of MRI acquisitions. MRCAT and original planning CT data sets were obtained for ten patients. An IMPT plan was generated on the MRCAT for each patient. Plans were produced such that they fulfill the prostate protocol in use at Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH). The plans were then recomputed onto the nominal planning CT for each patient. Robustness analyses (±5 mm setup shifts and ±3.5 % range uncertainties) were also performed. RESULTS: Comparison of MRCAT plans and their recomputation onto the planning CT plan showed excellent agreement. Likewise, dose perturbations due to setup shifts and range uncertainties were well within clinical acceptance demonstrating the clinical viability of the approach. CONCLUSIONS: This work demonstrate the clinical acceptability of substituting MR converted RSP images instead of CT for IMPT planning of prostate cancer. This further translates into higher contouring accuracy along with lesser imaging dose.

Quality assurance measurements of geometric accuracy for magnetic resonance imaging-based radiotherapy treatment planning.

BACKGROUND: Using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as the only imaging method for radiotherapy treatment planning (RTP) is becoming more common as MRI-only RTP solutions have evolved. The geometric accuracy of MR images is an essential factor of image quality when determining the suitability of MRI for RTP. The need is therefore clear for clinically feasible quality assurance (QA) methods for the geometric accuracy measurement. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This work evaluates long-term stability of geometric accuracy and the validity of a 2D geometric accuracy QA method compared to a prototype 3D method and analysis software in routine QA. The long-term follow-up measurements were conducted on one of the 1.5 T scanners over a period of 19 months using both methods. Inter-scanner variability of geometric distortions was also evaluated in three 1.5 T and three 3 T MRI scanners from a single vendor by using the prototype 3D QA method. RESULTS: The geometric accuracy of the magnetic resonance for radiotherapy (MR-RT) platform remained stable within 2 mm at distances of <250 mm from isocenter. All scanners achieved good geometric accuracy with mean geometric distortions of <1 mm at <150 mm and <2 mm at <250 mm from the isocenter. Both measurement methods provided relevant information about geometric distortions. CONCLUSIONS: Geometric distortions are often considered a limitation of MRI-only RTP. Results indicate that geometric accuracy of modern scanners remain within acceptable limits by default even after many years of clinical use based on the 3D QA evaluation.

Commissioning of the MultiRad 350 cell and small animal x-ray irradiation system.

PURPOSE: The main objective of this study was to commission a commercial x-ray irradiation system to be used for cell and small animal studies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Evaluated characteristics of an x-ray irradiator included dose linearity and dose repeatability with respect to time, x-ray beam profiles, light field to irradiation field agreement and absolute radiation dose. Radiochromic films, ionization chambers and radiophotoluminescence dosimeters were used for dosimetry and the maximum settings of the irradiator were applied. RESULTS: The dose was linear with time using several voltage settings and the dose repeatability with time was within 5% beyond 15 s of irradiation time. The x-ray beam profiles were acceptable, flatness being less than 4%. The light field to irradiation field agreement appeared to have a maximum difference of 0.5 cm; the irradiation field being closer to the irradiator's door than the light field. CONCLUSIONS: The MultiRad 350 x-ray irradiation system can be used in a safe and controlled manner for irradiating cells and small animals. However, the user should be careful to verify the filter position prior the irradiation.

Assessment of dosimetric and positioning accuracy of a magnetic resonance imaging-only solution for external beam radiotherapy of pelvic anatomy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: The clinical feasibility of synthetic computed tomography (sCT) images derived from magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) images for external beam radiation therapy (EBRT) planning have been studied and adopted into clinical use recently. This paper evaluates the dosimetric and positioning performance of a sCT approach for different pelvic cancers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five patients receiving EBRT at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland) were enrolled in the study. The sCT images were generated as part of a clinical MRI-simulation procedure. Dose calculation accuracy was assessed by comparing the sCT-based calculation with a CT-based calculation. In addition, we evaluated the patient position verification accuracy for both digitally reconstructed radiograph (DRR) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) -based image guidance using a subset of the cohort. Furthermore, the relevance of using continuous Hounsfield unit values was assessed. RESULTS: The mean (standard deviation) relative dose difference in the planning target volume mean dose computed over various cancer groups was less than 0.2 (0.4)% between sCT and CT. Among all groups, the average minimum gamma-index pass-rates were better than 95% with a 2%/2mm gamma-criteria. The difference between sCT- and CT-DRR-based patient positioning was less than 0.3 (1.4) mm in all directions. The registrations of sCT to CBCT produced similar results as compared with CT to CBCT registrations. CONCLUSIONS: The use of sCT for clinical EBRT dose calculation and patient positioning in the investigated types of pelvic cancers was dosimetrically and geometrically accurate for clinical use.

Compass model-based quality assurance for stereotactic VMAT treatment plans.

PURPOSE: To use Compass as a model-based quality assurance (QA) tool for stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) and stereotactic radiation therapy (SRT) volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) treatment plans calculated with Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty clinical stereotactic VMAT SBRT and SRT treatment plans were blindly selected for evaluation. Those plans included four different treatment sites: prostate, brain, lung and body. The plans were evaluated against dose-volume histogram (DVH) parameters and 2D and 3D gamma analysis. The dose calculated with Eclipse treatment planning system (TPS) was compared to Compass calculated dose (CCD) and Compass reconstructed dose (CRD). RESULTS: The maximum differences in mean dose of planning target volume (PTV) were 2.7 ±â€¯1.0% between AAA and Acuros XB calculation algorithm TPS dose, -7.6 ±â€¯3.5% between Eclipse TPS dose and CCD dose and -5.9 ±â€¯3.7% between Eclipse TPS dose and CRD dose for both Eclipse calculation algorithms, respectively. 2D gamma analysis was not able to identify all the cases that 3D gamma analysis specified for further verification. CONCLUSIONS: Compass is suitable for QA of SBRT and SRT treatment plans. However, the QA process should include wide set of DVH-based dose parameters and 3D gamma analysis should be the preferred method when performing clinical patient QA. The results suggest that the Compass should not be used for smaller field sizes than 3 × 3 cm2 or the beam model should be adjusted separately for both small (FS ≤ 3 cm) and large (FS > 3 cm) field sizes.

Magnetic resonance-only simulation and dose calculation in external beam radiation therapy: a feasibility study for pelvic cancers.

BACKGROUND: The clinical feasibility of using pseudo-computed tomography (pCT) images derived from magnetic resonance (MR) images for external bean radiation therapy (EBRT) planning for prostate cancer patients has been well demonstrated. This paper investigates the feasibility of applying an MR-derived, pCT planning approach to additional types of cancer in the pelvis. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Fifteen patients (five prostate cancer patients, five rectal cancer patients, and five gynecological cancer patients) receiving EBRT at Turku University Hospital (Turku, Finland) were included in the study. Images from an MRCAT (Magnetic Resonance for Calculating ATtenuation, Philips, Vantaa, Finland) pCT method were generated as a part of a clinical MR-simulation procedure. Dose calculation accuracy was assessed by comparing the pCT-based calculation with a CT-based calculation. In addition, the degree of geometric accuracy was studied. RESULTS: The median relative difference of PTV mean dose between CT and pCT images was within 0.8% for all tumor types. When assessing the tumor site-specific accuracy, the median [range] relative dose differences to the PTV mean were 0.7 [-0.11;1.05]% for the prostate cases, 0.3 [-0.25;0.57]% for the rectal cases, and 0.09 [-0.69;0.25]% for the gynecological cancer cases. System-induced geometric distortion was measured to be less than 1 mm for all PTV volumes and the effect on the PTV median dose was less than 0.1%. CONCLUSIONS: According to the comparison, using pCT for clinical EBRT planning and dose calculation in the three investigated types of pelvic cancers is feasible. Further studies are required to demonstrate the applicability to a larger cohort of patients.

Measurement and properties of the dose-area product ratio in external small-beam radiotherapy.

In small-beam radiation therapy (RT) the measurement of the beam quality parameter, i.e. the tissue-phantom ratio or TPR20,10, using a conventional point detector is a challenge. To obtain reliable results, one has to consider potential sources of error, including volume averaging and adjustment of the point detector into the narrow beam. To overcome these challenges, a different type of beam quality parameter in small beams was studied, namely the dose-area product ratio, or DAPR20,10. With this method, the measurement of a dose-area product (DAP) using a large-area plane-parallel chamber (LAC) eliminates the uncertainties in detector positioning and volume averaging that are present when using a point detector. In this study, the properties of the DAPR20,10 of a cone-collimated 6 MV photon beam were investigated using Monte Carlo (MC) calculations and the obtained values were compared to measurements obtained using two LAC detectors, PTW Type 34073 and PTW Type 34070. In addition, the possibility of determining the DAP using EBT3 film and a Razor diode detector was studied. The determination of the DAPR20,10 value was found to be feasible in external small-beam radiotherapy using cone-collimated beams with diameters from 4-40 mm, based on the results of the two LACs, the MC calculations and the Razor diode. The measurements indicated a constant DAPR20,10 value for fields 20-40 mm in diameter, with a maximum relative change of 0.6%, but an increase of 7.0% for fields from 20-4 mm in diameter for the PTW Type 34070 chamber. Simulations and measurements showed an increase of DAPR20,10 with increasing LAC size or dose integral area for the studied 4-40 mm cone-collimated 6 MV photon beams. This has the consequence that there should be a reference to the size of the used LAC active area or the DAP integration area with the reported DAPR20,10 value.

Dosimetric Comparison and Evaluation of 4 Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy Techniques for the Treatment of Prostate Cancer.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to compare dosimetric characteristics, monitor unit, and delivery efficiency of 4 different stereotactic body radiotherapy techniques for the treatment of prostate cancer. METHODS: This study included 8 patients with localized prostate cancer. Dosimetric assets of 4 delivery techniques for stereotactic body radiotherapy were evaluated: robotic CyberKnife, noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy, and 2 intensity-modulated arc therapy techniques (RapidArc and Elekta volumetric-modulated arc therapy). All the plans had equal treatment margins and a prescription dose of 35 Gy in 5 fractions. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences were observed in homogeneity index and mean doses of bladder wall and penile bulb, all of which were highest with CyberKnife. No significant differences were observed in the mean doses of rectum, with values of 15.2 ± 2.6, 13.3 ± 2.6, 13.1 ± 2.8, and 13.8 ± 1.6 Gy with CyberKnife, RapidArc, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy, respectively. The highest dose conformity was realized with RapidArc. The dose coverage of the planning target volume was lowest with noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy. Treatment times and number of monitor units were largest with CyberKnife (on average 34.0 ± 5.0 minutes and 8704 ± 1449 monitor units) and least with intensity-modulated arc therapy techniques (on average 5.1 ± 1.1 minutes and 2270 ± 497 monitor units). CONCLUSION: Compared to CyberKnife, the RapidArc, volumetric-modulated arc therapy, and noncoplanar intensity-modulated radiotherapy produced treatment plans with similar dosimetric quality, with RapidArc achieving the highest dose conformity. Overall, the dosimetric differences between the studied techniques were marginal, and thus, the choice of the technique should rather focus on the delivery accuracies and dose delivery times.

Toward a more patient-specific model of post-radiotherapy saliva secretion for head and neck cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Reduction of saliva secretion is a common side effect following radiotherapy (RT) for cancer of the head and neck region. The aim of this study is to predict the post-RT salivary function for individual patients prior to treatment and to recognise possible differences in individual radiosensitivity. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A predictive model for post-RT salivary function was validated for 64 head and neck cancer patients. The input parameters for the model were salivary excretion fraction (sEF) measured by 99mTc-pertechnetate scintigraphy, total stimulated salivary flow and mean absorbed dose for the major salivary glands. SEF values after RT relative to the baseline before RT (rEF) were compared among the patients using the distance ΔrEF between single gland rEF and the corresponding expected value at the dose response curve. RESULTS: A significant correlation (R = 0.86, p = 0.018) was found between the modelled and the measured values of stimulated salivary flow six months after RT. The average prediction error for the saliva flow rate was 6 ml/15 min. A linear relationship between ΔrEF for the left and the right parotid glands was observed both six (R = 0.53) and 12 (R = 0.79) months after RT. The average of absolute values of ΔrEF was 0.20 for parotid glands and 0.22 for submandibular glands. CONCLUSIONS: The salivary flow model was validated for 64 patients. The results imply, that one explanation for the discrepancies between the predicted and the measured salivary flow rate values and the common variations found in ΔrEF for the parotid glands may be differences in patients' individual response to radiation. However, quantitative extraction of individual radiosensitivity would require further studies in order to take it into account in predictive models.

Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for image-guided radiotherapy of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography or planar localization images.

PURPOSE: This study introduces methods to conduct image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) of the pelvis with either cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT) or planar localization images by relying solely on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based reference images. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Feasibility of MRI-based reference images for IGRT was evaluated against kV CBCT (50 scans, 5 prostate cancer patients) and kV & MV planar (5 & 5 image pairs and patients) localization images by comparing the achieved patient position corrections to those obtained by standard CT-based reference images. T1/T2*-weighted in-phase MRI, Hounsfield unit conversion-based heterogeneous pseudo-CT, and bulk pseudo-CT images were applied for reference against localization CBCTs, and patient position corrections were obtained by automatic image registration. IGRT with planar localization images was performed manually by 10 observers using reference digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) reconstructed from the pseudo-CTs and standard CTs. Quality of pseudo-DRRs against CT-DRRs was evaluated with image similarity metrics. RESULTS: The SDs of differences between CBCT-to-MRI and CBCT-to-CT automatic gray-value registrations were ≤1.0 mm & ≤0.8° and ≤2.5 mm & ≤3.6° with 10 cm diameter cubic VOI and prostate-shaped VOI, respectively. The corresponding values for reference heterogeneous pseudo-CT were ≤1.0 mm & ≤0.7° and ≤2.2 mm & ≤3.3°, respectively. Heterogeneous pseudo-CT was the only type of MRI-based reference image working reliably with automatic bone registration (SDs were ≤0.9 mm & ≤0.7°). The differences include possible residual errors from planning CT to MRI registration. The image similarity metrics were significantly (p≤0.01) better in agreement between heterogeneous pseudo-DRRs and CT-DRRs than between bulk pseudo-DRRs and CT-DRRs. The SDs of differences in manual registrations (3D) with planar kV and MV localization images were ≤1.0 mm and ≤1.7 mm, respectively, between heterogeneous pseudo-DRRs and CT-DRRs, and ≤1.4 mm and ≤2.1 mm between bulk pseudo-DRRs and CT-DRRs. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrated that it is feasible to conduct IGRT of the pelvis with MRI-based reference images.