RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Higher self-reported disability (high Health Assessment Questionnaire [HAQ] score) has been associated with hospitalizations and mortality in established rheumatoid arthritis (RA), but associations in early RA are unknown. METHODS: Patients with early RA (symptom duration <1 year) enrolled in the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort who initiated disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and had completed HAQ data at baseline and 1 year were included in the study. Discrete-time proportional hazards models were used to estimate crude and multi-adjusted associations of baseline HAQ and HAQ at 1 year with all-cause mortality in each year of follow-up. RESULTS: A total of 1,724 patients with early RA were included. The mean age was 55 years, and 72% were women. Over 10 years, 62 deaths (3.6%) were recorded. Deceased patients had higher HAQ scores at baseline (mean ± SD 1.2 ± 0.7) and at 1 year (0.9 ± 0.7) than living patients (1.0 ± 0.7 and 0.5 ± 0.6, respectively; P < 0.001). Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) was higher in deceased versus living patients at baseline (mean ± SD 5.4 ± 1.3 versus 4.9 ± 1.4) and at 1 year (mean ± SD 3.6 ± 1.4 versus 2.8 ± 1.4) (P < 0.001). Older age, male sex, lower education level, smoking, more comorbidities, higher baseline DAS28, and glucocorticoid use were associated with mortality. Contrary to HAQ score at baseline, the association between all-cause mortality and HAQ score at 1 year remained significant even after adjustment for confounders. For baseline HAQ score, the unadjusted hazard ratio (HR) was 1.46 (95% confidence interval [95% CI] 1.02-2.09), and the adjusted HR was 1.25 (95% CI 0.81-1.94). For HAQ score at 1 year, the unadjusted HR was 2.58 (95% CI 1.78-3.72), and the adjusted HR was 1.75 (95% CI 1.10-2.77). CONCLUSION: Our findings indicate that higher HAQ score and DAS28 at 1 year are significantly associated with all-cause mortality in a large early RA cohort.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Estado Funcional , Mortalidad , Autoinforme , Actividades Cotidianas , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Canadá , Causas de Muerte , Escolaridad , Femenino , Glucocorticoides/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Indígena Canadiense , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Factores Sexuales , Fumar/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Población BlancaRESUMEN
Objective: SB4, SB2, and SB5 are biosimilars of etanercept (ETN), infliximab (INF), and adalimumab (ADA), respectively. This pooled analysis evaluated the immunogenicity of these treatments across three phase III randomized controlled trials of patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA). Methods: Patients had to have at least one anti-drug antibody (ADAb) assessment up to the time of the primary endpoint from each study (week 24 in SB4 and SB5 studies; week 30 in SB2 study). The effect of ADAbs on American College of Rheumatology 20% (ACR20) response and the incidences of injection-site reactions (ISRs)/infusion-related reactions (IRRs) were evaluated. Results: The study included 1709 patients. The cumulative incidences of ADAbs were 30.3% in the all-treatments-combined group, 29.1% in the biosimilars combined group, and 31.5% in the reference products combined group. ACR20 response rates were significantly lower in ADAb-positive patients in the all-treatments-combined [odds ratio (95% confidence interval) 1.77 (1.37, 2.27), p < 0.0001], biosimilars combined [2.24 (1.53, 3.30), p < 0.0001], and reference products combined [1.49 (1.06, 2.09), p = 0.0225] groups. ADAb-positive patients also had a higher likelihood of developing ISRs/IRRs in the all-treatments-combined group [0.56 (0.31, 1.01), p = 0.0550], predominantly due to the results observed with SB2 + INF combined rather than with SB4 + ETN or SB5 + ADA combined. Conclusion: In this pooled analysis, ADAbs were associated with reduced efficacy in patients with RA treated with biosimilars (SB4, SB2, and SB5) or their reference products (ETN, INF, and ADA). ADAbs were associated with an increased incidence of ISRs/IRRs in those treated with SB2 + INF. Clinical trial registration numbers: NCT01936181 (SB2 study), NCT01895309 (SB4 study), and NCT02167139 (SB5 study).
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Etanercept/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/uso terapéutico , Adalimumab/efectos adversos , Adalimumab/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Anticuerpos , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/efectos adversos , Etanercept/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Infliximab/efectos adversos , Infliximab/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Inhibidores del Factor de Necrosis Tumoral/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This multicenter incident cohort aimed to characterize how often early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) patients self-report episodic joint inflammation (palindromic rheumatism) preceding ERA diagnosis and which characteristics differentiate these patients from those without prior episodic symptoms. METHODS: Data were from patients with early confirmed or suspected RA (more than 6 weeks and less than 12 months) enrolled in the Canadian Early ArThritis CoHort (CATCH) between April 2017 to March 2018 who completed study case report forms assessing joint pain and swelling prior to ERA diagnosis. Chi-square and t tests were used to compare characteristics of patients with and without self-reported episodic joint inflammation prior to ERA diagnosis. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify sociodemographic and clinical measures associated with past episodic joint inflammation around the time of ERA diagnosis. RESULTS: A total of 154 ERA patients were included; 66% were female, and mean (SD) age and RA symptom duration were 54 (15) years and 141 (118) days. Sixty-five (42%) ERA patients reported a history of episodic joint pain and swelling, half of whom reported that these symptoms preceded ERA diagnosis by over 6 months. ERA patients with past episodic joint inflammation were more often female, had higher income, were seropositive, had more comorbidities, fewer swollen joints, and lower Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) around the time of ERA diagnosis (P < 0.05). These associations remained significant in multivariable regression adjusting for other sociodemographic and RA clinical measures. CONCLUSION: Almost half of ERA patients experienced episodic joint inflammation prior to ERA diagnosis. These patients were more often female, had higher income, and presented with milder disease activity at ERA diagnosis.
RESUMEN
Objective: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) prevalence in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) is conflicting. The impact of sex, including menopause, has not been described. We estimated the prevalence and factors associated with MetS in men and women with ERA. Methods: A cross-sectional study of the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) was performed. Participants with baseline data to estimate key MetS components were included. Sex-stratified logistic regression identified baseline variables associated with MetS. Results: The sample included 1543 participants; 71% were female and the mean age was 54 (SD 15) years. MetS prevalence was higher in men 188 (42%) than women 288 (26%, P < 0.0001) and increased with age. Frequent MetS components in men were hypertension (62%), impaired glucose tolerance (IGT, 40%), obesity (36%), and low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (36%). Postmenopausal women had greater frequency of hypertension (65%), IGT (32%), and high triglycerides (21%) compared with premenopausal women (P < 0.001). In multivariate analysis, MetS was negatively associated with seropositivity and pulmonary disease in men. Increasing age was associated with MetS in women. In postmenopausal women, corticosteroid use was associated with MetS. Psychiatric comorbidity was associated with MetS in premenopausal women. MetS status was not explained by disease activity or core RA measures. Conclusion: The characteristics and associations of MetS differed in men and women with ERA. Sex differences, including postmenopausal status, should be considered in comorbidity screening. With this knowledge, the interplay of MetS, sex, and RA therapeutic response on cardiovascular outcomes should be investigated.
RESUMEN
This study aims to compare characteristics between late-onset rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and young-onset RA and determine the association between age at disease onset and disease severity. We cross-sectionally studied 971 patients at the time of entry into the Ontario Best Practices Research Initiative, a registry of RA patients followed up in routine care. We restricted patients to ≤5 years of disease duration. Late-onset RA was defined as an onset ≥60 years of age and young-onset RA <60 years. Group differences were compared, and multivariate linear regression models were used to test the influence of age at onset on Disease Activity Score in 28 Joints with erythrocyte sedimentation rate (DAS28-ESR), Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), and Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) scores. The swollen joint count (6.2 vs. 5.3), acute phase reactants (C-reactive protein (CRP) 17.4 vs. 11.8 mg/L, ESR 30.6 vs. 21.5 mm/h), and comorbidity burden were higher in late-onset RA compared to young-onset RA (p < 0.01). Mean DAS28-ESR (4.6 vs. 4.3) and HAQ (1.2 vs. 1.1) scores were higher in late-onset RA patients (p < 0.05). Late-onset RA patients received more initial disease-modifying antirheumatic drug (DMARD) monotherapy and corticosteroids in comparison to greater DMARD/biologic combination therapy in young-onset RA patients (p < 0.05). Adjusted multivariate analyses showed that late-onset RA was independently associated with higher mean DAS28-ESR and HAQ scores, but not CDAI. Late-onset RA patients have greater disease activity that may contribute to disability early in the disease course. Despite this, initial treatment consists of less combination DMARD and biologic use in late-onset RA patients. This may have implications for future response to therapy and development of joint damage, disability, and comorbidities in this group.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico , Personas con Discapacidad , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Edad de Inicio , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Sistema de Registros , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
The introduction of targeted biological therapies has revolutionised the management of immune-mediated inflammatory diseases (IMIDs) such as rheumatoid arthritis, ankylosing spondylitis, psoriasis and inflammatory bowel disease. Following treatment with these therapies, many patients experience significant improvements in different aspects of their disease, including symptoms, work productivity and other outcomes relevant for individuals and society. However, due to the complexity of biological drug development and manufacturing processes, the costs of these therapies are relatively high. Indeed, the financial burden on healthcare systems due to biological therapies is considerable and lack of patient access to effective treatment remains a concern in many parts of the world. As many reference biological therapies have now reached or are near to patent expiry, a number of 'biosimilar' drugs have been developed for use in various clinical settings, and some of these drugs are already in use in several countries. While the potential pharmacoeconomic benefits of cost-effective biosimilars seem clear, several issues have been raised regarding, for example, the definition of biosimilarity and the validity of indication extrapolation, as well as the 'switchability' and relative immunogenicity of biosimilars and their reference drugs. In this review, these issues will be discussed with reference to CT-P13, a biosimilar of the anti-tumour necrosis factor monoclonal antibody infliximab, which is approved in Europe and elsewhere for the treatment of various IMIDs. Other important issues, including those related to data collection during nonclinical and clinical development of biosimilars, are also discussed.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Biosimilares Farmacéuticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades del Sistema Inmune/terapia , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/inmunología , Humanos , Inflamación/terapia , Infliximab/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Simplified measures to quantify rheumatoid arthritis (RA) disease activity are increasingly used. The minimum clinically important differences (MCID) for some measures, such as the Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI), have not been well-defined in real-world clinic settings, especially for early RA patients with low/moderate disease activity. METHODS: Data from Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort patients were used to examine absolute change in CDAI in the first year after enrollment, stratified by disease activity. MCID cut points were derived to optimize the sum of sensitivity and specificity versus the gold standard of patient self-reported improvement or worsening. Sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive values, and negative predictive values were calculated against patient self-reported improvement (gold standard) and for change in pain, Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ), and Disease Activity Score in 28 joints (DAS28) improvement. Discrimination was examined using the area under receiver operator curves. Similar methods were used to evaluate MCIDs for worsening for patients who achieved low disease activity. RESULTS: A total of 578 patients (mean ± SD age 54.1 ± 15.3 years, 75% women, median [interquartile range] disease duration 5.3 [3.3, 8.0] months) contributed 1,169 visit pairs to the improvement analysis. The MCID cut points for improvement were 12 (patients starting in high disease activity: CDAI >22), 6 (moderate: CDAI 10-22), and 1 (low disease activity: CDAI <10). Performance characteristics were acceptable using these cut points for pain, HAQ, and DAS28. The MCID for CDAI worsening among patients who achieved low disease activity was 2 units. CONCLUSION: These minimum important absolute differences in CDAI can be used to evaluate improvement and worsening and increase the utility of CDAI in clinical practice.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/fisiopatología , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Rango del Movimiento Articular/fisiología , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Artritis Reumatoide/epidemiología , Canadá , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos Factuales , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Diagnóstico Precoz , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dimensión del Dolor , Examen Físico/métodos , Pronóstico , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Autoinforme , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Factores Sexuales , Perfil de Impacto de Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the relationship between function and disease activity in early inflammatory arthritis (EIA). METHODS: Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort (CATCH) (n=1143) is a multi-site EIA cohort. Correlations between the Health Assessment Questionnaire Disability Index (HAQ) and DAS28 were done at every 3 months for the first year and then at 18 and 24 months. We also investigated the relationship between HAQ and DAS28 by age (<65 versus ≥65) and RF (positive vs negative). RESULTS: Mean HAQ and DAS28 scores were highest at the initial visit with HAQ decreasing over 24 months from a baseline of 0.94 to 0.40 and DAS28 scores decreasing from 4.54 to 2.29. All correlations between HAQ and DAS28 were significant at all time points (p<0.01). The correlations between HAQ and DAS28 were variable over time. The strongest correlation between HAQ and DAS28 occurred at initial visit (most DMARD naive) (n=1,143) and 18 months (r=0.57, n=321) and 24 months (r=0.59, n=214). The baseline correlation between HAQ and DAS28 was significantly different than correlations obtained at 3, 6, and 12 months (p=0.02, 0.01, and 0.01, respectively). Age did not change the association between HAQ and DAS28 {<65 years old (r=0.50, n=868) versus ≥65 (r=0.48, n=254), p=0.49}. The correlation between HAQ and DAS28 was stronger with RF+ patients (r=0.63, n=636) vs RF negative (r=0.47, n=477), p=0.0043. CONCLUSION: Over 2 years in EIA, HAQ and DAS both improved; correlations at time points were different over 2 years and RF status affected the correlations.
RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine site variation by comparing outcomes across sites in an early rheumatoid arthritis cohort. METHODS: Sites from the Canadian Early Arthritis Cohort database with at least 40 patients were studied. Comparisons were made among sites in change in 28-joint Disease Activity Score (DAS28), proportion of patients in DAS28 remission, and treatment strategies. RESULTS: The study included 1138 baseline patients at 8 sites, with baseline (SD) age 52 years (16.9); 72% women; 23% erosions; 54% ever smokers; 51% rheumatoid factor-positive; 37% anticitrullinated protein antibody-positive; disease duration 187 (203) days; DAS28 4.5 (1.4). Site had an effect on outcomes when adjusting for confounders. At 6 and 12 months, sites B and H, the 2 largest sites, had the best changes in DAS28 (-1.82 and -2.09, respectively, at 6 mos, and -2.27 for both at 12 mos; p < 0.001). Site H had the most patients in DAS28 remission at 6 months [64.5% compared to other sites that had from 34.1% to 51.7% (p < 0.001)], and at the last followup, sites B and H had the most in remission. Subcutaneous methotrexate was used more overall and earlier at sites B and H. Those sites used less steroid therapy, and site B had the second-highest use of triple disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs at any visit. Medications were increased more in 2 of the 3 smallest sites. Biologics were used by 9 months most in the smallest (50.0%) and then largest (19.6%) sites. CONCLUSION: Sites in an early inflammatory arthritis cohort yielded different outcomes. Better outcomes up to 12 months may result from initial treatment with early combination therapy and/or subcutaneous methotrexate.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Nivel de Atención , Adulto , Canadá , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Inducción de Remisión/métodos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Abatacept , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Proteína Antagonista del Receptor de Interleucina 1/uso terapéutico , Rituximab , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Abatacept , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino/uso terapéutico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia/métodos , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Rituximab , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The American College of Rheumatology (ACR) hybrid (a modified mean percent response to treatment) was officially recommended by the ACR as a revision to 20%, 50%, and 70% response criteria (ACR20/50/70) scores, but has not been tested in clinical trials. We performed a post hoc analysis of a phase III study of certolizumab pegol (Rheumatoid Arthritis Prevention of Structural Damage 1 [RAPID 1]) using the ACR hybrid. METHODS: Patients with active rheumatoid arthritis were randomized to certolizumab pegol (200 mg or 400 mg every other week) plus methotrexate or placebo plus methotrexate. ACR hybrid scores were compared with ACR20/50/70 outcomes. RESULTS: Differences between active treatment and placebo were significant throughout the study using the ACR20 and ACR hybrid outcomes. In the certolizumab pegol 200 mg group, the median ACR hybrid score at week 52 (last observation carried forward) was 49.99. A total of 258 (65.8%) of 392 and 172 (43.9%) of 392 patients had ACR20 and ACR50 responses, respectively. An additional 55 patients (14.0%) and 59 patients (15.1%) had mean improvements in ACR core measures of ≥ 20% and ≥ 50%, respectively, and therefore had positive ACR hybrid scores, despite lacking ACR20 and ACR50 responses, respectively. In the placebo group, median ACR hybrid scores were <10 at most time points; unlike other measures, the ACR hybrid measure indicated worsening scores for many patients. CONCLUSION: ACR hybrid analysis had greater sensitivity than traditional ACR20/50/70 criteria, demonstrating improvements in ACR20 nonresponders treated with certolizumab pegol. Negligible benefit was observed with placebo using ACR hybrid analysis.
Asunto(s)
Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Fragmentos Fab de Inmunoglobulinas/administración & dosificación , Metotrexato/administración & dosificación , Polietilenglicoles/administración & dosificación , Reumatología/normas , Sociedades Médicas/normas , Adulto , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Artritis Reumatoide/patología , Certolizumab Pegol , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The target outcome in early rheumatoid arthritis (ERA) is now remission. This meta-analysis compared the efficacy of initial methotrexate monotherapy versus combination therapy (methotrexate plus biological agent) for clinical remission and radiographic non-progression among ERA patients with minimal or no previous methotrexate exposure. METHODS: A systematic search was performed for randomised controlled trials of ERA using predefined criteria. A random effects model was used to pool the risk ratio (RR) for clinical and radiographic remission at 52-56 weeks of follow-up. RESULTS: Seven trials of combination therapy with infliximab, adalimumab, etanercept or abatacept were included. The majority of studies defined clinical remission as a 28-joint disease activity score (DAS28) of 2.6 or less. Radiographic non-progression was primarily defined as a modified total Sharp score change of less than 0.5 units. All trials demonstrated risk estimates in favour of combination therapy: the pooled RR for achieving clinical remission was 1.74 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.98) and for radiographic non-progression was 1.30 (95% CI 1.01 to 1.68). Significant heterogeneity among studies for the latter outcome was detected (p<0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The efficacy of combination therapy with a biological agent is superior to methotrexate monotherapy for remission. Combination therapy has a greater initial effect on clinical remission than radiographic non-progression. Uniform definitions of remission are needed and the proportion of subjects who achieve the combined endpoint of clinical and radiographic remission should be considered as a meaningful outcome in future studies of ERA.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/diagnóstico por imagen , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Combinada/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Inducción de Remisión , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Abatacept , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Rituximab , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety of biological treatments for rheumatoid arthritis (RA) using results from randomised controlled trials (RCT). METHODS: The literature was searched to December 2007 for RCT evaluating inhibitors of tumour necrosis factor alpha (anti-TNF) for RA. Safety data were abstracted and risk estimates were calculated using three approaches, meta-analysis with and without adjustment for exposure and simple exposure-adjusted pooling. RESULTS: Eighteen randomised trials involving 8808 RA subjects were included. Treatment with recommended doses of anti-TNF found no increase in the odds of death (odds ratio (OR) 1.39; 95% CI 0.74 to 2.62), serious adverse events (OR 1.11; 95% CI 0.94 to 1.32), serious infection (OR 1.21; 95% CI 0.89 to 1.63), lymphoma (OR 1.26; 95% CI 0.52 to 3.06), non-melanoma skin cancers (OR 1.27; 95% CI 0.67 to 2.42) or the composite endpoint of non-cutaneous cancers plus melanomas (OR 1.31; 95% CI 0.69 to 2.48) when evaluated using the unadjusted meta-analytic method. Risk estimates were similar with the other methods. For subjects who received two to three times the recommended doses of anti-TNF the risk of serious infection was increased with the unadjusted meta-analytic and pooled analysis, (OR 2.07; 95% CI 1.31 to 3.26) and (risk ratio (RR) 1.83; 95% CI 1.18 to 2.85), respectively, but not increased in the exposure-adjusted meta-analysis (RR 1.99; 95% CI 0.90 to 4.37). Meta-regression identified that the risk of serious infection with anti-TNF therapy decreases with increasing trial duration (p = 0.035). CONCLUSION: Meta-analytic and exposure-adjusted pooled analyses on over 8800 RA subjects in RCT treated over an average of 0.8 years did not identify an increased risk of serious adverse events with recommended doses. High-dose anti-TNF therapy was associated with a twofold increase in the risk of serious infections.
Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Antirreumáticos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Infecciones/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The phase III GO-FORWARD study examined the efficacy and safety of golimumab in patients with active rheumatoid arthritis (RA) despite methotrexate therapy. METHODS: Patients were randomly assigned in a 3 : 3 : 2 : 2 ratio to receive placebo injections plus methotrexate capsules (group 1, n = 133), golimumab 100 mg injections plus placebo capsules (group 2, n = 133), golimumab 50 mg injections plus methotrexate capsules (group 3, n = 89), or golimumab 100 mg injections plus methotrexate capsules (group 4, n = 89). Injections were administered subcutaneously every 4 weeks. The co-primary endpoints were the proportion of patients with 20% or greater improvement in the American College of Rheumatology criteria (ACR20) at week 14 and the change from baseline in the health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) score at week 24. RESULTS: The proportion of patients who achieved an ACR20 response at week 14 was 33.1% in the placebo plus methotrexate group, 44.4% (p = 0.059) in the golimumab 100 mg plus placebo group, 55.1% (p = 0.001) in the golimumab 50 mg plus methotrexate group and 56.2% (p<0.001) in the golimumab 100 mg plus methotrexate group. At week 24, median improvements from baseline in HAQ-DI scores were 0.13, 0.13 (p = 0.240), 0.38 (p<0.001) and 0.50 (p<0.001), respectively. During the placebo-controlled portion of the study (to week 16), serious adverse events occurred in 2.3%, 3.8%, 5.6% and 9.0% of patients and serious infections occurred in 0.8%, 0.8%, 2.2% and 5.6%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The addition of golimumab to methotrexate in patients with active RA despite methotrexate therapy significantly reduced the signs and symptoms of RA and improved physical function.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales/administración & dosificación , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Inmunosupresores/administración & dosificación , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidores , Enfermedad Aguda , Adulto , Análisis de Varianza , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Artritis Reumatoide/inmunología , Artritis Reumatoide/microbiología , Infecciones Bacterianas/complicaciones , Distribución de Chi-Cuadrado , Método Doble Ciego , Esquema de Medicación , Quimioterapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Inmunosupresores/efectos adversos , Inmunosupresores/uso terapéutico , Inyecciones Subcutáneas , Masculino , Metotrexato/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/uso terapéutico , Enfermedades Reumáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Abatacept , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Factores Inmunológicos/efectos adversos , Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Interleucina-2/antagonistas & inhibidores , Infecciones Oportunistas/inducido químicamente , Rituximab , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresAsunto(s)
Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Artritis/tratamiento farmacológico , Abatacept , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/efectos adversos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales de Origen Murino , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Artritis Juvenil/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Psoriásica/tratamiento farmacológico , Artritis Reumatoide/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Inmunoconjugados/efectos adversos , Inmunoconjugados/uso terapéutico , Interleucina-1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Neoplasias/inducido químicamente , Rituximab , Espondilitis Anquilosante/tratamiento farmacológico , Tuberculosis/inducido químicamente , Factor de Necrosis Tumoral alfa/antagonistas & inhibidoresRESUMEN
Gene expression profiling of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and osteoarthritis (OA) joint tissue samples provides a unique insight into the gene signatures involved in disease development and progression. Fibroblast-like synovial (FLS) cells were obtained from RA, OA and control trauma joint tissues (non-RA, non-OA) and RNA was analyzed by Affymetrix microarray. Thirty-four genes specific to RA and OA FLS cells were identified (P<0.05). HOXD10, HOXD11, HOXD13, CCL8 and LIM homeobox 2 were highly and exclusively expressed in RA and CLU, sarcoglycan-gamma, GPR64, POU3F3, peroxisome proliferative activated receptor-gamma and tripartite motif-containing 2 were expressed only in OA. The data also revealed expression heterogeneity for patients with the same disease. To address disease heterogeneity in RA FLS cells, we examined the effects of clinical disease parameters (Health Assessment Questionnaire (HAQ) score, C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR), rheumatoid factor (RF)) and drug therapies (methotrexate/prednisone) on RA FLS cell gene expression. Eight specific and unique correlations were identified: human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DQA2 with HAQ score; Clec12A with RF; MAB21L2, SIAT7E, HAPLN1 and BAIAP2L1 with CRP level; RGMB and OSAP with ESR. Signature RA FLS cell gene expression profiles may provide insights into disease pathogenesis and have utility in diagnosis, prognosis and drug responsiveness.