RESUMEN
Background: Appropriate respiratory support is crucial for improving the clinical outcomes of critically ill patients infected with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. This study aimed to investigate the different modalities of respiratory support and clinical outcomes in patients with COVID-19 in intensive care units (ICUs). Materials and Methods: In a retrospective study, we enrolled 290 critically ill COVID-19 patients who were admitted to the ICUs of four hospitals in Mazandaran, northern Iran. Data were extracted from the medical records of all included patients, from December 2019 to July 2021. Patients' demographic data, symptoms, laboratory findings, comorbidities, treatment, and clinical outcomes were collected. Results: 46.55% of patients died. Patients with ≥2 comorbidities had significantly increased odds of death (OR=5.88, 95%CI: 1.97-17.52, P=0.001) as compared with patients with no comorbidities. Respiratory support methods such as face mask (survived=37, deceased=18, P=0.022), a non-rebreather mask (survived=39, deceased=12, P<0.001), and synchronized intermittent mandatory ventilation (SIMV) (survived=103, deceased=110, P=0.004) were associated with in-hospital mortality. Duration of respiratory support in nasal cannula (survived=3, deceased=2, P<0.001), face mask (survived=3, deceased=2, P<0.001), a non-rebreather mask (survived=3, deceased=2, P=0.033), mechanical ventilation (survived=5, deceased=6, P<0.019), continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) (survived=3, deceased=2, P<0.017), and SIMV (survived=4, deceased=5, P=0.001) methods were associated with higher in-hospital mortality. Conclusion: Special attention should be paid to COVID-19 patients with more than two comorbidities. As a specific point of interest, SIMV may increase the in-hospital mortality rate of critically ill patients with COVID-19 connected to mechanical ventilation and be associated with adverse outcomes.
RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The recommended position for measuring Intra-Abdominal Pressure (IAP) is the supine position. However, patients put in this position are prone to Ventilator-associated pneumonia. This study was done to evaluate the relationship between bed head angle and IAP measurements of intubated patients in the intensive care unit. METHODS: In this clinical trial, seventy-six critically ill patients under mechanical ventilation were enrolled. IAP measurement was performed every 8 hours for 24 hours using the KORN method in three different degrees of the head of bed (HOB) elevation (0 ° , 15 ° , and 30 ° ). Bland-Altman analysis was performed to identify the bias and limits of agreement among the three HOBs. According to World Society of the Abdominal Compartment Syndrome (WSACS), we can consider two IAP techniques equivalent if a bias of <1 mmHg and limits of agreement of - 4 to +4 were found between them. Data were analyzed using SPSS statistical software (v. 19), and the significance level was considered as 0.05. RESULTS: The prevalence of intra-abdominal hypertension was 18.42%. Mean ± standard deviation (SD) of IAP were 8.44 ± 4.02 mmHg for HOB angle 0°, 9.58 ± 4.52 for HOB angle 15 ° , and 11.10 ± 4.73 for HOB angle 30o (p = 0.0001). The IAP measurement bias between HOB angle 0°and HOB angle 15° was 1.13 mmHg. This bias was 2.66 mmHg between HOB angle 0° and HOB angle 30°. CONCLUSION: Elevation of HOB angle from 0 to 30 degree significantly increases IAP. It seems that the measurement of IAP at HOB angle 15° was more reliable than 30°.