RESUMEN
Cancer metastasis causes over 90% of cancer patient fatalities. Poor prognosis is determined by tumor type, the tumor microenvironment (TME), organ-specific biology, and animal physiology. While model organisms do not fully mimic the complexity of humans, many processes can be studied efficiently owing to the ease of genetic, developmental, and cell biology studies. For decades, Drosophila has been instrumental in identifying basic mechanisms controlling tumor growth and metastasis. The ability to generate clonal populations of distinct genotypes in otherwise wild-type animals makes Drosophila a powerful system to study tumor-host interactions at the local and global scales. This review discusses advancements in tumor biology, highlighting the strength of Drosophila for modeling TMEs and systemic responses in driving tumor progression and metastasis.
Asunto(s)
Drosophila , Neoplasias , Animales , Humanos , Microambiente Tumoral/genética , Neoplasias/genética , Neoplasias/patologíaRESUMEN
Ribosomal Protein (Rp) gene haploinsufficiency affects translation rate, can lead to protein aggregation, and causes cell elimination by competition with wild type cells in mosaic tissues. We find that the modest changes in ribosomal subunit levels observed were insufficient for these effects, which all depended on the AT-hook, bZip domain protein Xrp1. Xrp1 reduced global translation through PERK-dependent phosphorylation of eIF2α. eIF2α phosphorylation was itself sufficient to enable cell competition of otherwise wild type cells, but through Xrp1 expression, not as the downstream effector of Xrp1. Unexpectedly, many other defects reducing ribosome biogenesis or function (depletion of TAF1B, eIF2, eIF4G, eIF6, eEF2, eEF1α1, or eIF5A), also increased eIF2α phosphorylation and enabled cell competition. This was also through the Xrp1 expression that was induced in these depletions. In the absence of Xrp1, translation differences between cells were not themselves sufficient to trigger cell competition. Xrp1 is shown here to be a sequence-specific transcription factor that regulates transposable elements as well as single-copy genes. Thus, Xrp1 is the master regulator that triggers multiple consequences of ribosomal stresses and is the key instigator of cell competition.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Celular , Proteínas de Drosophila , Animales , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Factor 2 Eucariótico de Iniciación/metabolismo , Fosforilación , Biosíntesis de Proteínas , Ribosomas/metabolismo , Factores de Transcripción/metabolismoRESUMEN
Homologous recombination (HR) is one of the key pathways to repair double-strand breaks (DSBs). Rad51 serves an important function of catalysing strand exchange between two homologous sequences in the HR pathway. In higher organisms, rad51 function is indispensable with its absence leading to early embryonic lethality, thus precluding any mechanistic probing of the system. In contrast, the absence of Drosophila rad51 (spn-A/rad51) has been associated with defects in the germline, without any reported detrimental consequences to Drosophila somatic tissues. In this study, we have performed a systematic analysis of developmental defects in somatic tissues of spn-A mutant flies by using genetic complementation between multiple spn-A alleles. Our current study, for the first time, uncovers a requirement for spn-A in somatic tissue maintenance during both larval and pupal stages. Also, we show that spn-A mutant exhibits patterning defects in abdominal cuticle in the stripes and bristles, while there appear to be only subtle defects in the adult wing and eye. Interestingly, spn-A mutant shows a discernible phenotype of low temperature sensitivity, suggesting a role of spn-A in temperature sensitive cellular processes. In summary, our study describes the important role played by spn-A/rad51 in Drosophila somatic tissues.
Asunto(s)
Muerte Celular , Daño del ADN , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Drosophila melanogaster/crecimiento & desarrollo , Regulación del Desarrollo de la Expresión Génica , Mutación , Recombinasa Rad51/metabolismo , Temperatura , Animales , Tipificación del Cuerpo , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolismo , Femenino , Células Germinativas , Recombinación Homóloga , Masculino , Meiosis , Fenotipo , Recombinasa Rad51/genéticaRESUMEN
DNA repair is a critical cellular process required for the maintenance of genomic integrity. It is now well appreciated that cells employ several DNA repair pathways to take care of distinct types of DNA damage. It is also well known that a cascade of signals namely DNA damage response or DDR is activated in response to DNA damage which comprise cellular responses, such as cell cycle arrest, DNA repair and cell death, if the damage is irreparable. There is also emerging literature suggesting a cross-talk between DNA damage signaling and several signaling networks within a cell. Moreover, cell death players themselves are also well known to engage in processes outside their canonical function of apoptosis. This chapter attempts to build a link between DNA damage, DDR and signaling from the studies mainly conducted in mammals and Drosophila model systems, with a special emphasis on their relevance in overall tissue homeostasis and development.
Asunto(s)
Daño del ADN/genética , Drosophila/genética , Genoma de los Insectos , Homeostasis , Animales , Reparación del ADN , Mamíferos/genéticaRESUMEN
The term cell competition has been used to describe the phenomenon whereby particular cells can be eliminated during tissue growth only when more competitive cells are available to replace them. Multiple examples implicate differential activity of p53 in cell competition in mammals, but p53 has not been found to have the same role in Drosophila, where the phenomenon of cell competition was first recognized. Recent studies now show that Drosophila cells harboring mutations in Ribosomal protein (Rp) genes, which are eliminated by cell competition with wild type cells, activate a p53 target gene, Xrp1. In Diamond Blackfan Anemia, human Rp mutants activate p53 itself, through a nucleolar stress pathway. These results suggest a link between mammalian and Drosophila Rp mutants, translation, and cell competition.
Asunto(s)
Comunicación Celular , Proteínas de Drosophila/metabolismo , Proteínas Ribosómicas/metabolismo , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/metabolismo , Anemia de Diamond-Blackfan/genética , Anemia de Diamond-Blackfan/metabolismo , Animales , Supervivencia Celular , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/genética , Proteínas de Unión al ADN/metabolismo , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Proteínas de Drosophila/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/genética , Drosophila melanogaster/metabolismo , Humanos , Mutación , Proteínas Ribosómicas/genética , Proteína p53 Supresora de Tumor/genéticaRESUMEN
The phosphorylation of the variant histone H2Ax (denoted γH2Ax; γH2Av in flies) constitutes an important signalling event in DNA damage sensing, ensuring effective repair by recruiting DNA repair machinery. In contrast, the γH2Av response has also been reported in dying cells, where it requires activation of caspase-activated DNases (CADs). Moreover, caspases are known to be required downstream of DNA damage for cell death execution. We show here, for the first time, that the Drosophila initiator caspase Dronc acts as an upstream regulator of the DNA damage response (DDR) independently of executioner caspases by facilitating γH2Av signalling, possibly through a function that is not related to apoptosis. Such a γH2Av response is mediated by ATM rather than ATR, suggesting that Dronc function is required upstream of ATM. In contrast, the role of γH2Av in cell death requires effector caspases and is associated with fragmented nuclei. Our study uncovers a novel function of Dronc in response to DNA damage aimed at promoting DDR via γH2Av signalling in intact nuclei. We propose that Dronc plays a dual role that can either initiate DDR or apoptosis depending upon its level and the required threshold of its activation in damaged cells.This article has an associated First Person interview with the first author of the paper.