Lessons learned after 20 years of real-world experience with natalizumab.

BACKGROUND: While natalizumab (NTZ) is an effective therapy for multiple sclerosis (MS), it is associated with an increased risk of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). After 20 years (2002-2022) of experience with NTZ at our center, we observed no cases of PML. OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the likelihood of experiencing PML in a subset of our treatment cohort, as well as reviewed treatment practices at our center that may mitigate PML risk. METHODS: For this retrospective study, we reviewed patient characteristics, treatment practices, and clinical and MRI findings in patients receiving NTZ from 2006 to 2020. Observation of no PML cases was compared to the global and US PML incidences, and to the expected incidence based on published risk estimates. RESULTS: 766 patients were evaluated. The number of NTZ infusions received ranged from 1 to 126, with a mean of 28. Patients received neurological examination prior to each infusion, which sometimes resulted in a pause in therapy to rule out PML if clinical worsening occurred. Extended interval dosing (EID) was the overall dosing schedule for 31% of patients. EID did not result in higher rates of radiological disease worsening than standard interval dosing (SID) patients. Depending on the analysis conducted, the finding of 0 PML cases in our cohort ranged from slightly unexpected to slightly expected. CONCLUSIONS: The utilization of EID as well as regular clinical monitoring of patients may have lowered PML risk while still maintaining NTZ efficacy.

Satisfaction with alemtuzumab in relapsing multiple sclerosis patients: Results from the real-world PRO-ACT study.

Background: Patient-reported outcomes are increasingly used in the management of patients with multiple sclerosis to understand the patient's perspective of disease and treatment. These measures provide insights into important factors including treatment satisfaction, physical and psychological function, and quality of life. Objective: To present results from the real-world PRO-ACT study in patients with multiple sclerosis who switched to alemtuzumab from another disease-modifying therapy. Methods: This 24-month, prospective, multicenter, observational study had a primary endpoint of change in overall satisfaction, measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM) version 1.4. Secondary endpoints included the Multiple Sclerosis Impact Scale-29 (MSIS-29), Modified Fatigue Impact Scale-5 (MFIS-5), and the Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS). Safety was monitored with adverse events (AEs). Results: Of 199 enrolled patients, improvements were observed in mean TSQM scores for overall satisfaction (baseline, 50.3; year 2, + 13.2; p < 0.0001), effectiveness (49.3 and + 12.2; p < 0.0001), and side effects (77.6 and + 4.5; p = 0.04). Improvements were also observed in MSIS-29 physical (52.4 and -6.0; p < 0.0001), MSIS-29 psychological (53.4 and -7.0; p = 0.0003), and MFIS-5 (12.8 and -1.7; p < 0.0001). Most (95.0%) patients experienced ≥ 1 AE (88.4% mild, 67.8% moderate). Conclusions: The primary endpoint was met; the safety of alemtuzumab was consistent with pivotal studies.

Effect of dimethyl fumarate on lymphocyte subsets in patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis.

BACKGROUND: In patients treated with dimethyl fumarate, absolute lymphocyte count decline typically occurs during the first year and then plateaus; early drops have been associated with the development of severe prolonged lymphopenia. OBJECTIVE: We investigated the effect of dimethyl fumarate on absolute lymphocyte counts and CD4+/CD8+ T cells in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis treated with dimethyl fumarate in routine practice. METHODS: Lymphocyte data were collected via medical chart abstraction. Primary endpoint: change from baseline in absolute lymphocyte count and CD4+/CD8+ counts at 6-month intervals following dimethyl fumarate initiation. RESULTS: Charts of 483 patients were abstracted and 476 patients included in the analysis. Mean baseline absolute lymphocyte count (2.23 × 109/l) decreased by ∼39% (95% confidence interval: -41.1 to -37.2) by month 6 and 44% (95% confidence interval: -46.6 to -42.1) by month 12. CD4+ and CD8+ T-cell subsets strongly correlated with absolute lymphocyte count, with greater decreases from baseline to 6 months vs 6-12 months, and in CD8+ vs CD4+ T cells. Prior natalizumab was not a risk factor for lymphopenia. CONCLUSION: Dimethyl fumarate-associated decline in absolute lymphocyte count in the first 12 months correlated with decline in CD4+ and CD8+ T cells and was independent of prior natalizumab. Absolute lymphocyte count monitoring continues to be an effective strategy to identify patients at risk of prolonged lymphopenia.

Clinical Effects of the Self-administered Subcutaneous Complement Inhibitor Zilucoplan in Patients With Moderate to Severe Generalized Myasthenia Gravis: Results of a Phase 2 Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Multicenter Clinical Trial.

Importance: Many patients with generalized myasthenia gravis (gMG) have substantial clinical disability, persistent disease burden, and adverse effects attributable to chronic immunosuppression. Therefore, there is a significant need for targeted, well-tolerated therapies with the potential to improve disease control and enhance quality of life. Objective: To evaluate the clinical effects of zilucoplan, a subcutaneously (SC) self-administered macrocyclic peptide inhibitor of complement component 5, in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe gMG. Design, Setting, and Participants: This randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 2 clinical trial at 25 study sites across North America recruited participants between December 2017 and August 2018. Fifty-seven patients were screened, of whom 12 did not meet inclusion criteria and 1 was lost to follow-up after randomization but before receiving study drug, resulting in a total of 44 acetylcholine receptor autoantibody (AChR-Ab)-positive patients with gMG with baseline Quantitative Myasthenia Gravis (QMG) scores of at least 12, regardless of treatment history. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1:1 to a daily SC self-injection of placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, or 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan for 12 weeks. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary and key secondary end points were the change from baseline to week 12 in QMG and MG Activities of Daily Living scores, respectively. Significance testing was prespecified at a 1-sided α of .10. Safety and tolerability were also assessed. Results: The study of 44 patients was well balanced across the 3 treatment arms with respect to key demographic and disease-specific variables. The mean age of patients across all 3 treatment groups ranged from 45.5 to 54.6 years and most patients were white (average proportions across 3 treatment groups: 78.6%-86.7%). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements in primary and key secondary efficacy end points were observed. Zilucoplan at a dose of 0.3 mg/kg SC daily resulted in a mean reduction from baseline of 6.0 points in the QMG score (placebo-corrected change, -2.8; P = .05) and 3.4 points in the MG Activities of Daily Living score (placebo-corrected change, -2.3; P = .04). Clinically meaningful and statistically significant improvements were also observed in other secondary end points, the MG Composite and MG Quality-of-Life scores. Outcomes for the 0.1-mg/kg SC daily dose were also statistically significant but slower in onset and less pronounced than with the 0.3-mg/kg dose. Rescue therapy (intravenous immunoglobulin or plasma exchange) was required in 3 of 15, 1 of 15, and 0 of 14 participants in the placebo, 0.1-mg/kg zilucoplan, and 0.3-mg/kg zilucoplan arms, respectively. Zilucoplan was observed to have a favorable safety and tolerability profile. Conclusions and Relevance: Zilucoplan yielded rapid, meaningful, and sustained improvements over 12 weeks in a broad population of patients with moderate to severe AChR-Ab-positive gMG. Near-complete complement inhibition appeared superior to submaximal inhibition. The observed safety and tolerability profile of zilucoplan was favorable. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03315130.

Teriflunomide real-world evidence: Global differences in the phase 4 Teri-PRO study.

BACKGROUND: The demographics and management of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) differ across geographical regions, but it is unclear whether/how these differences affect treatment outcomes. The aim of this post-hoc analysis was to assess teriflunomide use and patient-reported outcomes in the United States (US) and the rest of the world (ROW) in the phase 4 Teri-PRO study (NCT01895335). METHODS: In the phase 4, real-world, Teri-PRO study, patients with relapsing forms of MS received teriflunomide for 48 weeks according to local labeling. The primary endpoint was treatment satisfaction measured using the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication Version 1.4 (TSQM 1.4). Secondary endpoints included scores on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS), Multiple Sclerosis Performance Scale (MSPS), and Patient-Determined Disease Steps (PDDS), and occurrence of adverse events. Primary and secondary endpoints were assessed at baseline and Week 48. An exploratory subgroup analysis assessed PROs in the black patient population. RESULTS: The US and ROW groups included 545 and 455 patients, respectively. The mean age of patients in the ROW group was lower, they had a shorter mean time since first symptoms of MS, and had lower mean EDSS scores at baseline, compared with the US group (all p < 0.0001). Black patients made up 9% of US patients vs 0.2% of ROW patients. TSQM global satisfaction scores and effectiveness, side effects, and convenience subscale scores were significantly improved from baseline to Week 48 (all p < 0.0001). Disability measures were stable from baseline to Week 48 for both groups, despite different baseline level scores between the two groups. The overall proportion of patients who experienced an AE was similar across both groups. Fewer patients in the US group vs the ROW group reported hair thinning (16.1% vs 31.2%). Black patients showed comparable baseline demographics and disease characteristics and similar change over time in PROs compared with the overall US group. CONCLUSION: Patient differences observed at baseline between the US and ROW groups suggest variation in teriflunomide prescribing practices in the real-world Teri-PRO study. Improvement in treatment satisfaction and stability of disability measures were comparable between patients in the US and ROW. This suggests that teriflunomide was effective despite differences in baseline demographics and possible cultural and management differences between these geographical regions.

Proceedings of the Inaugural Strategy Meeting for the Establishment of a Southeast Asia Regional Therapeutic Plasma Exchange Consortium for Neurological Disorders.

In conjunction with the third regional Southeast Asian (SEA) therapeutic plasma exchange (TPE) conference in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 25 clinicians and researchers from SEA and South Asian countries attended the inaugural strategy meeting for the establishment of a regional TPE consortium for neurological disorders. The primary objective was to establish regional collaboration to improve delivery of TPE services in SEA. A pre-meeting survey was conducted to gather insights on disease spectrum, contextual practice challenges, and the need for a regional TPE consensus. Challenges identified include limited healthcare funding in support of diagnostic workup, TPE therapy, as well as development of clinical infrastructure and expertise capacity building. There was favorable interest in developing a working plan contextualized to this region. Strategies to overcome challenges were discussed. This included the need for a comprehensive referral system and network of regional TPE centers suited to local needs, supported by innovative TPE delivery programs.

Comparative effectiveness of teriflunomide and dimethyl fumarate in patients with relapsing forms of MS in the retrospective real-world Teri-RADAR study.

AIM: Head-to-head clinical trials of teriflunomide (TFM) versus dimethyl fumarate (DMF) have not been conducted. OBJECTIVES: To compare the real-world effectiveness of TFM versus DMF. METHODS: Anonymized data were collected from patients with relapsing multiple sclerosis (MS) initiating treatment with teriflunomide (N = 50) or DMF (N = 50). RESULTS: On follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) compared with baseline, with TFM versus DMF treatment, the proportion of patients with new/enlarging T2 or gadolinium-enhancing lesions was 30.0 versus 40.0% (p = 0.2752). However, median annualized percent whole brain volume change was -0.1 versus -0.5 (p = 0.0212). There were no significant treatment differences on additional MRI and clinical end points and no unexpected safety signals. CONCLUSION: The effectiveness of teriflunomide was superior to DMF on whole brain atrophy and similar to DMF on other MRI/clinical end points.

Patient-reported outcomes in patients with relapsing forms of MS switching to teriflunomide from other disease-modifying therapies: Results from the global Phase 4 Teri-PRO study in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) can assist clinicians in understanding the impact of disease-modifying therapy (DMT) on the daily lives of patients with multiple sclerosis (MS). With an increased number of DMTs becoming available, patients are now switching treatments more frequently in clinical practice. The effects of switching DMTs on a patient's daily life and their disease course may be reflected in PROs. The global, multicenter, open-label, phase 4 Teri-PRO study (NCT01895335), which was conducted in routine clinical practice, previously showed statistically and clinically significant increases in patient-reported treatment satisfaction in patients switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs. The impact of switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs on treatment satisfaction and a range of additional PROs was also evaluated. METHODS: Patients with relapsing forms of MS (N = 1000) received teriflunomide for 48 weeks per local labeling. Outcomes assessed in this analysis included treatment satisfaction (as measured by Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication [Version 1.4]), disability worsening (as measured using the Expanded Disability Status Scale [EDSS] score, the Patient-Determined Disease Steps scale, and the Multiple Sclerosis Performance Scale), cognition (as measured using the Symbol Digit Modalities Test [SDMT]), treated relapses, quality of life (as measured by the Multiple Sclerosis International Quality of Life [MusiQoL] questionnaire and the Stern Leisure Activity Scale), and safety/tolerability over the course of the study in the subgroup of patients switching to teriflunomide from another DMT (n = 594). RESULTS: Patients reported significant improvements in treatment satisfaction scores following the switch to teriflunomide regardless of the reason for treating with teriflunomide (Global Satisfaction, disease worsening: baseline, 46.0, Week 48, 65.1; convenience: baseline, 57.4, Week 48, 72.4; intolerance: baseline, 50.9, Week 48, 71.1; side effects: baseline, 49.7, Week 48, 67.2; P < 0.0001 in all comparisons). These patients also showed improvement or stability in PROs evaluating disability worsening, cognition, and quality of life (EDSS: baseline, 3.1, Week 48, 3.0; SDMT: baseline, 0.975, Week 48, 0.978; MusiQoL: baseline, 67.5, Week 48, 69.5). The safety and tolerability profile of teriflunomide was consistent with that observed in other teriflunomide clinical trials. CONCLUSION: This analysis of the Teri-PRO study demonstrates the value of switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs in a real-world, clinical practice setting. The high levels of treatment satisfaction associated with teriflunomide in Teri-PRO may lead to improved adherence and thus improved outcomes.

Delayed lymphocyte re-population following discontinuation of dimethyl fumarate and after switching to other disease modifying drug therapies.

BACKGROUND: Dimethyl fumarate (DMF) reduces absolute lymphocyte counts, CD4, and CD8 counts, without significantly affecting total white blood cell counts. However, the recovery rate of these cells after discontinuation of DMF is unknown. The effect of subsequent disease modifying therapies (DMTs) on re-population rate is also unknown. OBJECTIVES: 1. To study the re-population rate of absolute lymphocytes, CD4, and CD8 counts back to baseline after discontinuation of DMF. 2. To measure the effect of subsequent DMTs on the re-population rate of these cells after DMF therapy. 3. To study the effect of the duration of exposure to DMF on repopulation of these cells. METHODS: A retrospective chart review of subjects who had discontinued DMF and in whom, CBC with differential, CD4 and CD8 counts were available at baseline, discontinuation and at follow-up (n = 113). Linear mixed models were used to analyze and assess linear trends in lymphocyte counts after DMF had been discontinued. RESULTS: DMF causes a significant drop in absolute lymphocyte, CD4, and CD8 counts. Re-population of these cells after discontinuation of DMF is significantly delayed, irrespective of whether or not a subsequent DMT is used, although there is a difference in re-population rate among DMTs. The re-population rate is also dependent on the duration of time patients have been exposed to DMF; longer exposure was associated with more delayed recovery. CONCLUSION: During this 30 month study period, re-population rates were significantly delayed post-DMF, irrespective of what subsequent DMT the patients received. Furthermore, no recovery of lymphocyte counts occurred in patients who were started on fingolimod or alemtuzumab after DMF was discontinued; in fact there was a continued decline in all of the cell populations studied.

Patient-reported outcomes in relapsing forms of MS: Real-world, global treatment experience with teriflunomide from the Teri-PRO study.

BACKGROUND: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) provide clinicians with further understanding of the impact of treatment on patients' daily lives. In addition, real-world studies, which employ broader inclusion criteria than randomized trials, may help to inform prescribing decisions when selecting a disease-modifying therapy (DMT) to treat relapsing forms of MS (RMS). We sought to use PROs to determine patient treatment satisfaction and other treatment outcomes, and report safety and tolerability associated with teriflunomide, in the global, phase 4 Teri-PRO study (NCT01895335). METHODS: Patients with RMS (N = 1000) received teriflunomide for 48 weeks per local labeling. The primary endpoint was Global Satisfaction with teriflunomide treatment measured by the Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire for Medication (TSQM, V1.4). Secondary endpoints included TSQM scores at Week (W)48 vs baseline in patients switching to teriflunomide from other DMTs ('switchers'), additional PROs, and safety. RESULTS: Mean TSQM Global Satisfaction score at W48 was high (68.2). Switchers reported significant improvements across all four TSQM domains at W48 vs baseline (all p < 0.0001). Adverse events were consistent with teriflunomide clinical trials. CONCLUSION: Patients reported high treatment satisfaction with teriflunomide, with switchers also reporting improved treatment satisfaction vs baseline. High treatment satisfaction in patients with RMS may lead to improved adherence, and hence treatment outcomes.

No evidence of disease activity in patients receiving daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a for relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis in the DECIDE study.

BACKGROUND: No evidence of disease activity (NEDA) is a composite endpoint being increasingly applied as an outcome measure in clinical trials as well as proposed for individual therapeutic decisions in multiple sclerosis (MS). OBJECTIVE: Assess the proportion of patients with relapsing-remitting MS achieving NEDA in the DECIDE study of daclizumab 150 mg subcutaneous versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a 30 µg for 96-144 weeks. METHODS: NEDA was defined as no relapses, no onset of 12-week confirmed disability progression (CDP), no new/newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions (NET2), and no gadolinium-enhancing (Gd+) lesions. Logistic regression models adjusted for baseline covariates compared treatment groups for baseline to week 96, weeks 0-24, and weeks 24-96. RESULTS: From baseline to week 96, more daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a patients achieved NEDA (24.6% vs 14.2%; odds ratio (OR; 95% confidence interval): 2.059 (1.592-2.661); p < 0.0001). ORs for clinical NEDA (no relapses, no CDP) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) NEDA (no NET2, no Gd+ lesions) were 1.651 (1.357-2.007; p < 0.0001) and 2.051 (1.628-2.582; p < 0.0001), respectively. ORs in favor of daclizumab for weeks 24-96 were consistently higher than for weeks 0-24. CONCLUSION: More daclizumab versus intramuscular interferon beta-1a patients achieved NEDA early in DECIDE, with effects increasing over time.

Safety and tolerability profile of daclizumab in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: An integrated analysis of clinical studies.

BACKGROUND: Daclizumab has been evaluated in multicentre, randomised, double-blind studies for the treatment of patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Safety and tolerability are key considerations in MS treatment selection, as they influence adherence to medication. OBJECTIVE: Evaluate the safety of daclizumab in patients with RRMS from an integrated analysis of six clinical studies. METHODS: Patients treated with at least one dose of subcutaneous daclizumab 150mg or 300mg monthly in three completed and three ongoing clinical studies were included in this integrated analysis. Cumulative incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (AEs) was the primary endpoint. RESULTS: This analysis included 2236 patients with 5214 patient-years of exposure to daclizumab. The cumulative incidence of any AE was 84% and of any serious AE excluding MS relapse was 16%. The incidences of AEs when evaluated by 6-month intervals remained stable over the 6.5 years of maximum follow-up. Most AEs were mild or moderate in severity. An important safety concern associated with daclizumab therapy involved hepatic AEs (16%) and serum transaminase elevations at least three times the upper limit of normal (10%), most of which were asymptomatic, self-limiting, and non-recurring. Cumulative incidences of cutaneous, infectious, and gastrointestinal AEs were 33%, 59%, and 25%, respectively; most events either resolved spontaneously or were treated successfully with standard medical interventions and did not result in discontinuation of treatment. CONCLUSION: This integrated analysis demonstrates that treatment of RRMS with daclizumab for periods of up to 6.5 years is associated with an acceptable safety profile with no evidence of cumulative toxicity over time.

Fingolimod in the treatment of relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis: long-term experience and an update on the clinical evidence.

Since the approval in 2010 of fingolimod 0.5 mg (Gilenya; Novartis Pharma AG, Basel, Switzerland) in the USA as an oral therapy for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis, long-term clinical experience with this therapy has been increasing. This review provides a summary of the cumulative dataset from clinical trials and their extensions, plus postmarketing studies that contribute to characterizing the efficacy and safety profile of fingolimod in patients with relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis. Data from the controlled, phase III, pivotal studies [FREEDOMS (FTY720 Research Evaluating Effects of Daily Oral therapy in Multiple Sclerosis), FREEDOMS II and TRANSFORMS (Trial Assessing Injectable Interferon versus FTY720 Oral in Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis)] in relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis have shown that fingolimod has a robust effect on clinical and magnetic resonance imaging outcomes. The respective study extensions show that effects on annualized relapse rates are sustained with continued fingolimod treatment. Consistent, significant reductions in magnetic resonance imaging lesion counts and brain volume loss have also been sustained with long-term treatment. The safety profile of fingolimod is also examined, particularly in light of its long-term use. A summary of the adverse events of interest that are associated with fingolimod treatment and associated label guidelines are also considered, which include cardiac effects following first-dose administration, infections, lymphopenia, macular edema and pregnancy. Historic hurdles to the prescription of fingolimod and how these challenges are being met are also discussed.

Long-term (up to 4.5 years) treatment with fingolimod in multiple sclerosis: results from the extension of the randomised TRANSFORMS study.

OBJECTIVE: The 12-month (M), phase 3, double-blind, randomised TRANSFORMS study demonstrated significant benefits of fingolimod 0.5 or 1.25 mg over interferon ß-1a (IFNß-1a) in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis. We report the results of long-term (up to 4.5 years) extension of TRANSFORMS. METHODS: Patients randomised to fingolimod (0.5/1.25 mg) in the core phase continued the same dose (continuous-fingolimod) in the extension, whereas those on IFNß-1a were re-randomised (1:1) to fingolimod (IFN-switch; IFN: 0.5/1.25 mg). Outcomes included annualised relapse rate (ARR), confirmed disability progression and MRI measures. Results are presented here for the continuous-fingolimod 0.5 mg and pooled IFN-switch groups. RESULTS: Of the 1027 patients who entered the extension, 772 (75.2%) completed the study. From baseline to the end of the study (EOS), ARR in patients on continuous-fingolimod 0.5 mg was significantly lower than in the IFN-switch group (M0-EOS: 0.17 vs 0.27). After switching to fingolimod (M0-12 vs M13-EOS), patients initially treated with IFN had a 50% reduction in ARR (0.40 vs 0.20), reduced MRI activity and a lower rate of brain volume loss. In a post hoc analysis, the proportion of IFN-switch patients with no evidence of disease activity increased by approximately 50% in the first year after switching to fingolimod treatment (44.3% to 66.0%). The safety profile was consistent with that observed in the core phase. CONCLUSIONS: These results support a continued effect of long-term fingolimod therapy in maintaining a low rate of disease activity and sustained improved efficacy after switching from IFNß-1a to fingolimod. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION NO: NCT00340834.

The effect of dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera™) on lymphocyte counts: A potential contributor to progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy risk.

Dimethyl fumarate (Tecfidera™) is an effective therapy for relapsing forms of multiple sclerosis (MS). Our study suggests that this drug may have immunosuppressive properties evidenced by significant sustained reduction in CD8 lymphocyte counts and, to a lesser extent, CD4 lymphocyte counts. This observation is relevant in light of the recent case of progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy in a patient receiving this drug.

The TRUST (EvaluaTion of Bladder Function in Relapsing-Remitting MUltiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Natalizumab) Observational Study.

BACKGROUND: Bladder dysfunction is a common symptom of multiple sclerosis (MS). This study was designed to evaluate effects of natalizumab on bladder function in patients with relapsing-remitting MS. METHODS: The TRUST (EvaluaTion of Bladder Function in Relapsing-Remitting MUltiple Sclerosis Patients Treated with Natalizumab) study was an open-label, single-arm, two-center study. Natalizumab-naive MS patients with disabling bladder dysfunction and initiating natalizumab were enrolled and followed for 6 months. The primary endpoint was change in the Urogenital Distress Inventory short form (UDI-6) score from baseline. Change in Incontinence Impact Questionnaire short form (IIQ-7) score from baseline was a secondary endpoint. RESULTS: Thirty patients were enrolled. Mean baseline characteristics were age 49.9 years, Expanded Disability Status Scale score 4.6, number of relapses in previous year 2.4, UDI-6 score 10.4, and IIQ-7 score 12.3. Mean changes in UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores were significantly improved from baseline beginning at week 4 and up to week 24; mean improvements at 24 weeks were 4.4 (P < .0001) and 4.9 (P = .0005) points, respectively. At week 24, 85.7% and 78.6% of patients demonstrated improvements from baseline in UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Incontinence-related quality of life as measured by UDI-6 and IIQ-7 scores improved significantly during natalizumab treatment.

Fingolimod versus intramuscular interferon in patient subgroups from TRANSFORMS.

In the 12-month phase 3 TRANSFORMS study, fingolimod showed greater efficacy than intramuscular interferon beta (IFNß)-1a in patients with relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). This study analyzed fingolimod efficacy compared with IFNß-1a in patient subgroups from TRANSFORMS. Patients were randomized to receive fingolimod or weekly IM IFNß-1a for 12 months. Analyses of efficacy included annualized relapse rate (ARR), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measures [gadolinium (Gd)-enhancing T1 lesions, new/newly enlarged (active) T2 lesions, brain volume change]. Subgroups were defined based on demographics, disease characteristics (baseline EDSS score, relapse rate, and MRI parameters), and response to previous therapy. Fingolimod 0.5 mg reduced ARR over 12 months by 32-59 % relative to IFNß-1a in all subgroups defined by demographic factors or baseline disease characteristics. Fingolimod also reduced the number of new Gd-enhancing lesions, active T2 lesions, and the rate of brain volume loss, versus IFNß-1a in most (95 %) subgroups. In patients with high disease activity despite IFNß treatment in the year before study, fingolimod 0.5 mg reduced ARR by 61 % relative to IFNß-1a. Reductions in lesion counts and brain volume loss also favored fingolimod in these patients. In conclusion, consistently better efficacy was observed for fingolimod compared with IFNß-1a across different subgroups of patients with RRMS.

The effect of plasma exchange on serum anti-JC virus antibodies.

OBJECTIVE: Natalizumab, a highly effective treatment for multiple sclerosis (MS) and Crohn's disease, is associated with progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML). Upon suspicion or diagnosis of PML, plasma exchange (PLEX) is performed to remove natalizumab from the circulation, allowing immune reconstitution of the central nervous system. Since PLEX may also remove other circulating antibodies, we examined the effects of PLEX on serum immunoglobulin (IgG) and anti-JC virus (JCV) antibody levels in MS patients with and without PML. METHODS: Serum samples from 12 natalizumab-treated patients without PML collected before, during and after PLEX were tested for IgG isotypes using a commercial assay, and for anti-JCV antibodies using a two-step enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Five natalizumab-treated PML patients who underwent PLEX were also tested for anti-JCV antibodies. RESULTS: PLEX produced a two- to three-fold reduction in all IgG isotypes. Among patients without PML, 42% (five of 12 patients) had detectable anti-JCV antibodies before PLEX; in these patients, anti-JCV antibodies were reduced approximately two- to five-fold, with levels returning to 50-100 percent of baseline two weeks after the final PLEX. The five PML patients, all of whom had detectable anti-JCV antibodies before PLEX, experienced similar reductions in anti-JCV antibody levels following PLEX. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that PLEX effectively removes circulating antibodies; however, levels of endogenous anti-JCV antibody, unlike exogenously administered natalizumab, were replenished relatively quickly following PLEX. While interpretation of anti-JCV antibody levels during or within two weeks after PLEX may be problematic, humoral JCV immunity is not abolished by PLEX and antibody levels are rapidly restored.

Maintenance plasma exchange therapy for steroid-refractory neuromyelitis optica.

Neuromyelitis optica (NMO) is a severe inflammatory demyelinating disease of the central nervous system with exacerbations involving the optic nerves, spinal cord, or both. This study explores the utility of maintenance plasma exchange (mTPE) as a therapy in patients with relapsing, corticosteroid-refractory, NMO. This retrospective case series presents data on patients who were diagnosed with NMO using currently accepted criteria. These patients were refractory to high-dose corticosteroids and received mTPE. Seven patients met the criteria for NMO diagnosis and all were positive for antibodies against aquaporin-4. Over a mean of 7.1 years (range, 2-16), these patients received between 21 and 154 TPE treatments (mean, 76). Although treated with mTPE, five out of the seven patients improved by more than one point on the Expanded Disability Status Scale. Interruption in mTPE in five patients resulted in clinical worsening. When mTPE was restarted in three out of the five patients who experienced a cessation of mTPE, these patients either stabilized or improved. The two patients who did not restart the mTPE protocol died. Patients treated with mTPE also experienced a reduction in the number of NMO exacerbations. Finally, stabilization of the retinal nerve fiber layer thickness was observed while on mTPE. In this preliminary study, mTPE appeared safe and may bring about improvement in disability and sustained stabilization of the clinical course in patients with steroid-refractory relapsing forms of NMO.