Efficacy and safety of ciprofol versus propofol for induction and maintenance of general anesthesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Propofol has been the gold standard for anesthesia induction and maintenance due to its rapid onset and favorable pharmacokinetic properties. However, the search for alternative agents with improved safety and efficacy has led to the emergence of ciprofol (HSK3486), a structural analog of propofol. This systematic review and meta-analysis aim to comprehensively assess the safety and efficacy of ciprofol compared to propofol for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgical procedures. METHODS: This study included only double-arm RCTs in which participants were aged eighteen or older undergoing surgery. For the statistical analysis of the extracted data, we employed RevMan 5.4.1. RESULTS: Ciprofol demonstrated a promising trend of higher anesthesiologists' satisfaction during the induction phase (MD 0.14, 95%, CI - 0.28 to 0.56, p = 0.51), whereas Propofol was favored during maintenance. Propofol also exhibited advantages with a shorter time to successful anesthesia induction (MD 0.08 min, 95% CI 0.00 to 0.15, p = 0.04), and quicker attainment of full alertness (MD 0.11 min, 95% CI - 1.29 to 1.52, p = 0.87), suggesting its efficiency in clinical practice. Importantly, there were no significant disparities in the success rate of anesthesia. CONCLUSION: Both ciprofol and propofol demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety for anesthesia induction and maintenance in adult patients undergoing surgery. While propofol provides a faster onset of induction, ciprofol exhibits advantages in terms of pain management. Clinicians should consider these findings when selecting anesthetic agents, and tailoring choices to individual patient needs and clinical scenarios.

Are We Providing Enough Information to the Pathologists? An Audit of Filling of Histopathology Request Forms for Surgically Resected Tumours.

OBJECTIVE: To analyse quantitatively the adequacy of demographics of clinical information and highlight specific areas of neglect, by assessing the adequacy of filling out histopathology request forms. STUDY DESIGN: Clinical Audit. Place and Duration of the Study: Department of Pathology, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, Pakistan, from January to September 2021. METHODOLOGY: A retrospective audit was carried out on the request forms of surgically resected tumours and biopsies. The recorded details of the patients' demographics and biopsy, clinical history and examination, and intraoperative findings were analysed. RESULTS: Out of 175 forms, patients' names were written in 174 (99.4%) while medical record numbers were written in 113 (64.6%). The doctors' names were given in 172 (98.3%) forms and phone numbers in 34 (19.4%). A clinical diagnosis was provided in 164 (93.7%) forms, while 152 (86.9%) forms correctly entered the biopsy site. Sixty-seven (38.3%) forms included the correct nature of the biopsy. Relevant operative details were provided in half of the forms. Symptoms and their duration were mentioned in 144 (82.3%) and 100 (57.1%), respectively. The form-filling rate was the same for both benign and malignant tumours. CONCLUSION: This study shows that in a significant proportion of cases, complete relevant information is not provided to the histopathologists on request forms for logistics. KEY WORDS: Histopathology, Request forms, Tumours, Audit.

Effect of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter 2 Inhibitors on the 24-Hour Ambulatory Blood Pressure in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus and Hypertension: An Updated Meta-Analysis.

OBJECTIVE: Sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), initially developed for type 2 diabetes mellitus (DM) treatment, have shown potential benefits beyond glycemic control, including a positive impact on the blood pressure (BP). This meta-analysis aimed to evaluate their effects on patients with type 2 DM and hypertension. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases for relevant randomized controlled trials published until May 31, 2023. Ten randomized controlled trials involving participants with confirmed type 2 DM were selected. The intervention group received SGLT2i, whereas the control group received a placebo or standard care. The primary outcomes were the 24-hour ambulatory systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP (DBP). RESULTS: The results showed a significant reduction in the 24-hour ambulatory SBP (weighted mean difference, -5.08 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -7.02 to -3.14; P <.00001) and DBP (weighted mean difference, -2.73 mm Hg; 95% confidence interval, -4.25 to -1.20; P =.0005) with the use of SGLT2i compared with that using the placebo. However, a high-heterogeneity level was observed in both analyses (SBP, I2 = 83%; DBP, I2 = 91%). Sensitivity analysis excluding specific studies reduced heterogeneity while maintaining statistically significant and clinically relevant reductions in the BP. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, this meta-analysis proves that SGLT2i significantly reduce the 24-hour ambulatory BP. SGLT2i may be considered an effective treatment option for lowering the BP in addition to standard care in patients with hypertension and type 2 DM.

Retraction: Molecular Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Bacterial Strains Isolated From Wound of Patients With Diabetes.

[This retracts the article DOI: 10.7759/cureus.47681.].

Thyroid and Its Ripple Effect: Impact on Cardiac Structure, Function, and Outcomes.

Thyroid dysfunction is a widespread and complex issue in the field of endocrine disorders. It has a significant impact on multiple physiological systems, particularly on the heart. This review explores the complex interaction between thyroid dysfunction and cardiac dynamics, examining the detailed network of molecular, cellular, and systemic changes that underlie the close connection between these two physiological areas. Thyroid dysfunction, which includes both hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism, is a common endocrine condition that affects millions of people worldwide. The thyroid hormones thyroxine and triiodothyronine regulate various metabolic activities essential for maintaining cellular balance. Disruptions in thyroid function result in widespread consequences, affecting the cardiovascular system. Thyroid hormones directly impact cardiac muscle cells, controlling their ability to contract, their electrical properties, and their reaction to hypertrophy. Thyroid dysfunction goes beyond the level of individual cells and involves complex interactions among vascular dynamics, neurohormonal control, and endothelial function. These factors all contribute to the development of cardiovascular illness. The impact of thyroid dysfunction on cardiac structure, function, and outcomes is not limited to a one-way pattern. Instead, it involves a dynamic two-way interaction. The manifestations of this condition can vary from minor changes in the electrical activity of the heart to more obvious structural abnormalities, such as an increase in the size of the heart muscle and a decrease in its ability to relax during the filling phase. Furthermore, the correlation between thyroid dysfunction and adverse cardiovascular outcomes, such as heart failure and arrhythmias, highlights the clinical importance of this connection. This review provides a complete overview of the relationship between thyroid dysfunction and cardiac dynamics by analyzing a wide range of research from clinical, molecular, and epidemiological perspectives. This study seeks to enhance our comprehension of the comprehensive effects of thyroid dysfunction on the anatomy and function of the heart by explaining the complex molecular mechanisms and systemic consequences. The goal is to establish a basis for informed clinical treatment and future research efforts.

Treating Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension With Sotatercept: A Meta-Analysis.

Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) results from proliferative remodeling and narrowing of the pulmonary vasculature. Sotatercept is a first-in-class fusion protein that has recently garnered attention for showing improvements in patients with PAH. This meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assesses the overall efficacy of Sotatercept in treating PAH. PubMed, Google Scholar, and Clinicaltrials.gov were searched using relevant keywords and MeSH terms. Studies were included if RCTs compared Sotatercept with placebo in patients with PAH. Our comprehensive literature search yielded 3,127 results, of which two RCTs with 429 patients were included in this meta-analysis. The patients were on background therapy for PAH. Results of the meta-analysis show that when compared with placebo, Sotatercept improved the six-minute walk distance (mean difference [MD] 34.99; 95% confidence interval [CI] 19.02-50.95; P < 0.0001), the World Health Organization (WHO) functional class (odds ratio [OR] 2.50; 95% CI 1.50-4.15; P = 0.0004), and pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR, MD -253.90; 95% CI -356.05 to -151.75; P < 0.00001). However, reduction in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP, MD -1563.14; 95% CI -3271.93 to 145.65; P = 0.07) was not statistically significant in the Sotatercept group versus placebo. In conclusion, Sotatercept improves the six-minute walk distance, WHO functional class, and PVR in patients with PAH receiving background therapy. However, the effect on NT-proBNP levels was not statistically significant. More research is needed to assess the clinical relevance of these findings.

Safety and efficacy revisited: a systematic review and meta-analysis of glue versus tack mesh fixation in laparoscopic inguinal herniorrhaphy.

Background: This analysis addresses the uncertainty surrounding the efficacy of glue mesh fixation (GMF) compared with tack mesh fixation (TMF) in laparoscopic herniorrhaphy. Our meta-analysis incorporates recently conducted randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to enhance the reference for assessing the efficacy and safety of GMF. Methods: PubMed Central, Google Scholar, Science Direct, and Cochrane Library were extensively reviewed for articles in the English language performed from inception to May 2023 using the keywords "Glue mesh repair," "Tack mesh repair," "Inguinal Hernia," "Herniorrhaphy," "Laparoscopic," "Mesh Fixation," and "Randomized controlled trials." Results: In this meta-analysis, we incorporated a total of 20 randomized controlled trials, evaluating each article individually using quality ratings. Compared with TMF, GMF demonstrated a significant reduction in the incidence of chronic pain [RR: 0.40, (0.23, 0.68)] and pain scores on postoperative day 1 [MD: -1.07, (-1.90, -0.25)]. We also used funnel plots and Egger's regression to test for publication bias. Conclusion: In summary, this meta-analysis establishes the significance of GMF in reducing chronic pain and postoperative day 1 pain compared with TMF. However, no statistically significant difference was noted between the GMF and TMF groups concerning hematoma, seroma, operation time, recurrence rate, and total complications. Nonetheless, given the small number of cases in this study, the findings must be validated in the future by multicenter, large-sample, high-quality RCTs.

Analgesic efficacy and safety of erector spinae versus serratus anterior plane block in thoracic surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: Erector spinae plane block (ESPB) and serratus anterior plane block (SAPB) are regional anesthesia techniques that have shown favorable results in pain management following thoracic surgeries; however, their relative superiority is unclear. This review (PROSPERO: CRD42023443018) aims to compare the analgesic efficacy of ESPB and SAPB in patients undergoing thoracic surgeries through the pooled analysis of co-primary outcomes: postoperative oral-morphine-equivalent (mg) consumption in 24 h and pain scores (static) at 24 h. METHODS: A literature search was conducted across PubMed, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar to identify randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from inception to May 2023, comparing ESPB and SAPB in thoracic surgeries. Statistical pooling was done using Review Manager 5.4.1. Bias assessment employed the Cochrane Collaboration Risk-of-Bias 2.0 tool. The strength of evidence was assessed using the guidelines from the GRADE working group. RESULTS: Nine RCTs (485 patients) were included in the study. Postoperative pain scores (static) at 24 h (mean difference (MD) = - 0.31 [- 0.57, 0.05], p = 0.02) and postoperative oral-morphine-equivalent (mg) consumption in 24 h (MD = - 19.73 [- 25.65, - 13.80], p < 0.00001) were significantly lower in the ESBP group. However, the MDs did not exceed the set threshold for clinical importance. No significant differences were observed in the opioid-related adverse effects and block-related complications. CONCLUSION: Our statistically significant results imply that ESPB has superior analgesic efficacy compared to SAPB; however, this difference is clinically unimportant. The safety profile of the two blocks is comparable; hence, current evidence cannot define the relative superiority of one block over the other. Our findings warrant further research with standardized methodologies and a longer duration of analgesic efficacy assessment to yield robust evidence for better clinical applications.

Antihypertensive Effects of Sacubitril/Valsartan Versus Olmesartan: An Updated Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Sacubitril/valsartan is a drug commonly prescribed for the management of hypertension. However, the complete understanding of its efficacy and safety as an antihypertensive agent remains a subject of ongoing investigation. To address this gap, a meta-analysis was conducted to assess and compare the efficacy and safety of sacubitril/valsartan in relation to olmesartan, an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB). A thorough search of PubMed, Google Scholar, and Cochrane databases was performed to identify relevant randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies that could contribute to this meta-analysis. The selected studies were evaluated for their efficacy and safety parameters, including mean sitting and ambulatory blood pressure measurements, common side effects, adverse events, and drug discontinuation rates. A total of eight studies, involving 4488 hypertensive patients, were included in this analysis. Among the participants, 63.5% were administered sacubitril/valsartan, while 36.5% received olmesartan. The analysis revealed significant changes in mean sitting systolic blood pressure (MsSBP), mean sitting diastolic blood pressure (MsDBP), and mean sitting pulse pressure (MsPP) favoring sacubitril/valsartan, with p-values <0.00001, 0.07, and <0.00001, respectively. Additionally, sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated a significant reduction in mean ambulatory systolic blood pressure (MaSBP), mean ambulatory diastolic blood pressure (MaDBP), and mean ambulatory pulse pressure (MaPP) with p-values of 0.001, 0.001, and 0.02, respectively. However, it is important to note that safety outcomes indicated that sacubitril/valsartan was associated with slightly less favorable results compared to olmesartan. This meta-analysis highlights that sacubitril/valsartan exhibits superior efficacy in reducing blood pressure parameters compared to olmesartan in hypertensive patients. Nevertheless, its safety profile appears to be slightly less favorable. To reinforce these findings and provide more robust evidence, further studies with larger sample sizes should be conducted in the future. This comprehensive review serves as a valuable resource for healthcare professionals and researchers seeking to make informed decisions regarding antihypertensive treatment options.

Efficacy of Terbinafine and Itraconazole Combination Therapy Versus Terbinafine or Itraconazole Monotherapy in the Management of Fungal Diseases: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Fungal infections constitute a common dermatological illness rampant in underdeveloped countries. Combination drug therapy is becoming increasingly well-established owing to drug resistance because of monotherapy. Different studies have been conducted previously to compare the medical regimens for the treatment of fungal infections. However, there is insufficient research on the difference in cure rates and recurrence rates with each regimen. To the best of our knowledge, this meta-analysis is the first to compare the effect of the most widely used oral antifungal medications and their combination usage. A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) assesses the efficacy of terbinafine or itraconazole monotherapy versus combination therapy in fungal diseases. We queried PubMed and Cochrane Central from their inception to April 2022 for published studies, RCTs, and observational studies without any language restriction that compared itraconazole and terbinafine combination therapy with monotherapy in patients with fungal infections. The results from the studies were presented as risk ratios (RRs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and were pooled using a random-effects model, and a p-value of ≤0.05 was considered significant for the analysis. Endpoints of interest included cure rates and recurrence rates. Cure rates were increased significantly for combination therapy compared to terbinafine monotherapy (RR=2.01 (1.37, 2.94); p=0.0003; I2=67%). On sensitivity analysis, a significant association was observed between combination therapy and itraconazole monotherapy in terms of cure rates (RR=1.91 (1.41, 2.57); p<0.0001; I2=0%) and recurrence rates (RR=0.08 (0.02, 0.44); p=0.003; I2=0%). The findings of this meta-analysis suggest that itraconazole and terbinafine combination therapy has a better cure rate when compared to terbinafine monotherapy.

Advances in Thyroid Function Tests: Precision Diagnostics and Clinical Implications.

This narrative review explores the evolving field of thyroid function testing, explicitly highlighting the significance of precision diagnostics and their substantial impact on clinical practice. Commencing with a comprehensive examination of the historical progression of thyroid diagnostics, the discourse proceeds to explore recent developments, highlighting the paramount importance of accuracy in testing methods. The primary issue under consideration is the crucial requirement for accuracy in the field of therapeutic practice. The review critically examines the problems related to the interpretation, standardization, and ethical considerations in examining advanced laboratory techniques, novel biomarkers, and state-of-the-art technologies like immunoassays, molecular testing, and automation. The focus on the paradigm shift towards precision diagnostics brings attention to the complex connection between test results and their direct influence on patient care. This investigation expands upon the incorporation of imaging and molecular diagnostics, highlighting the rising significance of precision in customizing treatment strategies. In summary, the study provides a prospective viewpoint, recognizing the persistent obstacles and highlighting the want for dependable, uniform methodologies in thyroid diagnostics. This narrative's primary objective is to guide physicians, researchers, and stakeholders in effectively navigating the intricate nature of contemporary thyroid function tests, with a particular emphasis on resolving the fundamental issue of precision.

Safety and Efficacy of Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-Prolyl Hydroxylase Inhibitors vs. Erythropoietin-Stimulating Agents in Treating Anemia in Renal Patients (With or Without Dialysis): A Meta-Analysis and Systematic Review.

Hypoxia-inducible factor-prolyl hydroxylase domain inhibitors (HIF-PHIs) are a novel group of drugs used to treat renal anemia, but their benefits vary among different trials. Our meta-analysis aims to assess the safety and efficacy of HIF-PHI versus erythropoiesis-stimulating agents (ESA) in managing anemia among patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD), regardless of their dialysis status. PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar were queried to discover eligible randomized controlled trials (RCTs). To quantify the specific effects of HIF-PHI, we estimated pooled mean differences (MDs) and relative risks (RR) with 95% CIs. Our meta-analysis involved 22,151 CKD patients, with 11,234 receiving HIF-PHI and 10,917 receiving ESA from 19 different RCTs. The HIF-PHI used included roxadustat, daprodustat, and vadadustat. HIF-PHI yielded a slight but significant increase in change in mean hemoglobin (Hb) levels (MD: 0.06, 95% CI (0.00, 0.11); p = 0.03), with the maximum significant increase shown in roxadustat followed by daprodustat as compared to ESA. There was a significant decrease in efficacy outcomes such as change in mean iron (MD: -1.54, 95% CI (-3.01, -0.06); p = 0.04), change in mean hepcidin (MD: -21.04, 95% CI (-28.92, -13.17); p < 0.00001), change in mean ferritin (MD: -16.45, 95% CI (-27.17,-5.73); p = 0.03) with roxadustat showing maximum efficacy followed by daprodustat. As for safety, HIF-PHI showed significantly increased incidence in safety outcomes such as diarrhea (MD: 1.3, 95% CI (1.11, 1.51); p = 0.001), adverse events leading to withdrawal (MD: 2.03, 95% CI (1.5, 2.74), p = 0.00001) among 25 various analyzed outcomes. This meta-analysis indicates that HIF-PHIs present a potentially safer and more effective alternative to ESAs, with increased Hb levels and decreased iron usage in CKD patients without significantly increasing adverse events. Therefore, in these patients, we propose HIF-PHI alongside renal anemia treatment.

Molecular Characterization and Antibiotic Susceptibility Pattern of Bacterial Strains Isolated From Wound of Patients With Diabetes.

BACKGROUND:  Diabetic wound infections are susceptible to various pathogens, particularly bacteria, due to the immunocompromised state of diabetic patients. Staphylococcus aureus is frequently implicated in diabetic wounds. To ascertain the presence of multiple antibiotic resistance in bacterial pathogens derived from diabetic wound infections, a comprehensive analysis is required. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The present cross-sectional investigation was carried out at a tertiary care facility. The samples were collected in aseptic conditions from the Endocrinology unit, specifically from local in-hospital patients (n=140). These samples were then assessed for their susceptibility to the commonly used antibacterial medications within the study area. The specimens were obtained from the lesions of individuals diagnosed with diabetes. The subjects were subjected to inoculation using various media and cultures. RESULTS: The findings of this study revealed that a collective sum of 122 bacterial isolates was acquired. The conclusions of the antibiotic susceptibility analysis revealed that the gram-positive isolates had a higher level of resistance to penicillin G (93.18%). However, they demonstrated sensitivity to vancomycin (100%) and linezolid (LZD) (95%). The gram-negative isolates exhibited complete resistance, at a rate of 100%, to penicillin, specifically amoxicillin (AMC), as well as to sulfonamides, such as sulfamethoxazole/trimethoprim (SXT), which belong to the antibiotic classes mentioned. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, there has been a notable rise in antibiotic resistance.

Exploring the Cardiovascular Benefits of Sodium-Glucose Cotransporter-2 (SGLT2) Inhibitors: Expanding Horizons Beyond Diabetes Management.

Globally, cardiovascular disease (CVD) continues to be the primary cause of morbidity and mortality. The risk of cardiovascular disease is markedly increased in individuals with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), making managing cardiovascular health a top priority. Initially developed for their glucose-lowering properties, sodium-glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors have emerged as a transformative class of pharmaceuticals with profound cardiovascular benefits that extend far beyond glycemic control. One of the most striking findings is the substantial reduction in major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), including myocardial infarction, stroke, and cardiovascular mortality, observed in clinical trials evaluating SGLT2 inhibitors. These extraordinary cardioprotective effects are demonstrated by landmark trials such as EMPA-REG OUTCOME, CANVAS, and DECLARE-TIMI 58, which are discussed in detail. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have demonstrated positive outcomes in heart failure (HF) with reduced ejection fraction, which has led to their incorporation into HF treatment guidelines. SGLT2 inhibitors offer renoprotection by delaying the progression of diabetic kidney disease, reducing albuminuria, preserving glomerular filtration rates, and their immediate cardiovascular benefits. We investigate the potential mechanisms underlying these renal benefits, focusing on the role of hemodynamic alterations and intraglomerular pressure reduction. In addition, SGLT2 inhibitors have a distinct diuretic effect that can contribute to volume reduction and symptom alleviation in patients with heart failure (HF). This diuretic action, distinct from conventional diuretics, warrants additional research to optimize their use in T2DM and HF patients. The risk of euglycemic diabetic ketoacidosis, genital mycobacterial infections, and bone fractures are also discussed. Understanding these issues is essential for making educated clinical decisions. In conclusion, SGLT2 inhibitors have transcended their initial function as anti-diabetic agents to become essential components of cardiovascular and renal protection strategies in T2DM patients. Their diverse benefits, which include cardioprotection, renoprotection, and the potential for HF management, highlight their potential to transform cardiovascular medicine. Optimizing the use of SGLT2 inhibitors in clinical practice bears the promise of improved cardiovascular outcomes for patients with T2DM and beyond as we navigate this changing landscape.

Cannulation Strategies in Type A Aortic Dissection: Overlooked Details and Novel Approaches.

Aortic dissection type A is a life-threatening condition that frequently necessitates surgical intervention. This review focuses on central aortic cannulation, arch branch vessel (ABV) cannulation, and proximal arch cannulation as key techniques during aortic surgery. It discusses innovative solutions for addressing these challenges. The review synthesizes findings from recent studies and emphasizes the significance of meticulous planning and execution of cannulation in aortic dissection repair. This review aims to contribute to the advancement of surgical practices and the enhancement of patient outcomes in the management of type A aortic dissection (AAD) by addressing these frequently overlooked details.