Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Nat Hum Behav ; 5(10): 1369-1380, 2021 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33888880

RESUMEN

Pervading global narratives suggest that political polarization is increasing, yet the accuracy of such group meta-perceptions has been drawn into question. A recent US study suggests that these beliefs are inaccurate and drive polarized beliefs about out-groups. However, it also found that informing people of inaccuracies reduces those negative beliefs. In this work, we explore whether these results generalize to other countries. To achieve this, we replicate two of the original experiments with 10,207 participants across 26 countries. We focus on local group divisions, which we refer to as fault lines. We find broad generalizability for both inaccurate meta-perceptions and reduced negative motive attribution through a simple disclosure intervention. We conclude that inaccurate and negative group meta-perceptions are exhibited in myriad contexts and that informing individuals of their misperceptions can yield positive benefits for intergroup relations. Such generalizability highlights a robust phenomenon with implications for political discourse worldwide.


Asunto(s)
Procesos de Grupo , Política , Prejuicio , Conducta Social , Percepción Social/psicología , Barreras de Comunicación , Comparación Transcultural , Cultura , Generalización Psicológica , Humanos , Prejuicio/prevención & control , Prejuicio/psicología , Racionalización , Cambio Social , Factores Sociológicos , Estereotipo
2.
Nat Hum Behav ; 4(6): 622-633, 2020 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32424259

RESUMEN

Prospect theory is among the most influential frameworks in behavioural science, specifically in research on decision-making under risk. Kahneman and Tversky's 1979 study tested financial choices under risk, concluding that such judgements deviate significantly from the assumptions of expected utility theory, which had remarkable impacts on science, policy and industry. Though substantial evidence supports prospect theory, many presumed canonical theories have drawn scrutiny for recent replication failures. In response, we directly test the original methods in a multinational study (n = 4,098 participants, 19 countries, 13 languages), adjusting only for current and local currencies while requiring all participants to respond to all items. The results replicated for 94% of items, with some attenuation. Twelve of 13 theoretical contrasts replicated, with 100% replication in some countries. Heterogeneity between countries and intra-individual variation highlight meaningful avenues for future theorizing and applications. We conclude that the empirical foundations for prospect theory replicate beyond any reasonable thresholds.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Teoría Psicológica , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Comparación Transcultural , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Riesgo , Asunción de Riesgos , Adulto Joven
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA