Usefulness of cell block examination for the cytological diagnosis of thoracic SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor: A case report.

SMARCA4-deficient undifferentiated tumor (SMARCA4-UT) is a high-grade malignant neoplasm showing undifferentiated or rhabdoid morphology that significantly involves the thorax of adults. It has been reported as SMARCA4-deficient thoracic sarcoma or SMARCA4-deficient non-small cell lung carcinoma according to the findings of immunohistochemical and genetic studies. We report a case of thoracic SMARCA4-UT for which cell block analysis and immunohistochemical staining were useful for the final diagnosis. A 51-year-old man had a chief complaint of left back pain and visited our hospital for further examination. Cytological examination of a left pleural effusion was performed and we also made a cell block of the pleural effusion. Cytological examination revealed polyhedral to round tumor cells. The tumor cells appeared singly or formed loosely cohesive clusters. The nuclei were round to oval, enlarged, and sometimes eccentric with prominent nucleoli with irregular borders. The nuclear chromatin was unevenly distributed. The cytoplasm was vacuolar to eosinophilic. There were no characteristic structures of tumor cells. The cell block revealed many single or loosely cohesive round to epithelioid cells. Some tumor cells often exhibited eccentrically located nuclei and lightly eosinophilic cytoplasm, showing a rhabdoid morphology. On immunohistochemistry, the tumor cells were positive for SOX-2 and they demonstrated significantly reduced SMARCA4 (BRG1) expression; SMARCA2 (BRM) and SMARCB1 (INI1) expression were retained. Accordingly, we made a diagnosis of SMARCA4-UT. This case demonstrates the importance of performing histological and immunohistochemical analysis using cell blocks for immediate diagnosis.

Usefulness of SynCAM3 and cyclin D1 immunohistochemistry in distinguishing superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor from its histological mimics.

Superficial CD34-positive fibroblastic tumor (SCPFT) is a fibroblastic/myofibroblastic soft tissue tumor of rarely metastasizing intermediate malignancy. Some recent studies have described a relationship between SCPFT and PRDM10-rearranged soft tissue tumor (PRT) based on SynCAM3 and PRDM10 expression on immunohistochemistry. We performed CD34, cytokeratin AE1/AE3, SynCAM3, and PRDM10 immunohistochemistry in SCPFT and its histological mimics, including myxoinflammatory fibroblastic sarcoma (MIFS), superficially localized myxofibrosarcoma (MFS), and undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcoma. We also examined cyclin D1 expression because it is expressed in MIFS and MFS. We conducted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) of PRDM10 rearrangement in SCPFT cases. On immunohistochemistry, only SCPFT showed strong and diffuse SynCAM3 expression. SCPFT also exhibited strong nuclear and weak cytoplasmic cyclin D1 expression, which was similar to that observed in MIFS. Two of five SCPFT cases exhibited nuclear PRDM10 expression. FISH revealed PRDM10 split signals in 44% and 24% of tumor cells in two SCPFT cases showing nuclear PRDM10 expression on immunohistochemistry, respectively. A minority of non-SCPFT cases showed focal SynCAM3 expression, but a combination of SynCAM3 and cyclin D1 in addition to CD34 and cytokeratin AE1/AE3 may be useful for the differential diagnosis of SCPFT and its histological mimics.

Diagnostic utility of CSF1 immunohistochemistry in tenosynovial giant cell tumor for differentiating from giant cell-rich tumors and tumor-like lesions of bone and soft tissue.

BACKGROUND: Tenosynovial giant cell tumor (TSGCT) is a benign fibrohistiocytic tumor that affects the synovium of joints, bursa, and tendon sheaths and is categorized into localized TSGCT (LTSGCT) and diffuse TSGCT (DTSGCT). LTSGCT and DTSGCT are characterized by recurrent fusions involving the colony-stimulating factor 1 (CSF1) gene and its translocation partner collagen type VI alpha 3 chain. The fusion gene induces intratumoral overexpression of CSF1 mRNA and CSF1 protein. CSF1 expression is a characteristic finding of TSGCT and detection of CSF1 mRNA and CSF1 protein may be useful for the pathological diagnosis. Although there have been no effective anti-CSF1 antibodies to date, in situ hybridization (ISH) for CSF1 mRNA has been performed to detect CSF1 expression in TSGCT. We performed CSF1 immunohistochemistry (IHC) using anti-CSF1 antibody (clone 2D10) in cases of TSGCT, giant cell-rich tumor (GCRT), and GCRT-like lesion and verified its utility for the pathological diagnosis of TSGCT. METHODS: We performed CSF1 IHC in 110 cases including 44 LTSGCTs, 20 DTSGCTs, 1 malignant TSGCT (MTSGCT), 10 giant cell tumors of bone, 2 giant cell reparative granulomas, 3 aneurysmal bone cysts, 10 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas, 10 leiomyosarcomas, and 10 myxofibrosarcomas. We performed fluorescence ISH (FISH) for CSF1 rearrangement to confirm CSF1 expression on IHC in TSGCTs. We considered the specimens to have CSF1 rearrangement if a split signal was observed in greater than 2% of the tumor cells. RESULTS: Overall, 50 of 65 TSGCT cases, including 35 of the 44 LTSGCTs and 15 of the 20 DTSGCTs, showed distinct scattered expression of CSF1 in the majority of mononuclear tumor cells. MTSGCT showed no CSF1 expression. Non-TSGCT cases were negative for CSF1. FISH revealed CSF1 rearrangement in 6 of 7 CSF1-positive cases on IHC. On the other hand, FISH detected no CSF1 rearrangement in all CSF1-negative cases on IHC. Thus, the results of IHC corresponded to those of FISH. CONCLUSION: We revealed characteristic CSF1 expression on IHC in cases of TSGCT, whereas the cases of non-TSGCT exhibited no CSF1 expression. CSF1 IHC may be useful for differentiating TSGCTs from histologically mimicking GCRTs and GCRT-like lesions.

Prognostic usefulness of a modified risk model for solitary fibrous tumor that includes the Ki-67 labeling index.

BACKGROUND: Predicting the prognosis of patients with solitary fibrous tumor (SFT) is often difficult. The prognostic risk models developed by Demicco et al. are now the standard for evaluating the risk of SFT metastasis in the current World Health Organization classification of soft tissue and bone tumors. METHODS: In this study, we examined the prognostic usefulness of a modified version of the Demicco risk models that replaces the mitotic count with the Ki-67 labeling index. We compared the three-variable and four-variable Demicco risk models with our modified risk models using Kaplan-Meier curves based on data for 43 patients with SFT. RESULTS: We found a significant difference in metastasis-free survival when patients were classified into low-risk and intermediate/high-risk groups using the three-variable (P = 0.022) and four-variable (P = 0.046) Demicco models. There was also a significant difference in metastasis-free survival between the low-risk and intermediate/high-risk groups when the modified three-variable (P = 0.006) and four-variable (P = 0.022) models were used. CONCLUSION: Modified risk models that include the Ki-67 labeling index are effective for prediction of the prognosis in patients with SFT.

Assessment of H3K27me3 immunohistochemistry and combination of NF1 and p16 deletions by fluorescence in situ hybridization in the differential diagnosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor and its histological mimics.

BACKGROUND: A definitive diagnosis of malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (MPNST) is challenging, especially in cases without neurofibromatosis 1 (NF1), because MPNST lacks specific markers on immunohistochemistry (IHC). METHODS: We performed IHC for histone 3 trimethylated on lysine 27 (H3K27me3) and evaluated the percentage of cells with H3K27me3 loss using measured values at 10% intervals, categorized as complete loss (100% of tumor cells lost staining), partial loss (10% to 90% of tumor cells lost staining), and intact (no tumor cells lost staining). We conducted fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) for NF1 and p16 deletions comparing 55 MPNSTs and 35 non-MPNSTs, consisting of 9 synovial sarcomas (SSs), 8 leiomyosarcomas (LMSs), 10 myxofibrosarcomas (MFSs), and 8 undifferentiated pleomorphic sarcomas (UPSs). We assessed the percentage of cells with homozygous and heterozygous deletions and defined "deletion" if the percentage of either the NF1 or p16 deletion signals was greater than 50% of tumor cells. RESULTS: Among the 55 MPNSTs, 23 (42%) showed complete H3K27me3 loss and 32 (58%) exhibited partial loss or intact. One each of the 9 SSs (11%), 8 LMSs (12%), and 8 UPSs (12%) showed complete H3K27me3 loss and many non-MPNSTs exhibited intact or partial H3K27me3 loss. Among the 55 MPNSTs, 33 (60%) and 44 (80%) showed NF1 or p16 deletion, respectively. Co-deletion of NF1 and p16 was observed in 29 (53%) MPNSTs. Among the 23 MPNTSs showing H3K27me3 complete loss, 18 (78%) and 20 (87%) exhibited NF1 or p16 deletion, respectively. Among the 32 MPNSTs with H3K27me3 partial loss or intact, 15 (47%) and 24 (75%) exhibited NF1 or p16 deletion, respectively. The frequency of NF1 and/or p16 deletion tended to be lower in non-MPNSTs than in MPNSTs. Approximately 90% of MPNSTs included cases with H3K27me3 complete loss and cases showing H3K27me3 partial loss or intact with NF1 and/or p16 deletion. Approximately 50% of MPNSTs showed co-deletion of NF1 and p16 regardless of H3K27me3 loss. CONCLUSIONS: FISH for NF1 and p16 deletions, frequently observed in high-grade MPNSTs, might be a useful ancillary diagnostic tool for differentiating MPNST from other mimicking spindle cell and pleomorphic sarcomas.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus during perioperative period of cerebrovascular surgery.

Nonconvulsive status epilepticus (NCSE) is generally defined as a change in behavior and/or mental process from the baseline, which is associated with ongoing seizure activity or continuous epileptiform discharges on electroencephalography (EEG) in the absence of convulsive seizures. The present study investigated NCSE incidence using serial EEG during the perioperative periods of cerebrovascular surgery at a medium-sized, local hospital. A total of 54 patients were admitted to our department and underwent various neurosurgical procedures over a course of one year. If clinical symptoms worsened without clear explanation, EEG was performed, resulting in a diagnosis of NCSE in four patients (7.4%). The EEG abnormalities included periodic lateralized epileptiform discharges in 1 patient, triphasic waves in 2 patients, and repeated ictal discharges in 1 patient. Improved mental status and consciousness level, together with disappearance of EEG abnormalities, after appropriate anticonvulsant treatment supported the diagnosis of NCSE. The present study stressed the importance of EEG if no adequate explanation for neurological deterioration can be determined from the clinical course, laboratory data, or neuroimaging examination.