Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 65
Filtrar
1.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 79: 77-82, 2024 Aug 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39216262

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy and precision of oral thermometry in pediatric patients, along with its sensitivity and specificity for detecting fever and hypothermia, with rectal thermometry as reference standard. DESIGN AND METHODS: This method-comparison study enrolled patients aged between 6 and 17 years, admitted to the surgical ward during a 21-month period. KD-2150 and IVAC Temp Plus II were used for oral and rectal temperature measurements respectively. Fever and hypothermia were defined as core temperature ≥38.0 °C and ≤ 35.9 °C respectively. Accuracy and precision of oral thermometry were determined by the Bland-Altman method. Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value, and correct classification of oral temperature cutoffs for detecting fever and hypothermia were calculated. RESULTS: Based on power analysis, 100 pediatric patients were enrolled. The mean difference between oral and rectal temperatures was -0.34 °C, with 95 % limits of agreement ranging between -0.52 and -0.16. Sensitivity and specificity of oral thermometry for detecting fever were 0.50 and 1.0 respectively; its sensitivity and specificity for detecting hypothermia were 1.0 and 0.88 respectively. The oral temperature value of 37.6 °C provided excellent sensitivity for detecting fever, while the value of 35.7 °C provided optimal sensitivity and specificity for detecting hypothermia. CONCLUSIONS: Oral thermometry had low sensitivity for detecting fever and suboptimal specificity for detecting hypothermia; thus, temperature values <38.0 °C and <36.0 °C cannot exclude fever and confirm hypothermia respectively with high certainty. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Diagnostic accuracy of oral thermometry can be improved by the use of oral temperature thresholds <38.0 °C for detecting fever and <35.9 °C for detecting hypothermia.

2.
Am J Crit Care ; 32(5): 338-345, 2023 09 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-37652884

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The few studies of associations between fever and outcomes in pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) patients have conflicting findings. Associations between hypothermia and patient outcomes have not been studied. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the incidence and characteristics of fever and hypothermia and their associations with adverse outcomes among PICU patients. METHODS: Patients consecutively admitted to 2 PICUs in a 2-year period were prospectively studied. Core temperature was mainly measured by rectal or axillary thermometry. Fever and hypothermia were defined as core temperatures of greater than 38.0 °C and less than 36.0 °C, respectively. Prolonged mechanical ventilation, prolonged PICU stay, and PICU mortality were the adverse patient outcomes studied. Associations between patient outcomes and core temperature disorders were evaluated with univariate comparisons and multivariate analyses. RESULTS: Of 545 patients enrolled, fever occurred in 299 (54.9%) and hypothermia occurred in 161 (29.5%). Both temperature disorders were independently associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation and prolonged PICU stay (P < .001) but not with PICU mortality. Late onset of fever (P < .001) and hypothermia (P = .009) were independently associated with prolonged mechanical ventilation, fever magnitude and duration (both P < .001) were independently associated with prolonged PICU stay, and fever magnitude (P < .001) and infectious cause of hypothermia (P= .01) were independently associated with higher PICU mortality. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide evidence that the manifestation and characteristics of fever and hypothermia are independent predictors of adverse outcomes in PICU patients.


Asunto(s)
Hipotermia , Humanos , Niño , Hipotermia/epidemiología , Temperatura , Hospitalización , Unidades de Cuidado Intensivo Pediátrico , Pacientes
3.
Biomed Res Int ; 2022: 4083494, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35146022

RESUMEN

Delayed admission of patients to the intensive care unit (ICU) is increasing worldwide and can be followed by adverse outcomes when critical care treatment is not provided timely. This systematic review and meta-analysis appraised and synthesized the published literature about the association between delayed ICU admission and mortality of adult patients. Articles published from inception up to August 2021 in English-language, peer-reviewed journals indexed in CINAHL, PubMed, Scopus, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were searched by using key terms. Delayed ICU admission constituted the intervention, while mortality for any predefined time period was the outcome. Risk for bias was evaluated with the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale and additional criteria. Study findings were synthesized qualitatively, while the odds ratios (ORs) for mortality with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were combined quantitatively. Thirty-four observational studies met inclusion criteria. Risk for bias was low in most studies. Unadjusted mortality was reported in 33 studies and was significantly higher in the delayed ICU admission group in 23 studies. Adjusted mortality was reported in 18 studies, and delayed ICU admission was independently associated with significantly higher mortality in 13 studies. Overall, pooled OR for mortality in case of delayed ICU admission was 1.61 (95% CI 1.44-1.81). Interstudy heterogeneity was high (I 2 = 66.96%). According to subgroup analysis, OR for mortality was remarkably higher in postoperative patients (OR, 2.44, 95% CI 1.49-4.01). These findings indicate that delayed ICU admission is significantly associated with mortality of critically ill adults and highlight the importance of providing timely critical care in non-ICU settings.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Crítica/mortalidad , Mortalidad Hospitalaria , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos , Admisión del Paciente , Adulto , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo
5.
J Clin Nurs ; 31(5-6): 520-531, 2022 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34278635

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To synthesise the evidence on the accuracy and precision of oral thermometry in adult patients, as well as on its sensitivity and specificity for fever detection. BACKGROUND: Oral thermometry has long been used in various clinical settings thanks to its rapid, safe and convenient measurements, which are easy to obtain and minimally prone to operator errors. DESIGN: Literature review and meta-analysis that adhered to the PRISMA statement. METHODS: By using key terms, literature searches were conducted in CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus and Cochrane Library. Method-comparison studies, which were published from January 1990 to December 2020 in English-language, peer-reviewed journals, compared oral temperature measurements with invasive thermometry ones, and were conducted on patients ≥18 years, were included. Methodological quality of selected studies was evaluated with QUADAS-2. RESULTS: Sixteen articles were selected for inclusion. Risk of bias was assessed as low in most of them. Quantitative synthesis indicated that pooled mean oral temperature was lower than core temperature by .07℃, with 95% limits of agreement ranging between -.22℃ and .08℃. Pooled sensitivity and specificity for fever detection (defined as core temperature ≥38℃ in most studies) were .53 (95% confidence interval, .39-.66) and .98 (95% confidence interval, .97-.99), respectively. Sensitivity analysis indicated larger temperature underestimation in case rectal temperature was used as reference standard. CONCLUSION: Despite its satisfactory accuracy, precision and specificity, oral thermometry has low sensitivity for fever detection, which entails a high number of false-negative readings and uncertainty for excluding fever in patients found to be non-febrile. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Oral thermometry cannot be recommended for replacing invasive thermometry methods in hospitalised adult patients, considering the high incidence of fever in them and possible negative effects of missing fever for patient diagnosis and outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Temperatura Corporal , Termometría , Adulto , Sesgo , Fiebre/diagnóstico , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
8.
J Perianesth Nurs ; 36(3): 232-237, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33618995

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the prevalence, activities, and reasons for missed nursing care in the postanesthesia care unit (PACU) and the effect of intensive care unit (ICU) overflow patients. DESIGN: This is a single-center, cross-sectional survey. METHODS: Nineteen PACU-registered nurses of a tertiary care hospital participated. Over a 7-month period, participants were asked to complete a validated questionnaire, which included 19 items related to missed nursing care activities and 10 items related to reasons for missed nursing care. χ2 test and 1-way analysis of variance were used for data analysis. FINDINGS: Questionnaires (N = 397) were completed. Prevalence of missed nursing care activities was 78.1% and was significantly higher in cases of ICU overflow patients (P < .001). The three most reported missed nursing care activities were "drug preparation, administration, and assessment of effectiveness," "patient surveillance and assessment," and "care associated with pain"; prevalence was significantly higher in cases of ICU overflow patients (P = .036, P = .003, and P = .004, respectively). The three most reported reasons for missed nursing care were "inadequate number of nursing personnel," "unexpected rise in patient volume or acuity," and "heavy admission or discharge activity". CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicated missed nursing care was common in the PACU and increased in case of ICU overflow patients. Therefore, missed nursing care needs to be identified and minimized, while the number and length of stay of critically ill patients admitted to the PACU should be limited.


Asunto(s)
Atención de Enfermería , Enfermería Posanestésica , Cuidados Críticos , Enfermedad Crítica , Estudios Transversales , Hospitalización , Humanos
9.
SAGE Open Med ; 8: 2050312120962338, 2020.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33062276

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Once a patent expires, generic analogue drugs are alternatives to brand name drugs. Because bioequivalence/biodistribution problems have been reported for many generic analogue drugs, we prospectively evaluated 31 patients to reveal the differences in the doses used and the efficacy and adverse events of two different intravenous esmolol formulations. METHODS: This was a prospective observational pilot study. Our aim was to reveal the possible differences in the required doses between two different formulations (brand name drug vs generic analogue drug) of intravenous esmolol in beats per minute, systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure and mean arterial pressure in intra- and postoperative patients with supraventricular tachycardia and hypertension. The patients were categorised into two groups according to the medication they received (brand name drug or generic analogue drug). RESULTS: Esmolol was given to 31 patients (16 generic analogue drug and 15 brand name drug). Although there was a statistically significant difference in bolus (mg/kg) and continued (mg/kg/h) drug dose used (brand name drug/generic analogue drug, mean (standard deviation), 0.3 (0.1) vs 0.38 (0.1), p = 0.03 for bolus dose, and 0.22 (0.09) vs 0.29 (0.08) for continued dose at 10 min (p = 0.03), 0.19 (0.06) vs 0.24 (0.05) at 20 min (p = 0.01) and 0.14 (0.05) vs 0.18 (0.05) at 30 min (p = 0.02)), there were no time-related statistical significant differences in the reduction rates of the two drugs (p = 0.47). There were no time-related statistically significant differences between the two groups in systolic blood pressure, diastolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure and beats per minute, nor in their adverse events. CONCLUSION: In this pilot study, smaller doses were given for controlling the patient's haemodynamics when a brand name drug was used. Because there were no significant time-related differences in the reduction rates of the two drugs nor in any haemodynamic differences between the two groups, optimal titration of the drug used could effectively control the patient's haemodynamics. The adverse events were also similar in both groups.

12.
Nurse Educ Today ; 86: 104314, 2020 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31841828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Understanding why nursing students engage in academic dishonesty is crucial, since cheating is becoming more common and can be followed by unethical professional practice. OBJECTIVES: To develop and validate a questionnaire for investigating nursing students' perceptions about the reasons for academic dishonesty during examinations, along with identifying the most important of these reasons. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey with the use of a convenience sample. PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING: 660 undergraduate students of a nursing department in Greece. METHODS: Questionnaire items were developed based on literature review and student interviews, evaluation of their content validity and intra-rater reliability. The participants completed the questionnaire electronically, which included items referring to behaviors of and reasons for academic dishonesty during examinations. Based on their responses, factor analysis was used to determine structural validity of the items that referred to the reasons for academic dishonesty. RESULTS: High prevalence of academic dishonesty behaviors during examinations was confirmed. Reasons for academic dishonesty were grouped into three factors, which included 17 items in total. Highly-rated items mainly referred to non-realistic demands of and unfair student treatment by academic personnel, absence of severe consequences for cheating, the way examinations are performed, and the importance of achieving high grades. Female, junior and high degree grade students had significantly higher percentages of highly-rated responses in some items. CONCLUSIONS: These findings offered knowledge about the reasons that students perceive to mostly favor cheating, whose identification can guide preventive strategies.


Asunto(s)
Decepción , Evaluación Educacional/normas , Mala Conducta Profesional/ética , Estudiantes de Enfermería , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Bachillerato en Enfermería , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto Joven
13.
Nurs Philos ; 21(1): e12283, 2020 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31512817

RESUMEN

The allocation of healthcare resources takes place at two distinct levels. At the macroeconomic level, policymakers decide on budgets, staffing, cost-effectiveness thresholds, clinical guidelines and insurance payments; at the microeconomic level, healthcare professionals decide on whom to treat, what the appropriate treatment is, how much time and effort should each patient receive and how urgent the need for care is. At both levels, there is a constant social need for just allocation. Policymakers are mostly guided by abstract principles of justice, thinking in terms of groups of patients, epidemiological data, impersonal statistics and economic costs. On the other hand, healthcare professionals understand the need for justice at a more personal level, as they interact with patients and, in a sense, put theory into practice. Nurses hold a unique position in healthcare systems, as, traditionally, they are closer to patients than other health professionals. This means that they have a firsthand view of the effect that their decisions have on specific patients and, therefore, nurses tend to get more influenced by their personal feelings, values and beliefs at the microeconomic level. This presentation shall examine the gap between abstract macroeconomic and concrete microeconomic health resources allocation decisions, with a particular emphasis on the role of the nurse.


Asunto(s)
Toma de Decisiones , Economía/tendencias , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/provisión & distribución , Asignación de Recursos/métodos , Humanos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/tendencias , Asignación de Recursos/normas , Asignación de Recursos/tendencias , Justicia Social
14.
J Infus Nurs ; 42(6): 283-287, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31693561

RESUMEN

The use of peripheral implanted ports to administer parenteral nutrition in a number of patient cohorts is increasingly seen as a safe alternative to chest ports with equivalence in long-term outcomes. Two insertion sites on the upper arm were compared using the zone insertion method (ZIM), which was developed as an approach to optimize and reduce catheter-related exit site complications. The ZIM divides the medial upper arm into 3 main colors, red, green, and yellow, which are based on musculoskeletal, skin, and vessel characteristics. The optimal exit site is considered to be the green zone, the middle third of the upper arm. Thirty-five patients were allocated to vein puncture at the yellow/green zone (group A) and 35 patients at the yellow zone near the axilla (group B). All devices were implanted in the distal green zone. Successful peripheral port implantation was 91.4% (n = 35) for group A and 100.0% (n = 35) for group B (P = .07). No procedural or postprocedural complications were observed.


Asunto(s)
Brazo/irrigación sanguínea , Cateterismo Periférico , Catéteres de Permanencia , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos
15.
Biomed Res Int ; 2019: 1035730, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31662961

RESUMEN

Despite the use of lung protective ventilation (LPV) strategies, a severe form of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is unfortunately associated with high mortality rates, which sometimes exceed 60%. Recently, major technical improvements have been applied in extracorporeal life support (ECLS) systems, but as these techniques are costly and associated with very serious adverse events, high-quality evidence is needed before these techniques can become the "cornerstone" in the management of moderate to severe ARDS. Unfortunately, evaluation of previous randomized controlled and observational trials revealed major methodological issues. In this review, we focused on the most important clinical trials aiming at a final conclusion about the effectiveness of ECLS in moderate to severe ARDS patients. Totally, 20 published clinical studies were included in this review. Most studies have important limitations with regard to quality and design. In the 20 included studies (2,956 patients), 1,185 patients received ECLS. Of them, 976 patients received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) and 209 patients received extracorporeal carbon dioxide removal (ECCO2R). According to our results, ECLS use was not associated with a benefit in mortality rate in patients with ARDS. However, when restricted to higher quality studies, ECMO was associated with a significant benefit in mortality rate. Furthermore, in patients with H1N1, a potential benefit of ECLS in mortality rate was apparent. Until more high-quality data are derived, ECLS should be an option as a salvage therapy in severe hypoxemic ARDS patients.


Asunto(s)
Circulación Extracorporea/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Respiración Artificial/métodos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/terapia , Disnea/terapia , Circulación Extracorporea/efectos adversos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/efectos adversos , Humanos , Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana/terapia , Mortalidad , Intercambio Gaseoso Pulmonar , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Síndrome de Dificultad Respiratoria/mortalidad , Terapia Recuperativa , Resultado del Tratamiento
16.
J Vasc Nurs ; 37(2): 113-116, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31155157

RESUMEN

Implanted ports are an important vascular access device for patients with malignancies requiring long-term chemotherapy. Peripherally placed ports are increasing in use as they are a safe, cost-effective alternative to chest-placed ports. Most peripheral ports can be placed bedside by specialist nurses in designated clinical areas rather than costly operating rooms or interventional radiology suites. Peripheral ports are considered less invasive compared with chest port placement because of reduced procedural risk. To enhance the success rate of peripheral port placement and minimize risks, we provide vascular access specialists with a systematic approach along with some technical advice tips and tricks to help avoid mechanical complications such as repeated puncture of the vein, excessive bleeding, thrombosis or skin dehiscence, as well as latent complications such as catheter migration and catheter-related blood stream infection.


Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Periférico/enfermería , Guías como Asunto , Especialización , Dispositivos de Acceso Vascular/tendencias , Enfermería Cardiovascular , Infecciones Relacionadas con Catéteres/prevención & control , Quimioterapia , Humanos
17.
J Pediatr Nurs ; 46: 89-99, 2019.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30865876

RESUMEN

PROBLEM: Non-invasive thermometry methods have been used as substitutes for intra-corporeal ones in order to decrease patient discomfort and risk for complications, yet the evaluation of their performance is necessary. Our aim was to synthesize the evidence on the accuracy and precision of temporal artery (TA) thermometry, as well as on its sensitivity and specificity for fever detection. ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA: This systematic review and meta-analysis included method-comparison studies, which compared TA temperature measurements with invasive thermometry ones, were published between 2000 and 2018, and were conducted on patients aged <18 years. SAMPLE: Thirty articles were selected for inclusion in the final analysis after screening those identified by searches in CINAHL, PubMed, Web of Science, Cochrane Library, EMBASE and Scopus. RESULTS: Quantitative synthesis indicated that pooled mean TA temperature was lower than core temperature by 0.01 °C (95% limits of agreement, -0.06 °C to 0.03 °C). Average summary sensitivity and specificity for fever detection were 0.72 (95% confidence interval, 0.66-0.79) and 0.91 (95% confidence interval, 0.86-0.93) respectively. Subgroup analysis indicated a trend toward larger temperature underestimation in febrile patients and in ages ≤4 years. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its satisfactory accuracy, precision and specificity, TA thermometry has low sensitivity when used in pediatric patients, which does not allow satisfactory fever detection. IMPLICATIONS: TA thermometry cannot be recommended for replacing rectal temperature measurement methods in children, due to its high proportion of false negative readings during screening for fever.


Asunto(s)
Fiebre/diagnóstico , Arterias Temporales , Termometría/métodos , Niño , Humanos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
18.
J Clin Nurs ; 28(11-12): 2245-2252, 2019 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30790377

RESUMEN

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To investigate the associations between nurse staffing and the incidence and severity of hypoxaemia, arterial hypotension and bradycardia of postoperative patients during their postanaesthesia care unit stay. BACKGROUND: Nurse understaffing has been associated with adverse patient outcomes in a variety of hospital settings. In the postanaesthesia care unit, nursing shortage is common and can be related to compromised prevention, detection and treatment of adverse events. DESIGN: Observational, single-centre, prospective study that adhered to Strengthening the Reporting of Observational studies in Epidemiology checklist (see Supporting information Appendix S1); 2,207 patients admitted to the postanaesthesia care unit of a tertiary care hospital over a 5-month period were enrolled. METHODS: Incidence of hypoxaemia (arterial oxygen saturation <95%), arterial hypotension (systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg) and bradycardia (heart rate <50 beats per minute), along with episode severity, was recorded. Patients were classified into three groups as follows: sufficient staffing, low and high understaffing. Risk for hypoxaemia, arterial hypotension and bradycardia was adjusted according to patient, anaesthesia and operation characteristics. RESULTS: The incidence of hypoxaemia was significantly higher in the high understaffing group patients, while the incidence of arterial hypotension was significantly higher in both low and high understaffing group patients, compared to sufficient staffing group ones. In the high understaffing group patients, hypoxaemia and arterial hypotension episodes were of significantly higher severity. CONCLUSIONS: These associations between hypoxaemia and arterial hypotension and postanaesthesia care unit understaffing indicate that care quality and patient safety can be compromised in case patient acuity is not matched with sufficient nursing resources. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: Higher incidence of hypoxaemia and arterial hypotension advocates for the prevention of imbalances between patient number and care demands and the number of available nurses.


Asunto(s)
Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/provisión & distribución , Admisión y Programación de Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Adulto , Bradicardia/epidemiología , Femenino , Humanos , Hipotensión/epidemiología , Hipoxia/epidemiología , Incidencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud
19.
Gastroenterol Nurs ; 41(2): 104-110, 2018.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29596123

RESUMEN

The objective of this study was to compare fast-track (FT) recovery protocol with the conventional one in patients treated with major liver resection by evaluating perioperative morbidity, length of hospitalization, and readmission rate. Sixty-two patients suffering from malignant liver tumors were surgically treated from May 2012 to April 2014. After randomization, they were prospectively divided into two groups: Group A patients (n = 32) followed FT recovery protocol and Group B patients (n = 30) were treated with the conventional (CON) protocol. Postoperative morbidity, readmission rate, and median hospital stay in the two groups were studied. Fast-track protocol was associated with a decreased complication (25%, p = .002), whereas the risk of postoperative morbidity was 2.4 times higher in patients treated with the CON protocol (60%, p = .002). Readmission rate was not significantly different between the two groups (6.25%, p = .35). Age (p = .382) and body mass index (p = .818) were not a suspending factor for following the FT protocol. Overall length of stay (postoperative days) in the FT group was (mean ± SD) 5.75 ± .5 and in the CON group was 13.5 ± 6.7 (p < .001). Fast-track recovery protocol seems to be safe and particularly efficient in patients undergoing major liver resections.


Asunto(s)
Ambulación Precoz/métodos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Seguridad del Paciente , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/diagnóstico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/terapia , Estudios Prospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Tasa de Supervivencia , Resultado del Tratamiento
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA