Comparing a recommendation for self-paced versus moderate intensity physical activity for midlife adults: Rationale and design.

Current U.S. guidelines recommend that adults obtain 150 min per week of moderate intensity physical activity (PA), 75 min of vigorous intensity PA, or some equivalent combination. However, less than half of U.S. adults reach this goal, with the proportion even smaller among adults with overweight or obesity. Moreover, regular PA declines after age 45-50. Previous research suggests a shift in national guidelines to emphasize PA of a self-selected intensity (i.e., self-paced), instead of prescribed moderate intensity PA, may result in better adherence to PA programs, particularly among midlife adults with overweight or obesity. The present paper presents the protocol for a field-based RCT testing the hypothesis that adherence to PA programs is improved when PA is explicitly recommended to be self-paced rather than prescribed at moderate intensity among midlife (ages 50-64) adults (N = 240) with overweight or obesity. All participants receive a 12-month intervention designed to help them overcome barriers to regular PA and are randomly assigned to either self-paced or prescribed moderate intensity PA. The primary outcome is total volume of PA (minutes by intensity) as measured by accelerometry. Secondary outcomes include self-reported min/week of PA and changes in bodyweight. Additionally, using ecological momentary assessment, we examine putative mediators of treatment effects. We hypothesize self-paced PA will lead to a more positive affective response to PA, more perceived autonomy, and lower perceived exertion during PA, and thus greater increases in PA behavior. Findings will have direct implications for PA intensity recommendations among midlife adults with overweight or obesity.

Impact of medical school responses during the COVID-19 pandemic on student satisfaction: a nationwide survey of US medical students.

PURPOSE: Medical schools have faced various challenges in preparing their clinical students for the frontlines of a pandemic. This study investigated medical students' satisfaction with their institutions during the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic with the intention of guiding educators in future public health crises. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study surveying students in clinical rotations, the primary outcome was overall satisfaction regarding medical schools' responses to the pandemic, and the four secondary outcomes were school communication, exposure to COVID-19, availability of personal protective equipment, and access to COVID-19 testing. RESULTS: The survey was distributed to ten medical schools, of which 430 students responded for a response rate of 13.0%. While most students were satisfied (61.9%, n=266) with their schools' response, more than one in five (21.9%, n=94) were dissatisfied. Among the four secondary outcomes, communication with students was most predictive of overall satisfaction. CONCLUSION: In future crises, schools can best improve student satisfaction by prioritizing timely communication.

An Uncommon Rash in the Emergency Department: Sporothrix schenckii.

The authors present a case of Sporothrix schenckii diagnosed in the emergency department, based on a thorough history. The patient presented with skin nodules that had spread proximally up the arm in various stages of healing. He reported minimal pain for the unhealed ulcer and no pain for the healing ulcers, and no other concerning symptoms. The history of a thorn prick followed by the initial red nodule on the forearm has led to the diagnosis - as it was consistent with the classic presentation of lymphocutaneous sporotrichosis. A high index of suspicion and carefully noting occupational history is required for a diagnosis of sporotrichosis. Clinicians should recommend long sleeves and gloves to their patients when they are handling soil.