RESUMEN
Single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) has contributed to understanding cellular heterogeneity and immune profiling in cancer. The aim of the study was to investigate gene expression and immune profiling in colorectal cancer (CRC) using scRNA-seq. We analyzed single-cell gene expression and T cell receptor (TCR) sequences in 30 pairs of CRC and matched normal tissue. Intratumoral lymphocytes were measured with digital image analysis. CRC had more T cells, epithelial cells, and myeloid cells than normal colorectal tissue. CRCs with microsatellite instability had more abundant T cells than those without microsatellite instability. Immune cell compositions of CRC and normal colorectal tissue were inversely correlated. CD4 + or CD8 + proliferating T cells, CD4 + effector memory T cells, CD8 + naïve T cells, and regulatory T cells of CRC showed higher TCR clonal expansion. Tumor epithelial cells interacted with immune cells more strongly than normal. T cells, myeloid cells, and fibroblasts from CRCs of expanded T cell clonotypes showed increased expression of genes related to TNF and NFKB signaling and T cell activation. CRCs of expanded T cell clonotypes also showed stronger cellular interactions among immune cells, fibroblasts, and endothelial cells. Pro-inflammatory CXCL and TNF signaling were activated in CRCs of expanded T cell clonotype. In conclusion, scRNA-seq analysis revealed different immune cell compositions, differential gene expression, and diverse TCR clonotype dynamics in CRC. TCR clonality expansion is associated with immune activation through T cell signaling and chemokine signaling. Patients with CRCs of expanded clonotype can be promising candidates for immunotherapy.
RESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to compare tumor tissue DNA (ttDNA) and circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) to explore the clinical applicability of ctDNA and to better understand clonal evolution in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer undergoing palliative first-line systemic therapy. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed targeted sequencing analysis of 88 cancer-associated genes using germline DNA, ctDNA at baseline (baseline-ctDNA), and ctDNA at progressive disease (PD-ctDNA). The results were compared with ttDNA data. RESULTS: Among 208 consecutively enrolled patients, we selected 84 (41 males; median age, 59 years; range, 35 to 90 years) with all four sample types available. A total of 202 driver mutations were found in 34 genes. ttDNA exhibited the highest mutation frequency (n=232), followed by baseline-ctDNA (n=155) and PD-ctDNA (n=117). Sequencing ctDNA alongside ttDNA revealed additional mutations in 40 patients (47.6%). PD-ctDNA detected 13 novel mutations in 10 patients (11.9%) compared to ttDNA and baseline-ctDNA. Notably, seven mutations in five patients (6.0%) were missense or nonsense mutations in APC, TP53, SMAD4, and CDH1 genes. In baseline-ctDNA, higher maximal variant allele frequency (VAF) values (p=0.010) and higher VAF values of APC (p=0.012), TP53 (p=0.012), and KRAS (p=0.005) mutations were significantly associated with worse overall survival. CONCLUSION: While ttDNA remains more sensitive than ctDNA, our ctDNA platform demonstrated validity and potential value when ttDNA was unavailable. Post-treatment analysis of PD-ctDNA unveiled new pathogenic mutations, signifying cancer's clonal evolution. Additionally, baseline-ctDNA's VAF values were prognostic after treatment.