Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF): biometrical results and own experiences.

Lumbar fusion is a mainstay in the treatment of low back pain resulting from degenerative disc disease. Anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) has become a reasonable treatment technique to achieve indirect foraminal decompression with high fusion rates. The aim of the study was to analyse the biometrical parameters of the lumbar spine and the clinical outcome. The medical records of 51 patients treated with ALIF between 2012 and 2016 were retrospectively reviewed. Anterior and posterior disc height (DH), lumbar lordosis (LL), local disc angle (LDA) and foraminal dimensions were obtained on pre- and postoperative plain radiographs and computed tomography scans using ImageJ and Surgimap software according to the pedicle-pedicle technique. To evaluate the interbody fusion status on the last follow-up CT scans, we used Bridwell criteria. Preoperative and 12 months postoperative Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) scores were determined for all patients. The average length of hospitalisation was 4 days. Most of the patients had degenerative disc disease with foraminal stenosis. Five patients had early complications like paresthesia of lower limbs, sympathetic dysfunction or wound infections, but there were no major complications. Statistically significant (P < .01) improvement was observed in foraminal dimensions (area = 49%, height = 33% and width = 19%), anterior DH (49%), posterior DH (69%), LDA (47%) and LL (17.5%). Posterior DH correlated significantly with foramen height improvement. Radiographic evidence of fusion according to the modified Bridwell criteria (grade I and grade II) was observed in 96% (49/51) of the patients in the last CT of the lumbar spine. We also observed significant improvement in functional recovery in 94% of patients. The mini-open ALIF approach is a reasonable alternative to the more extensive posterior approaches. ALIF significantly restores the height of the intervertebral disc, indirectly increases foraminal dimensions, increases lordosis angle with significant short and long-term pain relief and functional recovery.

Reliability and validity of the Polish version of the Core Outcome Measures Index for the neck.

PURPOSE: Patient reported outcome measures play an increasingly important role in the outcomes research. The Core Outcome Measures Index (COMI) is a short, multidimensional instrument initially developed for the use by patients with low back pain. This study is an evaluation of a Polish version of COMI adapted for neck pain. METHODS: One hundred twenty-three patients complaining of neck pain were enrolled. All of them completed a questionnaire booklet containing COMI-neck, Neck Disability Index and Likert-type questions regarding the frequency of use of pain medications and pain frequency. Ninety-eight patients returned the retest questionnaire. Data quality was also assessed. Assessment of psychometric properties included examination of data quality, construct validity, test-retest reliability and factor analysis. RESULTS: The quality of data was good with no missing answers and a little floor effect. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a single-factor structure. Reliability expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.88 (95% CI 0.84-0.92) for the overall COMI score and was generally good for most of individual core items. The minimum detectable change (MDC95%) was 1.97. CONCLUSION: This version of the COMI-neck is a valid and reliable instrument, with good psychometric properties. It can be recommended for Polish-speaking patients.

Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Polish version of the core outcome measures index for low back pain.

PURPOSE: The core outcome measures index (COMI) is a short, multidimensional outcome scale validated for the use by patients with spinal disorders. It is a recommended instrument in the Spine Society of Europe Spine Tango Registry. The purpose of this study was to produce a cross-culturally adapted and validated Polish COMI. METHODS: The cross-cultural adaptation was carried out using the established guidelines. One-hundred and sixty-nine patients with chronic low back pain were enrolled, 89 took part in the reproducibility part of the study. Data quality, construct validity and reproducibility were assessed. RESULTS: The quality of data was very good with very few missing answers and modest floor effect. Reliability expressed as intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) was 0.90 (95 % CI 0.85-0.93) for the overall COMI score and for most of the individual core items. The minimum detectable change (MDC95%) was 1.79. CONCLUSIONS: The Polish version of COMI showed a favorable reproducibility similar to that of previously tested language versions. The COMI scores correlated sufficiently with existing measures. This version of the COMI is a valuable instrument for the use by Polish-speaking patients with spinal disorders.

Validation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index.

STUDY DESIGN: Validation of a translated, culturally adapted questionnaire. OBJECTIVE: To translate and culturally adapt a Polish version of the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) and to validate its use in Polish patients. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The ODI is among the most popular questionnaires used to evaluate back pain-related disability. To our knowledge no validated Polish version of the index was available at the time our study was initiated. METHODS: The questionnaire was translated and culturally adapted by 2 independent translators and approved by expert committee. Final version was included in the booklet consisting in addition of a previously validated Roland-Morris disability questionnaire, VAS for low back and leg and 3 Likert scale questions (pain medications, pain frequency, disability). It was tested on 169 patients with chronic low back pain, 164 (97%) of them were enrolled, and 84 of 164 (53%) returned the completed retest booklet within 2 to 14 days after the baseline test. There were no differences between the 2 groups in demographic and clinical parameters. Test-retest reliability, internal consistency, and construct validity were investigated. RESULTS: The mean ODI (standard deviation [SD]) was 48.45 (18.94); minimum 2, maximum 94. The Cronbach α for baseline questionnaires (n = 164) was 0.90. Concurrent validity, measured by comparing ODI responses with the results of the Roland-Morris disability questionnaire score was very good (r = 0.607, P < 0.001). The correlation with VAS back was fair (r = 0.37, P < 0.001) and with VAS leg was good (r = 0.56, P < 0.001). The tested ODI had excellent test-retest reliability, the intraclass correlation coefficient was 0.97 and standard error of measurements was 3.54, the resulting minimal detectable changes at the 95% confidence level was 10. CONCLUSION: The results of this study indicate that the Polish version of the ODI is a reliable and valid instrument for the measurement of disability in Polish-speaking patients with lower back pain.

Paraganglioma of the cauda equina presenting with erectile and sphincter dysfunction.

Paragangliomas of the cauda equina are rare neuroepithelial tumors, usually manifesting clinically as sciatica. Here, we report a case of cauda equina paraganglioma with an unusual course in a 43-year-old man. His main complaints were erectile and sphincter dysfunction. The low back pain was initially ascribed to accidental injury. Magnetic resonance imaging revealed intradural tumor at the L2/L3 level. The patient underwent gross tumor resection, and the diagnosis of paraganglioma was based on neuropathologic examination. The symptoms completely resolved after tumor resection.