A Phase 1b PK/PD Study to Demonstrate Antigen Elimination with RLYB212, a Monoclonal Anti-HPA-1a Antibody for FNAIT Prevention.

BACKGROUND: Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare bleeding disorder of the fetus/newborn caused by development of maternal alloantibodies against fetal human platelet antigens (HPAs), predominantly HPA-1a. Currently there are no treatments available to prevent maternal alloimmunization to HPAs or FNAIT. METHODS: This proof-of-concept study (EudraCT Number: 2021-005380-49) was designed to assess the ability of subcutaneous (SC) RLYB212, a monoclonal anti-HPA-1a antibody, to eliminate HPA-1a-positive platelets in an antigen challenge model of a 30 mL fetal-maternal hemorrhage. Subjects were randomized to receive a single SC dose of RLYB212 or placebo on day 1 in a single-blinded manner, followed by transfusion of 10 × 109 HPA-1a-positive platelets on day 8. RESULTS: Four subjects received 0.09 mg SC RLYB212, five received 0.29 mg SC RLYB212, and two received placebo. RLYB212 achieved rapid elimination of HPA-1a-positive platelets in a concentration-dependent manner, with concentrations as low as 3.57 ng/mL meeting the prespecified proof-of-concept criterion of ≥90% reduction in platelet elimination half-life versus placebo. Following HPA-1a-positive platelet transfusion, a rapid decline was observed in the concentration of RLYB212 over a period of 2 to 24 hours, corresponding to the time needed for RLYB212 to bind to ∼10% of HPA-1a on cell surfaces. RLYB212 was well tolerated with no reports of drug-related adverse events. CONCLUSION: The data from this study are consistent with preclinical efficacy data and support the potential use of RLYB212 as a prophylactic treatment for FNAIT that prevents maternal HPA-1a alloimmunization during at-risk pregnancies.

Adherence to a restrictive red blood cell transfusion strategy in critically ill patients: An observational study.

BACKGROUND: Randomized controlled trials relatively consistently show that restrictive red blood cell (RBC) transfusion strategies are safe and associated with similar outcomes compared to liberal transfusion strategies in critically ill patients. Based on these data, the general threshold for RBC transfusion was changed to 70 g/L at a 9-bed tertiary level intensive care unit in September 2020. Implementation measures included lectures, webinars and feedback during clinical practice. The aim of this study was to investigate how implementation of a restrictive transfusion strategy influenced RBC usage, haemoglobin trigger levels and adherence to prescribed trigger levels. METHODS: In this registry-based, observational study, critically ill adult patients without massive bleeding were included and divided into a pre-cohort, with admissions prior to the change of transfusion strategy, and a post-cohort, with admissions following the change of transfusion strategy. These cohorts were compared regarding key RBC transfusion-related variables. RESULTS: In total 5626 admissions were included in the analyses (pre-cohort n = 4373, post-cohort n = 1253). The median volume (interquartile range, IQR) of RBC transfusions per 100 admission days, in the pre-cohort was 6120 (4110-8110) mL versus 3010 (2890-4970) mL in the post-cohort (p < .001). This corresponds to an estimated median saving of 1128 € per 100 admission days after a restrictive RBC transfusion strategy was implemented. In total, 26% of the admissions in the pre-cohort and 19% in the post-cohort (p < .001) received RBC transfusion(s) during days 0-10. Both median (IQR) prescribed trigger levels (determined by intensivist) and actual haemoglobin trigger levels (i.e., levels prior to actual administration of transfusion) were higher in the pre- versus post-cohort (90 [80-100] vs. 80 [72-90] g/L, p < .001 and 89 [82-96] g/L vs. 83 [79-94], p < .001, respectively). Percentage of days without compliance with the prescribed transfusion trigger was higher in the pre-cohort than in the post-cohort (23% vs. 14%, p < .001). Sensitivity analyses, excluding patients with traumatic brain injury, ischemic heart disease and COVID-19 demonstrated similar results. CONCLUSIONS: Implementation of a restrictive transfusion trigger in a critical care setting resulted in lasting decreased RBC transfusion use and costs, decreased prescribed and actual haemoglobin trigger levels and improved adherence to prescribed haemoglobin trigger levels.

Pregnant Women at Low Risk of Having a Child with Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia Do Not Require Treatment with Intravenous Immunoglobulin.

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare condition in which maternal alloantibodies to fetal platelets cause fetal thrombocytopenia that may lead to intracranial hemorrhage (ICH). Off-label intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has for 30 years been the standard of care for pregnant women who previously have had a child with FNAIT. The efficacy of this treatment has never been tested in a placebo-controlled clinical trial. Although IVIg treatment may improve the neonatal outcome in women who previously have had a child with FNAIT-associated ICH, the question is whether IVIg is necessary for all immunized pregnant women at risk of having a child with FNAIT. The results from some recent publications suggest that antenatal IVIg treatment is not necessary for women who are (1) HPA-1a-immunized and HLA-DRB3*01:01-negative, (2) HPA-1a-immunized with a previous child with FNAIT but without ICH or (3) HPA-5b-immunized. If IVIg is not used for these categories of pregnant women, the amount of IVIg used in pregnant women with platelet antibodies would be reduced to less than » of today's use. This is important because IVIg is a scarce resource, and the collection of plasma for the treatment of one pregnant woman is not only extremely expensive but also requires tremendous donor efforts.

An HPA-1a-positive platelet-depleting agent for prevention of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study.

BACKGROUND: Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare and potentially life-threatening bleeding disorder of the fetus/newborn. Antibodies against human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) are associated with the most frequent FNAIT cases. There are no approved therapies for FNAIT prevention or treatment. RLYB211 is a polyclonal HPA-1a hyperimmune IgG being developed to prevent FNAIT. OBJECTIVES: To investigate whether a single dose of anti-HPA-1a (1000 IU) could markedly accelerate the elimination of HPA-1ab platelets transfused into healthy, HPA-1a-negative participants as compared with placebo. METHODS: This randomized, single-blind, placebo-controlled, single-center, phase 1/2 proof-of-concept study (EudraCT: 2019-003459-12) included HPA-1a- and HLA-A2-negative healthy men. Cohort 1 received intravenous RLYB211 or placebo 1 hour after transfusion of HPA-1ab platelets. Cohort 1B received RLYB211 or placebo, followed by platelet transfusion 1 week later. Primary endpoint was the half-life of transfused platelets in circulation after administration of RLYB211 or placebo, determined by flow cytometry. Proof of concept was ≥90% reduction of half-life relative to placebo. RESULTS: Twelve participants were allocated to cohort 1 or 1B and randomized to receive RLYB211 (n = 9) or placebo (n = 3). RLYB211 markedly accelerated the elimination of HPA-1ab platelets in all participants vs placebo. In cohort 1B, this effect was observed 7 days after RLYB211 administration. Two treatment-emergent adverse events were possibly related to treatment, both in RLYB211-treated participants. No participants developed HPA-1a antibodies at 12 or 24 weeks. CONCLUSION: These data support the hypothesis that anti-HPA-1a could be used as prophylaxis in women at risk of having an FNAIT-affected pregnancy.

Antenatal intravenous immunoglobulins in pregnancies at risk of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: comparison of neonatal outcome in treated and nontreated pregnancies.

BACKGROUND: Maternal alloantibodies to human platelet antigen-1a can cause severe intracranial hemorrhage in a fetus or newborn. Although never evaluated in placebo-controlled clinical trials, most Western countries use off-label weekly administration of high-dosage intravenous immunoglobulin in all pregnant women with an obstetrical history of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. In Norway, antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin is only recommended in pregnancies wherein a previous child had intracranial hemorrhage (high-risk) and is generally not given in other human platelet antigen-1a alloimmunized pregnancies (low-risk). OBJECTIVE: To compare the frequency of anti-human platelet antigen-1a-induced intracranial hemorrhage in pregnancies at risk treated with intravenous immunoglobulin vs pregnancies not receiving this treatment as a part of a different management program. STUDY DESIGN: This was a retrospective comparative study where the neonatal outcomes of 71 untreated human platelet antigen-1a-alloimmunized pregnancies in Norway during a 20-year period was compared with 403 intravenous-immunoglobulin-treated pregnancies identified through a recent systematic review. We stratified analyses on the basis of whether the mothers belonged to high- or low-risk pregnancies. Therefore, only women who previously had a child with fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia were included. RESULTS: Two neonates with brain bleeds were identified from 313 treated low-risk pregnancies (0.6%; 95% confidence interval, 0.2-2.3). There were no neonates born with intracranial hemorrhage of 64 nontreated, low-risk mothers (0.0%; 95% confidence interval, 0.0-5.7). Thus, no significant difference was observed in the neonatal outcome between immunoglobulin-treated and untreated low-risk pregnancies. Among high-risk mothers, 5 of 90 neonates from treated pregnancies were diagnosed with intracranial hemorrhage (5.6%; 95% confidence interval, 2.4-12.4) compared with 2 of 7 neonates from nontreated pregnancies (29%; 95% confidence interval, 8.2-64.1; P=.08). CONCLUSION: The most reliable data hitherto for the evaluation of intravenous immunoglobulins treatment in low-risk pregnancies is shown herein. We did not find evidence that omitting antenatal intravenous immunoglobulin treatment in low-risk pregnancies increases the risk of neonatal intracranial hemorrhage.

Noninvasive Prenatal Testing in Immunohematology-Clinical, Technical and Ethical Considerations.

Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN), as well as fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT), represent two important disease entities that are caused by maternal IgG antibodies directed against nonmaternally inherited antigens on the fetal blood cells. These antibodies are most frequently directed against the RhD antigen on red blood cells (RBCs) or the human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) on platelets. For optimal management of pregnancies where HDFN or FNAIT is suspected, it is essential to determine the RhD or the HPA-1a type of the fetus. Noninvasive fetal RhD typing is also relevant for identifying which RhD-negative pregnant women should receive antenatal RhD prophylaxis. In this review, we will give an overview of the clinical indications and technical challenges related to the noninvasive analysis of fetal RBCs or platelet types. In addition, we will discuss the ethical implications associated with the routine administration of antenatal RhD to all pregnant RhD-negative women and likewise the ethical challenges related to making clinical decisions concerning the mother that have been based on samples collected from the (presumptive) father, which is a common practice when determining the risk of FNAIT.

Convalescent plasma treatment in severely immunosuppressed patients hospitalized with COVID-19: an observational study of 28 cases.

BACKGROUND: Immunosuppressed patients are particularly vulnerable to severe infection from the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2), risking prolonged viremia and symptom duration. In this study we describe clinical and virological treatment outcomes in a heterogeneous group of patients with severe immunosuppression due to various causes suffering from COVID-19 infection, who were all treated with convalescent plasma (CCP) along with standard treatment. METHODS: We performed an observational, retrospective case series between May 2020 to March 2021 at three sites in Skåne, Sweden, with a population of nearly 1.4 million people. All patients hospitalized for COVID-19 who received CCP with the indication severe immunosuppression as defined by the treating physician were included in the study (n = 28). RESULTS: In total, 28 severely immunocompromised patients, half of which previously had been treated with rituximab, who had received in-hospital convalescent plasma treatment of COVID-19 were identified. One week after CCP treatment, 13 of 28 (46%) patients had improved clinically defined as a decrease of at least one point at the WHO-scale. Three patients had increased score points of whom two had died. For 12 patients, the WHO-scale was unchanged. CONCLUSION: As one of only few studies on CCP treatment of COVID-19 in hospitalized patients with severe immunosuppression, this study adds descriptive data. The study design prohibits conclusions on safety and efficacy, and the results should be interpreted with caution. Prospective, randomized trials are needed to investigate this further.

Convalescence plasma treatment of COVID-19: results from a prematurely terminated randomized controlled open-label study in Southern Sweden.

OBJECTIVE: Convalescent plasma has been tried as therapy for various viral infections. Early observational studies of convalescent plasma treatment for hospitalized COVID-19 patients were promising, but randomized controlled studies were lacking at the time. The objective of this study was to investigate if convalescent plasma is beneficial to hospitalized patients with COVID-19. RESULTS: Hospitalized patients with confirmed COVID-19 and an oxygen saturation below 94% were randomized 1:1 to receive convalescent plasma in addition to standard of care or standard of care only. The primary outcome was number of days of oxygen treatment to keep saturation above 93% within 28 days from inclusion. The study was prematurely terminated when thirty-one of 100 intended patients had been included. The median time of oxygen treatment among survivors was 11 days (IQR 6-15) for the convalescent plasma group and 7 days (IQR 5-9) for the standard of care group (p = 0.4, median difference -4). Two patients in the convalescent plasma group and three patients in the standard of care group died (p = 0.64, OR 0.49, 95% CI 0.08-2.79). Thus no significant differences were observed between the groups. Trial registration ClinicalTrials NCT04600440, retrospectively registered Oct 23, 2020.

Fetal and Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia-New Prospects for Fetal Risk Assessment of HPA-1a-Negative Pregnant Women.

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is a rare and potentially serious bleeding condition in the fetus/newborn. FNAIT is usually considered as the platelet counterpart of hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. In FNAIT, maternal alloantibodies against paternally inherited platelet antigens traverse the placenta and cause thrombocytopenia in the fetus/newborn. The most common and most serious cases of FNAIT among white people are caused by alloantibodies against the human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a), which is absent in 2.3% of women. Today, there is no screening for FNAIT, and for this reason, FNAIT is not suspected until an otherwise healthy child, born at term, presents with thrombocytopenia. Clinical management of subsequent pregnancies at risk of FNAIT is mostly based on the obstetric history. During the last 5 decades, hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn caused by antibodies against RhD has successfully been prevented by administration of hyperimmune anti-D IgG drug products to RhD-negative women after delivery of an RhD-positive child. Similarly, a hyperimmune anti-HPA-1a IgG (NAITgam) is under development for the prevention of HPA-1a immunization and FNAIT. If NAITgam becomes licensed for FNAIT prophylaxis and national health authorities decide to include FNAIT screening in their antenatal health care programs, it will be necessary to improve today's tools for assessing the risk of FNAIT. Although the primary risk factor for HPA-1a immunization is platelet type HPA-1bb, not all HPA-1a-negative women develop anti-HPA-1a. The women who are HLA-DRB3:01:01 negative (72%) only rarely develop anti-HPA-1a, and for those few who become HPA-1a immunized, it is quite rare to have a child with severe thrombocytopenia. Determination of fetal HPA-1 type is important because 15% of HPA-1a-negative women will carry an HPA-1a-negative fetus and therefore not be at risk of FNAIT. The severity of FNAIT seems to be associated with the level of anti-HPA-1a. Hence, in Norway, for example, an Ab threshold of 3 IU/mL is used to distinguish between low- and high-risk pregnancies. The current review will discuss to what extent these analyses, as well as determination of subtypes of anti-HPA-1a (anti-ß3, anti-αIIbß3, and anti-αvß3) and Fc core fucosylation of anti-HPA-1a IgG, can be used as risk stratification tools.

A combined effect of anti-HPA-1a and anti-HLA Class I in pregnancy?

BACKGROUND: Maternal anti-human leukocyte antigen (HLA) Class I is commonly detected alongside anti-human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a in fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT). Little is known regarding whether the presence of anti-HLA Class I may exert an additive effect on the risk and severity of FNAIT. METHODS AND MATERIALS: We reanalyzed samples originally collected as part of a large Norwegian screening study on FNAIT during 1995-2004. This study identified and managed 170 pregnancies where the mother was HPA-1a negative and had detectable anti-HPA-1a during pregnancy. Maternal samples from 166 of these pregnancies were rescreened for anti-HLA Class I, revealing 111 (67%) that were antibody positive. Various regression models were used to assess if and how maternal anti-HLA Class I influenced the neonatal platelet count. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Unadjusted neonatal platelet counts and the frequency of neonatal thrombocytopenia was not significantly affected by the presence of anti-HLA Class I alongside anti-HPA-1a, but results from regression analyses revealed a possible increased risk when the mother was nulliparous. These results warrant further investigation.

Fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: a systematic review of impact of HLA-DRB3*01:01 on fetal/neonatal outcome.

The most common, severe cases of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia among whites are caused by antibodies against human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a). The aims of this systematic review and meta-analysis are to determine the association between maternal HLA-DRB3*01:01 and: (1) HPA-1a-alloimmunization and (2) neonatal outcome in children born of HPA-1a-immunized women. A systematic literature search identified 4 prospective and 8 retrospective studies. Data were combined across studies to estimate pooled odds ratios (ORs) and the associated 95% confidence intervals (CIs). The population represented by the prospective studies was more than 150 000. In the prospective studies, there were 64 severely thrombocytopenic newborns (platelet count <50 × 109/L) of whom 3 had intracranial hemorrhage. The mothers of all 64 children were HLA-DRB3*01:01+. The number of severely thrombocytopenic children born of HPA-1a-alloimmunized women in the retrospective studies was 214; 205 of whom were born of HLA-DRB3*01:01+ women. For HLA-DRB3*01:01- women, the OR (95% CI) for alloimmunization was 0.05 (0.00-0.60), and for severe neonatal thrombocytopenia 0.08 (0.02-0.37). This meta-analysis demonstrates that the risk of alloimmunization and of having a child with severe thrombocytopenia are both very low for HPA-1a- women who are HLA-DRB3*01:01-.

The prevalence of HPA-1a alloimmunization and the potential risk of FNAIT depend on both the DRB3*01:01 allele and associated DR-DQ haplotypes.

Alloimmunization against human platelet antigen (HPA)-1a during pregnancy can cause foetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) and severe bleeding in the foetus or newborn and likely depends on several factors. HPA-1a alloimmunization is associated with DRB3*01:01, which is associated with several DR-DQ haplotypes. However, it is not known to what extent these haplotypes contribute to the prevalence of HPA-1a alloimmunization. HPA-1a-alloimmunized women, identified in a prospective study, and random donors were typed for selected DRB3, DRB4, DRB1, DQA1 and DQB1 alleles to determine allele and DR-DQ haplotype frequencies. DRB3*01:01 was carried by 94% HPA-1a-immunized women compared to 27% in the general population. In the first population, the DR3-DQ2 haplotype was overrepresented (P < .003). The prevalence of HPA-1a alloimmunization was estimated to be about twice as frequent with DR3-DQ2 compared to DR13-DQ6, together accounting for about 90% of DRB3*01:01-positive individuals. Further, we examined DQB1*02 and DRB4*01:01 alleles for their reported association with HPA-1a alloimmunization, in the context of DR-DQ haplotypes. Since ~ 80% of DQB1*02 alleles are linked to the DR3-DQ2 haplotype, the association might be coincidental. However, the DQB1*02:02-associated DR7-DQ2 haplotype was also overrepresented in alloimmunized women, suggesting a role for this allele or haplotype in HPA-1a alloimmunization. As DRB4*01:01 is predominantly associated with the DR7-DQ2 haplotype in HPA-1a-alloimmunized individuals, the reported association with FNAIT may be coincidental. Typing for DR-DQ haplotypes revealed important genetic associations with HPA-1a alloimmunization not evident from typing individual alleles, and the presence of different DRB3-associated DR-DQ haplotypes showed different prevalence of HPA-1a alloimmunization.

Foetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia - The role of the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele for HPA-1a-immunisation and foetal/neonatal outcome.

Foetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is the platelet counterpart of haemolytic disease of the foetus and newborn. Among Caucasians, around 80 % of FNAIT cases and some of the most severe cases, are caused by alloantibodies against the human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a). For around 3 decades it has been known that almost all HPA-1a-immunised women are HLA-DRB3*01:01 positive. The HLA molecule encoded by the HLA-DRA/DRB3*01:01 genes seems to be of crucial importance for initiating the immune response against HPA-1a. The HLA-DRB3*01:01 carrier status is not only important as a risk factor for immunisation, but does also have a significant impact on foetal/neonatal outcome. The possible role of HLA-DRB3*01:01 typing as tool for risk stratification is discussed.

Postnatal intervention for the treatment of FNAIT: a systematic review.

OBJECTIVE: Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is associated with life-threatening bleeding. This systematic review of postnatal management of FNAIT examined transfusion of human platelet antigen (HPA) selected or unselected platelets, and/or IVIg on platelet increments, hemorrhage and mortality. STUDY DESIGN: MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane searches were conducted until 11 May 2018. RESULT: Of 754 neonates, 382 received platelet transfusions (51%). HPA-selected platelets resulted in higher platelet increments and longer response times than HPA-unselected platelets. However, unselected platelets generally led to sufficient platelet increments to 30 × 109/L, a level above which intracranial hemorrhage or other life-threatening bleeding rarely occurred. Platelet increments were not improved with the addition of IVIg to platelet transfusion. CONCLUSION: Overall, HPA-selected platelet transfusions were more effective than HPA-unselected platelets but unselected platelets were often effective enough to achieve clinical goals. Available studies do not clearly demonstrate a benefit for addition of IVIg to platelet transfusion.

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia: recommendations for evidence-based practice, an international approach.

Fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) may result in severe bleeding, particularly fetal and neonatal intracranial haemorrhage (ICH). As a result, FNAIT requires prompt identification and treatment; subsequent pregnancies need close surveillance and management. An international panel convened to develop evidence-based recommendations for diagnosis and management of FNAIT. A rigorous approach was used to search, review and develop recommendations from published data for: antenatal management, postnatal management, diagnostic testing and universal screening. To confirm FNAIT, fetal human platelet antigen (HPA) typing, using non-invasive methods if quality-assured, should be performed during pregnancy when the father is unknown, unavailable for testing or heterozygous for the implicated antigen. Women with a previous child with an ICH related to FNAIT should be offered intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) infusions during subsequent affected pregnancies as early as 12 weeks gestation. Ideally, HPA-selected platelets should be available at delivery for potentially affected infants and used to increase the neonatal platelet count as needed. If HPA-selected platelets are not immediately available, unselected platelets should be transfused. FNAIT studies that optimize antenatal and postnatal management, develop risk stratification algorithms to guide management and standardize laboratory testing to identify high risk pregnancies are needed.

HLA-DRB3*01:01 exhibits a dose-dependent impact on HPA-1a antibody levels in HPA-1a-immunized women.

HLA-DRB3*01:01 is a predisposing factor for human platelet antigen 1a (HPA-1a) immunization, which is responsible for most cases of fetal and neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia. The aim of this study was to investigate if the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele imposes a dose-dependent effect on anti-HPA-1a levels and neonatal platelet counts. One hundred and thirty HPA-1a-immunized women were divided into 3 groups: HLA-DRB3*01:01 negative, HLA-DRB3*01:01 hemizygous or heterozygous, and HLA-DRB3*01:01 homozygous. The dose of the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele was determined by sequencing exon 2 of the HLA-DRB3 gene followed by HLA-DRB3 and HLA-DRB1 typing of selected samples. Anti-HPA-1a levels at time of delivery and neonatal platelet counts were compared among groups. There was a significant dose-dependent effect of the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele on anti-HPA-1a levels (global P value [P global] = .0032). Median (range) anti-HPA-1a levels were 1.5 IU/mL (0.0-19.0 IU/mL), 21.1 IU/mL (0.0-1967 IU/mL), and 43.7 IU/mL (1.0-980 IU/mL) in women with 0, 1, and 2 copies of the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele, respectively. There was also a significant, but opposite, dose-dependent effect of the mother's HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele on the platelet count of the newborn (P global = .0155). Median (range) neonatal platelet counts were 241 × 109/L (59 × 109/L to 393 × 109/L), 107 × 109/L (4 × 109/L to 387 × 109/L) and 32 × 109/L (4 × 109/L to 352 × 109/L) for newborns of mothers with 0, 1, and 2 copies of the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele, respectively. Thus, the HLA-DRB3*01:01 allele exhibits a dose-dependent impact on maternal anti-HPA-1a levels in HPA-1a-immunized women.

Maternal HPA-1a antibody level and its role in predicting the severity of Fetal/Neonatal Alloimmune Thrombocytopenia: a systematic review.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: In Caucasians, fetal/neonatal alloimmune thrombocytopenia (FNAIT) is most commonly due to maternal HPA-1a antibodies. HPA-1a typing followed by screening for anti-HPA-1a antibodies in HPA-1bb women may identify first pregnancies at risk. Our goal was to review results from previous published studies to examine whether the maternal antibody level to HPA-1a could be used to identify high-risk pregnancies. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The studies included were categorized by recruitment strategies: screening of unselected pregnancies or samples analyzed from known or suspected FNAIT patients. RESULTS: Three prospective studies reported results from screening programmes, and 10 retrospective studies focused on suspected cases of FNAIT. In 8 studies samples for antibody measurement, performed by the monoclonal antibody immobilization of platelet antigen (MAIPA) assay, and samples for determining fetal/neonatal platelet count were collected simultaneously. In these 8 studies, the maternal antibody level correlated with the risk of severe thrombocytopenia. The prospective studies reported high negative predictive values (88-95%), which would allow for the use of maternal anti-HPA-1a antibody level as a predictive tool in a screening setting, in order to identify cases at low risk for FNAIT. However, due to low positive predictive values reported in prospective as well as retrospective studies (54-97%), the maternal antibody level is less suited for the final diagnosis and for guiding antenatal treatment. CONCLUSION: HPA-1a antibody level has the potential to predict the severity of FNAIT.