If we keep doing what we're doing we'll keep getting what we're getting: A need to rethink "academic" medicine.

PURPOSE: For generations there have been warnings of the need to reform medical education at all levels. Today the voices pushing reform are louder, the need is greater, and there is an urgency not seen before. Approaches that have worked in the past to train physicians are no longer as relevant today as demographics, disease patterns, human resources, practice behaviors, technology, and attention to costs demand new collaborative approaches to clinical practice. To prepare for this practice tomorrow's doctors will need a different type of educational model, a different type of learning, in different environments, often taught by different faculty. This paper provides one innovative approach to redefine "academic medicine". METHODS: After reviewing current trends in medical education, this paper describes one approach being taken by a large nonprofit American health care system to move medical education and discovery (research) out of traditional academic universities and placing it within a health care delivery system. CONCLUSIONS: The creation of a learning laboratory in a high functioning health care delivery system allows for leveraging the successes in quality health care delivery to transform medical education with a focus on prevention, improving health care quality, reducing disparities in health, and promoting practical evidence-based clinical and outcomes focused research.

Physicians' Voices: What Skills and Supports Are Needed for Effective Practice in an Integrated Delivery System? A Case Study of Kaiser Permanente.

Payers are demanding that US health care become more accountable and integrated, posing new demands for physicians and the organizations that partner with them. We conducted focus groups with 30 physicians in a large integrated delivery system who had previous experience practicing in less integrated settings and asked about skills they need to succeed in this environment. Physicians identified 3 primary skills: orienting to teams and systems, engaging patients as individuals and as a panel, and integrating cost awareness into practice. Physicians also expressed a high level of trust that the system was designed to help them provide better care. This belief appeared to make the new demands and mental shifts tolerable, even welcome, standing in contrast to research showing widespread physician distrust of their institutional settings. Physicians' new skills and the system features that promote trust are described in the article and should be a focus for systems transitioning to a more integrated, accountable model.

Understanding Faculty and Trainee Needs Related to Scholarly Activity in a Large, Nonuniversity Graduate Medical Education Program.

CONTEXT: Graduate medical education (GME) programs must develop curriculum to ensure scholarly activity among trainees and faculty to meet accreditation requirements and to support evidence-based medicine. OBJECTIVE: Test whether research-related needs and interests varied across four groups: primary care trainees, specialty trainees, primary care faculty, and specialty faculty. DESIGN: We surveyed a random sample of trainees and faculty in Kaiser Permanente Southern California's GME programs. We investigated group differences in outcomes using Fisher exact and Kruskal-Wallis tests. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Research experiences, skills, barriers, motivators, and interests in specific research skills development. RESULTS: Participants included 47 trainees and 26 faculty (response rate = 30%). Among primary care faculty, 12 (71%) reported little or no research experience vs 1 (11%) for specialty faculty, 14 (41%) for primary care trainees, and 1 (8%) for specialty trainees (p < 0.001). Submission of research to the institutional review board, an abstract to a conference, or a manuscript for publication in the previous year varied across groups (p = 0.001, p = 0.003, and p < 0.001, respectively). Overall self-reported research skills also differed across groups (p < 0.001). Primary care faculty reported the lowest skill level. Research barriers that differed across groups included other work roles taking priority; desire for work-life balance; and lack of managerial support, research equipment, administrative support, and funding. CONCLUSION: Faculty and trainees in primary care and specialties have differing research-related needs that GME programs should consider when designing curricula to support scholarly activity. Developing research skills of primary care faculty is a priority to support trainees' scholarly activity.

Surgeon volume in thyroid surgery: Surgical efficiency, outcomes, and utilization.

OBJECTIVES/HYPOTHESIS: To test our hypothesis that high-surgeon volume is associated with improved surgical efficiency and 30-day outcomes, and lower hospital utilization. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort, 2008-2013. METHODS: A total of 3,135 patients with hemithyroidectomy or total thyroidectomy performed by a high-volume surgeon, propensity score-matched to 3,135 patients with the same procedure performed by a low-volume surgeon. All-cause 30-day complication, mortality, readmission, and emergency department visit rates, proportion of outpatient procedures, cut-to-close time, and length of stay were assessed. RESULTS: Hemithyroidectomies: Compared to low-volume surgeons, high-volume surgeons had fewer readmitted patients (2.7% vs. 7.0%, P < .05), more outpatient procedures (46% vs. 29%, P < .05), and shorter lengths of stay (mean [standard deviation] 16.6 [22.1] vs. 21.7 [27.5] hours, P < .05) and surgical (cut-to-close) times (1.7 [0.7] vs. 2.0 [1.1] hours, P < .05). Total thyroidectomies: High-volume surgeons had lower rates of all surgery-related complications (5.7% vs. 7.5%, P < .05), hypocalcemia (4.9% vs. 7.0%, P < .05), surgical site infections (0.3% vs. 1.0%, P < .05), more outpatient procedures (13% vs. 3%, P < .05), shorter lengths of stay (29.9 [32.8] vs. 39.8 [36.2] hours, P < .05), and cut-to-close times (2.4 [1.1] vs. 3.0 [1.7] hours, P < .05). CONCLUSION: High-volume surgeons improve patient safety and have the potential to contribute to organizational efficiency that may be underutilized in some settings. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 126:2630-2639, 2016.

Risk of Complications after Thyroidectomy and Parathyroidectomy: A Case Series with Planned Chart Review.

OBJECTIVE: To develop a predictive model for the risk of complications after thyroid and parathyroid surgery. STUDY DESIGN: Case series with planned chart review of patients undergoing surgery, 2007-2013. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Southern California. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Patients (N = 16,458) undergoing thyroid and parathyroid procedures were randomly assigned to model development and validation groups. We used univariate analysis to assess relationships between each of 28 predictor variables and 30-day complication rates. We subsequently entered all variables into a recursive partitioning decision tree analysis, with P < .05 as the basis for branching. RESULTS: Among patients undergoing thyroidectomies, the most important predictor variable was thyroid cancer. For patients with thyroid cancer, additional risk predictors included coronary artery disease and central neck dissection. For patients without thyroid cancer, additional predictors included coronary artery disease, dyspnea, complete thyroidectomy, and lobe size. Among patients undergoing parathyroidectomies, the most important predictor variable was coronary artery disease, followed by cerebrovascular disease and chronic kidney disease. The model performed similarly in the validation groups. CONCLUSION: For patients undergoing thyroid surgery, 7 of 28 predictor variables accounted for statistically significant differences in the risk of 30-day complications; for patients undergoing parathyroid surgery, 3 variables accounted for significant differences in risk. This study forms the foundation of a parsimonious model to predict the risk of complications among patients undergoing thyroid and parathyroid surgery.

Safety of Outpatient Thyroid and Parathyroid Surgery: A Propensity Score-Matched Study.

OBJECTIVE: To test our hypothesis that general and thyroid surgery-specific complications, mortality, and postdischarge utilization for patients undergoing outpatient and inpatient thyroid and parathyroid surgery would not differ when outpatient status was defined as discharge within 8 hours of surgery completion. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective observational cohort, 2008 to 2013. SETTING: Kaiser Permanente Northern California and Kaiser Permanente Southern California. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: We used a robust set of variables and propensity score methods to match 2362 patients undergoing hemithyroidectomy, total thyroidectomy, or parathyroidectomy surgery as outpatients to 2362 patients undergoing the same procedures as inpatients. Outcomes assessed were 30-day rates of complications, emergency department visits, all-cause hospital readmissions, and mortality. RESULTS: After matching, no statistically significant differences between inpatients and outpatients were found for complication rates or postdischarge utilization. After matching, there was no statistically significant difference between inpatients and outpatients in hematoma rates, which were 0.55% in both groups. In the matched-pair groups, 2 deaths occurred among inpatients (0.09%) and none occurred among outpatients (0.00%), a difference that was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Discharge within 8 hours after completion of thyroid and parathyroid surgery is as safe as inpatient surgery.

Low-value care for acute sinusitis encounters: who's choosing wisely?

OBJECTIVES: To assess acute sinusitis (AS) encounters in primary care (PC), urgent care (UC), and emergency department (ED) settings for adherence to recommendations to avoid low-value care. STUDY DESIGN: A retrospective, observational study of adult AS encounters (2010-2012) within a large integrated healthcare system. METHODS: We compared ED and UC encounters with PC visits, adjusting for differences in patient characteristics. PRIMARY OUTCOMES: adherence to recommendations to avoid antibiotics and a computed tomography (CT) scan of the face, head, or sinuses. SECONDARY OUTCOMES: length of symptoms and adherence with AS recommendations. RESULTS: Of 152,774 AS encounters, 89.2% resulted in antibiotics and 1.1% resulted in a CT scan. Compared with PC encounters, ED encounters were less likely to result in antibiotics (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 0.57; 95% CI, 0.50-0.65) but more likely to result in a CT scan (AOR, 59.4; 95% CI, 51.3-68.7), while UC encounters were more likely to result in both antibiotics (AOR, 1.12; 95% CI, 1.08-1.17) and CT imaging (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 2.1-2.7). Chart review of encounters resulting in antibiotics found that 50% were inappropriately prescribed for symptoms of ≤7 days' duration (95% CI, 41%-58%), while 35% were appropriately prescribed for symptoms of ≥14 days' duration (95% CI, 27%-44%). Only 29% (95% CI, 22%-36%) of encounters were consistent with guideline-adherent care. CONCLUSIONS: AS encounters in an integrated health system infrequently result in CT imaging, but antibiotic treatment is common. Differences exist across acute care settings, but improved antibiotic stewardship is needed in all settings.

Higher antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA) titers are associated with increased overall healthcare use in patients with sinonasal manifestations of granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA).

BACKGROUND: Granulomatosis with polyangiitis (GPA) is an autoimmune disease characterized by necrotizing granulomatous airway inflammation and vasculitis. Sinonasal involvement occurs in more than 80% cases, with antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (C-ANCA) titers used as a marker of disease severity. The purpose of this study was to determine whether C-ANCA levels impact radiographic findings and healthcare use in patients with sinonasal GPA. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed on GPA patients evaluated in a multidisciplinary rheumatologic/otolaryngologic clinic from 2008 to 2013. Data were collected with respect to age, gender, clinical presentation, C-ANCA titers, Lund-Mackay (LM) scores, surgical interventions, and healthcare use, the latter of which were determined by assessing the number of rheumatology/otolaryngology clinic visits, computed tomography (CT) scans, and email/telephone encounters. RESULTS: A total of 44 patients were identified, 11 male and 33 female. Sinonasal manifestations were evident in 70.4%, with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) (41.9%), septal perforation (38.7%), and crusting (32.2%) the most common findings. No significant differences in number of CT scans (p = 0.10) or mean LM scores (p = 0.47) were found between patients with more than or equal to 1:80 and less than 1:80 C-ANCA titers, respectively. However, overall healthcare use was increased in the more than or equal to 1:80 C-ANCA group (n = 28) compared with less than 1:80 (n = 16), with a significantly greater number of rheumatologic/otolaryngologic encounters (mean 121 versus 69.2, p = 0.03) noted. When otolaryngologic healthcare use was specifically examined, the average number of encounters was also higher in more than or equal to 1:80 C-ANCA patients (31.9 versus 22.9), but this difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.16). CONCLUSION: Sinonasal GPA patients with presenting C-ANCA titers more than or equal to 1:80 demonstrated significantly greater overall healthcare use than their lower C-ANCA level counterparts (less than 1:80). However, no significant differences in otolaryngology resource use or LM scores were evident between the two titer groups.

What does professionalism mean to the physician?

Professionalism, which is a core competency for physicians, can be described as a spectrum of behaviors and may have a significant impact on the problems in today's changing health care climate. In this article, we discuss the meaning of professionalism and its role in the Southern California Permanente Medical Group (SCPMG) and consider how it may be applied to integrated care delivery systems such as Kaiser Permanente. To understand professionalism, one must consider Stern's definition, which consists of four principles: excellence, humanism, accountability, and altruism. SCPMG has taken three of these principles-excellence, accountability, and altruism-and divided the fourth, humanism, into another three principles similar to those identified by the University of California Los Angeles Task Force on Professionalism: humanitarianism, respect for others, and honor and integrity. SCPMG has a rich history and culture of promoting clinical excellence and professionalism, as evidenced by the programs and initiatives described throughout this article. Indeed, the SCPMG experience validates professionalism as a core physician competency comprising a set of behaviors that are continually refined.

Results of the First National Kaiser Permanente Continuing Medical Education Needs Assessment Survey.

CONTEXT: Needs assessment is an important part of planning effective continuing medical education (CME) programs. The Kaiser Permanente National CME Committee (KPNCME) was formed in 1998 to accredit and provide oversight and assistance to Kaiser Permanente (KP) national CME programs and to provide expertise on an as-needed basis to regional and local KP CME efforts. OBJECTIVE: To develop, distribute, and analyze a CME needs assessment survey of Permanente physicians. DESIGN: Cross-sectional survey completed by Permanente physicians on paper or online during September 2000 through December 2000. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Physician motivations for, preferences about, and perceived barriers to participating in CME programs. RESULTS: Of 10,959 surveys distributed to KP physicians, 1976 (19.1%) were completed. Survey responses showed that Permanente physicians choose topics on the basis of self-perceived need and tend not to be influenced by objective performance data. Survey respondents preferred evidence-based, clinical CME topics that address a major aspect of their practice and that potentially provide an opportunity to learn new skills. Respondents preferred CME programs delivered in group format, although a subset of respondents found the computerized format valuable. In choosing a CME program, respondents were influenced more by program location than by time of day at which programs were scheduled. CONCLUSIONS: At all levels-from individual to national-CME planning should incorporate objectively determined quality, program utilization, and other objective data as well as more subjectively determined need as perceived by individual physicians and CME experts. Live programs delivered onsite should use interactive format. The need for clinicians to develop cultural competence and effective communication skills should be framed in clinical context. Locations of KP national CME programs should periodically be rotated to make these programs more accessible to prospective attendees from all KP Regions.