Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Asunto de la revista
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
J Minim Invasive Gynecol ; 29(7): 840-847, 2022 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35405331

RESUMEN

STUDY OBJECTIVE: To identify the incidence, type, and grade of postoperative adverse events in minimally invasive radical hysterectomy vs abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) for patients with early-stage cervical cancer and determine risk factors associated with these adverse events. DESIGN: The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (ACS NSQIP) was queried to identify patients with early-stage cervical cancer undergoing radical hysterectomy. Multivariable logistic regression was used to assess risk factors associated with adverse postoperative outcomes among patients undergoing radical hysterectomy. SETTING: ACS NSQIP participating institutions within the United States. PATIENTS: Patients were collected from the ACS NSQIP databases (2014-2017) undergoing radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer. INTERVENTIONS: N/A MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: ARH had a significantly increased incidence of any 30-day postoperative adverse event compared with minimally invasive radical hysterectomy (31.2% vs 19.9%, p <.001). There was a higher incidence of surgical site infection, both deep and superficial, and blood transfusions in ARH. On multivariable logistic regression, the abdominal surgical approach was the only risk factor significantly associated with any postoperative adverse event (odds ratio, 1.4; confidence interval, 1.1-1.9; p = .018; 95% CIs). CONCLUSIONS: In this study, the abdominal surgical approach for radical hysterectomy in early-stage cervical cancer was associated with a higher incidence of postoperative adverse events than the minimally invasive approach.


Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Femenino , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Periodo Posoperatorio , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Estados Unidos , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/patología , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/cirugía
2.
Am J Surg ; 209(2): 219-29, 2015 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-25457238

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Pay-for-performance measures incorporate surgical site infection rates into reimbursement algorithms without accounting for patient-specific risk factors predictive for surgical site infections and other adverse postoperative outcomes. METHODS: Using American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program data of 67,445 colorectal patients, multivariable logistic regression was performed to determine independent risk factors associated with various measures of adverse postoperative outcomes. RESULTS: Notable patient-specific factors included (number of models containing predictor variable; range of odds ratios [ORs] from all models): American Society of Anesthesiologists class 3, 4, or 5 (7 of 7 models; OR 1.25 to 1.74), open procedures (7 of 7 models; OR .51 to 4.37), increased body mass index (6 of 7 models; OR 1.15 to 2.19), history of COPD (6 of 7 models; OR 1.19 to 1.64), smoking (6 of 7 models; OR 1.15 to 1.61), wound class 3 or 4 (6 of 7 models; OR 1.22 to 1.56), sepsis (6 of 7 models; OR 1.14 to 1.89), corticosteroid administration (5 of 7 models; OR 1.11 to 2.24), and operation duration more than 3 hours (5 of 7 models; OR 1.41 to 1.76). CONCLUSIONS: These findings may be used to pre-emptively identify colorectal surgery patients at increased risk of experiencing adverse outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Cirugía Colorrectal , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Algoritmos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reembolso de Incentivo , Factores de Riesgo , Sociedades Médicas , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
3.
Am J Surg ; 208(1): 41-4, 2014 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-24300671

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to identify unique risk factors for mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nonemergent colorectal surgery. METHODS: A multivariate logistic regression model predicting 30-day mortality was constructed for patients with end-stage renal disease undergoing nonemergent colorectal procedures. Data were obtained from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (2005-2010). RESULTS: Among the 394 patients analyzed, those with serum creatinine levels >7.5 mg/dL had .07 times the adjusted mortality risk of those with levels <3.5 mg/dL. For colorectal surgery patients, the average serum creatinine level was 5.52 ± 2.6 mg/dL, and mortality was 13% (n = 50). CONCLUSIONS: High serum creatinine was associated with a lower risk for mortality in patients with end-stage renal disease, even though creatinine is often considered a risk factor for surgery. These results show how variables from a patient-centered subpopulation can differ in meaning from the general population.


Asunto(s)
Colectomía/mortalidad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/mortalidad , Íleon/cirugía , Fallo Renal Crónico/mortalidad , Recto/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Anastomosis Quirúrgica/mortalidad , Biomarcadores/sangre , Creatinina/sangre , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Humanos , Fallo Renal Crónico/sangre , Modelos Logísticos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Análisis Multivariante , Proctocolectomía Restauradora/mortalidad , Mejoramiento de la Calidad , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA