Pathologic Outcomes of Short-Course and Long-Course Radiotherapy for Locally Advanced Rectal Cancers Treated With Total Neoadjuvant Therapy.

INTRODUCTION: Total neoadjuvant therapy (TNT) for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) is now the standard of care. Randomized trials suggest the use of short-course radiotherapy (SCRT) and long-course radiotherapy (LCRT) are oncologically equivalent. OBJECTIVE: To describe pathologic outcomes after surgical resections of patients receiving SCRT versus LCRT as part of TNT for LARC. PARTICIPANTS: All patients with LARC treated at a single tertiary hospital who underwent proctectomy after completing TNT were included. Patients were excluded if adequate details of TNT were not available in the electronic medical record. RESULTS: A total of 53 patients with LARC were included. Thirty-nine patients (73.5%) received LCRT and 14 (26.4%) received SCRT. Forty-nine patients (92.5%) were clinical stage III (cN1-2) prior to treatment. The average lymph node yield after proctectomy was 20.9 for SCRT and 17.0 for LCRT (P = .075). Of the 49 patients with clinically positive nodes before treatment, 76.9% of those who received SCRT and 72.2% of those who received LCRT achieved pN0 disease after TNT. Additionally, there were no significant differences in rates of pathologic complete response between patients who received SCRT and LCRT, 7.1% and 12.8%, respectively (P = .565). CONCLUSION: Pathologic outcomes of patients with LARC treated with SCRT or LCRT, as part of TNT, may be similar. Further prospective trials are needed to assess long-term clinical outcomes and to determine best treatment protocols.

Rectal Cancer Survival for Residual Carcinoma In Situ Versus Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Therapy.

BACKGROUND: Pathologic complete response after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy for rectal cancer is associated with improved survival. It is unclear whether residual carcinoma in situ portends a similar outcome. OBJECTIVE: To compare the survival of patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy and achieved pathologic carcinoma in situ versus pathologic complete response. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. SETTING: National public database. PATIENTS: A total of 4594 patients in the National Cancer Database from 2006 to 2016 with locally advanced rectal cancer who received neoadjuvant therapy, underwent surgery, and had node-negative ypTis or ypT0 on final pathology were included. Of these, 4321 patients (94.1%) had ypT0 and 273 (5.9%) had ypTis on final pathology. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: Overall survival. RESULTS: The median age was 60 years, and 1822 patients (39.7%) were women. On initial staging, 54.5% (n = 2503) had stage II disease and 45.5% (n = 2091) had stage III disease. The ypTis group had decreased overall survival compared to the ypT0 group (HR 1.42; 95% CI, 1.04-1.95; p = 0.028). Other factors associated with decreased overall survival were older age at diagnosis, increasing Charlson-Deyo score, and poorly differentiated tumor grade. Variables associated with improved survival were female sex, private insurance, and receipt of both neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy. For the total cohort, there was no difference in survival between clinical stage II and stage III. LIMITATIONS: Standard therapy versus total neoadjuvant therapy could not be abstracted. Overall survival was defined as the time from surgery to death from any cause or last contact, allowing for some erroneously misclassified deaths. CONCLUSIONS: ypTis is associated with worse overall survival than ypT0 for patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who receive neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy followed by surgery. For this cohort, clinical stage was not a significant predictor of survival. Prospective trials comparing survival for these pathologic outcomes are needed. See Video Abstract . SUPERVIVENCIA DEL CNCER DE RECTO PARA EL CARCINOMA RESIDUAL IN SITU VS RESPUESTA PATOLGICA COMPLETA DESPUS DE LA TERAPIA NEOADYUVANTE: ANTECEDENTESLa respuesta patológica completa después de la quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante para el cáncer de recto se asocia con una mayor supervivencia. No está claro si el carcinoma residual in situ presagia un resultado similar.OBJETIVOComparar la supervivencia de pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante y lograron un carcinoma patológico in situ versus una respuesta patológica completa.DISEÑOEstudio de cohorte retrospectivo.ESCENARIOBase de datos pública nacional.PACIENTESSe incluyeron 4,594 pacientes de la Base de Datos Nacional de Cáncer de 2006 a 2016 con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que recibieron terapia neoadyuvante, fueron sometidos a cirugía y tuvieron ganglios negativos, ypTis o ypT0 en el reporte patológico final. 4.321 (94,1%) tuvieron ypT0 y 273 (5,9%) tuvieron ypTis en el reporte final.PRINCIPALES MEDIDAS DE RESULTADOSupervivencia general.RESULTADOSLa mediana de edad fue de 60 años. 1.822 pacientes (39,7%) fueron mujeres. El 54,5% (n = 2.503) tuvo la enfermedad en estadio II y el 45,5% (n = 2.091) tuvo la enfermedad en estadio III según la estadificación inicial. El grupo ypTis tuvo una supervivencia general reducida en comparación con el grupo ypT0 (HR 1,42, IC 95 % 1,04-1,95, p = 0,028). Otros factores asociados con una menor supervivencia general fueron una edad más avanzada al momento del diagnóstico, un aumento de la puntuación de Charlson-Deyo y un grado tumoral poco diferenciado. Las variables asociadas con una mejor supervivencia fueron el sexo femenino, el seguro privado y la recepción de quimioterapia neoadyuvante y adyuvante. Para la cohorte total, no hubo diferencias en la supervivencia entre el estadio clínico 2 y el estadio 3.LIMITACIONESNo se pudo resumir el tratamiento estándar versus el tratamiento neoadyuvante total. La supervivencia general se definió como el tiempo transcurrido desde la cirugía hasta la muerte por cualquier causa o último contacto, lo que permite algunas muertes erróneamente clasificadas.CONCLUSIONESypTis se asocia con una peor supervivencia general que ypT0 en pacientes con cáncer de recto localmente avanzado que reciben quimiorradioterapia neoadyuvante seguida de cirugía. Para esta cohorte, el estadio clínico no fue un predictor significativo de supervivencia. Se necesitan ensayos prospectivos que comparen la supervivencia de estos resultados patológicos. ( Traducción-Dr Osvaldo Gauto ).

Prevalence of and Risk Factors for Incidental Colonic Diverticulosis.

INTRODUCTION: The true prevalence and pathogenesis of diverticulosis is poorly understood. Risk factors for diverticulosis are presently unclear, with most clinicians attributing its development to years of chronic constipation. Previous studies have been limited by their failure to include young, ethnically diverse patient populations. METHODS: Patients who presented to the emergency department of our hospital from January-September 2019 and underwent abdominal computerized tomography (CT) scan for the evaluation of appendicitis were included. CT's were reviewed for the presence of diverticulosis. Risk factors for diverticulosis were determined for two age groups: >40 and ≤ 40. RESULTS: A total of 359 patients were included in the study. The median age was 38.57.1% were male. 81.6% were Hispanic. 43.5% had colonic diverticulosis on CT. 198 patients (55.1%) were ≤ age 40. The rate of diverticulosis in this group was 35.3% (n = 70). Those with diverticulosis were not significantly older (median age 29 versus 27, P = 0.061) but had a higher median body mass index (BMI) (28.4 versus 25.3, P = 0.003) compared to those without diverticulosis. On multivariate analysis, no characteristics were associated with the presence of diverticulosis for this group. Over age 40, 53.4% of patients (n = 86) had diverticulosis. Patients with diverticulosis were more likely to be Hispanic (95.3% versus 73.3%, P ≤ 0.001), less likely to be Asian (2.4% versus 16.0%, P = 0.004), had a higher median BMI (28.7 versus 25.5, P ≤ 0.001), and were more likely to use alcohol (30.2% versus 14.7%, P = 0.024) than those without diverticulosis. On multivariate analysis, characteristics associated with the presence of diverticulosis were BMI >30 (odds ratio OR 2.22, 95% confidence interval CI 1.03-4.80), Hispanic ethnicity (OR 10.05, 95% CI 1.74-58.26), and alcohol use (OR 3.44, 95% CI 1.26-9.39). CONCLUSIONS: There was a higher rate of asymptomatic diverticulosis in the <40 cohort than previously reported in the literature. Obesity, alcohol use, and Hispanic ethnicity were associated with the presence of diverticulosis in patients > age 40, but no risk factors for diverticulosis were identified for patients ≤ age 40, suggesting that diverticular pathogenesis may differ by age. Constipation was not a risk factor for diverticulosis in either age group. The data regarding the prevalence of diverticulosis in Hispanic patients is lacking and should be the focus of future inquiry.

Comparative Effectiveness and Risks of Bowel Preparation Before Elective Colorectal Surgery.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to determine the relationship between bowel preparation and surgical site infections (SSIs), and also other postoperative complications, after elective colorectal surgery. BACKGROUND: SSI is a major source of postoperative morbidity/costs after colorectal surgery. The value of preoperative bowel preparation to prevent SSI remains controversial. METHODS: We analyzed 32,359 patients who underwent elective colorectal resections in the American College of Surgeons National Surgery Quality Improvement Program database from 2012 to 2014. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed; propensity adjustment using patient/procedure characteristics was used to account for nonrandom receipt of bowel preparation. RESULTS: 26.7%, 36.6%, 3.8%, and 32.9% of patients received no bowel preparation, mechanical bowel preparation (MBP), oral antibiotics (OA), and MBP + OA, respectively. After propensity adjustment, MBP was not associated with decreased risk of SSI compared with no bowel preparation. In contrast, both OA and OA + MBP were associated with decreased risk of any SSI (adjusted odds ratio 0.49, 95% confidence interval 0.38-0.64; and adjusted odds ratio 0.45, 95% confidence interval 0.40-0.50, respectively) compared with no bowel preparation. OA and MBP + OA were associated with decreased risks of anastomotic leak, postoperative ileus, readmission, and also shorter length of stay (all P < 0.05). Bowel preparation was not associated with increased risk of cardiac/renal complications compared with no preparation. CONCLUSIONS: The use of MBP alone before elective colorectal resection to prevent SSI is ineffective and should be abandoned. In contrast, OA and MBP + OA are associated with decreased risks of SSI and are not associated with increased risks of other adverse outcomes compared with no preparation. Prospective studies to determine the efficacy of OA are warranted; in the interim, MBP + OA should be used routinely before elective colorectal resection to prevent SSI.

An Informed Consent Program Enhances Surgery Resident Education.

OBJECTIVE: First-year residents often obtain informed consent from patients. However, they typically receive no formal training in this area before residency. We wished to determine whether an educational program would improve residents' comfort with this process. DESIGN: Our institution created an informed consent educational program, which included a didactic component, a role-play about informed consent, and a simulation exercise using standardized patients. Residents completed surveys before and after the intervention, and responses to survey questions were compared using the signed-rank test. SETTING: This study took place at Temple University Hospital, a tertiary care institution in Philadelphia, PA. PARTICIPANTS: First-year surgery and emergency medicine residents at Temple University Hospital in 2014 participated in this study. Thirty-two residents completed the preintervention survey and 27 residents completed the educational program and postintervention survey. RESULTS: Only 37.5% had ever received formal training in informed consent before residency. After participating in the educational program, residents were significantly more confident that they could correctly describe the process of informed consent, properly fill out a procedure consent form, and properly obtain informed consent from a patient. Their comfort level in obtaining informed consent significantly increased. They found the educational program to be very effective in improving their knowledge and comfort level in obtaining informed consent. In all, 100% (N = 27) of residents said they would recommend the use of the program with other first-year residents. CONCLUSIONS: Residents became more confident in their ability to obtain informed consent after participating in an educational program that included didactic, role-play, and patient simulation elements.