Effect of Cold Adaptation on the State of Cardiovascular System and Cardiac Tolerance to Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury.

Despite the unconditional success achieved in the treatment and prevention of AMI over the past 40 years, mortality in this disease remains high. Hence, it is necessary to develop novel drugs with mechanism of action different from those currently used in clinical practices. Studying the molecular mechanisms involved in the cardioprotective effect of adapting to cold could contribute to the development of drugs that increase cardiac tolerance to the impact of ischemia/reperfusion. An analysis of the published data shows that the long-term human stay in the Far North contributes to the occurrence of cardiovascular diseases. At the same time, chronic and continuous exposure to cold increases tolerance of the rat heart to ischemia/ reperfusion. It has been demonstrated that the cardioprotective effect of cold adaptation depends on the activation of ROS production, stimulation of the ß2-adrenergic receptor and protein kinase C, MPT pore closing, and KATP channel.

The role of ß-adrenergic receptors in the regulation of cardiac tolerance to ischemia/reperfusion. Why do ß-adrenergic receptor agonists and antagonists protect the heart?

BACKGROUND: Catecholamines and ß-adrenergic receptors (ß-ARs) play an important role in the regulation of cardiac tolerance to the impact of ischemia and reperfusion. This systematic review analyzed the molecular mechanisms of the cardioprotective activity of ß-AR ligands. METHODS: We performed an electronic search of topical articles using PubMed databases from 1966 to 2023. We cited original in vitro and in vivo studies and review articles that documented the cardioprotective properties of ß-AR agonists and antagonists. RESULTS: The infarct-reducing effect of ß-AR antagonists did not depend on a decrease in the heart rate. The target for ß-blockers is not only cardiomyocytes but also neutrophils. ß1-blockers (metoprolol, propranolol, timolol) and the selective ß2-AR agonist arformoterol have an infarct-reducing effect in coronary artery occlusion (CAO) in animals. Antagonists of ß1- and ß2-АR (metoprolol, propranolol, nadolol, carvedilol, bisoprolol, esmolol) are able to prevent reperfusion cardiac injury. All ß-AR ligands that reduced infarct size are the selective or nonselective ß1-blockers. It was hypothesized that ß1-AR blocking promotes an increase in cardiac tolerance to I/R. The activation of ß1-AR, ß2-AR, and ß3-AR can increase cardiac tolerance to I/R. The cardioprotective effect of ß-AR agonists is mediated via the activation of kinases and reactive oxygen species production. CONCLUSIONS: It is unclear why ß-blockers with the similar receptor selectivity have the infarct-sparing effect while other ß-blockers with the same selectivity do not affect infarct size. What is the molecular mechanism of the infarct-reducing effect of ß-blockers in reperfusion? Why did in early studies ß-blockers decrease the mortality rate in patients with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and without reperfusion and in more recent studies ß-blockers had no effect on the mortality rate in patients with AMI and reperfusion? The creation of more effective ß-AR ligands depends on the answers to these questions.