Comparison of Survival Between ypStage and pStage in Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: In East Asia, the standard treatment for resectable advanced gastric cancer involves gastrectomy and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy; nevertheless, neoadjuvant chemotherapy is also expected to improve survival rates. However, it remains unclear whether the same criteria can be used to select adjuvant chemotherapy for patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy, or how survival varies between post-chemotherapy pathological Stage (ypStage) and pathological Stage without chemotherapy (pStage). This study evaluated the long-term outcomes of ypStage and pStage in gastric cancers and investigated the optimal intensity of adjuvant chemotherapy for patients who have received preoperative chemotherapy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From January 2007 to November 2019, 1,585 patients underwent radical gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the Kanagawa Cancer Center. The patient background was adjusted by propensity score matching, and recurrence-free survival was compared between the two groups. In addition, a prognostic factor analysis was conducted for each yp/pStage. RESULTS: The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for yp/pStage I were 77.1% and 90.9%, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.342). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for yp/pStage II were 50.4% and 69.1%, respectively, with no significant difference (p=0.062). The 5-year recurrence-free survival rates for yp/pStage III were 42.9% and 68.7%, respectively, with a significant difference observed (p=0.016). In the prognostic factor analysis for each stage, the presence or absence of preoperative chemotherapy was selected as an independent prognostic factor for yp/pStage I [hazard ratio (HR)=17.72; p=0.001] and yp/pStage II (HR=2.655, p=0.003). CONCLUSION: ypStage tends to have a worse prognosis than pStage, and further development of multidisciplinary treatment is necessary.

[A Case of Distal Gastrectomy and Left Segmentectomy for Hepatic Invasion of Gastric Cancer].

A 66-year-old male came to our hospital because of occult blood in stool and anemia. The patient was diagnosed as unresectable advanced gastric cancer,( ML/Less, type 2, tub2, cT4b[liver], cN+, cM0, cStage Ⅳ, HER2 negative). He was given oxaliplatin plus S-1 therapy. In the 3rd course of chemotherapy, he had severe anemia, and active bleeding from the tumor. To control the bleeding he underwent distal gastrectomy, lateral segmentectomy of the liver, and S4 partial hepatectomy. The patient underwent adjuvant chemotherapy with docetaxel plus S-1. Three months after surgery, lymph nodes recurrence was observed. He underwent second-line therapy with paclitaxel and ramucirumab. Seven months after surgery, lymph nodes recurrence was increased. He was switched to third-line therapy with nivolumab. He is currently arrive 12 months after surgery.

The Clinical Impact of the Pretreatment Albumin to Fibrinogen Ratio in Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The albumin to fibrinogen ratio (AFR) has been identified as a promising prognostic marker for some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of AFR in esophageal cancer patients who received curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 123 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between patients with high and low AFRs. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed when using a pretreatment AFR of 1.23. When comparing the patient backgrounds between the high-AFR (AFR ≥12.3) and low-AFR (AFR<12.3) groups, significant differences were noted in the pathological T status. The high-AFR group had significantly higher OS rates at 3 years (70.8%) and 5 years (59.3%) after surgery in comparison to the low-AFR group (46.6% and 37.4%, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS showed that the AFR was a significant prognostic factor. In addition, when comparing the site of first recurrence, a marginally significant difference was noted in hematological recurrence. CONCLUSION: The AFR is a significant risk factor in patients with esophageal cancer, holding promise as a valuable prognostic factor.

[A Case of Colon Metastasis after Surgery for Left Renal Pelvis Cancer].

The patient was a 73-year-old man. He was diagnosed with left renal pelvic carcinoma(papillary urothelial carcinoma, pT3aN0M0, Stage Ⅱ)at the age of 69. Left nephroureterectomy and partial cystectomy were performed at our hospital. At the age of 71, he was diagnosed with a recurrent bladder tumor and underwent radical cystectomy and ureteroenterostomy at a different hospital. At the age of 73, he visited our hospital with abdominal pain. Computed tomography(CT)revealed wall thickening of the descending colon and dilation of the oral tract. Emergency colonoscopy was performed. He was diagnosed with intestinal obstruction due to descending colon cancer. Colonoscopy revealed a circumferential type 2 lesion in the descending colon that was completely stenosed. Colonic stent placement was performed. A tumor biopsy confirmed the diagnosis of micropapillary adenocarcinoma. The preoperative diagnosis was descending colon cancer cT4aN2aM0, cStage Ⅲc. One month after stent placement, an open segmental resection of the descending colon with D2 dissection was performed. Immunostaining of the specimen showed CK7(+)and CK20(-), and the postoperative diagnosis was a recurrence of left renal pelvic carcinoma in the descending colon. We report a rare case of renal pelvic carcinoma that recurred in the descending colon 4 years after initial surgery.

CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) Index Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for the Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Received Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Perioperative inflammation and the nutritional status affect both short- and long-term oncological outcomes in various malignancies. We clarified the clinical impacts of the CRP-albumin-lymphocyte (CALLY) index in patients with esophageal cancer who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The present study included 180 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between a high-fibrinogen group and a low-fibrinogen group. RESULTS: The 3- and 5-year overall survival rates were 50.0% and 42.6%, respectively, in the CALLY index-low group, and 75.9% and 66.6% in the CALLY index-high group. The differences between the two groups were statistically significant (p<0.001). Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the CALLY index was an independent prognostic factor [hazard ratio=2.310, 95% confidence interval=1.416-3.767, p<0.001]. Similar results were observed in recurrence-free survival. When comparing the details of postoperative surgical complications, there was a significant difference in the incidence of anastomotic leakage. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 40.2% in the CALLY index-low group, while it was 27.5% in the CALLY index-high group (p=0.030). CONCLUSION: The pretreatment CALLY index is one of the independent prognostic factors for esophageal cancer. The CALLY index might become a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of esophageal cancer.

The Naples Prognostic Score Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the Naples Prognostic Score (NPS) in patients with gastric cancer and to clarify the potential of the NPS as a nutritional and inflammation evaluation system. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 158 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinical pathological parameters of the high-NPS (NPS >2) and low-NPS (NPS=0, 1) groups were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) rates at 3 and 5 years were 86.7% and 77.7%, respectively, in the low-NPS group and 55.4% and 47.4%, respectively, in the high-NPS group. There were significant differences in OS between the two groups. Uni- and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the NPS was an independent prognostic factor for OS (HR=2.495, 95%CI=1.240-5.451). In addition, the 3- and 5-year recurrence-free survival (RFS) rates were 82.1% and 76.0%, respectively, in the NPS-low group, and 43.8% and 36.6% in the NPS-high group. Univariate and multivariate analyses demonstrated that the NPS was an independent prognostic factor for RFS (HR=2.739, 95%CI=1.509-4.972). When the first site of recurrence was compared between the low-NPS group and high-NPS group, there were significant differences in peritoneal recurrence (8.7% vs. 34.3%, p=0.001) and hematologic recurrence (5.6% vs. 21.9%, p=0.004). CONCLUSION: The NPS was a significant prognostic factor in patients with gastric cancer who received curative treatment. The NPS may be a promising biomarker for the treatment and management of gastric cancer.

Albumin-Globulin Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Gastric Cancer Patients who Received Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The albumin-globulin ratio (AGR) is a useful biomarker for predicting postoperative complications and a poor prognosis in patients with various types of cancer and can be evaluated without invasive testing or surgery. In this study, we aimed to evaluate the usefulness of the AGR in predicting the short- and long-term prognoses of patients with gastric cancer who underwent radical resection at our institution. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study is a retrospective cohort analysis in which eligible patients were selected from the medical records of patients who underwent radical resection for gastric cancer at Yokohama City University from 2000 to 2020 and their medical records were reviewed. A total of 240 patients with gastric cancer were classified into high-AGR (>1.57) and low-AGR (≤1.57) groups and their overall survival (OS), recurrence-free survival (RFS), and postoperative complication rates were compared. RESULTS: Of the total 240 patients, 87 were classified into the high AGR group and 153 were classified into the low AGR group; the incidence of postoperative complications in the two groups did not differ to a statistically significant extent (34.4% vs. 39.2%, p=0.491). The long-term findings showed that the 5-year OS and RFS rates were significantly better in the high AGR group [84.0% vs. 64.8% (p=0.005), 80.0% vs. 61.9% (p=0.015), respectively]. CONCLUSION: Preoperative low AGR is a risk factor for OS and DFS in patients with gastric cancer who undergo surgery. The AGR may be a useful biomarker that can be applied as a prognostic indicator for patients with gastric cancer.

Comparison of Dietary Intake After Gastric Cancer Gastrectomy Between Patients With and Without Postoperative Surgical Complications.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study aimed to compare dietary intake (DI) after gastrectomy for gastric cancer between patients with (C group) and without (NC group) postoperative surgical complications. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective observational study enrolled patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. DI was assessed using a food frequency questionnaire with 82 food items (FFQW82) during nutritional counseling before surgery and at one and three months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 225 patients participated in this study. Of the 225 patients, 193 had no postoperative complications, and 32 had postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥2). The median DI at 1 month postoperatively was 1508 kcal/day in the NC group and 1,470.5 kcal/day in the C group (p=0.175). The median DI at 3 months postoperatively was 1,623 kcal/day in the NC group and 1575 kcal/day in the C group (p=0.473). There was a significant difference between the NC and C groups in the rate of decrease in DI at one month (median: -8.44% vs. -15.37%, p=0.032) and at three months postoperatively (median: -3.58% vs. -6.12%, p=0.038). CONCLUSION: There was a statistically significant difference in the rate of decrease in DI after gastrectomy between the C and NC groups at 1 and 3 months postoperatively. Our results suggest that patients with postoperative surgical complications require additional nutritional treatment for decreased DI.

[A Case of Meningeal Carcinomatosis following Esophagogastric Junction Cancer Surgery].

In a 79-year-old man, upper gastrointestinal endoscopy and CT revealed an entire circumferential type 3 tumor with stenosis from the lower thoracic esophagus to the abdominal esophagus. He was diagnosed with esophageal adenocarcinoma and underwent middle and lower esophageal resection and 2 regional lymph node dissections. The postoperative pathological diagnosis was poorly differentiated adenocarcinoma, pT3N0M0, pStage ⅡA esophagogastric junction cancer(Siewert type Ⅱ). The patient was followed-up without postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy, following the Japanese Gastric Cancer Treatment Guidelines 2021(6th edition). Six months postoperatively, contrast-enhanced CT revealed multiple lymph node, small intestinal mesenteric, and left adrenal metastases, and SOX therapy was initiated. After 4 courses of SOX therapy, the patient was brought to the emergency room and admitted with anorexia and weakness, and consciousness disorder was observed on the next day. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the head was indicative of meningeal carcinomatosis, and cytological examination of the spinal fluid revealed adenocarcinoma, which was diagnosed as meningeal carcinomatosis from esophagogastric junction carcinoma. Subsequently, his consciousness disorder worsened, and he died on the 9th day of hospitalization. We report a rare case of meningeal carcinomatosis following esophagogastric junction cancer.

Pretreatment Fibrinogen Level Is a Prognostic Factor for Esophageal Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Pretreatment fibrinogen levels are a promising prognostic marker for some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of fibrinogen levels before treatment in patients with esophageal cancer who underwent curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 123 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters in the high fibrinogen and low fibrinogen groups were analyzed. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) stratified by individual clinical factors was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed when a pretreatment fibrinogen level of 400 g/dl was used as a cutoff value. The comparison of the patient background factors between the high fibrinogen (400 g/dl) and low fibrinogen (<400 g/dl) groups revealed significant differences in pathological T status and lymph node metastasis. In the low fibrinogen group, the OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery (71.4% and 58.1%, respectively) were significantly higher than those in the high fibrinogen group (38.3% and 32.4%, respectively). Univariate and multivariate analyses for OS showed that the fibrinogen level prior to treatment was a significant prognostic factor. Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. In addition, when the first recurrence site was compared, there were marginally significant differences in hematologic recurrence. CONCLUSION: Pretreatment fibrinogen levels are a significant risk factor in patients with esophageal cancer. Therefore, pretreatment fibrinogen levels are a promising prognostic factor for patients with esophageal cancer.

Lymphocyte to Monocyte Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor in Patients With Esophageal Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: This study evaluated the clinical impact of the lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio (LMR) in patients with esophageal cancer who received curative treatment and perioperative adjuvant treatment. The association between LMR and the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with esophageal cancer was also investigated. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 181 patients who underwent curative treatment for esophageal cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters of patients with high and low LMR statuses were analyzed. RESULTS: The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly lower (40.6% and 33.8%, respectively) in the low-LMR group than in the high-LMR group (67.1% and 58.4%, respectively). The pretreatment LMR was selected as an independent prognostic factor in the multivariate analysis model [hazard ratio (HR)=2.606; 95%CI=1.504-4.516, p<0.001]. Similar results were observed for RFS. Furthermore, LMR was associated with the occurrence of postoperative surgical complications and hematological recurrence. The incidence of anastomotic leakage was 63.3% in the low-LMR group and 27.2% in the high-LMR group (p<0.001). Moreover, the hematologic recurrence rate in the low-LMR group was significantly higher than that in the high-LMR group (46.7% vs. 23.8%, p=0.011). CONCLUSION: The LMR may be a promising prognostic and predictive factor for esophageal cancer, and may be used to select optimal treatment strategies in the future.

Dietary Intake After Surgery in Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Underwent Laparoscopic-assisted Versus Those Who Underwent Conventional Gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Dietary intake (DI) loss after gastrectomy is a serious problem for patients with gastric cancer. This study compared the dietary intake after surgery in patients with early gastric cancer who received laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG) versus those who underwent conventional open distal gastrectomy (ODG). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a prospective, observational study enrolling patients who underwent gastrectomy for gastric cancer. Dietary intake was assessed using the food frequency questionnaire with eighty-two food items (FFQW82) at nutritional counseling before surgery and one and three months after surgery. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were included. Among them, 69 (58.5%) were male, and 49 (41.5%) were female. Seventy-five (63.6%) received LDG, and 43 (36.4%) received ODG. At 1 month postoperatively, the median DI in the LDG group was 1,540 (1,014-2,195) kcal/day, whereas that in the ODG group was 1547 (986-2,143) kcal/day (p=0.891). At 3 months postoperatively, the median DI in the LDG group was 1,624 (1,050-2,443) kcal/day, and that in the ODG group was 1,652 (917-2,144) kcal/day (p=0.749). There was no significant difference in the DI loss rate at 1 month (median: -8.2% vs. -9.3%, p=0.398) and 3 months (median: -3.2% vs. -3.7%, p=0.635) between the LDG and ODG groups. CONCLUSION: Minimally invasive laparoscopic surgery may not prevent postoperative DI loss after distal gastrectomy. Therefore, methods other than laparoscopic surgery are needed to prevent post-gastrectomy DI loss.

The C-reactive Protein to Prealbumin Ratio Is an Independent Prognostic Factor for Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Receive Curative Surgery.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The C-reactive protein to prealbumin ratio (CPAR) has been proposed and introduced in gastrointestinal cancer management. This study aimed to evaluate the clinical impact of the CPAR in patients with gastric cancer (GC) who received curative treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 447 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2013 and 2017. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between patients with high and low CPARs. RESULTS: Overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed using a pretreatment CPAR of 5.0. Significant differences were observed in the 3- and 5-year OS rates of the CPAR-low (CPAR <5.0) and CPAR-high (CPAR ≥5.0) groups. The 3- and 5-year OS rates were 92.6% and 87.8%, respectively, in the CPAR-low group and 88.0% and 75.4% in the CPAR-high group. The CPAR was determined to be a significant prognostic factor for OS in a multivariate analysis (p=0.032). Similar results were observed for recurrence-free survival. CONCLUSION: The CAPR is a prognostic factor for GC patients. Therefore, the CAPR may be a promising nutritional biomarker of inflammation that can be applied in the management of GC patients.

The Clinical Influence of Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index in Patients With Gastric Cancer Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: We evaluated the clinical impact of the Geriatric Nutritional Risk Index (GNRI) in patients who received curative treatment and perioperative adjuvant treatment. We also investigated the association between the GNRI and the clinicopathological features of patients with GC. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 280 patients who underwent curative treatment for GC between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters of the high-GNRI and low-GNRI groups were compared. RESULTS: In the GNRI-high group, the overall survival (OS) rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly lower (82.7% and 77.9%, respectively) than those in the GNRI-low group (56.4% and 40.8%). The GNRI was selected for the final multivariate analysis model for OS. The GNRI was also a significant prognostic factor for recurrence-free survival (RFS). The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 79.1% and 74.8%, respectively, in the GNRI-high group, and 48.0% and 38.6% in the GNRI-low group. The GNRI was selected for the final multivariate analysis model for RFS. The GNRI was also found to affect the postoperative clinical course, including postoperative surgical complications and postoperative adjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSION: The GNRI may be a promising prognostic and predictive factor for gastric cancer. In the future, the GNRI may be used to select optimal treatment strategies.

The Clinical Impact of Change in the C-Reactive Protein/Albumin Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: Recently, change in the C-reactive protein/albumin ratio (CAR) has become a promising prognostic marker in some malignancies. The aim of the present study was to evaluate the clinical impact of change in the CAR in gastric cancer patients who received curative resection. METHOD: The present study included 458 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2013 and 2017. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters were compared between patients who showed a high-change in CAR and those who showed a low-change in CAR. RESULTS: The OS stratified by each clinical factor was compared using a log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed using a 0.05 change in CAR. When the patient background factors were compared between the high-change (change in CAR ≥ 0.05) and low-change (change in CAR < 0.05) groups, the median age, sex ratio, T factor, and N factor were similar. In the low-change group, the OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 94.1% and 87.6%, respectively, which amounted to a significant difference from the low-change group, with rates of 83.6 and 77.5% in the high-change group. In the low-change group, the RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 90.1% and 85.1%, respectively, while those in the high-change group 77.6 and 75.2%. The univariate and multivariate analyses of factors associated with OS and RFS showed that the change in CAR was a significant prognostic factor. CONCLUSIONS: The change in CAR is a significant risk factor and promising prognostic factor for gastric cancer patients.

The Clinical Impact of the Pretreatment Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND/AIM: The platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) is a promising prognostic marker in some malignancies. The present study evaluated the clinical impact of the PLR in patients with gastric cancer who underwent curative resection. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included 258 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2005 and 2020. The prognosis and clinicopathological parameters between the high- and low-PLR statuses were analyzed. RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) stratified by each clinical factor was compared using the log-rank test, and a significant difference was observed using a pretreatment PLR of 150. When comparing the patient backgrounds between the high-PLR (PLR≥150) and low-PLR (PLR<150) groups, there were no significant differences between the two groups. The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were significantly higher at 70.8% and 60.4%, respectively, for the high-PLR group than at 83.6% and 79.7%, respectively, for the low-PLR group. Univariate and multivariate analyses of the OS showed that the PLR was a significant prognostic factor. In addition, when comparing the first recurrence sites, there were significant differences in peritoneal recurrence. CONCLUSION: The PLR is a significant risk factor for gastric cancer, making it a promising prognostic factor for patients with gastric cancer.

Can Clinical Stage in the 8th Edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM Classification Stratify the Prognosis of Patients Undergoing Curative Surgery for Siewert Type II/III Adenocarcinoma of the Esophagogastric Junction?

BACKGROUND/AIM: Clinical staging in the eighth edition of the Union for International Cancer Control TNM classification (TNM8) is reported to predict the prognosis of patients with gastric cancer. However, there have been no reports on using the TNM8 for prognostic stratification of patients with adenocarcinoma of the esophagogastric junction (AEG). This study aimed to investigate whether it was possible to stratify the prognosis of patients who underwent curative surgery for Siewert type II/III AEG according to the TNM8 clinical stage (cStage). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included patients with Siewert type II/III AEG who underwent curative surgery between 2000 and 2019 at Kanagawa Cancer Center. Those who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were excluded. We investigated the survival of patients with AEG of each TNM8 cStage. RESULTS: This study included 138 patients, among whom 102 (74%) had Siewert type II and 36 (26%) had Siewert type III AEG. A total of 50, 38, 43, and seven patients were classified with cStage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. The median duration of follow-up of the survivors was 54.7 months. The 5-year overall survival rate of the entire cohort was 65.8%, whereas for patients with cStage I, II, III and IV was 81.6%, 69.0%, 54.3% and 14.3%, respectively. The hazard ratio with reference to cStage I was 1.83, 3.07, and 8.13 for cStage I, III, and IV, respectively, increasing in a stepwise manner. CONCLUSION: TNM8 Clinical staging is able to stratify the prognosis of patients with Siewert type II/III AEG.

Clinicopathological Characteristics and Prognosis of Mucinous Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Mucinous gastric carcinoma (MGC) has a poor prognosis. Due to the differences in clinicopathology factors between MGC and non-MGC (NMGC), it is difficult to compare them. In this study, we compared the clinicopathological characteristics and prognosis of MGC and NMGC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For gastric carcinoma (GC), 3,042 gastrectomy patients were included in the study and divided into the MGC (n=86) and NMGC (n=2,956) groups. The characteristics and prognoses of patients in both groups were compared before and after (both groups, n=86) propensity score matching. RESULTS: Significant differences were observed in the tumor location (upper) (MGC group: 28.0% vs. NMGC group: 24.7%, p=0.003), tumor diameter (median) [65 mm (8-200 mm) vs. 40 mm (2-75 mm), p<0.001], lymph node metastasis (70.9% vs. 37.3%, p<0.001), venous invasion (57.0% vs. 40.4%, p<0.001), and lymphatic invasion (62.8% vs. 34.9%, p<0.001) before propensity score matching. The 5-year overall survival (OS) (70.9% vs. 76.2%, p=0.006) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) (75.5% vs. 82.4%, p=0.014) rates were significantly lower in the MGC group. After propensity score matching, there were no significant differences in either the 5-year OS (70.9% vs. 73.7%, p=0.230) or CSS (75.5% vs. 75.7%, p=0.587) rates. In addition, no substantial difference was observed in either of the recurrence forms. CONCLUSION: MGC is rare and usually diagnosed at a more advanced stage. However, MGC and NMGC have similar prognoses.

Clinical Course of Vitamin B12 Deficiency and Associated Risk Factors in Patients After Total Gastrectomy for Gastric Cancer.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Patients are at-risk for vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy due to a lack of intrinsic factors. The aim of the study was to clarify the clinical course and risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer were selected from the medical records of the Yokohama City University from 2000 to 2020. A logistic regression analysis was performed to identify risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency. RESULTS: We evaluated 47 patients. The median serum vitamin B12 levels before surgery were 359 pg/ml, while those at 3, 6, 9, and 12 months after surgery these were 255 pg/ml, 197.5 pg/ml, 195 pg/ml, and 206 pg/ml, respectively. Univariate analyses to identify factors associated with vitamin B12 deficiency at 6 months after surgery showed that the occurrence of postoperative complications was a significant risk factor (OR=6.347, 95%CI=1.607-25.774, p=0.009), while adjuvant chemotherapy was a marginally significantly risk factor (OR=3.562, 95%CI=0.877-14.477, p=0.076). CONCLUSION: Almost half of the patients were diagnosed with vitamin B12 deficiency at 6 months after total gastrectomy for gastric cancer. In addition, the occurrence of postoperative complications and adjuvant chemotherapy were risk factors for vitamin B12 deficiency at 6 months after surgery.

Clinical Significance of the Prealbumin Level in Gastric Cancer Patients Who Receive Curative Treatment.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the clinical influence of the prealbumin level on the gastric cancer survival and recurrence after curative treatment. METHODS: This study included 447 patients who underwent curative treatment for gastric cancer between 2013 and 2017. The risk factors for the overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were identified. RESULTS: A prealbumin level of 20 mg/dl was regarded as the optimal point of classification, considering the 3- and 5-year survival rates. The OS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 80.7% and 65.0% in the low-prealbumin group, respectively, and 93.1% and 87.9% in the high-prealbumin group, respectively, a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001). The RFS rates at 3 and 5 years after surgery were 71.7% and 68.0% in the low-prealbumin group, respectively, and 90.1% and 84.7% in the high-prealbumin group, respectively, a statistically significant difference (p = 0.031). A multivariate analysis demonstrated that the prealbumin level was a significant independent risk factor for the OS and RFS. In addition, the rate of introduction of adjuvant chemotherapy was significantly lower and the frequency of peritoneal recurrence and lymph node recurrence significantly higher in the low-prealbumin group than in the high-prealbumin group. CONCLUSION: Prealbumin is a risk factor for the survival in patients who undergo curative treatment for gastric cancer. It is necessary to develop an effective plan of perioperative care and surgical strategy according to the prealbumin level.