Complementary and Alternative Medicine for Hidradenitis Suppurativa Discussed on TikTok: A Cross-Sectional Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a painful, chronic inflammatory skin disease that negatively affects patient quality of life, and conventional treatments are variably effective. As a result, patients often turn to complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) for pain relief. Social media enables HS patients to share treatment recommendations. TikTok is a popular social media platform, but little is known about the HS treatments discussed in TikTok videos.  Objective: To evaluate the content and quality of information on TikTok regarding CAM HS therapies.  Methods: A cross-sectional analysis was conducted by performing a search in TikTok using the terms #hidradenitissuppurativa, #hswarrior, #naturalremedy, #complementarymedicine, #alternativemedicine, and #HStreatment. Two independent reviewers evaluated video quality using the DISCERN and AVA instruments. Linear regressions compared the engagement, DISCERN, and AVA scores among different uploader types. RESULTS: In total, 91 TikTok videos were analyzed. Videos were uploaded by non-physicians (82.4), dermatologists (6.6%), and private companies (11.0%). The average DISCERN and AVA scores were 36.2 and 1.6, respectively (poor quality). Common CAM therapies were natural salves, turmeric, Epsom salts, elimination diets, and zinc supplements. Physician-uploaded videos were of significantly higher quality than videos by other uploader types, with an average DISCERN and AVA score of 44.3 (P<0.009) and 2.6 (P<0.001), respectively (fair quality). CONCLUSION: TikTok videos were poor quality (low DISCERN and AVA scores); physician-uploaded videos were fair quality. Dermatologists can improve video quality by adequately discussing the supporting evidence, mechanisms of action, and remaining questions for HS treatments.  J Drugs Dermatol. 2024;23(3):e93-96. doi:10.36849/JDD.7738e.

Correlation between Dermatology Life Quality Index and Psoriasis Area and Severity Index in Patients with Psoriasis: A Cross-sectional Global Healthcare Study on Psoriasis.

Quality of life impairment in dermatology patients and severity of psoriasis are quantified by the Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) and the Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI), respectively. The aim of this study is to compare the correlation between PASI and DLQI in patients from different geographical areas and to identify predictors of high DLQI across geographical regions. Correlations between PASI and DLQI were evaluated using Spearman's rank correlation tests and quantile regression. The study included 1,158 patients with psoriasis, with a median (interquartile range) PASI and DLQI of 6.0 (3.0-12.0) and 8.0 (4.0-15.0), respectively. Correlations were demonstrated between PASI and DLQI, both overall and stratified by geographical region. Quantile (median) regression yielded coefficients of 0.75 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 0.62, 0.88) for Switzerland, 0.50 (95% CI 0.42, 0.58) for Latin America, 0.34 (95% CI 0.16, 0.51) for Asia, and 0.31 (95% CI 0.08, 0.53) for the USA. Current age, age at diagnosis, sex, body mass index, and psoriasis arthritis affected DLQI in Latin America, while education had an impact among patients treated in Switzerland. Few countries were included within each continent; hence, more data from different countries are necessary for generalizability. The study showed correlations between PASI and DLQI among patients in all included geographical regions. The patients' characteristics affecting DLQI vary worldwide.

Comorbidity Burden in Psoriasis Patients with Skin of Color.

Background: Psoriasis is a chronic disease with increased risk of numerous comorbidities. Known differences exist regarding treatment outcomes for psoriasis patients with skin of color (SOC). However, factors contributing to these differences are relatively unknown. Objectives: This study aims to compare the comorbidity burden in SOC psoriasis patients vs. White patients, as measured by the Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) score. Methods: We utilized the National Ambulatory Medical Care Survey (NAMCS) to identify visits for adult psoriasis patients occurring in the years 2002-2016 and 2018. The CCI was used to objectively measure comorbidity burden. Patients were identified by race, and SOC was defined as any reported race besides White Only. A multiple linear regression was run to compare the CCI among adult psoriasis patients based on race and ethnicity, controlling for age, sex, insurance status, and geographic region. Results: A total of 39,176,928 weighted visits were analyzed. Compared to White patients, patients with SOC did not have statistically significant differences in comorbidity burden, as measured by CCI score (p=0.073 for Black/African American Only vs. White Only, p=0.073 for American Indian/Alaska Native Only vs. White Only, p=0.435 for Asian Only vs. White Only, p=0.403 for Native Hawaiian/Pacific Islander Only vs. White Only, p=0.195 for Other vs. White Only). Conclusion: Patients with SOC were not found to have differences in comorbidity burden compared to White patients. These results highlight that social factors such as socioeconomic status and access to healthcare may contribute more directly to psoriasis treatment outcomes than patient race.

Shared decision-making and satisfaction with care in patients with psoriasis: A population-based study in the United States.

BACKGROUND: Shared decision-making (SDM) is a critical component of the patient-physician relationship. Although SDM has been reported to improve patient knowledge in other fields, it is still relatively unknown in dermatology. OBJECTIVE: To determine the association between SDM and satisfaction with care among patients with psoriasis. METHODS: Cross-sectional study using data from the 2014 to 2017 and 2019 Medical Expenditure Panel Survey. RESULTS: A weighted total of 3,715,027 patients with psoriasis were identified. The average SDM score was 3.6 (of 4), and the average satisfaction with care score was 8.6 (of 10). Approximately 42% of the cohort reported having a high SDM (score, ≥3.9). Patients who had high SDM had, on average, 85% higher satisfaction with care (P < .001) after adjusting for covariates. LIMITATIONS: The results of our study should be interpreted within the context of the Medical Expenditure Panel Survey database. The ability to measure SDM was limited by the 7 items from Medical Expenditure Panel Survey, which may not fully capture active participation in shared decision-making. CONCLUSION: A majority of patients with psoriasis are not participating in highly SDM. It is important to construct a framework for carrying out SDM efficiently to enhance physician-patient communication and improve patient outcomes.

Shared decision-making and satisfaction with care: a population-based study in patients with acne with skin of colour in the USA.

Little is known about differences in shared decision-making and patient satisfaction with acne care among different ethnicities and races. We conducted a cross-sectional study to determine differences between patients with acne who are White and those with skin of colour (SOC), i.e. (i) engagement in shared decision-making, and (ii) patient satisfaction with care, using the 2009-2017 and 2019 Medical Panel Expenditure Survey. Patients with acne with SOC were nearly two times more likely to engage in high shared decision-making compared with White patients [adjusted odds ratio 1.80, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.30-2.51, P < 0.001]. Patients with SOC with acne reported lower satisfaction with care compared with White patients (ß = -0.38, 95% CI -0.69 to -0.06, P = 0.02). Patients with SOC who had acne reported higher levels of shared decision-making than White patients. However, compared with the White patients, patients with SOC report lower satisfaction with their care. There may be other factors contributing to lower satisfaction with care in patients with SOC who have acne.