Recommended medical and non-medical factors to assess military preventable deaths: subject matter experts provide valuable insights.

INTRODUCTION: Historically, there has been variability in the methods for determining preventable death within the US Department of Defense. Differences in methodologies partially explain variable preventable death rates ranging from 3% to 51%. The lack of standard review process likely misses opportunities for improvement in combat casualty care. This project identified recommended medical and non-medical factors necessary to (1) establish a comprehensive preventable death review process and (2) identify opportunities for improvement throughout the entire continuum of care. METHODS: This qualitative study used a modified rapid assessment process that includes the following steps: (1) identification and recruitment of US government subject matter experts (SMEs); (2) multiple cycles of data collection via key informant interviews and focus groups; (3) consolidation of information collected in these interviews; and (4) iterative analysis of data collected from interviews into common themes. Common themes identified from SME feedback were grouped into the following subject areas: (1) prehospital, (2) in-hospital and (3) forensic pathology. RESULTS: Medical recommendations for military preventable death reviews included the development, training, documentation, collection, analysis and reporting of the implementation of the Tactical Combat Casualty Care Guidelines, Joint Trauma System Clinical Practice Guidelines and National Association of Medical Examiners autopsy standards. Non-medical recommendations included training, improved documentation, data collection and analysis of non-medical factors needed to understand how these factors impact optimal medical care. CONCLUSIONS: In the operational environment, medical care must be considered in the context of non-medical factors. For a comprehensive preventable death review process to be sustainable in the military health system, the process must be based on an appropriate conceptual framework implemented consistently across all military services.

Complete excision of the infrapatellar fat pad is associated with patellar tendon shortening after primary total knee arthroplasty.

BACKGROUND: Patella baja is a potentially disabling and difficult-to-treat complication following total knee arthroplasty (TKA). We investigated whether complete or partial excision of the fat pad has an effect on the length of the patellar tendon following TKA. METHODS: A retrospective review of patient radiographs was performed. One hundred and eleven consecutive patients who underwent primary TKA for osteoarthritis using the same components by two consultants were selected. Seventy-two patients underwent complete excision of the fat pad, whilst 39 had partial excision as per consultant practice. Patellar height was measured using the Caton-Deschamps Index (CDI) on immediate postoperative radiographs and at a minimum follow-up of 1 year. RESULTS: In the complete excision group, the mean CDI changed from 0.54 immediately postoperatively to 0.45 at a minimum follow-up of 1 year (p < 0.0001) indicating shortening of the patellar tendon, and eight patients reported anterior knee pain. The partial excision group's mean CDI changed from 0.76 to 0.75 (p = 0.231). An analysis of variance showed that the effect of complete fat pad excision on patella tendon length was significant, F(1, 109) = 15.273, p < 0.001. CONCLUSION: At a minimum follow-up of 1 year, the patellar tendon length shortened significantly in the group of patients with complete fat pad excision. With partial excision, there was no significant change in tendon length. Complete excision of the fat pad should therefore be avoided wherever possible in an attempt to avoid patella baja. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Outcome of treatment for dislocation after primary total hip replacement.

We have studied the natural history of a first episode of dislocation after primary total hip replacement (THR) to clarify the incidence of recurrent dislocation, the need for subsequent revision and the quality of life of these patients. Over a six-year period, 99 patients (101 hips) presented with a first dislocation of a primary THR. A total of 61 hips (60.4%) had dislocated more than once. After a minimum follow-up of one year, seven patients had died. Of the remaining 94 hips (92 patients), 47 underwent a revision for instability and one awaits operation (51% in total). Of these, seven re-dislocated and four needed further surgery. The quality of life of the patients was studied using the Oxford Hip Score and the EuroQol-5 Dimension (EQ-5D) questionnaire. A control group of patients who had not dislocated was also studied. At a mean follow-up of 4.5 years (1 to 20), the mean Oxford Hip Score was 26.7 (15 to 47) after one episode of dislocation, 27.2 (12 to 45) after recurrent dislocation, 34.5 (12 to 54) after successful revision surgery, 42 (29 to 55) after failed revision surgery and 17.4 (12 to 32) in the control group. The EuroQol-5 dimension questionnaire revealed more health problems in patients undergoing revision surgery.