A mixed-methods study to evaluate the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of delivering the optimal health program (OHP) for youth at clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis: A study protocol.

Individuals with clinical high risk (CHR) for psychosis experience significant distress, impaired general functioning and a high lifetime risk of self-harm and attempted suicide. The CHR period is an important phase in an individual's mental health where appropriate interventions may reduce the risk of progression to several negative outcomes, including the development of schizophrenia. Given that up to 80% of individuals with CHR have another diagnosable mental illness and almost half experience poor psychosocial functioning, developing interventions that address psychosocial functioning in young people with CHR is of great importance. This mixed-methods study aims to employ qualitative and quantitative methods to adapt an evidence-based comprehensive psychosocial and mental health self-efficacy program, the Optimal Health Program (OHP), and evaluate the feasibility, acceptability and preliminary clinical efficacy in young people with CHR. We aim to recruit 30 CHR participants (age 16-29 years) in a single-arm 12-week exploratory clinical trial. Feasibility metrics will include recruitment, retention, and data completion rates. Acceptability will be informed by the Client Satisfaction Questionnaire. Clinical assessments (psychosis spectrum symptoms, depression, and anxiety), functional measures, and cognitive outcomes will be completed at study entry and repeated post-intervention at 12-weeks. We will run pre-post test data analysis to examine changes following engagement in the OHP intervention. Qualitative interviews will be conducted post-intervention to further evaluate the acceptability of the intervention and the trial design, and will be analyzed using thematic analysis. OHP may enhance the long-term mental health, well-being and functioning of CHR youth. However, the intervention must first be adapted to a CHR population; then, the feasibility and preliminary efficacy of delivering an intervention tailored around the varied needs of the CHR group must be established before a larger-scale appropriately powered study is pursued. Trial registration: The trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05757128.

Mental Health Service Use Before First Diagnosis of a Psychotic Disorder.

Importance: Characterizing mental health service use trajectories preceding diagnosis of a psychotic disorder may help identify individuals at highest risk and in which settings they are at highest risk. Objective: To examine mental health service use and diagnostic trajectories before first diagnosis of psychotic disorder and identify utilization and diagnostic patterns. Design, Setting, and Participants: This population-based, retrospective cohort study used linked provincial health administrative data. The sample included individuals aged 15 to 29 years diagnosed with a psychotic disorder in Ontario, Canada, between April 1, 2012, and March 31, 2018. These individuals were matched to individuals with a diagnosis of a mood disorder. Data were analyzed from November 2108 to November 2019. Main Outcomes and Measures: The main outcomes were rates, timing, and setting of mental health-related service use and associated diagnoses in the 3 years before the index disorder among individuals first diagnosed with a psychotic disorder compared with those first diagnosed with a mood disorder. Results: A total of 10 501 individuals with a first diagnosis of psychotic disorder were identified (mean [SD] age, 21.55 [3.83] years; 72.1% male). A total of 72.2% of individuals had at least 1 mental health service visit during the 3 years before their first psychotic disorder diagnosis, which was significantly more than matched controls with a first mood disorder diagnosis (66.8%) (odds ratio [OR], 1.34; 95% CI, 1.26-1.42). Compared with individuals diagnosed with a mood disorder, individuals diagnosed with a psychotic disorder were significantly more likely to have had mental health-related hospital admissions (OR, 3.98; 95% CI, 3.43-4.62) and emergency department visits (OR, 2.27; 95% CI, 2.12-2.43) in the preceding 3 years. Those with psychotic disorders were more likely to have had prior diagnoses of substance use disorders (OR, 2.57; 95% CI, 2.35-2.81), other disorders (personality disorders, developmental disorders) (OR, 1.75; 95% CI, 1.61-1.90), and self-harm (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.36-1.98) in the past 3 years compared with those diagnosed with mood disorders. Conclusions and Relevance: This study found that in the 3 years prior to an index diagnosis, individuals with a first diagnosis of psychotic disorder had higher rates of mental health service use, particularly emergency department visits and hospitalizations, compared with individuals with a first diagnosis of a mood disorder. Individuals with psychotic disorders also had a greater number of premorbid diagnoses. Differences in health service utilization patterns between those with a first psychotic disorder diagnosis vs a first mood disorder diagnosis suggest distinct premorbid trajectories that could be useful for next steps in prediction and prevention research.

Service restrictions from emergency shelters among people experiencing homelessness: Uncovering pathways into unsheltered homelessness and institutional circuitry.

Service restrictions refer to temporary or permanent bans of individuals from a program or an organization's services, and are widely used in emergency shelter systems. Limited research exists on how service restrictions unfold and their impacts on people experiencing homelessness. This qualitative study used in-depth interviews with timeline mapping to examine the antecedents and consequences of service restrictions from emergency shelters among people experiencing homelessness in two cities in Ontario, Canada. A total of 49 people experiencing homelessness who had been restricted from an emergency shelter program in the past year were recruited and included in the study analysis. A pragmatic and integrative approach was used for data analysis that involved the development of meta-matrices to identify prominent and divergent perspectives and experiences with regard to service restriction antecedents and consequences. Study findings underscored that service restrictions were often the result of violence and aggression, primarily between service users. There were regional differences in other service restriction reasons, including substance use and possession. Service restrictions affected the shelter status of almost all participants, with many subsequently experiencing unsheltered homelessness, and cycling through institutional health, social, and criminal justice services (i.e., institutional circuitry). Other health and social consequences included substance use relapses and hospitalizations; cold-related injuries due to post-restriction unsheltered homelessness; suicidality; food insecurity; diminished contact with support network and connections; and intense feelings of anger, fear, and hopelessness. Overall, the study findings advance our understanding of the role of homeless services in pathways into unsheltered homelessness and institutional circuitry, which raise critical questions about how to mitigate the harms associated with service restrictions, while concurrently facilitating safety and upholding the rights of people experiencing homelessness and emergency shelter staff.

The Need to Adapt the Psychiatric Clinical Assessment to the Digital Age: A Practical Approach.

The use of electronic devices and social media is becoming a ubiquitous part of most people's lives. Although researchers are exploring the sequelae of such use, little attention has been given to the importance of digital media use in routine psychiatric assessments of patients. The nature of technology use is relevant to understanding a patient's lifestyle and activities, the same way that it is important to evaluate the patient's occupation, functioning, and general activities. The authors propose a framework for psychiatric inquiry into digital media use, emphasizing that such inquiry should focus on quality of use, including emotional and behavioral consequences, rather than simply the amount of use.

An SMS text messaging intervention to improve clinical engagement in early psychosis: A pilot randomized-controlled trial.

Disengagement of youth with psychosis from Early Psychosis Intervention (EPI) services continues to be a significant barrier to recovery, with approximately one-third prematurely discontinuing treatment despite the ongoing need. The current pilot trial sought to evaluate the preliminary efficacy and feasibility of a weekly short message service (SMS) intervention to improve engagement in EPI services. This was a longitudinal single-blinded randomized control trial in which participants were assigned to receive either an active or sham SMS intervention over nine months. Sixty-one participants with early psychosis between the ages of 16 and 29 were enrolled, randomized, and received at least part of the intervention. Primary outcomes consisted of participant clinic attendance rates over the course of the intervention and clinician-rated engagement. Secondary measures included patient-rated therapeutic rapport, attitude toward medication, psychopathology, cognition, functioning, and intervention feedback from participants. Compared to the sham group, participants receiving the active intervention did not show improved appointment attendance rates; however, did exhibit some improvements in aspects of engagement, including improved clinician-rated availability, attitude toward medication, positive symptoms, avolition-apathy and social functioning. Thus, contrary to our hypotheses, digitally augmented care did not result in enhanced engagement in EPI services, as measured by clinic attendance, although with some indication that it may contribute to improved attitude toward medication and, potentially, medication adherence. Weekly SMS text messaging appeared to result in a pattern of engagement whereby individuals who were improving clinically attended appointments less often, possibly due to inadvertent use of the intervention to check in with clinicians. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT04379349).

Understanding attitudes and beliefs regarding COVID-19 vaccines among transitional-aged youth with mental health concerns: a youth-led qualitative study.

BACKGROUND: Transitional-aged youth (16-29 years) with mental health concerns have experienced a disproportionate burden of the COVID-19 pandemic. Vaccination is limited in this population; however, determinants of its vaccine hesitancy are not yet thoroughly characterised. OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to answer the following research question: What are the beliefs and attitudes of youth with mental illness about COVID-19 vaccines, and how do these perspectives affect vaccine acceptance? The study aims to generate findings to inform the development of vaccine resources specific to youth with mental health concerns. METHODS: A qualitative methodology with a youth engagement focus was used to conduct in-depth semistructured interviews with transitional-aged youth aged 16-29 years with one or more self-reported mental health diagnoses or concerns. Mental health concerns encompassed a wide range of symptoms and diagnoses, including mood disorders, anxiety disorders, neurodevelopmental disorders and personality disorders. Participants were recruited from seven main mental health clinical and support networks across Canada. Transcripts from 46 youth and 6 family member interviews were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Two major themes were generated: (1) factors affecting trust in COVID-19 vaccines and (2) mental health influences and safety considerations in vaccine decision-making. Subthemes included trust in vaccines, trust in healthcare providers, trust in government and mistreatment towards racialised populations, and direct and indirect influences of mental health. CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests how lived experiences of mental illness affected vaccine decision-making and related factors that can be targeted to increase vaccine uptake. Our findings provide new insights into vaccine attitudes among youth with mental health concerns, which is highly relevant to ongoing vaccination efforts for new COVID-19 strains as well as other transmissible diseases and future pandemics. Next steps include cocreating youth-specific public health and clinical resources to encourage vaccination in this population.

Remodeling Broken Systems: Addressing the National Emergency in Child and Adolescent Mental Health.

A national emergency in child and adolescent mental health was declared in the United States in 2021 in the wake of the COVID-19 pandemic. This Open Forum discusses potential solutions to better support child and adolescent mental health by improving or expanding school-based mental health services, child psychiatry access programs, virtual mental health services, and new models of care (e.g., integrated youth services hubs and crisis stabilization units). The success of such programs is dependent on stable funding, strong leadership and accountability, robust and well-trained workforces, systems integration, and attention to health equity.

The Toronto Adolescent and Youth Cohort Study: Study Design and Early Data Related to Psychosis Spectrum Symptoms, Functioning, and Suicidality.

BACKGROUND: Psychosis spectrum symptoms (PSSs) occur in a sizable percentage of youth and are associated with poorer cognitive performance, poorer functioning, and suicidality (i.e., suicidal thoughts and behaviors). PSSs may occur more frequently in youths already experiencing another mental illness, but the antecedents are not well known. The Toronto Adolescent and Youth (TAY) Cohort Study aims to characterize developmental trajectories in youths with mental illness and understand associations with PSSs, functioning, and suicidality. METHODS: The TAY Cohort Study is a longitudinal cohort study that aims to assess 1500 youths (age 11-24 years) presenting to tertiary care. In this article, we describe the extensive diagnostic and clinical characterization of psychopathology, substance use, functioning, suicidality, and health service utilization in these youths, with follow-up every 6 months over 5 years, including early baseline data. RESULTS: A total of 417 participants were enrolled between May 4, 2021, and February 2, 2023. Participants met diagnostic criteria for an average of 3.5 psychiatric diagnoses, most frequently anxiety and depressive disorders. Forty-nine percent of participants met a pre-established threshold for PSSs and exhibited higher rates of functional impairment, internalizing and externalizing symptoms, and suicidality than participants without PSSs. CONCLUSIONS: Initial findings from the TAY Cohort Study demonstrate the feasibility of extensive clinical phenotyping in youths who are seeking help for mental health problems. PSS prevalence is much higher than in community-based studies. Our early data support the critical need to better understand longitudinal trajectories of clinical youth cohorts in relation to psychosis risk, functioning, and suicidality.

Neuroimaging and Biosample Collection in the Toronto Adolescent and Youth Cohort Study: Rationale, Methods, and Early Data.

BACKGROUND: The Toronto Adolescent and Youth (TAY) Cohort Study will characterize the neurobiological trajectories of psychosis spectrum symptoms, functioning, and suicidality (i.e., suicidal thoughts and behaviors) in youth seeking mental health care. Here, we present the neuroimaging and biosample component of the protocol. We also present feasibility and quality control metrics for the baseline sample collected thus far. METHODS: The current study includes youths (ages 11-24 years) who were referred to child and youth mental health services within a large tertiary care center in Toronto, Ontario, Canada, with target recruitment of 1500 participants. Participants were offered the opportunity to provide any or all of the following: 1) 1-hour magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scan (electroencephalography if ineligible for or declined MRI), 2) blood sample for genomic and proteomic data (or saliva if blood collection was declined or not feasible) and urine sample, and 3) heart rate recording to assess respiratory sinus arrhythmia. RESULTS: Of the first 417 participants who consented to participate between May 4, 2021, and February 2, 2023, 412 agreed to participate in the imaging and biosample protocol. Of these, 334 completed imaging, 341 provided a biosample, 338 completed respiratory sinus arrhythmia, and 316 completed all 3. Following quality control, data usability was high (MRI: T1-weighted 99%, diffusion-weighted imaging 99%, arterial spin labeling 90%, resting-state functional MRI 95%, task functional MRI 90%; electroencephalography: 83%; respiratory sinus arrhythmia: 99%). CONCLUSIONS: The high consent rates, good completion rates, and high data usability reported here demonstrate the feasibility of collecting and using brain imaging and biosamples in a large clinical cohort of youths seeking mental health care.

Cognition and Educational Achievement in the Toronto Adolescent and Youth Cohort Study: Rationale, Methods, and Early Data.

BACKGROUND: Both cognition and educational achievement in youths are linked to psychosis risk. One major aim of the Toronto Adolescent and Youth (TAY) Cohort Study is to characterize how cognitive and educational achievement trajectories inform the course of psychosis spectrum symptoms (PSSs), functioning, and suicidality. Here, we describe the protocol for the cognitive and educational data and early baseline data. METHODS: The cognitive assessment design is consistent with youth population cohort studies, including the NIH Toolbox, Rey Auditory Verbal Learning Test, Wechsler Matrix Reasoning Task, and Little Man Task. Participants complete an educational achievement questionnaire, and report cards are requested. Completion rates, descriptive data, and differences across PSS status are reported for the first participants (N = 417) ages 11 to 24 years, who were recruited between May 4, 2021, and February 2, 2023. RESULTS: Nearly 84% of the sample completed cognitive testing, and 88.2% completed the educational questionnaire, whereas report cards were collected for only 40.3%. Modifications to workflows were implemented to improve data collection. Participants who met criteria for PSSs demonstrated lower performance than those who did not on numerous key cognitive indices (p < .05) and also had more academic/educational problems. CONCLUSIONS: Following youths longitudinally enabled trajectory mapping and prediction based on cognitive and educational performance in relation to PSSs in treatment-seeking youths. Youths with PSSs had lower cognitive performance and worse educational outcomes than youths without PSSs. Results show the feasibility of collecting data on cognitive and educational outcomes in a cohort of youths seeking treatment related to mental illness and substance use.

A scoping review of resilience among transition-age youth with serious mental illness: tensions, knowledge gaps, and future directions.

INTRODUCTION: The study of resilience among transition-age youth (aged 16-29 years) living with serious mental illness (SMI) has provided a promising new direction for research with the capacity to explore individuals' strengths and resources. However, variability in how resilience is defined and measured has led to a lack of conceptual clarity. A comprehensive synthesis is needed to understand current trends and gaps in resilience research among this population. The purpose of the current study was to map how resilience has been conceptualized and operationalized among transition-age youth with SMI, explore resilience factors and outcomes that have been studied, and recommend areas for future research. METHODS: A six-stage scoping review methodology was used to systematically identify relevant empirical literature across multiple databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, AMED, CINAHL, Scopus), addressing transition-age youth diagnosed with SMI and resilience. Topic consultation and reaction meetings were conducted to gather feedback from transition-age youth with SMI, researchers, and clinicians during the review process to enhance the applicability of the review findings. A meta-narrative approach was used to organize included studies into research traditions (i.e., paradigms of inquiry with similar storylines, theoretical and methodological orientations). Resilience factors and outcomes, and the consultative meetings, were analyzed using content analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies met inclusion criteria (14 quantitative, 9 qualitative, 1 mixed-method). Four research traditions were identified, each contributing a unique storyline which conceptualized and operationalized resilience in slightly different ways: Stress Adaptation, Person-Environment Interactions, Recovery-Focused, and Critical and Cultural Perspectives. Resilience factors and outcomes were most commonly evaluated at the individual-level or within the immediate environment (e.g., personal characteristics, social support networks). Limited research has explored the influence of macro-level systems and health inequalities on resilience processes. Results from the consultative meetings further demonstrated the importance of health services and sociocultural factors in shaping processes of resilience among youth. CONCLUSION: The present results may be used to inform future work, as well as the development of age-appropriate, strengths-based, and resilience-oriented approaches to service delivery. Interdisciplinary and intersectional research that prioritizes community and youth engagement is needed to advance current understandings of resilience among transition-age youth with SMI.

Care Pathways and Initial Engagement in Early Psychosis Intervention Services Among Youths and Young Adults.

Importance: Broad efforts to improve access to early psychosis intervention (EPI) services may not address health disparities in pathways to care and initial engagement in treatment. Objective: To understand factors associated with referral from acute hospital-based settings and initial engagement in EPI services. Design, Setting, and Participants: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical record data from all patients aged 16 to 29 years who were referred to a large EPI program between January 2018 and December 2019. Statistical analysis was performed from March 2022 to February 2023. Exposures: Patients self-reported demographic information in a structured questionnaire. The main outcome for the first research question (referral source) was an exposure for the second research question (initial attendance). Main Outcomes and Measures: Rate of EPI referral from acute pathways compared with other referral sources, and rate of attendance at the consultation appointment. Results: The final study population included 999 unique patient referrals. At referral, patients were a mean (SD) age of 22.5 (3.5) years; 654 (65.5%) identified as male, 323 (32.3%) female, and 22 (2.2%) transgender, 2-spirit, nonbinary, do not know, or prefer not to answer; 199 (19.9%) identified as Asian, 176 (17.6%) Black, 384 (38.4%) White, and 167 (16.7%) other racial or ethnic groups, do not know, or prefer not to answer. Participants more likely to be referred to EPI services from inpatient units included those who were older (relative risk ratio [RRR], 1.10; 95% CI, 1.05-1.15) and those who identified as Black (RRR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.38-3.22) or belonging to other minoritized racial or ethnic groups (RRR, 1.79; 95% CI, 1.14-2.79) compared with White participants. Older patients (RRR, 1.16; 95% CI, 1.11-1.22) and those who identified as Black (RRR, 1.67; 95% CI, 1.04-2.70) or belonging to other minoritized racial or ethnic groups (RRR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.33-3.36) were more likely to be referred from the emergency department (ED) compared with White participants, whereas participants who identified as female (RRR, 0.51 95% CI, 0.34-.74) had a lower risk of ED referral compared with male participants. Being older (odds ratio [OR], 0.95; 95% CI, 0.90-1.00) and referred from the ED (OR, 0.40; 95% CI, 0.27-0.58) were associated with decreased odds of attendance at the consultation appointment. Conclusions and relevance: In this cohort study of patients referred to EPI services, disparities existed in referral pathways and initial engagement in services. Improving entry into EPI services may help facilitate a key step on the path to recovery among youths and young adults with psychosis.

Characterization and prediction of individual functional outcome trajectories in schizophrenia spectrum disorders (PREDICTS study): Study protocol.

Schizophrenia spectrum disorders (SSDs) are associated with significant functional impairments, disability, and low rates of personal recovery, along with tremendous economic costs linked primarily to lost productivity and premature mortality. Efforts to delineate the contributors to disability in SSDs have highlighted prominent roles for a diverse range of symptoms, physical health conditions, substance use disorders, neurobiological changes, and social factors. These findings have provided valuable advances in knowledge and helped define broad patterns of illness and outcomes across SSDs. Unsurprisingly, there have also been conflicting findings for many of these determinants that reflect the heterogeneous population of individuals with SSDs and the challenges of conceptualizing and treating SSDs as a unitary categorical construct. Presently it is not possible to identify the functional course on an individual level that would enable a personalized approach to treatment to alter the individual's functional trajectory and mitigate the ensuing disability they would otherwise experience. To address this ongoing challenge, this study aims to conduct a longitudinal multimodal investigation of a large cohort of individuals with SSDs in order to establish discrete trajectories of personal recovery, disability, and community functioning, as well as the antecedents and predictors of these trajectories. This investigation will also provide the foundation for the co-design and testing of personalized interventions that alter these functional trajectories and improve outcomes for people with SSDs.

"When I think about my future, I just see darkness": How youth exiting homelessness navigate the hazy, liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion.

OBJECTIVES: The overarching objective of this mixed methods longitudinal study was to understand whether and how rent subsidies and mentorship influenced socioeconomic inclusion outcomes for youth exiting homelessness. The focus of this paper is on the qualitative objectives, which evolved from a primary focus on exploring how study mentorship was working as a facilitator of socioeconomic inclusion to focusing on how participants navigated the hazy, liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion. METHODS: This was a convergent mixed methods study scaffolded by community-based participatory action axiology. The quantitative component is reported elsewhere and involved a 2-year pilot randomized controlled trial where 24 participants received rent subsidies and 13 were randomly assigned a study mentor; proxy indicators of socioeconomic inclusion were measured every 6 months for 2.5 years. Qualitative objectives were explored using a qualitative descriptive design and theoretically framed using critical social theory. The lead author interviewed 12 participants every 6 months for 2.5 years. Qualitative interviews were analyzed using reflexive thematic analysis with an emphasis on critical interpretation. RESULTS: Navigating the liminal space between socioeconomic exclusion and inclusion was complex and non-linear, and the way youth navigated that journey was more strongly associated with factors like informal mentorship (naturally occurring "coach-like" mentorship) and identity capital (sense of purpose, control, self-efficacy, and self-esteem), rather than whether or not they were assigned a formal study mentor. CONCLUSION: A holistic approach integrating coaching and attention to identity capital alongside economic supports may be key to helping youth exiting homelessness achieve socioeconomic inclusion.

RéSUMé: OBJECTIFS: L'objectif primordial de cette étude longitudinale à méthodes mixtes était de comprendre si et comment les suppléments au loyer et le mentorat influencent les résultats sur le plan de l'inclusion socioéconomique pour les jeunes qui sortent du sans-abrisme. Notre article porte sur des objectifs qualitatifs; à l'origine, il visait principalement à explorer l'efficacité du mentorat des études comme moyen de faciliter l'inclusion socioéconomique, puis il a évolué en s'attachant à la manière dont les participantes et les participants trouvaient leurs repères dans l'espace liminaire flou entre l'exclusion et l'inclusion socioéconomique. MéTHODE: Cette étude à méthodes mixtes convergentes est échafaudée sur l'axiologie de l'action participative communautaire. L'élément quantitatif, qui fait l'objet d'un autre article, a impliqué un essai pilote comparatif randomisé de deux ans où 24 participantes et participants ont reçu des suppléments au loyer, et 13 ont été jumelés de façon aléatoire à un tuteur ou une tutrice scolaire; des indicateurs approximatifs de l'inclusion socioéconomique ont été mesurés tous les six mois pendant deux ans et demi. Les objectifs qualitatifs ont été explorés à l'aide d'un protocole descriptif qualitatif et encadrés théoriquement par la théorie sociale critique. L'autrice principale a interviewé 12 participantes et participants tous les six mois pendant deux ans et demi. Les entretiens qualitatifs ont été analysés en employant l'analyse thématique réflexive et en mettant l'accent sur l'interprétation critique. RéSULTATS: L'exploration de l'espace liminaire entre l'exclusion et l'inclusion socioéconomique était complexe et non linéaire, et le parcours des jeunes était davantage associé à des facteurs comme le mentorat informel (le mentorat naturel semblable à celui d'un entraîneur ou d'une entraîneuse) et le capital identitaire (le sentiment d'avoir un but, le contrôle, l'auto-efficacité et l'estime de soi) qu'au fait d'avoir ou non été jumelés à un tuteur ou une tutrice dans leurs études. CONCLUSION: Une démarche holistique intégrant l'encadrement et l'attention au capital identitaire, en plus des mesures de soutien économique, pourrait être essentielle pour aider les jeunes qui sortent du sans-abrisme à s'intégrer sur le plan socioéconomique.

Sex differences in the prevalence and factors associated with anxiety disorders in Canada: A population-based study.

The prevalence of anxiety disorders continues to increase in Canada. The study aimed to evaluate sex differences in the prevalence of anxiety disorders, associated identity factors and social determinants, and their interactions among the Canadian population. We used data from the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS), a nationally representative survey. We evaluated associations between sex, other identity characteristics and social determinants, and anxiety disorders using multivariable logistic regression. To account for the complex sampling design, we applied sampling and bootstrap weights. The CCHS included 113,290 respondents, representative of 98% of the Canadian population over 12 years old. The prevalence of self-reported anxiety disorders was higher among females than males (11.6% vs 6.3%, p < 0.001). Adjusted regression analysis revealed higher odds of having mood disorders for those who were female, non-White, non-immigrant, homosexual or bisexual, unemployed, had lower income or food insecurity, had a disability and a weak sense of community belonging. Younger age was associated with higher odds of anxiety disorders among females (aOR: 1.50, 95%CI: 1.10-2.05) but not among males (aOR: 0.99, 95%CI: 0.64-1.56). An association between employment and higher income with lower odds of anxiety disorders, and bisexuality with higher odds of anxiety disorders, was stronger among males compared with females. Anxiety disorders are more prevalent among females than males in Canada. Age, employment, income, and sexual orientation have varying associations with anxiety disorders among the sexes. Strategies for improving mental health must recognize the complex links between sex and intersecting factors.

Evaluating sex-differences in the prevalence and associated factors of mood disorders in Canada.

BACKGROUND: We assessed the sex-differences in the prevalence and associated factors of mood disorders in Canada using a nationally representative survey, focusing on identity characteristics and socioeconomic factors. METHODS: A secondary analysis of the 2017-2018 Canadian Community Health Survey (CCHS) - Annual Component was conducted using Gender-Based Analysis Plus, which is an analytical process for incorporating various intersecting identity factors into research, programs, and policies. The presence of mood disorders was assessed through self-reporting. Factors associated with mood disorders were evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analysis after the application of sampling and bootstrap weights. RESULTS: The CCHS was completed by 113,290 Canadians, representative of 98 % of the population over the age of 12. Self-reported mood disorders were more prevalent among females than males (11.0 % vs 6.4 %, p < 0.001). Adjusted regression analysis revealed higher odds of reporting mood disorders for those who were female, unemployed, non-immigrant, non-White, smokers, homosexual or bisexual, had lower income, suffered from food insecurity, had a disability and weak sense of community belonging. Employment and higher income were more protective against mood disorders among males than females, and the association of older age with mood disorders was stronger in males than in females. LIMITATIONS: Mood disorders were assessed through self-reporting, and certain population groups were excluded from the survey. CONCLUSIONS: Females in Canada are affected by mood disorders at higher rates than males and certain factors have differential associations with mood disorders among the sexes. Strategies targeting mental disorders must be tailored towards the needs of specific groups.

A Pragmatic Randomized Controlled Trial of Financial Incentives in Case Management for Homeless Adults With Mental Illness.

OBJECTIVE: Financial incentives can facilitate behavior change and service engagement in health care settings, but research on their use with adults experiencing homelessness is limited. This study examined the effectiveness of financial incentives in improving service engagement and health outcomes among homeless adults with mental illness in Toronto. METHODS: The authors of this randomized controlled trial recruited 176 participants receiving brief multidisciplinary case management services for homeless adults with mental illness after hospital discharge. In a 1:1 randomization design, 87 participants received a financial incentive of CAN$20 for every week they remained engaged with the service for up to 6 months. The remaining 89 participants received treatment as usual. The primary outcome was service contact rates for up to 6 months of follow-up. Secondary outcomes included self-reported health status, mental health symptoms, substance use, quality of life, housing stability, acute health service use, and working alliance. Negative binomial regression models, analyses of covariance, generalized estimating equations models, and Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to examine differences between the financial incentive and treatment-as-usual groups across outcomes of interest. RESULTS: No significant differences were found between the financial incentive and treatment-as-usual groups in service contact rates or any of the secondary outcomes examined over the 6-month period. CONCLUSIONS: In low-barrier, brief case management programs tailored to the needs of adults experiencing homelessness, financial incentives may not affect service engagement or health outcomes. Further research is needed to identify the effect of financial incentives on engagement in other services, including housing-based interventions.

Disengagement from early psychosis intervention services: an observational study informed by a survey of patient and family perspectives.

Approximately one-third of patients with early psychosis disengage from services before the end of treatment. We sought to understand patient and family perspectives on early psychosis intervention (EPI) service engagement and use these findings to elucidate factors associated with early disengagement, defined as dropout from EPI in the first 9 months. Patients aged 16-29 referred to a large EPI program between July 2018-February 2020 and their family members were invited to complete a survey exploring facilitators and barriers to service engagement. A prospective chart review was conducted for 225 patients consecutively enrolled in the same EPI program, receiving the NAVIGATE model of coordinated specialty care, between July 2018-May 2019. We conducted a survival analysis, generating Kaplan-Meier curves depicting time to disengagement and Cox proportional hazards models to determine rate of disengagement controlling for demographic, clinical, and program factors. The survey was completed by 167 patients and 79 family members. The top endorsed engagement facilitator was related to the therapeutic relationship in both patients (36.5%) and families (43.0%). The top endorsed barrier to engagement was medication side effects in both patients (28.7%) and families (39.2%). In Cox proportional hazards models, medication nonadherence (HR = 2.37, 95% CI = 1.17-4.80) and use of individual psychotherapy (HR = .460, 95% CI = 0.220-0.962) were associated with early disengagement, but some of the health equity factors expected to affect engagement were not. Findings suggest that delivery of standardized treatment may buffer the effects of health disparities on service disengagement in early psychosis.

Effect of Portable Rent Subsidies and Mentorship on Socioeconomic Inclusion for Young People Exiting Homelessness: A Community-Based Pilot Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: There have been no published randomized clinical trials with a primary outcome of socioeconomic inclusion for young people who have experienced homelessness. Objective: To explore whether young people exiting homelessness who received rent subsidies and adult mentorship experienced more socioeconomic inclusion relative to young people who received only rent subsidies. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a convergent mixed-methods, unblinded, 2-group, parallel randomized clinical trial with 1:1 allocation embedded within a community-based framework in 3 cities in Ontario, Canada. Participants were enrolled between March 1 and September 30, 2019, and were followed up through March 31, 2022. Interventions: Participants (n = 24) were randomly assigned adult mentors (n = 13) who had been recruited and screened by community partner agencies. All participants received portable rent subsidies (subsidy not tied to a specific location) for 2 years. Main Outcomes and Measures: Primary quantitative outcomes were self-reported measures of community integration (psychological and physical) and self-esteem-proxy indicators of socioeconomic inclusion. Community integration was measured with the Community Integration Scale, with a score range of 1 to 7 for the physical component and 4 to 20 for the psychological component; higher scores indicate higher integration. Self-esteem was measured with the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale, with a score range of 0 to 30; higher scores indicate greater self-esteem. Secondary quantitative outcomes included social connectedness, hopelessness, and academic and vocational participation. All analyses followed the intention-to-treat principle. Results: A total of 24 youths (12 women [50.0%]; mean [SD] age, 21.8 [2.2] years [range, 18-26 years]; race and ethnicity: 10 White [41.7%], 8 Black [33.3%], 2 Asian [8.3%], 2 Indigenous [8.3%], and 2 different choice [8.3%]) transitioned out of homelessness and into market-rent housing. All youths in the group that received mentorship and in the group that did not receive mentorship had stable or nonsignificant improvements in all study outcomes at the primary end point of 18 months compared with baseline (mean [SD] Community Integration Scale psychological score: mentorship group, 11.3 [2.6] at baseline and 11.2 [3.9] at 18 months; no-mentorship group, 10.8 [4.1] at baseline and 13.2 [2.9] at 18 months; mean [SD] Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale score: mentorship group, 16.0 [4.6] at baseline and 18.1 [5.2] at 18 months; no-mentorship group, 16.3 [6.1] at baseline and 19.6 [5.7] at 18 months). However, there were no significant differences between the 2 groups in the Community Integration Scale psychological score (adjusted mean difference, -2.0; 95% CI, -5.0 to 1.0; P = .18) and Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale score (adjusted mean difference, -1.4; 95% CI, -5.0 to 2.3; P = .44) 18 months after randomization. Ancillary analysis suggested that youths with informal mentors (mentors outside the study) at baseline felt more psychologically integrated at 18 months relative to those with no informal mentors at baseline (adjusted mean difference, 3.6; 95% CI, 0.4-6.8; P = .03). Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, COVID-19 pandemic-related restrictions made it challenging for mentors and mentees to connect, which may have affected the findings. Steady socioeconomic outcomes-potentially attributable to portable rent subsidies-are noteworthy, given the socioeconomic inequities this population has faced during the COVID-19 pandemic. The possible benefit of informal mentorship warrants further investigation. This small pilot study was designed with the intention of generating data and hypotheses for a full-scale study; findings should be interpreted with caution. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03779204.