RESUMEN
The presence of mutant BRAF V600E correlates with the risk of recurrence in papillary thyroid cancer (PTC) patients. However, not all PTC patients with BRAF V600E are associated with poor prognosis. Thus, understanding the mechanisms by which certain PTC patients with nuclear BRAF V600E become aggressive and develop resistance to a selective BRAF inhibitor, PLX-4032, is urgently needed. The effect of nuclear localization of BRAFV600E using in vitro studies, xenograft mouse-model and human tissues was evaluated. PTC cells harboring a nuclear localization signal (NLS) of BRAFV600E were established and examined in nude mice implanted with TPC1-NLS-BRAFV600E cells followed by PLX-4032 treatment. Immunohistochemical (IHC) analysis was performed on 100 PTC specimens previously confirmed that they have BRAFV600E mutations. Our results demonstrate that 21 of 100 (21%) PTC tissues stained with specific BRAFV600E antibody had nuclear staining with more aggressive features compared to their cytosolic counterparts. In vitro studies show that BRAFV600E is transported between the nucleus and the cytosol through CRM1 and importin (α/ß) system. Sequestration of BRAFV600E in the cytosol sensitized resistant cells to PLX-4032, whereas nuclear BRAFV600E was associated with aggressive phenotypes and developed drug resistance. Proteomic analysis revealed Arp2/3 complex members, actin-related protein 2 (ACTR2 aliases ARP2) and actin-related protein 3 (ACTR3 aliases ARP3), as the most enriched nuclear BRAFV600E partners. ACTR3 was highly correlated to lymph node stage and extrathyroidal extension and was validated with different functional assays. Our findings provide new insights into the clinical utility of the nuclear BRAFV600E as a prognostic marker for PTC aggressiveness and determine the efficacy of selective BRAFV600E inhibitor treatment which opens new avenues for future treatment options.
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Previously, we have demonstrated that nuclear BRAFV600E is associated with melanoma aggressiveness and vemurafenib resistance. However, the underlying mechanisms of how nuclear localization of BRAFV600E promotes cell aggressiveness have not yet been investigated. Despite therapeutic advancements targeting cutaneous melanoma, unknown cellular processes prevent effective treatment for this malignancy, prompting an urgent need to identify new biological targets. This study aims to explore the association of inducible heme oxygenase 1 (HMOX-1) with nuclear BRAFV600E in promoting melanoma aggressiveness. METHODS: Proteomics analysis was performed to identify the interacting partner(s) of nuclear BRAFV600E. Immunohistochemistry was applied to evaluate the levels of HMOX-1 and nuclear BRAFV600E expression in melanoma and adjacent healthy tissues. Immunofluorescence assessed the nuclear localization of BRAFV600E in vemurafenib-resistant A375R melanoma cells. Further study of HMOX-1 knockdown or BRAFV600E overexpression in melanoma cells suggested a role for HMOX-1 in the regulation of cell proliferation in vivo and in vitro. Finally, Western blot analysis was performed to confirm the pathway by which HMOX-1 mediates Akt signaling. RESULTS: Proteomics results showed that HMOX-1 protein expression was 10-fold higher in resistant A375R cells compared to parental counterpart cells. In vitro and in vivo results illustrate that nuclear BRAFV600E promotes HMOX-1 overexpression, whereas HMOX-1 reduction represses melanoma cell proliferation and tumor growth. Mechanistic studies revealed that HMOX-1 was associated with nuclear BRAFV600E localization, thus promoting melanoma proliferation via a persistent activation of the AKT pathway. CONCLUSIONS: Our results highlight a previously unknown mechanism in which the nuclear BRAFV600E/HMOX-1/AKT axis plays an essential role in melanoma cell proliferation. Targeting HMOX-1 could be a novel method for treating melanoma patients who develop BRAF inhibitor resistance.