Robotic thyroidectomy using gas-insufflation one-step single-port transaxillary (GOSTA) approach.

BACKGROUND: We conducted this study to report our novel robotic thyroidectomy using gas-insufflation one-step single-port transaxillary (GOSTA) approach and compare it with a conventional transaxillary (CTA) approach using a retraction method for intraoperative and postoperative outcomes. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 354 patients who underwent robotic thyroidectomy between January 2019 and April 2023. Of these patients, 143 underwent the procedure through the GOSTA approach, which involves a small incision of 3 cm along the axillary folds with both arms down and a gas-insufflation, from skin flap creation to the completion of thyroidectomy as a one-step single-port procedure without the need for a retractor. The remaining 211 patients underwent the CTA approach. We analyzed the GOSTA approach and compared the surgical outcomes of the GOSTA (n = 100) and CTA (n = 167) approaches in patients with differentiated thyroid cancer who underwent thyroid lobectomy. RESULTS: Out of the 143 patients who underwent the GOSTA approach, 12 underwent total thyroidectomy and 9 underwent lateral neck lymph node dissection with total thyroidectomy. GOSTA-thyroid lobectomy was performed on 122 patients; of these, 100 were diagnosed with differentiated thyroid carcinoma. A comparative study with the CTA approach was only conducted in patients who underwent thyroid lobectomy. No significant differences were found in operative time, hospital stay, or complications between the two groups. CONCLUSIONS: Despite proceeding in one-step with a single smaller incision, from skin flap creation to the completion of thyroidectomy, the GOSTA approach is as feasible and safe as the CTA approach. Additionally, the GOSTA approach allows for thyroidectomy without using a retractor and reduces the workload for the surgeon and assistants.

Comparison of robotic and laparoscopic lateral transperitoneal adrenalectomies.

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the intraoperative and postoperative outcomes between robotic and laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomies. Methods: In this retrospective study, 93 patients underwent adrenalectomy using 2 surgical modalities: 45 patients underwent adrenalectomy using the da Vinci Xi system (robotic group), and 48 patients using laparoscopic devices (laparoscopic group). We compared the operation time, intraoperative bleeding, and hospital stay according to the surgical modality and tumor characteristics. Results: There were no significant differences in the operative time (P = 0.827), hospital stay (P = 0.177), and intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.174) between the groups. However, the robotic group showed a lower coefficient of variation in total operative time than that of the laparoscopic group (100.6 ± 23.3 minutes vs. 101.9±32.7 minutes, 0.230 vs. 0.321). When divided into 2 subgroups based on the tumor size (<3 cm and ≥3 cm), the robotic group with a tumor sized >3 cm had a shorter operative time than that of the laparoscopic group (P = 0.032). The robotic group also had fewer cases of intraoperative bleeding (P = 0.034). Conclusions: Compared to the laparoscopic transperitoneal adrenalectomy, the robotic one achieved a lower deviation in total operative time and showed less bleeding and a shorter operative time, especially for tumors sized >3 cm.

A Prospective Randomized Control Study Comparing the Effects of Dermal Staples and Intradermal Sutures on Postoperative Scarring After Thyroidectomy.

BACKGROUND: We compared cosmetic outcomes, pain intensity, and costs between dermal stapling and intradermal suturing in patients who underwent thyroidectomy through cervical incision. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In total, 40 patients were randomly assigned to undergo thyroidectomy through a low cervical incision and dermal closure using either absorbable staples (n = 20, staple group) or interrupted intradermal sutures (n = 20, suture group). Wound complications, cosmetic outcomes (modified Stony Brook Scar Evaluation Scale [SBSES] and Manchester Scar Scale [MSS]), and pain intensity (visual analog scale) were assessed at 1, 4, 12, and 24 weeks postoperatively. The difference in total "wound-closure cost" between the two groups was also analyzed. RESULTS: There were no wound-related complications and no significant differences in SBSES or MSS scores between the two groups (P = 0.609 and P = 0.141, respectively). However, the staple group had significantly higher SBSES scores, compared to the suture group, at 24 wk postoperatively (4.06 ± 0.94 versus 3.26 ± 1.24; P = 0.030, respectively); MSS scores were significantly lower in the staple group than in the suture group at 24 wk postoperatively (6.72 ± 1.27 versus 8.16 ± 2.17, respectively; P = 0.028). Visual analog scale scores were significantly lower in the suture group than in the staple group (P = 0.038). The total wound-closure cost was significantly higher in the staple group than in the suture group (137.10 ± 8.39 versus 81.79 ± 19.95 USD; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: When dermal staples were used, wound complications were absent and long-term cosmetic outcomes were superior; however, pain intensity was higher and the cost was greater, although healing was significantly more rapid, compared to intradermal sutures. Closure using absorbable dermal staples may be safe and effective for cervical incisions during thyroid surgery. Further studies with larger number of participants are needed to confirm our findings.