Simultaneously recorded intracranial and scalp high frequency oscillations help identify patients with poor postsurgical seizure outcome.

OBJECTIVE: High frequency oscillations (HFO) between 80-500 Hz are markers of epileptic areas in intracranial and maybe also scalp EEG. We investigate simultaneous recordings of scalp and intracranial EEG and hypothesize that scalp HFOs provide important additional clinical information in the presurgical setting. METHODS: Spikes and HFOs were visually identified in all intracranial scalp EEG channels. Analysis of correlation of event location between intracranial and scalp EEG as well as relationship between events and the SOZ and zone of surgical removal was performed. RESULTS: 24 patients could be included, 23 showed spikes and 19 HFOs on scalp recordings. In 15/19 patients highest scalp HFO rate was located over the implantation side, with 13 patients having the highest scalp and intracranial HFO rate over the same region. 17 patients underwent surgery, 7 became seizure free. Patients with poor post-operative outcome showed significantly more regions with HFO than those with seizure free outcome. CONCLUSIONS: Scalp HFOs are mostly located over the SOZ. Widespread scalp HFOs are indicative of a larger epileptic network and associated with poor postsurgical outcome. SIGNIFICANCE: Analysis of scalp HFO add clinically important information about the extent of epileptic areas during presurgical simultaneous scalp and intracranial EEG recordings.

High Frequency Oscillations in the Ripple Band (80-250 Hz) in Scalp EEG: Higher Density of Electrodes Allows for Better Localization of the Seizure Onset Zone.

High frequency oscillations (HFO) are known as markers of epileptic areas in intracranial EEG and possibly scalp EEG. We compared distributions of HFO in the ripple band (80-250 Hz) in intracranial and scalp EEG with either a conventional 10-20-montage (10-20-EEG) or a high density recording using 128 electrodes (HD-EEG). HFO were visually identified, in all intracranial EEG channels (80-500 Hz) and all channels of the 10-20-EEG (scalp EEG 80-250 Hz). For the HD-EEG, HFO were analyzed in regions of interest using areas with HFO as seen on the 10-20-EEG as well as areas in the clinically-defined seizure onset zone (SOZ). 13 patients were included in the study, of whom 12 showed HFO in the ripple band. In 8 patients HD-EEG revealed additional regions of ripples compared to the 10-20-EEG. With HD-EEG, areas of highest ripple rates were corresponding between scalp and intracranial EEG in 7 patients (58%) and 8 (67%) patients showed highest ripple rates over the SOZ. In contrast, with 10-20-EEG only 2 patients (17%) had corresponding areas of highest ripple rates and only 3 patients (23%) showed highest ripple rates over the SOZ. HD-EEG proved to be better to identify scalp HFO in the ripple band compared to standard 10-20-EEG. Moreover, ripples in 10-20-EEG seem to lead to false localization of epileptic areas. In contrast ripples detected with HD-EEG were located over the seizure onset zone and maybe a promising tool to localize epileptic tissue in the future.

Do patients with congenital hemiparesis and ipsilateral corticospinal projections respond differently to constraint-induced movement therapy?

This study investigates whether the type of corticospinal reorganization (identified by transcranial magnetic stimulation) influences the efficacy of constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT). Nine patients (five males, four females; mean age 16y [SD 6y 5mo], range 11-30y) controlling their paretic hand via ipsilateral corticospinal projections from the contralesional hemisphere and seven patients (three males, four females; mean age 17y [SD 7y], range 10-30y) with preserved crossed corticospinal projections from the affected hemisphere to the paretic hand underwent 12 consecutive days of CIMT. A Wolf motor function test applied before and after CIMT revealed a significant improvement in the quality of upper extremity movements in both groups. Only in patients with preserved crossed projections, however, was this amelioration accompanied by a significant gain in speed, whereas patients with ipsilateral projections tended to show speed reduction. These data, although preliminary, suggest that patients with congenital hemiparesis and ipsilateral corticospinal projections respond differently to CIMT.