Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 3 de 3
Filtrar
Más filtros




Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Am J Case Rep ; 24: e937843, 2023 Jan 20.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36659828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Cutaneous metastatic breast cancer is a rare manifestation. Causes include vascular or lymphatic spread or iatrogenic mechanisms following surgery. A sub-type of this disease process, "Carcinoma Erysipeloides," represents subcutaneous and dermal tissue layer invasion via lymphatic spread. Diagnosis can be challenging, and therefore, obtaining a thorough history and physical, with careful inspection of prior surgical scars is essential for an accurate diagnosis. Lesions present in variable ways, including papules, plaques, ulcerations, nodules, crusting, or fungating masses, with common locations in the chest, scalp, abdomen, and less commonly the arms. When carcinoma erysipeloides is identified, it is imperative to evaluate for distant metastases. Recent literature has identified benefits with trastuzumab deruxtecan therapy instead of trastuzumab emtansine, with decreased progression rates and decreased mortality rates. Metastasis to the skin can indicate advanced disease; however, this metastatic site may be preferable to visceral organs or bones in terms of prognosis. CASE REPORT We present a rare manifestation of metastatic breast cancer in 45-year-old Hispanic woman, status post neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy on maintenance trastuzumab and pertuzumab. We discuss the clinical presentation variability, keys to diagnosis, treatment considerations, and outcomes for this unique patient population. CONCLUSIONS Carcinoma erysipeloides varies in clinical presentation, especially when patients develop exclusive skin lesions. We identify common etiologies for this progression of disease and discuss combination therapy which has demonstrated a reduction in mortality in this patient population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma , Neoplasias Cutáneas , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Ado-Trastuzumab Emtansina/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias Cutáneas/patología , Carcinoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Piel/patología , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico
2.
Am J Case Rep ; 23: e937370, 2022 Nov 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36335424

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND Male breast cancer represents a rare malignancy with identifiable risk factors, including genetics, radiation exposure, liver dysfunction, and concomitant diagnosis of Klinefelter syndrome. Gynecomastia can commonly present in these patients, and despite increased estrogen levels in adipose breast tissue, gynecomastia has not been proven to be a significant risk factor for carcinoma development. Male patients with new-onset breast masses are recommended to undergo diagnostic mammograms and breast ultrasound for further evaluation. Those diagnosed with breast cancer most commonly have invasive ductal carcinoma of the breast, and over half of these patients are found to have estrogen and progesterone receptor (ER/PR) positivity. CASE REPORT In this case report, we present a Black man with gynecomastia and an areolar lesion for a 6-month duration following a traumatic event. He was initially referred to the surgical team for further evaluation, and subsequent imaging and biopsy data revealed ER/PR-positive invasive ductal carcinoma. Multidisciplinary discussions were held, and the patient was arranged to begin neoadjuvant treatment with doxorubicin hydrochloride and cyclophosphamide, followed by treatment with paclitaxel (AC-T) chemotherapy, followed by bilateral mastectomy and adjuvant hormonal therapy. CONCLUSIONS The treatment of male breast cancer has remained relatively like that of female breast cancer, which may be due to the limited data in the treatment of male breast cancer. Thus far, studies involving neoadjuvant chemotherapy of female patients have demonstrated promising responses to expand surgical options for patients and possibly decrease the rates of recurrence. Additional studies are warranted to discern optimal therapy for the male patient population.


Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina , Neoplasias de la Mama , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama , Carcinoma Ductal , Ginecomastia , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Receptores de Progesterona/uso terapéutico , Receptor ErbB-2 , Receptores de Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Mastectomía , Neoplasias de la Mama Masculina/cirugía , Ginecomastia/etiología , Ginecomastia/tratamiento farmacológico , Ginecomastia/cirugía , Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Ductal/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Ductal/cirugía , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/terapia , Carcinoma Ductal de Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioterapia Adyuvante
3.
Cureus ; 12(11): e11779, 2020 Nov 30.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33409026

RESUMEN

Background and objective The anti-inflammatory properties of vitamin C (VC) and the promising results it has shown in the treatment for common cold have prompted clinicians to use it as adjuvant therapy in the treatment of COVID-19. The purpose of this study was to find out the role of VC as adjunctive therapy in coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19). Methodology This study was conducted from March to July 2020 in the COVID-19 unit of a tertiary care hospital in Karachi. In this randomized controlled trial (RCT), one group received the intervention [50 mg/kg/day of intravenous (IV) VC] along with the standard therapy, and the other group received standard therapy only. Data such as age, gender, vitals, and biochemical values as well as outcomes including the number of days required for treatment, hospital stay, need for ventilation, and mortality were compared between the two groups and recorded using a self-structured questionnaire. Results COVID-19 patients who received IV VC became symptom-free earlier (7.1 ± 1.8 vs. 9.6 ± 2.1 days, p-value: <0.0001) and spent fewer days in the hospital (8.1 ± 1.8 vs. 10.7 ± 2.2 days, p-value: <0.0001) compared to those who received standard therapy only. However, there was no significant difference in the need for mechanical ventilation (p-value: 0.406) and mortality (p-value: 0.31) between the two groups. Conclusion VC can significantly improve clinical symptoms in patients affected with COVID-19; however, it had no impact on mortality and the need for mechanical ventilation. More large-scale studies are required to further assess the role of VC in the treatment of COVID-19.

SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA