Fixed-Dose Combination of Dapagliflozin + Sitagliptin + Metformin in Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Poorly Controlled with Metformin: Phase 3, Randomized Comparison with Dual Combinations.

INTRODUCTION: This study compared efficacy and safety of triple drug fixed-dose combination (FDC) of dapagliflozin (DAPA) + sitagliptin (SITA) + metformin (MET) extended release (ER) with SITA + MET sustained release (SR) and DAPA + MET ER in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin. METHODS: This phase 3, randomized, open-label, active-controlled study included adult patients with glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 8% (64 mmol/mol) and ≤ 11% (97 mmol/mol), randomized in 1:1:1 ratio to receive either FDC of DAPA + SITA + MET ER (10 mg + 100 mg + 1000 mg) tablets once daily (n = 137) or co-administration of SITA + MET SR (100 mg + 1000 mg) tablets once daily (n = 139) or FDC of DAPA + MET ER (10 mg + 1000 mg) tablets once daily (n = 139). Primary endpoint was mean change in HbA1c from baseline to week 16. RESULTS: Mean baseline HbA1c was approximately 9% (75 mmol/mol) in each treatment group. At week 16, adjusted mean reduction in HbA1c from baseline was significantly greater with DAPA + SITA + MET ER (- 1.73% [- 19.0 mmol/mol]) compared to SITA + MET SR (- 1.28% [- 14.1 mmol/mol]; difference of - 0.46% [- 5.1 mmol/mol], p < 0.001) and DAPA + MET ER (- 1.33% [- 14.6 mmol/mol]; difference - 0.4% [4.4 mmol/mol], p < 0.001). Similarly, at week 12, reduction in HbA1c from baseline was significantly greater with DAPA + SITA + MET ER compared to SITA + MET SR (p = 0.0006) and DAPA + MET ER (p = 0.0276). At week 16, DAPA + SITA + MET ER showed significant reduction in postprandial blood glucose compared to DAPA + MET ER (p = 0.0394) and significant reduction in fasting blood glucose with DAPA + SITA + MET ER compared to SITA + MET SR (p = 0.0226). The proportion of patients achieving HbA1c < 7.0% (53 mmol/mol) at week 16 was significantly higher with DAPA + SITA + MET ER (38.5%) versus SITA + MET SR (12.8%) (p < 0.001) and DAPA + MET ER (21.3%) (p = 0.0023). All study medications were well tolerated. CONCLUSION: Triple FDC of DAPA + SITA + MET ER tablets once daily was significantly better in achieving glycemic control versus dual combination once daily in patients with type 2 diabetes poorly controlled with metformin without any significant safety concerns. TRIAL REGISTRATION: CTRI/2021/11/038176, registered on 22 November 2021.

Type 2 diabetes is a progressive disease in which the risks of microvascular and macrovascular complications and mortality are strongly associated with hyperglycemia. Achieving glycemic control remains the main goal of treatment to prevent these complications. Estimates in 2019 showed that 77 million individuals had diabetes in India, which is expected to rise over 134 million by 2045. Considering the progressive nature of the disease, many guidelines recommend use of dual or triple drug therapy based on glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) level. Use of fixed-dose combination (FDC) helps to improve therapy compliance and can provide optimum therapeutic benefits. Mechanisms of action of dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4) and sodium­glucose cotransporter 2 (SGLT2) inhibitors are complementary to that of metformin with low risk of hypoglycemia. Studies have shown beneficial effects of adding both DPP4 inhibitors and SGLT2 inhibitors after metformin monotherapy. This phase 3 study was designed to assess efficacy and safety of triple FDC of dapagliflozin + sitagliptin + metformin extended release in comparison with combipack of sitagliptin + metformin sustained release and FDC of dapagliflozin + metformin ER in patients with type 2 diabetes inadequately controlled with metformin monotherapy. The study demonstrated superiority of triple FDC of dapagliflozin + sitagliptin + metformin ER over dual combinations in terms of reduction in HbA1c and percentage of patients achieving target HbA1c at the end of week 16. The current study provides evidence for considering triple FDC of dapagliflozin + sitagliptin + metformin ER as an alternative option with minimal risk of hypoglycemia and weight gain, while considering oral triple-combination therapy for patients to achieve their glycemic target.

A Randomized Trial of Mycobacterium w in Severe Presumed Gram-Negative Sepsis.

BACKGROUND: Mycobacterium w (Mw), an immunomodulator, has been shown to resolve early organ failure in severe sepsis. RESEARCH QUESTION: Does Mw improve survival in patients with severe presumed gram-negative sepsis? STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, parallel-group study conducted in ICUs of five tertiary care centers in India. We included consecutive patients (age ≥ 18 years) with presumed gram-negative sepsis in the study within 48 h of the first organ dysfunction. Patients in the treatment arm received 0.3 mL/d of Mw intradermally for 3 consecutive days, whereas the control arm received matching placebo. The primary outcome was 28-day all-cause mortality. The secondary outcomes were ventilator-free days, days receiving vasopressor therapy, ICU and hospital length of stay, nosocomial infection rate, antibiotic use duration, and delta Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) score. RESULTS: We included 202 patients with severe sepsis (101 Mw, 101 placebo). The use of Mw significantly reduced the mortality (9/101 vs 20/101; estimate difference, 0.11 [95% CI, 0.01-0.21]; P = .04). We found no difference in ventilator-free days, days receiving vasopressor drugs, ICU length of stay, and the hospital length of stay. The time to mortality (median, 13 days vs 8.5 days) was significantly longer in the Mw than in the placebo arm. The delta SOFA score, rate of nosocomial infections, and antibiotic use duration were similar in the two arms. We found Mw to reduce significantly the odds (OR, 0.37 [95% CI, 0.15-0.9]) of mortality after adjusting for culture-positive sepsis, baseline SOFA score, age, and sex. INTERPRETATION: The use of Mw was associated with a significant reduction in mortality in patients with severe presumed gram-negative sepsis. Further studies are required to confirm our findings. TRIAL REGISTRY: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02330432; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov.

A Phase 3, Randomized, Open-label, Noninferiority Trial Evaluating Anti-Rabies Monoclonal Antibody Cocktail (TwinrabTM) Against Human Rabies Immunoglobulin (HRIG).

BACKGROUND: Limited supply, cost and potential for severe adverse effects observed with the blood derived rabies immunoglobulin products has led to search for alternative therapies. This issue has been addressed by developing an anti-rabies monoclonal antibody cocktail. METHODS: This is a phase 3, randomized, open-label, noninferiority trial conducted in patients with World Health Organization (WHO) category III exposure with suspected rabid animal. Eligible patients were assigned to either the test arm, TwinrabTM (docaravimab and miromavimab) or the reference arm, human rabies immunoglobulin (HRIG; Imogam® Rabies-HT), in a ratio of 1:1. The primary endpoint was the comparison of responder rates between the 2 arms assessed as percentage of those with rabies virus neutralizing antibodies titers ≥0.5 IU/mL on day 14. RESULTS: A total of 308 patients were equally randomized into the 2 arms. In the per-protocol (PP) population, there were 90.21% responders in the TwinrabTM arm and 94.37% in the HRIG arm. The geometric mean of rapid fluorescent foci inhibition test titers in the PP on day 14 were 4.38 and 4.85 IU/mL, for the TwinrabTM and HRIG arms, respectively. There were no deaths or serious adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: This study confirmed that TwinrabTM is noninferior to HRIG in terms of providing an unbroken window of protection up to day 84. This trial in healthy adults with WHO category III exposure from suspected rabid animal also establishes the safety of TwinrabTM in patients with 1 WHO approved vaccine regimen (Essen). CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRATION: CTRI/2017/07/009038.