The relationship between clinical and pathological findings and FDG - PET uptake in metastatic colorectal cancers.

BACKGROUND: In metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), the genetic structure and cell metabolism of the primary tumor lesion might be different from metastatic lesions. It is thought that cell-level glucose metabolism may differ due to the difference in RAS wild and mutant mCRC patients' prognosis. In this study, we aimed to compare 2-deoxy-2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-D-glucose Positron Emission Tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) uptake levels for KRAS mutation status and primary-metastatic tumor localization. METHODS: Our study is a retrospective cohort analysis that included RAS mutation status study and staging-oriented 18F-FDG PET/CT conducted on mCRC patients. RESULTS: There was no significant relationship between metastasis and primary tumor maximum Standardized uptake value (SUVmax) values according to the KRAS mutational status (P > 0.05). Patients with liver metastasis along with mutant BRAF mutation status had significantly higher SUVmax values in PET-CT scans (P = 0.04). There was a negative correlation between SUVmax values of lung metastases and overall survival (r = -0.35, P = 0.04). Patients with high carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) levels had significantly higher SUVmax values of lung metastasis than patients with normal CEA levels (P = 0.009). Patients with high CA19-9 levels had significantly higher SUVmax values of liver, peritoneal, and bone metastasis than patients with normal CA19-9 levels (P = 0.002, P = 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively). There was no significant correlation between SUVmax values of metastasis and Lactate dehydrogenase (LDH) values. Liver metastasis of right-sided mCRCs had significantly higher SUVmax values (P = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We could not demonstrate a significant association between KRAS mutation and SUVmax values of PET scan in primary or metastatic tumor sites in advanced CRC.

Retrospective Analyses of PD-L1, LAG-3, TIM-3, OX40L Expressions and MSI Status in Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.

We investigated expressions of PD-L1, LAG-3, TIM-3, and OX40L as immune checkpoint proteins, and MSI (repetitive short-DNA-sequences due to defective DNA-repair system) status were analyzed with immunohistochemistry from tissue blocks. Of 83 patients, PD-L1 expression was observed in 18.1% (n = 15) of the patients. None of the patients exhibited LAG-3 expression. TIM-3 expression was 4.9% (n = 4), OX40L was 22.9% (n = 19), and 8.4% (n = 7) of the patients had MSI tumor. A low-to-intermediate positive correlation was observed between PD-L1 and TIM-3 expressions (rho: 0.333, p < 0.01). Although PD-L1 expression was higher in grade 3 NET/NEC, MSI status was prominent in grade 1/2 NET.

Current status of biosimilars in Turkey: A survey among medical oncologists.

INTRODUCTION: To evaluate biosimilar understanding and preference trends of medical oncologists in Turkey. METHODS: A survey consisting of 24 multiple-choice questions with checkbox answers was conducted among medical oncologists. The questionnaire was divided into five parts to some intentions: demographic characteristics, general knowledge about biosimilars, knowledge about local approval and reimbursement issues, individual preference trends, and ranking the knowledge of their own. All answers were analyzed as whole cohort, specialists and fellows. RESULTS: Fellows (n = 47) consisted 42%, and academic clinicians (n = 37) consisted 35% of the participants. In the whole cohort, the overall rate of correct answers was 55.1% in the general knowledge about the biosimilars part, and 26.7% in the local approval and reimbursement issues part. At all, 57.7% of the participants declared that they object to switch from a reference product to a biosimilar product. The rate of those who defined themselves as extremely knowledgeable decreased from 8.1% to 2.7% in the whole cohort at the end of the survey. CONCLUSION: The need for more accurate and clarified local regulations and education emerging in the biotechnology era must be met.

Does docetaxel matter in metastatic gastric cancer? FOLFOX versus FLOT regimens as first-line treatment.

We aimed to compare the efficacy and the safety of the FOLFOX and the FLOT regimens in metastatic gastric cancer (mGC) as first-line treatment. It was a retrospective multicenter observational study. The comparisons between groups were conducted in terms of progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR) and hematologic adverse events. Seventy-nine patients, diagnosed with mGC between March 2012 and December 2019, treated with FOLFOX (n = 43) or FLOT (n = 36) regimens as first-line treatment were included in the study. The mPFS was 10.9 months [95% confidence interval (CI), 5.8-16.1] in the FLOT arm and 7.1 months (95% CI, 5.1-9.1) in the FOLFOX arm (P < 0.001). The ORR was 63.9% in the FLOT arm and 30.2% in the FOLFOX arm (P = 0.003). The mOS was 13.3 months (95% CI, 11.3-15.4) in the FLOT arm and 10.9 months (95% CI, 8.2-13.5) in the FOLFOX arm (P = 0.103). The hematologic adverse events in all grades were 88.4% (n = 38) in the FOLFOX arm compared with 80.6% (n = 29) in the FLOT arm (P = 0.335). The FLOT regimen might be a preferred option in mGC with an improved PFS and ORR compared with the FOLFOX regimen.

The role of serum albumin/globulin ratio in combination with prognostic risk indexes of febrile neutropenia.

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of the serum albumin/globulin ratio (AGR) on the 30-day mortality of febrile neutropenia (FEN). The second aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of the combination of the AGR with the Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC) and Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) risk indexes on 30-day mortality of FEN. METHODS: A retrospective study evaluating the effect of serum AGR, MASCC and CISNE scores on 30-day FEN mortality. RESULTS: A total of 137 FEN episodes in 120 patients were included in this study. Nineteen patients (14%) died within the first 30 days of FEN episodes. The 30-day mortality rate was calculated as 4% in patients with high AGR and 23% in patients with low AGR (P = .002). According to the MASCC and CISNE risk scores, the mortality rates in low-risk patients were 8% and 6%, respectively, and in the high-risk group 22% and 29%, respectively (P = .024 vs P < .001). In the group of patients with MASCC <21 and CISNE ≥3, the 30-day mortality rate was 7%, when the AGR was >1.13, and in those with AGR ≤1.13 mortality rate increased to 50% (P = .012). CONCLUSION: A low AGR in a patient with FEN was found to be associated with an increased risk of 30-day mortality. Combining the AGR with MASCC and CISNE risk indexes might increase the predictive value of these scoring systems on 30-day mortality.