Development of an Innovative Interprofessional Palliative Care Student Learning Collaborative.

BACKGROUND: Training all clinicians in primary palliative care has been proposed as one solution to hospice and palliative care workforce challenges. With palliative care's focus on interprofessional practice and collaboration, interprofessional education is optimal to teach foundational palliative care principles. AIM: To develop, pilot, and evaluate an innovative interprofessional primary palliative care student learning collaborative. METHODS: An interprofessional faculty and clinician team developed a semester-long palliative care interprofessional learning collaborative program that was delivered in a hybrid format. The National Consensus Project's Clinical Practice Guidelines for Quality Palliative Care were used as the framework for the program content. Pre-post measures of palliative and end-of-life care-specific educational needs and post-program evaluation were used to evaluate the program. RESULTS: The program was piloted with 25 student participants from 10 health professional programs. Participants reported gains in knowledge post-program participation. Post-program evaluation comments were positive and the interprofessional design was regarded as a strength of the program. CONCLUSION: Incorporating interprofessional learning into a palliative care curriculum may be an effective way to strengthen palliative care teams, as greater exposure to the diverse approaches of each team member can increase the appreciation and understanding of everyone's critical role to play in providing excellent palliative care.

Evaluation of Bereavement Assessment Within Inpatient Palliative Care Consultation.

It is crucial for palliative care teams to evaluate practices in assessing the risk of developing complicated grief among family members and caregivers of patients. A retrospective chart review of 99 patients seen by an inpatient palliative care team at an academic medical center was conducted to assess for documentation and prevalence of complicated grief risk factors. Factors included patients whose family are their primary caregiver, involvement of young children, mental health or substance use diagnoses in patients or their family members, a history of multiple losses, traumatic or sudden death. 64% of charts did not formally document bereavement assessment while 45% of families exhibited at least one risk factor for prolonged grief. This work suggests the need for increased education for PC providers on grief risk factors as well as the implementation of a formal screening assessment in order to best utilize limited psychosocial support resources to address needs.