Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 23
Filtrar
2.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 31(6): 3742-3749, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38300404

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Epidural analgesia is resource and labor intense and may limit postoperative management options and delay discharge. This study compared postoperative outcomes after cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (CRS/HIPEC) with epidural analgesia versus continuous wound infusion system (CWIS) with/without intraoperative methadone. METHODS: A single-institution, retrospective chart review was performed including all patients undergoing open CRS/HIPEC from 2018 to 2021. Patient demographics, surgical characteristics, length of stay, and in-hospital analgesic use were reviewed. In-hospital opioid exposure in morphine milligram equivalents (MME) was calculated. Multivariate analysis (MVA) for mean total and daily opioid exposure was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 157 patients were included. Fifty-three (34%) had epidural analgesia, 96 (61%) had CWIS, and 79 (50%) received methadone. Length of stay was significantly shorter with CWIS + methadone versus epidural (7 vs. 8 days, p < 0.01). MVA showed significantly lower mean total and daily opioid exposure with CWIS+methadone versus epidural (total: 252.8 ± 17.7 MME vs. 486.8 ± 86.6 MME; odds ratio [OR] 0.72, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.52-0.98, p = 0.04; Daily: 32.8 ± 2.0 MME vs. 51.9 ± 5.7 MME, OR 0.72, 95% CI 0.52-0.99, p ≤ 0.05). The CWIS-only group (n = 17) had a significantly lower median oral opioid exposure versus epidural (135 MME vs. 7.5 MME, p < 0.001) and longer length of stay versus CWIS + methadone (9 vs. 7 days, p = 0.04), There were no CWIS or methadone-associated complications and one epidural abscess. CONCLUSIONS: CWIS + methadone safely offers better pain control with less in-hospital opioid use, shorter length of stay, and decreased resource utilization compared with epidural analgesia in patients undergoing CRS-HIPEC.


Asunto(s)
Analgésicos Opioides , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción , Tiempo de Internación , Metadona , Dolor Postoperatorio , Humanos , Metadona/administración & dosificación , Metadona/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Analgésicos Opioides/administración & dosificación , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Irrigación Terapéutica/métodos , Analgesia Epidural/métodos , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Pronóstico , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Terapia Combinada , Anciano
3.
5.
J Opioid Manag ; 18(4): 377-383, 2022.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36052934

RESUMEN

A recent review suggests minimal respiratory depression (RD) after perioperative methadone, while another identified RD in up to 37 percent of patients. A meta-analysis is equivocal. At our institution, five of 75 opioid naive patients (6.6 percent) given perioperative methadone received naloxone. We report three of these cases in detail. Two others were discovered during an electronic medical record search for opioid naïve patients who received methadone plus naloxone during their anesthesia care. Our five patients indicate that RD owing to methadone can occur with excessive perioperative adjuvant medications and/or in patients who are taking home central nervous system depressants. We define perioperative adjuvant medications as medications given by the anesthesiologist prior to induction and intraoperatively. The risks and benefits of perioperative methadone administration, specifically in patients who received post-operative naloxone, deserve further investigation.


Asunto(s)
Depresores del Sistema Nervioso Central , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides , Insuficiencia Respiratoria , Analgésicos Opioides/efectos adversos , Depresores del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Metadona/efectos adversos , Naloxona/efectos adversos , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/diagnóstico , Trastornos Relacionados con Opioides/tratamiento farmacológico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/inducido químicamente , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/diagnóstico , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia
6.
A A Pract ; 16(8): e01592, 2022 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-35939359

RESUMEN

With aging-associated obesity and osteoarthritis, anesthesiology trainees and their instructors face difficulties in identifying the surface anatomy and landmarks for spinal anesthesia, and successfully advancing the needle into the intrathecal space. Through a series of illustrations and instructions, this teaching tool suggests that using a spinal needle in the same way that a blind person uses a white cane may improve a trainee's ability to successfully perform a lumbar puncture. Reviewing the technique and instructions with the trainee before approaching the patient can minimize verbal instructions in the patient's presence and may lead to improved efficiency and trainee success.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia Raquidea , Anestesiología , Anestesia Raquidea/métodos , Anestesiología/educación , Humanos , Agujas
8.
J Clin Monit Comput ; 36(3): 909-915, 2022 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34860322

RESUMEN

A Hotline® fluid warmer is a device commonly used by anesthesia providers in the operating room to warm and infuse blood products and large fluid volumes. The purpose of the fluid warmer is to counter heat loss, which occurs under anesthesia. Despite normal checks performed prior to its use, we discovered a breach in the fluid warming set attached to the Hotline® fluid warmer during blood administration. The breach contaminated the patient's sterile intravenous line. We describe the quality and safety processes we undertook in detail. We discuss the notion that monitoring alarms are an important safety feature of most modern devices utilized by anesthesia providers. We believe the Hotline® fluid warmer lacks a crucial monitor for detecting a breach within the fluid warming set, and therefore recommend the addition of an alarm to improve this device's safety.


Asunto(s)
Anestesia , Anestesiología , Administración Intravenosa , Regulación de la Temperatura Corporal , Humanos , Monitoreo Fisiológico
9.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 26(2): 490-496, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30515670

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent data have demonstrated multiple benefits of intra- and postoperative fluid restriction in major abdominal surgery; however, data regarding the outcomes of fluid restriction in cytoreductive surgery and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemoperfusion (CRS/HIPEC) are limited. This study evaluates the safety and short-term clinical outcomes of restricted intraoperative fluid therapy in CRS/HIPEC. METHODS: This was a single-institution, retrospective review of all CRS/HIPEC procedures performed at the University of Massachusetts Medical School between January 2009 and July 2017. Recorded variables included demographics, intraoperative factors, 60-day postoperative complications, and length of stay (LOS). Outcomes based on the use of intraoperative permissive fluid therapy (PFT) versus restrictive fluid therapy (RFT) were compared. RESULTS: Overall, 169 CRS/HIPEC cases were performed during the study period; 84 were managed with PFT and 85 were managed with RFT. No significant differences were identified in patient demographics. There was a decrease in intraoperative administration of crystalloid (8.0 vs. 4.4 L, p < 0.01), colloid (900 vs. 300 mL, p < 0.01), and blood transfusion (0.26 vs. 0.04 units, p < 0.01) in the RFT cohort. LOS was reduced from 11.5 to 9.7 days (p < 0.01) and the incidence of any 60-day complication decreased from 45 to 28% (p = 0.02) in the RFT group. The overall 90-day mortality rate was 0.6% (n = 1). Adjusted logistic regression demonstrated the odds of having a Clavien-Dindo grade III or higher complication was 0.31 (95% confidence interval 0.10-0.95) with RFT. CONCLUSION: Intraoperative RFT with standard anesthesia monitoring devices can be safely used in CRS/HIPEC and is associated with a decreased LOS and decreased rate of postoperative complications.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos de Citorreducción/efectos adversos , Fluidoterapia , Hipertermia Inducida/efectos adversos , Neoplasias/terapia , Neoplasias Peritoneales/terapia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/prevención & control , Quimioterapia del Cáncer por Perfusión Regional , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Cuidados Intraoperatorios , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/patología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/epidemiología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos
11.
Ann Surg Oncol ; 16(8): 2181-7, 2009 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19475451

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) are considered the standard of care for patients with peritoneal dissemination of appendiceal cancer and are increasingly being evaluated for use in patients with carcinomatosis from colon cancer. Mitomycin C (MMC) is one of the most frequently used HIPEC agents in the management of peritoneal-based gastrointestinal malignancies. This study analyzes the incidence and risk factors for developing neutropenia following MMC-HIPEC combined with CRS. METHODS: All patients undergoing CRS and MMC-HIPEC for appendiceal cancer between January 1993 and October 2006 were retrospectively reviewed. Logistic regression was used to identify risk factors for the development of neutropenia, defined as an absolute neutrophil count (ANC) <1,000/mm(3). RESULTS: One hundred and twenty MMC-HIPEC were performed in 117 patients with appendiceal cancer. The incidence of neutropenia was 39%. Neutropenia occurred in 57.6% of female and 21.3% of male patients (p < 0.0001). Female gender and MMC dose per body surface area (BSA) were independent risk factors for neutropenia on multivariable logistic regression [odds ratio (OR) of neutropenia in females = 3.58 (95% confidence interval, CI: 1.52, 8.43); OR for 5 unit (mg/m(2)) increase in MMC dose per BSA = 3.37 (95% CI: 1.72, 6.63)]. Neutropenia did not increase the risk of mortality, postoperative infection or length of hospital stay. CONCLUSION: Neutropenia is a frequent complication associated with MMC-HIPEC. Female sex and MMC dose per BSA are independent risk factors for neutropenia. These differences must be considered in the management of patients undergoing MMC-HIPEC to minimize the toxicity of the procedure.


Asunto(s)
Antibióticos Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Neoplasias del Apéndice/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipertermia Inducida , Mitomicina/efectos adversos , Neutropenia/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Anciano , Neoplasias del Apéndice/patología , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Infusiones Parenterales , Inyecciones Intraperitoneales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neutropenia/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del Tratamiento
12.
Cancer Res ; 68(19): 7966-74, 2008 Oct 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-18829554

RESUMEN

Doxorubicin is a genotoxic chemotherapy agent used in treatment of a wide variety of cancers. Significant clinical side effects, including cardiac toxicity and myelosuppression, severely limit the therapeutic index of this commonly used agent and methods which improve doxorubicin efficacy could benefit many patients. Because doxorubicin cytotoxicity is cell cycle specific, the cell cycle is a rational target to enhance its efficacy. We examined the direct, cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor roscovitine as a means of enhancing doxorubicin cytotoxicity. This study showed synergistic cytotoxicity between doxorubicin and roscovitine in three sarcoma cell lines: SW-982 (synovial sarcoma), U2OS-LC3-GFP (osteosarcoma), and SK-LMS-1 (uterine leiomyosarcoma), but not the fibroblast cell line WI38. The combined treatment of doxorubicin and roscovitine was associated with a prolonged G(2)-M cell cycle arrest in the three sarcoma cell lines. Using three different methods for detecting apoptosis, our results revealed that apoptotic cell death did not account for the synergistic cytotoxicity between doxorubicin and roscovitine. However, morphologic changes observed by light microscopy and increased cytoplasmic LC3-GFP puncta in U20S-LC3-GFP cells after the combined treatment suggested the induction of autophagy. Induction of autophagy was also shown in SW-982 and SK-LMS-1 cells treated with both doxorubicin and roscovitine by acridine orange staining. These results suggest a novel role of autophagy in the enhanced cytotoxicity by cell cycle inhibition after genotoxic injury in tumor cells. Further investigation of this enhanced cytotoxicity as a treatment strategy for sarcomas is warranted.


Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Autofagia/efectos de los fármacos , Doxorrubicina/administración & dosificación , Purinas/administración & dosificación , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Apoptosis/efectos de los fármacos , Apoptosis/fisiología , Autofagia/fisiología , Citotoxinas/administración & dosificación , Citotoxinas/farmacología , Doxorrubicina/farmacología , Sinergismo Farmacológico , Fase G2/efectos de los fármacos , Humanos , Modelos Biológicos , Purinas/farmacología , Roscovitina , Sarcoma/patología , Células Tumorales Cultivadas , Ensayo de Tumor de Célula Madre
15.
Anesthesiology ; 106(4): 882; author reply 882-3, 2007 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-17413939
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA