Barriers to accessing post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil: The impact of COVID-19.

The aim of our article is to discuss barriers associated with post-pregnancy contraception in Brazil during the SARS-CoV-2 (COVID-19) pandemic. Socioeconomic differences in gaining access to long-acting reversible contraceptive (LARC) methods became greater during the COVID-19 pandemic. The inadequate distribution of existing resources and the reduced capacity for elective care meant that healthcare providers in family planning had to be reallocated to respond to COVID-19 emergencies. In Brazil, 74% of the population depends on the national health service (Sistema Unico de Saúde) including for the provision of free contraception. However, the only LARC method available at the public service is the copper-intrauterine device (IUD); implants and hormonal-IUDs are not available, except at some teaching hospitals. Contraceptive sales remained unmodified during the pandemic, which shows that the majority of the population used less effective or no contraceptive methods during this time. However, sales of implants and the hormonal-IUD increased significantly, indicating the inequity of the low-income portion of the society as only the wealthy can afford these. On the other hand, there was an increase in sales of emergency contraception. The uptake of postpartum IUDs and contraceptive implants at the selected teaching hospitals in which they were available was high during the COVID-19 pandemic as they were the only methods immediately available. In conclusion, the COVID-19 pandemic increased both inequality and social differences in gaining access to contraceptives. Postpartum and immediate post abortion methods were also good strategies during the pandemic and were well accepted by the population. However, they were not offered by most services.

Effectiveness and continuation rates of the etonogestrel-subdermal contraceptive implant versus short-acting contraceptive methods offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy, reasons for discontinuation and continuation rates of the etonogestrel (ENG)-subdermal contraceptive implant when offered at no cost, and the basis of free choice versus short-acting reversible contraceptive (SARC) methods including combined oral contraceptives (COCs), once-a-month injectables, vaginal ring, and patch. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study at the University of Campinas, Brazil, involving women aged 18 to 40 years. They were counseled on various contraceptive methods before entering the study and followed up every 3 months for up to 24 months. Satisfaction was assessed using a Likert scale. Survival rates were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier test, and curve comparisons were performed using the log-rank test. RESULTS: We enrolled 609 women including 358/609 women (58.8%) who chose the ENG-implant and 251/609 (41.2%) who chose SARC methods. Contraceptive failure and all other reasons for discontinuation were significantly higher in SARC users compared to the ENG-implant users (P < 0.001 and P = 0.002, respectively). The continuation rate was higher among ENG-implant users (89.9% and 75.4%) compared to SARC methods users (27.2% and 15.9%) up to 1 and 2 years after study initiation, respectively. Satisfaction was high in both groups (>82%). CONCLUSIONS: The ENG-implant showed higher contraceptive effectiveness and higher continuation rates than SARC methods up to 2 years after study initiation. Furthermore, users from both groups were highly satisfied with their contraceptive. The main reason for discontinuing use of the ENG-implant was bothersome uterine bleeding, while for SARC methods it was for personal reasons.

Uptake, discontinuation, and continuation rate of long-acting contraceptive methods when offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil.

OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to compare the uptake, reasons for discontinuation, continuation, and satisfaction of long-acting contraceptive methods (LARC) when offered at no cost in Campinas, Brazil. STUDY DESIGN: This was a prospective cohort study conducted at University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil, including women aged 18 to 48 years, who adopted one of three methods. Participants underwent telephone follow-up every 3 months for up to 24 months after insertion. Satisfaction was assessed at the end of 2 years of use through the Likert scale. RESULTS: We invited 1222 women, and among the 971 women who volunteered to participate in follow-up, 414 (42.6%) chose the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine device (IUD), 358 (36.9%) chose the etonogestrel (ENG) implant, and 199 (20.5%) chose the TCu380A IUD. Discontinuation due to bothersome bleeding was higher among users of the ENG implant (10/358; 2.4%) and the TCu380A IUD (32/199; 8.9%), and expulsion was higher for the TCu380A IUD (30/199; 15.1%). Women continued at 24 months were 340/414 (82.1%), 270/358 (75.4%), and 119/199 (59.8%) among users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD, ENG implant, and TCu380A IUD, respectively. The users of the levonorgestrel 52-mg IUD (301/339, 88.8%), the ENG-implant (222/270, 82.2%), and the TCu380A IUD (105/119, 88.2%) were satisfied or very satisfied by 24 months of follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The three LARC methods had great uptake, high continuation, and discontinuation due to bothersome bleeding was higher among users of the ENG implant and the TCu380A IUD, and expulsion was higher for the TCu380A IUD compared to the 52-mg levonorgestrel IUD. Most of the participants reported being very satisfied. IMPLICATIONS: When the LARC methods were offered at no cost in a Brazilian public clinic the uptake, satisfaction and continuation were high by 24 months after device placement, and high level of satisfaction was reported by most of the participants.

Women's perspectives on impact on the post menopause of use of the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine device during the menopausal transition.

OBJECTIVES: To assess perimenopausal users of 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine devices (LNG-IUD) regarding the IUD impact after menopause. MATERIAL AND METHODS: a cross-sectional study with users aged 40 and 49 years old, without cognitive impairment that answered a questionnaire regarding worries and benefits after the menopause due to LNG-IUD use. RESULTS: Almost half of 221 users (52.9%) have concerns that LNG-IUD use could influence aspects after menopause, 111 (50.3%) that the post-menopause symptoms get worse and 92 (41.6%) that interfere with recognition of menopausal symptoms. CONCLUSION: Half of perimenopausal LNG-IUD users expressed concerns about how device use could affect post-menopause symptoms.

The 52 mg hormonal-IUD who were at menopausal transition reported worries that the use of the IUD can affect menopausal symptoms. It is important that health professionals can routinely guide these women.

Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception provision and pregnancy rates within 3 months.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the occurrence of pregnancy in a cohort of women who received a copper intrauterine device (IUD), hormonal IUDs or an etonogestrel (ENG) contraceptive implant at a single-visit practice. METHODS: Prospective study conducted at the University of Campinas, Campinas, São Paulo, Brazil. We obtained data from four ongoing studies including both the date of the device placement, the first day of the last menstrual period, and the occurrence of pregnancy up to 3 months after device placement. RESULTS: We included 2479 device placements (413 TCu380A IUDs, 1476 hormonal IUD and 590 ENG implants). Almost half of the device placements (1113/2479; 44.9%) were performed within the first 5 days of the menstrual cycle. We observed three pregnancies: one in an ENG implant user who received the implant within days 1-5 of the menstrual cycle; one in a woman who received a hormonal IUD during days 6-10 of the menstrual cycle; and one in a copper IUD user with placement during days 21-25 of menstrual cycle. CONCLUSIONS: Single-visit long-acting reversible contraception placements are a good strategy with overall very low pregnancy rates. This strategy has a potential to reduce unintended pregnancies and to reduce costs and barriers to both women and the healthcare system.

Reasons for satisfaction with the use of the 52-mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the reasons to use, reasons they liked, satisfaction with, and possibilities of recommendation to other women of the levonorgestrel 52-mg intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) by users. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted at the University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil from January to July 2021. We enrolled users who came to the clinic, and we applied a pre-tested structured questionnaire with open-ended questions. We performed descriptive analyses of the variables, assessing the level of satisfaction with, and the reasons regarding the possibility of continuing to use, the IUS. RESULTS: Of the 517 enrolled women, 251 (48%) were aged 35 years or older (mean age 33.9 ± 9.0 years), 276 (53%) were white, 14 (3%) were adolescents, 155 (30%) were nulligravidas, and 307 (59.4%) reported experiencing amenorrhea in the last 90 days. Common reasons why women liked to use the LNG-IUS included both the reduction of menstrual bleeding (419 women; 81%) and dysmenorrhea (290 women; 56.1%). Nine out of 10 users (517 women; 91%) were satisfied with the method, and the majority would recommend it to other women. CONCLUSION: We found a high satisfaction rate among LNG-IUS users mainly due to the reduction of both menstrual bleeding and dysmenorrhea.

Perspectives of health care providers regarding the levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system.

OBJECTIVES: The aims of the study were to assess the number of insertions per month of the 52 mg levonorgestrel-releasing intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) and gauge the knowledge and opinions of health care providers with regard to some of its characteristics and the reasons why women liked using the method. METHODS: An online questionnaire survey was conducted between January and July 2021 at the University of Campinas, Brazil. The survey comprised physicians and nurses from centres that had requested and received donated devices. RESULTS: A total of 65 health care providers answered the questionnaire (41 physicians and 24 nurses). The main misconceptions were related to insertion after an ectopic pregnancy: 60/65 (92.3%) answered that users with previous ectopic pregnancy must have frequent follow-up. Wrong answers were also given on the occurrence of acne (37/65, 56.9%) and depression (32/65, 49.2%). Participants reported that the LNG-IUS was highly effective (100%), long-acting (93.9%) and an appropriate method for controlling uterine bleeding (90.8%) and that it had few side effects (86.2%). CONCLUSION: Our study suggests that health care providers from centres that requested and received LNG-IUS donations, even though they reported adequate knowledge about the device, still had misconceptions with regard to its clinical management.

Reasons reported by women for choosing the levonorgestrel intrauterine system as a contraceptive method.

OBJECTIVE: To assess the reasons provided by women for choosing the use of the 52 mg levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) as a contraceptive method. METHODS: We conducted a cross sectional study from January 2021 to August 2021 at the University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, Brazil. Women who had never used the 52 mg LNG-IUS and were requesting it for contraception answered a questionnaire asking for their sociodemographic characteristics, the last contraceptive method in use, how they received information about the device, and their main reasons for choosing the method. RESULTS: We enrolled 516 women, 365 (70.7%) of whom were under the age of 35 and 352 (68.2%) of whom were parous. The last contraceptive method in use was a short-acting reversible method among 387 (80.8%) women, 454 (88%) reported that they wanted to use the IUS only for contraception, and the main source of information was their health care providers. The main reported reasons for choosing the method were because it is safe, has high contraceptive efficacy, and reduces menstrual bleeding. CONCLUSION: Health care providers should continue their efforts to provide guidance about the LNG-IUS, including the non-contraceptive benefits, which may contribute to a reduction in the number of unplanned pregnancies.

Major differences in the characteristics of users of the copper intrauterine device or levonorgestrel intrauterine system at a clinic in Campinas, Brazil.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the sociodemographic characteristics of users of the copper intrauterine device (Cu-IUD) and the levonorgestrel intrauterine system (LNG-IUS) at a family planning clinic in Campinas, SP, Brazil. METHODS: A retrospective audit study was conducted to analyze the characteristics of new users of IUDs at the clinic of the Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Campinas. Data covered insertions performed between 1979 and 2006 when only the Cu-IUD was offered at the clinic, and between 2007 and 2019 when the LNG-IUS was also offered, both free of charge to women. Logistic regression analysis was performed. RESULTS: There were 31 385 insertions. Cu-IUD: n = 17 156 (1979-2006) and n = 2013 (2007-2019); LNG-IUS n = 12 216 (2007-2019). Up to 2006, Cu-IUD users were less likely to be nulligravidas, more likely to be younger than 40 years of age, and with fewer years of schooling. Following introduction of LNG-IUS, the sociodemographic characteristics of users presented major changes over time. Comparing the period 1979-2006 with 2007-2019, new users of the LNG-IUS were more likely to be older than 40 years of age, with fewer years of completed schooling, and to be nulligravidas. CONCLUSION: Major changes in sociodemographic characteristics of users were noted according to preference over time. Introduction of the LNG-IUS presents a major opportunity to increase IUD use.

One-year follow up on post-placental IUD insertion: A randomized clinical trial.

INTRODUCTION: Our objectives were to compare the 1-year follow-up clinical performance of the TCu380A intrauterine device (TCu380A-IUD) and levonorgestrel (LNG) 52-mg intrauterine system (IUS) inserted at post-placental period. MATERIAL AND METHODS: We conducted an open-label, parallel-group, randomized clinical trial, 1:1 with pregnant women admitted for childbirth independently of the mode of birth. Our primary outcome was expulsion up to 1 year after device placement by type of IUD and mode of delivery. During the follow up (42, 90 and 365 days (±7 days) after device placement), an ultrasound was performed to evaluate the device position. Kaplan-Meier with log-rank test was used to compare the survival curves of the TCu380A IUD and the LNG IUS. Couple-Years of Protection after insertion of both devices was calculated. RESULTS: One hundred and forty women were randomized to the TCu380A IUD (n = 70) or the LNG IUS (n = 70). By the end of the first year after device placement, 38 women experienced device expulsion (27.1%), most of them (33/38; 86.8%) within the first 42 days after delivery. The expulsions were significantly higher among users of TCu380A IUD (39.4%) than among users of the LNG IUS (22.2%; P = .039), and among those with vaginal delivery (43.8%) than among women with cesarean delivery (15%; P = .003). The 1-year cumulative continuation rate was 64.2%, significantly higher for LNG IUS (73.1%) than for TCu380A IUD (54.4%; P = .03), and among women with cesarean delivery (77.6%) than for vaginal delivery (52%; P = .00). The post-placental IUD insertion provided 356.4 Couple-Years of Protection. CONCLUSIONS: Two-thirds of women who accepted a post-placental IUD placement still used the device 1 year after childbirth. However, expulsion was the most prevalent reason for discontinuation, mainly within 42 days after device placement. The expulsion rate was significantly higher among TCu380A IUD users and among women with vaginal delivery.

Evaluation of clinical performance when intrauterine devices are inserted by different categories of healthcare professional.

OBJECTIVE: We evaluated clinical performance when the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD) and the levonorgestrel (LNG) 52-mg intrauterine system (IUS) were inserted by different categories of healthcare professionals. METHODS: A retrospective study was conducted at the University of Campinas, Brazil. The medical records were reviewed of all women in whom an IUD was inserted between January 1980 and December 2018, with data for at least 1 year, and for whom information on the healthcare provider who inserted the device was available. RESULTS: Overall, 19 132 (76.9%) IUD and 5733 (23.1%) LNG-IUS insertions were included, with residents/interns performing 13 853 (55.8%), nurses 7024 (28.2%), and physicians 3988 (16.0%). Removals for pregnancy and infection were significantly higher when physicians inserted the device, while removals for bleeding/pain and other medical reasons were more common when nurses performed the insertion. Expulsion and removals for personal reasons were similar for all three categories. CONCLUSION: Clinical outcomes were similar regardless of whether trained nurses, residents/interns, or physicians inserted the device, and were irrespective of users' age and parity. These results could stimulate other healthcare services, particularly in regions where there is a shortage of physicians, to invest in training nurses to perform insertions of IUDs.

Postplacental placement of intrauterine devices: A randomized clinical trial.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the expulsion rate of the TCu380A intrauterine device (IUD) or levonorgestrel (LNG) 52 mg intrauterine system (IUS) up to 90 days after postplacental placement (10 min after delivery of the placenta). STUDY DESIGN: Randomized trial (1:1) of women aged 18-43 years and ≥37 weeks pregnant enrolled during early or prodromal labor at the University of Campinas, Brazil. Follow-up was scheduled at 42 and 90 days after device placement. We confirmed the IUD or IUS location using ultrasonography. Multivariate logistic regression was used to assess variables associated with expulsion. RESULTS: We enrolled 140 women, and assigned 70 to the TCu380A IUD and 70 to the IUS groups. By the 90-day follow-up visit, 22/60 women (36.7%) in the TCu380A IUD group had expelled the device, as had 12/60 women in the IUS group (20%). Thirty-three of the 34 expulsions had occurred by the 42-day visit. Multivariate analysis demonstrated that the expulsion odds ratio ([OR]; 95% confidence interval [CI]) was higher after vaginal delivery than after Cesarean delivery (OR 5.60; 95% CI 2.08-15.10; P < 0.00) and higher among women with one (OR 4.38; 95% CI 1.33-14.43; P 0.00) or three or more deliveries (including the present one) (OR 6.08; 95% CI 1.78-20.77; P 0.00) than those with two deliveries. CONCLUSIONS: Postplacental TCu380A IUD placement had a higher expulsion rate than the IUS, and the expulsion rate was higher among women who had a vaginal delivery than those who had a Cesarean delivery. Most of the expulsions occurred within 42 days. IMPLICATIONS: Policy makers should increase the availability of both the TCu380A and the LNG intrauterine devices for the immediate postpartum period, even though the expulsion rate is higher than that after interval placement.