Correlation between quantitative angiographic and intravascular ultrasound parameters in patients treated with sirolimus analogous-eluting stents.

Despite the undeniable contribution of intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) and quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) to assess drug-eluting stent (DES) effectiveness, the way these image modalities correlate to each other and to target-lesion revascularization (TLR) after PCI, is yet to be established. Thus we sought to evaluate whether there is an acceptable correlation between QCA and IVUS after DES implantation. We analyzed 204 pts treated with DES: Zotarolimus- (126), Sirolimus- (57), and Biolimus (31) with baseline and follow-up QCA and IVUS. The correlation between QCA lumen loss (LL) and intimal hyperplasia (IH) volume obstruction by IVUS was assessed by multiple regression analysis. Two QCA parameters (in-segment diameter stenosis and in-segment LL) and one IVUS variable (in-stent volume of IH) were evaluated as quantitative surrogates of 6 month TLR. The receiver operating characteristic method with c-statistics was used to assess the ability of each surrogate endpoint to predict TLR. QCA LL correlated positively with IVUS IH volume of obstruction (r = 0.69; CI95% 0.61-0.75: P < 0.0001), independent of DES type. The 2 QCA parameters were superior to the IVUS parameter as surrogates for TLR. Of note, QCA LL (c = 0.99) correlated best with TLR, even better than percent DS. In the DES era there is a good correlation between QCA measured LL and IVUS IH volume and therefore can be used as a surrogate of DES efficacy.

Stents farmacológios versus não-farmacológicos para o tratamento de pacientes uniarteriais portadores de lesão em artéria descendente anterior: seguimento clínico de dois anos / Drug-Eluting Stents Versus Bare-Metal Stents for the Treatment of Single Left Anterior Descending Artery: Two Year Clinical Follow-Up

Introdução: Pacientes submetidos a intervenção percutânea em hospitais públicos brasileiros não têm acesso aos stents farmacológicos. No início de 2006, participamos de um registro multicêntrico internacional que disponibilizava o uso rotineiro dessas próteses, no cenário do mundo real. Neste artigo, procuramos identificar os perfis clínico, angiográfico e do procedimento de pacientes consecutivamente tratados em períodos subseqüentes de dois meses, de acordo com a disponibilidade desses modelos, visando à identificação de eventuais alterações nesses perfis. Método: Estudo observacional de uma série de 471 pacientes, divididos em dois grupos: A, 229 casos dilatados na vigência da disponibilidade de stents farmacológicos; e B, 242 pacientes subseqüentes tratados da forma usual. Não houve critérios de inclusão/exclusão. Resultados: Stents farmacológicos foram mais implantados no grupo A (44% vs. 2%; p < 0,0001). No que se refere às características de base, observou-se predomínio significante de diabéticos dependentes de insulina em A (8% vs. 3%; p = 0,02), o mesmo ocorrendo com lesões-alvo tipos B2 ou C (73% vs. 57%; p < 0,0001), lesões situadas em bifurcações (15% vs. 9%; p = 0,02) e intervenções multiarteriais (15% vs. 6%; p = 0,003). A angiografia quantitativa identificou os casos de A como portadores de estenoses situadas em vasos de menor calibre (2,4 mm vs. 2,6 mm; p = 0,0004), também exibindo lesões mais longas (14,9 mm vs. 12,7 mm; p = 0,0008). Conclusões: A disponibilidade dos stents farmacológicos gerou alterações no perfil dos casos tratados, que passou a abordar situações mais predispostas à reestenose, como os diabéticos dependentes de insulina, os multiarteriais com lesões de alta complexidade e os portadores de lesões mais longas em vasos de fino calibre.

Introduction: Patients submitted to percutaneous intervention in public hospitals in Brazil have no access to DES. At the beginning of 2006, we participated in an international multicenter registry which made available the routine use of these prosthesis, in a "real world" scenario. In this article, we intend to identify the clinical, angiographical and procedural profiles of the patients, consecutively treated in twomonth subsequent periods, according to the availability of these models, with the aim of identifying eventual changes in their profiles. Method: Observational series of 471 patients, divided into two groups: A) 229 cases, treated during a period of availability of DES for routine use; and B) 242 patients subsequently treated as usual (no routine avalilability of DES). There were no inclusion/exclusion criteria. Results: More DES were implanted in group A (44% vs. 2%; p<0.0001). Regarding baseline clinical and angiographic characteristics, a significant predominance of insulin-dependent diabetics was observed in group A (8% vs. 3%; p=0.02), as well as B2 or C lesions (73% vs. 57%; p<0.0001); lesions in bifurcations (15% vs. 9%; p=0.02), and multiarterial interventions (15% vs. 6%; p=0.003). Quantitative angiography identified the A group cases as bearers of stenosis placed in smaller vessels (2.4 mm vs. 2.6 mm; p=0.0004), also exhibiting longer lesions (14.9 mm vs. 12.7 mm; p=0.0008). Conclusions: The availability of DES changed the profile of the patients treated, being more likely situations prone to restenosis, such as insulin dependent diabetics, multiarterial disease, patients presenting complex lesions, longer lesions and smaller target vessels.