EEG markers of successful allocentric spatial working memory maintenance in humans.

Several brain regions in the frontal, occipital and medial temporal lobes are known to contribute to spatial information processing. In contrast, the oscillatory patterns contributing to allocentric spatial working memory maintenance are poorly understood, especially in humans. Here, we tested twenty-three 21- to 32-year-old and twenty-two 64- to 76-year-old healthy right-handed adults in a real-world, spatial working memory task and recorded electroencephalographic (EEG) activity during the maintenance period. We established criteria for designating recall trials as perfect (no errors) or failed (errors and random search) and identified 8 young and 13 older adults who had at least 1 perfect and 1 failed trial amongst 10 recall trials. Individual alpha frequency-based analyses were used to identify oscillatory patterns during the maintenance period of perfect and failed trials. Spectral scalp topographies showed that individual theta frequency band relative power was stronger in perfect than in failed trials in the frontal midline and posterior regions. Similarly, gamma band (30-40 Hz) relative power was stronger in perfect than in failed trials over the right motor cortex. Exact low-resolution brain electromagnetic tomography in the frequency domain identified greater theta power in perfect than in failed trials in the secondary visual area (BA19) and greater gamma power in perfect than in failed trials in the right supplementary motor area. The findings of this exploratory study suggest that theta oscillations in the occipital lobe and gamma oscillations in the secondary motor cortex (BA6) play a particular role in successful allocentric spatial working memory maintenance.

Why do individuals with Williams syndrome or Down syndrome fail the Weather Prediction Task?

Williams syndrome (WS) and Down syndrome (DS) are two neurodevelopmental disorders with distinct genetic origins characterized by mild to moderate intellectual disability. Individuals with WS or DS exhibit impaired hippocampus-dependent place learning and enhanced striatum-dependent spatial response learning. Here, we used the Weather Prediction Task (WPT), which can be solved using hippocampus- or striatum-dependent learning strategies, to determine whether individuals with WS or DS exhibit similar profiles outside the spatial domain. Only 10% of individuals with WS or DS solved the WPT. We further assessed whether a concurrent memory task could promote reliance on procedural learning to solve the WPT in individuals with WS but found that the concurrent task did not improve performance. To understand how the probabilistic cue-outcome associations influences WPT performance, and whether individuals with WS or DS can ignore distractors, we assessed performance using a visual learning task with differing reward contingencies, and a modified WPT with unpredictive cues. Both probabilistic feedback and distractors negatively impacted the performance of individuals with WS or DS. These findings are consistent with deficits in hippocampus-dependent learning and executive functions, and reveal the importance of congruent feedback and the minimization of distractors to optimize learning in these two populations.

Well-designed manufacturing work improves some cognitive abilities in individuals with cognitive impairments.

Introduction: Employment is recognized as a fundamental human right, which correlates with better physical and mental health. Importantly, well-designed work, which considers the physical, social, and psychological impacts of work, can serve to enhance the cognitive abilities of workers. Although often overlooked, work for individuals with disabilities, including cognitive impairments, is equally important for their physical and mental well-being. What has not been established, however, is whether well-designed work can also enhance the cognitive abilities of individuals with cognitive impairments. Methods: Using a longitudinal study design, we investigated the impact of well-designed work on the cognitive abilities of 60 participants (operators) at the AMIPI Foundation factories, which employ individuals with cognitive impairments to produce electrical cables and harnesses for the automobile industry. The same operators were assessed at three different time points: upon hiring (n = 60), and after working in the factory for 1 year (n = 41, since 19 left the factory) and 2 years (n = 28, since 13 more left the factory). We used five cognitive tests evaluating: (1) finger and manual dexterity, bimanual dexterity, and procedural memory using the Purdue Pegboard; (2) sustained and selective attention using the Symbol Cancellation Task; (3) short- and long-term declarative verbal memory and long-term verbal recognition memory using Rey's Audio-Verbal Learning Test; (4) short- and long-term visual recognition memory using the Continuous Visual Memory Test; and (5) abstract reasoning using Raven's Standard Progressive Matrices. Results: We observed improvements in procedural memory, sustained and selective attention, and short- and long-term visual recognition memory after working in the factory for 1 or 2 years. We did not observe improvements in finger or manual dexterity or bimanual dexterity, nor short- or long-term declarative verbal memory or verbal recognition memory, nor abstract reasoning. Discussion: We conclude that, in addition to improving physical and mental well-being, well-designed manufacturing work can serve as a training intervention improving some types of cognitive functioning in individuals with cognitive impairments.