Medication adherence, related factors and outcomes among patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension or chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a systematic review.

INTRODUCTION: Pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) and chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH) are life-threatening conditions that can progress to death without treatment. Although strong medication adherence (MA) is known to enhance outcomes in chronic illnesses, its association with PAH and CTEPH was sporadically explored. This study aims to examine the MA of patients with PAH or CTEPH, identify factors associated with low adherence and explore the resulting outcomes. METHODS: A systematic review was conducted by searching multiple databases (Medline, Embase, Cochrane Central, ClinicalTrials.gov, Scopus, Web of Science and Google Scholar) from 6 March 1998 to 6 July 2023. We included studies reporting MA as primary or secondary end-points. Study selection, data extraction and methodological quality assessment were performed in duplicate. RESULTS: 20 studies involving 22 675 patients met the inclusion criteria. Heterogeneity was observed, particularly in the methods employed. MA means ranged from 0.62 to 0.96, with the proportion of patients exhibiting high MA varying from 40% (95% CI 35-45%) to 94% (95% CI 88-97%). Factors associated with low adherence included increased treatment frequency, time since diagnosis and co-payment. High MA seems to be associated with reduced hospitalisation rates, inpatient stays, outpatient visits and healthcare costs. CONCLUSIONS: This systematic review underscores the heterogeneity of MA across studies. Nevertheless, the findings suggest that high MA could improve patients' clinical outcomes and alleviate the economic burden. Identifying factors consistently associated with poor MA could strengthen educational efforts for these patients, ultimately contributing to improved outcomes.

Infectious sacroiliitis: MRI- and CT-based assessment of disease extent, complications, and anatomic correlation.

OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of MR and CT features of infectious sacroiliitis (ISI) and assess its extent and complications MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study included patients with ISI who were evaluated between 2008 and 2021 in a single center. Two radiologists reviewed MRI and CT images to determine the anatomical distribution (unilateral/bilateral, iliac/sacral bone, proximal/middle/distal), severity (bone marrow edema [BME]/periostitis/erosions), concurrent infection (vertebral/nonvertebral), and complications (abscess/probable adjacent osteomyelitis/cavitation/devitalized areas/sequestrum/pelvic venous thrombosis) of ISI. Interobserver reproducibility was assessed. Correlation analysis evaluated the effect of the causative microorganism on severity. Two human bodies were dissected to outline possible ways that ISI can spread. RESULTS: Forty patients with ISI (40 years ± 22; 26 women) were evaluated. Ten patients had bilateral ISI. Concurrent vertebral infection was associated in 15% of cases. Reproducibility of sacral BME, periostitis, and reactive locoregional abnormalities was perfect (κ = 1). Reproducibility was low for erosion count (κ = 0.52[0.52-0.82]) and periarticular osteopenia (κ = 0.50[0.18-0.82]). Inflammatory changes were BME (42/42 joints), muscle edema (38/42), and severe periostitis along the ilium (33/37). Destructive structural changes occurred with confluent erosions (iliac, 20/48; sacral, 13/48), sequestrum (20/48), and cavitation (12/48). Complications occurred in 75% of cases, including periarticular abscesses (n = 30/47), probable adjacent osteomyelitis (n = 16/37), and pelvic thrombophlebitis (n = 3). Tuberculous ISI (6/40) correlated with sclerosis (rs = 0.45[0.16; 0.67]; p < 10-2) and bone devitalization (rs = 0.38[0.16; 0.67]; p = .02). The anatomical study highlighted the shared venous vascularization of sacroiliac joints, pelvic organs, and mobile spine. CONCLUSION: Complications of ISI are frequent, including abscesses, adjacent osteomyelitis, and periostitis. ISI had bilateral involvement nonrarely and is commonly associated with another spinal infection.

Prevalence of cannabidiol (CBD) consumption and cancer patients' expectations in one oncology day-hospital: A cross-sectional study and questionnaire validation.

INTRODUCTION: The growing interest of cannabidiol (CBD) in medical care prompted French health authorities to explore the potential of CBD in cancer-related severe symptoms. This study aimed to assess the prevalence of CBD use among cancer patients with potential associated factors and to measure the cancer patient's health literacy (HL) on CBD consumption. METHODS: In a prospective study in oncology day-care hospital including patients from 29 October to 20 December 2021, we collected demographic, biological, and oncological characteristics. Patient CBD HL was measured by the hetero-questionnaire 8-item-CBD HL scale (HLS-8-CBD) whose conception has been validated by a psychometric analysis. RESULTS: Among 363 participants, 20 patients (5.5%) reported CBD use. Factors associated with CBD use were: age <60 years (odd ratio = 7.80[1.36-13.32], p < 10-4 versus ≥60 years), smoking history (OR = 5.53[1.81-16.88], p < 0.01), and no smoking cessation (OR = 5.07[1.66-15.46], p < 0.01). CBD use was also associated with a better CBD total HL score than non-users (p-value = 0.02). CONCLUSION: Identification of factors associated with CBD use and a relatively high patient CBD HL in CBD users showed that CBD use in cancer patients care represented a new concern and should enhance health professionals to consider CBD with its associated drug-related problems.

Beta-blocker exposure and survival outcomes in patients with advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study (BETAPANC).

Introduction: Preclinical studies have demonstrated the possible role of beta-adrenergic receptors in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) tumor invasion and migration. The current study aimed to explore the possible association between survival outcomes and beta-blocker (BB) exposure in patients with advanced PDAC. Methods: This retrospective single-center study included 182 patients with advanced PDAC. Clinical [age, sex, BMI, cardiovascular condition, presence (SBB) or absence (NSBB) of beta-1 selectivity of BB, exposure duration, and multimorbidity], oncological (stage and anticancer treatment regimen), and biological (renal and liver function) data were collected. The endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS). Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) for survival outcomes associated with BB exposure were estimated using Cox regression model and propensity score (PS) methods. Results: Forty-one patients (22.5%) were exposed to BB. A total of 104 patients progressed (57.1%) to PDAC and 139 (76.4%) patients died at the end of follow-up (median, 320 days; IQR, 438.75 days). When compared to the non-exposed group, there was no increase in survival outcomes associated with BB use (OS: HR = 1.38, 95% CI = 0.80-2.39, p = 0.25; PFS: adjusted HR = 0.95, 95% CI = 0.48-1.88, p = 0.88). Similar results were obtained using the PS method. Compared to no BB usage, SBB use was associated with a significant decrease in OS (HR = 1.80, 95% CI = 1.16-2.80, p < 10-2). Conclusion: BB exposure was not associated with improved PDAC survival outcomes. Beta-1-selectivity was not independently associated with any differences.

Cannabidiol-drug interaction in cancer patients: A retrospective study in a real-life setting.

Cannabidiol (CBD) consumption in cancer patients is growing and there is a need to investigate how to detect cannabidiol-drug interactions (CDIs). However, CDIs and the clinical relevance between CBD, anticancer treatment, supportive care and conventional drugs is poorly studied especially in real-life settings. In 1 oncology day-hospital, a cross-sectional study in 363 cancer patients treated with chemotherapy revealed 20 patients (5.5%) who consumed CBD. In this study we aimed to explore the prevalence and clinical relevance of CDIs among these 20 patients. CDI detection used the Food and Drug Administration Drugs.com database and clinical relevance was assessed accordingly. Ninety CDIs with 34 medicines were detected (4.6 CDI/patient). The main clinical risks were central nervous system depression and hepatoxicity. The main CDIs were assessed as moderate and anticancer treatment do not seem to add to the risk. CBD discontinuation appears to be the most consistent management. Future studies should explore the clinical relevance of drug interactions with CBD in cancer patients.

Association between proton pump inhibitors and severe hematological toxicity in patients receiving pemetrexed-based anticancer treatment: The prospective IPPEM study.

OBJECTIVE: Pemetrexed is associated with hematological toxicity. Drug-drug interactions (DDIs) between methotrexate and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) induce a higher risk of hematological toxicity due to the inhibition of methotrexate excretion by PPIs. As pemetrexed and methotrexate are both excreted by human organic anion transporter 3 (hOAT3), this study investigates the hypothetical DDI between pemetrexed and PPIs in lung cancer patients. The primary objective was the occurrence of severe (grade ≥ 3) hematological toxicity. The secondary objectives were to describe the type of hematological toxicity and associated clinical consequences (NCT03537833). MATERIALS AND METHODS: PPI consumption was collected for each patient receiving pemetrexed-based anticancer chemotherapy from May 2018 to October 2020 in a prospective multicentric observational and nonrandomized study. Multivariate Cox regression and propensity score (PS) adjustment, PS matching and inverse weighting on PS (IPTW) methods were used. RESULTS: PPI consumption (55 among 156 included patients) was associated with a significantly higher risk of severe hematological toxicity in the multivariable Cox regression model (hazard ratio HR = 2.51, 95% confidence interval [1.47-4.26]; p = 0.005). Similar results were found with PS adjustment (HR = 1.91 CI95% [1.14-3.20]; p = 0.002), PS-matching (HR = 1.93 CI95% [1.08-3.45]; p = 0.02) and IPTW method (HR = 2.06 CI95% [1.27-3.35]; p = 0.004). Severe neutropenia and anemia occurred in 32.7% and 14.1% of patients, respectively. This resulted in 48 anticancer chemotherapy postponements and 24 dose adjustments, 26 growth factor prescriptions, 24 red blood cell transfusions, and 20 hospitalizations. CONCLUSIONS: The results strongly suggest an association between PPI consumption and pemetrexed-related severe hematological toxicity. Deprescription of PPIs when feasible should be considered to prevent this DDI.

Safety and Survival Outcomes in Lung Cancer Patients Receiving Carboplatin: Impact of Uncapped Dosage.

The prescription of carboplatin is commonly based on the Calvert formula, and low serum creatinine values can lead to an overestimation of the glomerular filtration rate and of the carboplatin dose. Limited data recommend to cap carboplatin dose at 800 mg, but the risk of suboptimal carboplatin dose is concerning. This study compared hematologic toxicity occurrence and survival outcomes in lung cancer patients receiving carboplatin > or <800 mg based on the Calvert formula (target area under the curve = 5 mg/mL min). Our results show more severe cytopenia in patients receiving carboplatin >800 mg with significant difference for all grades of thrombocytopenia in the uncapped group (37% patients vs. 3%, p = 0.02). For metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer patients, we also observed hematologic toxicity in the uncapped group with more severe anemia (30% of patients vs. 0%, p = 0.03) and all grades of thrombocytopenia (39 vs. 0%, p = 0.02) than the capped group. Concerning the secondary endpoint, we obtained a trend of lower progression-free survival and overall survival in patients receiving carboplatin >800 mg, but no significant difference appears for the both survival criteria. This study aims to improve the determination of carboplatin dosage to know the real impact of carboplatin capping and to find the optimum balance between excessive toxicity and substandard therapeutics outcomes.