RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: (1) Evaluate the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) scans for localization of liver masses. (2) Assess the agreement between radiologists on localization. (3) Determine if location influences the accuracy of localization and histopathologic diagnosis. (4) Determine what lobar vasculature radiologists found most useful for localization. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective. ANIMALS: A total of 67 client-owned dogs with a total of 75 hepatic masses. METHODS: Records were reviewed for relevant data. Localization for each hepatic mass was performed by four radiologists (JH, EH, ML, JF) independently. RESULTS: Overall accuracy of mass localization was 217/292 (74.3%) by lobe and 264/300 (88%) by division. Accuracy for the quadrate lobe (11/27, 40.7%) was lower (p < .05) than for the caudate process of the caudate lobe (19/24, 79.2%), left medial lobe (47/64, 73.4%) and left lateral lobe (95/101, 89.6%). Accuracy for the right lateral lobe (17/35, 48.6%) was lower (p < .05) lower than for the left lateral lobe (95/101, 89.6%). Accuracy of localization was 173/192 (90.1%) for masses located in the left division, 37/48 (77.1%) in the central division, and 53/60 (88.3%) for the right division. The agreement (kappa) between radiologists was good (0.61-0.8) to excellent (0.81-1) for division and moderate (0.41-0.6) to good for lobe localization. CONCLUSION: CT localization was more accurate for division than lobe localization of canine hepatic masses. Similarly, radiologists had a better agreement for division than lobe localization. CLINICAL SIGNIFICANCE: This study supports CT as a useful modality for liver mass localization based on division. CT localization to specific lobes should be interpreted with some caution.
RESUMEN
Chiari-like malformation (CM) and syringomyelia (SM) are common illnesses that can cause debilitating neuropathic pain in Cavalier King Charles spaniels (CKCS). The current imaging modality to screen CKCS for CM/SM is MRI of the brain and cervical spine. Magnetic resonance imaging provides good soft tissue detail and contrast of the cerebellum and cervical spinal cord. Computed tomography (CT) is another cross-sectional imaging technique that facilitates brain and neck evaluation; however, soft tissue resolution does not match that of MRI. Computed tomography benefits include identification of concurrent craniocervical junction anomalies (atlantooccipital overlap) and shorter imaging/anesthesia times with the ability to use only sedation. The aim of this retrospective, method comparison study is to assess the utility of multidetector CT for screening CM and SM in CKCS as compared to high-field MRI. Three groups of observers with different levels of experience graded CM and SM based on the British Veterinary Association/Kennel Club CM/SM classification criteria. Thirty CKCS underwent multidetector CT and 3 Tesla MRI studies. Computed tomography and MRI studies were reviewed at different timepoints to minimize bias. Computed tomography has lower Cohen's Kappa agreement for each observer group compared to MRI. The intraclass correlation coefficient averaging CM and SM for all groups was excellent using MRI, while CT was poor for SM and moderate for cerebellar herniation. Greater observer experience resulted in a higher agreement for CT and MRI. Magnetic resonance imaging should remain the standard for screening of CM and SM as CT can result in misclassification and greater disagreement.