A novel computer-assisted tool for 3D imaging of programmed death-ligand 1 expression in immunofluorescence-stained and optically cleared breast cancer specimens.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-1 (PD-1) and programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) are the two most common immune checkpoints targeted in triple-negative breast cancer (BC). Refining patient selection for immunotherapy is non-trivial and finding an appropriate digital pathology framework for spatial analysis of theranostic biomarkers for PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors remains an unmet clinical need. METHODS: We describe a novel computer-assisted tool for three-dimensional (3D) imaging of PD-L1 expression in immunofluorescence-stained and optically cleared BC specimens (n = 20). The proposed 3D framework appeared to be feasible and showed a high overall agreement with traditional, clinical-grade two-dimensional (2D) staining techniques. Additionally, the results obtained for automated immune cell detection and analysis of PD-L1 expression were satisfactory. RESULTS: The spatial distribution of PD-L1 expression was heterogeneous across various BC tissue layers in the 3D space. Notably, there were six cases (30%) wherein PD-L1 expression levels along different layers crossed the 1% threshold for admitting patients to PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitors. The average PD-L1 expression in 3D space was different from that of traditional immunohistochemistry (IHC) in eight cases (40%). Pending further standardization and optimization, we expect that our technology will become a valuable addition for assessing PD-L1 expression in patients with BC. CONCLUSION: Via a single round of immunofluorescence imaging, our approach may provide a considerable improvement in patient stratification for cancer immunotherapy as compared with standard techniques.

Factors associated with survival of patients with advanced lung cancer and long travel distances.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Patients with advanced cancer sometimes travel to locations that have the treatment that they need. We explored the prognostic factors of survival in patients with advanced lung cancer who travel long distances in Taiwan. METHODS: We obtained data from the National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) Integrated Medical Database. Patients who received a diagnosis of stage IV lung cancer from 2010 to 2019 and were treated in NTUH and its Hsinchu and Yunlin branches were enrolled. Factors associated with survival were analyzed using a Cox hazard regression model. RESULTS: In total, 6178 patients with stage IV lung cancer were enrolled. Young age, female sex, smaller primary tumor size, better performance, and non-squamous cell non-small cell histology were independently associated with longer survival. Treatment in medical centers and long travel distances (>50 km) were associated with longer survival in the univariate analysis but not in the multivariate analysis (hazard ratio [HR]: 1.04, p = 0.361; HR: 0.99, p = 0.775, respectively). Participation in clinical trials was associated with longer survival in the univariate (HR: 0.53, p < 0.001) and multivariate analyses (HR: 0.62, p < 0.001). For the 1144 patients in the Hsinchu area, enrolment in clinical trials was an independent prognostic factor (HR: 0.72, p = 0.040), whereas treatment in medical centers was not (HR: 0.95, p = 0.635). CONCLUSION: Long travel distances and treatment in medical centers were not independently associated with survival for patients with advanced lung cancer. Enrolment in clinical trials was an independent prognostic factor.

Recommended first-line management of asymptomatic brain metastases from EGFR mutant and ALK positive non-small cell lung cancer varies significantly according to specialty: an international survey of clinical practice.

Background: The role for radiotherapy or surgery in the upfront management of brain metastases (BrM) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant (EGFRm) or anaplastic lymphoma kinase translocation positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is uncertain because of a lack of prospective evidence supporting tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) monotherapy. Further understanding of practice heterogeneity is necessary to guide collaborative efforts in establishing guideline recommendations. Methods: We conducted an international survey among medical (MO), clinical (CO), and radiation oncologists (RO), as well as neurosurgeons (NS), of treatment recommendations for asymptomatic BrM (in non-eloquent regions) EGFRm or ALK+ NSCLC patients according to specific clinical scenarios. We grouped and compared treatment recommendations according to specialty. Responses were summarized using counts and percentages and analyzed using the Fisher exact test. Results: A total of 449 surveys were included in the final analysis: 48 CO, 85 MO, 60 NS, and 256 RO. MO and CO were significantly more likely than RO and NS to recommend first-line TKI monotherapy, regardless of the number and/or size of asymptomatic BrM (in non-eloquent regions). Radiotherapy in addition to TKI as first-line management was preferred by all specialties for patients with ≥4 BrM. NS recommended surgical resection more often than other specialties for BrM measuring >2 cm. Conclusions: Recommendations for the management of BrM from EGFRm or ALK+ NSCLC vary significantly according to oncology sub-specialties. Development of multidisciplinary guidelines and further research on establishing optimal treatment strategies is warranted.

The impact of BRAF targeting agents in advanced anaplastic thyroid cancer: a multi-institutional retrospective study in Taiwan.

Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is a rare but lethal thyroid cancer. Dabrafenib and trametinib has been the standard treatment for the patients with BRAF mutation based on phase II study. This study aimed to exam the impact of dabrafenib and trametinib in ATC patients. ATC patients treated in three institutes in Taiwan were retrospectively reviewed. The clinical features, BRAF status, and survivals were collected. Multivariate analysis was performed to determine the independent prognostic factors. A total of 44 ATC patients were enrolled in current study. Twelve (50%) out of 24 detected patients had BRAF V600E mutation and eleven received dabrafenib and trametinib treatment. Patients treated with dabrafenib and trametinib had longer overall survival (OS) than the patients without treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib (median OS: 10.4 months vs. 3.3 months, P=0.05). The objective response rate was 81.8% and progress-free survival was 7.4 months. Multivariate analysis identified prior surgery, treatment with dabrafenib and trametinib and metastasis to lung, brain, and bone were significant prognostic factors for OS. The benefit of prior surgery was significant in patients receiving dabrafenib and trametinib (P=0.017) rather than those without dabrafenib and trametinib (P=0.067). The current study provides the real-world evidence that targeted therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib was effective and significantly improved the OS for ATC patients. The role of prior surgery became important in the era of targeted therapy. Future studies should focus on resistance mechanisms and combination with immunotherapy for ATC patients.

Real-world treatment patterns and outcomes among patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with spindle cell and/or giant cell carcinoma.

Objectives: A definitive diagnosis of pulmonary sarcomatoid carcinoma cannot be made with small biopsies. In clinical practice, a diagnosis of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer with spindle cell and/or giant cell carcinoma (NSCLCsg), or possible sarcomatoid carcinoma, is acceptable. Therefore, we aimed to investigate the treatment patterns and outcomes of advanced NSCLCsg. Materials and methods: Between 01 January 2012 and 01 April 2021, patients with pathologically proven advanced NSCLCsg were enrolled. The choice of treatment was based on clinician discretion. Results: In all, 101 patients with advanced NSCLCsg were enrolled. In total, 77 (76.2%) patients received at least one line of systemic therapy; 44 patients (43.1%) had received platinum doublet chemotherapy; 27 (26.7%) patients had been treated with targeted therapies; and 23 patients (22.8%) had been given an immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI). The median overall survival (OS) was 6.3 months [95% confidence interval (CI): 3.6-9.0 months]. Excluding patients without systemic therapy, patients who had received an ICI had better OS (median: 18.2 months) than those who had not (median 3.8 months, log-rank test p = 0.002). No significant difference in OS was detected between patients who had or had not received platinum doublet chemotherapy (log-rank test p = 0.279), or targeted therapy (log-rank test p = 0.416). Having received any systemic therapy [hazard ratio (HR): 0.33, 95% CI: 0.18-0.61, p < 0.0001) and ICI (HR: 0.38, 95% CI: 0.19-0.78, p = 0.008) were independent factors for better OS. Patients with programmed death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression ⩾50% had better OS than those with PD-L1 expression <50% (HR: 0.51, 95%: 0.30-0.86, p = 0.012). Conclusion: Although advanced NSCLCsg has a poor survival outcome, our results showed that ICI may prolong OS in patients with advanced NSCLCsg. Further prospective studies are warranted to gain more understanding of the role of ICI in this specific patient population.

Potential Therapeutic Strategy for EGFR-Mutant Lung Cancer With Concomitant EML4-ALK Rearrangement-Combination of EGFR Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors and ALK Inhibitors.

Introduction: Although driver gene mutations have been believed to be mutually exclusive, some patients with NSCLC and concomitant EGFR mutations and EML4-ALK rearrangements have been reported. In this study, we reported a case of a patient with lung cancer who harbored both EGFR mutation and the EML4-ALK rearrangement after acquiring resistance to the EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor treatment. EGFR-mutant and ALK fusion proteins were detected in the same tumor cells through immunohistochemical analysis. Investigation of the molecular mechanisms of concomitant EGFR mutation and the EML4-ALK rearrangement in the same tumor cell can help discover an appropriate treatment for these patients. Methods: PC-9 cells, expressing EGFR exon 19 deletion, were transfected with EML4-ALK variant 3a (v3a) and variant 3b (v3b) separately and selected, and the effect of EGFR and ALK inhibitors was evaluated in vitro and in vivo. Results: PC-9_v3a-gef and PC-9_v3b-gef cells were resistant to gefitinib and ALK inhibitors alone, but ALK inhibitors enhanced gefitinib-induced cytotoxicity. In animal studies, gefitinib completely inhibited the tumor growth in PC-9_vector cells but not in PC-9_v3a-gef and PC-9_v3b-gef cells. A combination of ALK inhibitor and gefitinib was found to be more potent than gefitinib alone in PC-9_v3a-gef and PC-9_v3b-gef cells. Furthermore, combination treatment with osimertinib and ceritinib caused a decrease in liver tumor size of the patient with liver metastases. Conclusions: Our data suggest that combination treatment with EGFR and ALK inhibitors can be a therapeutic strategy for treating NSCLC with concomitant EGFR mutation and EML4-ALK rearrangement.

Recommended first-line management of brain metastases from melanoma: A multicenter survey of clinical practice.

BACKGROUND: Radiotherapy (RT) and surgery (Sx) are effective in treating brain metastases. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have shown activity against asymptomatic melanoma brain metastases (MBM). BRAF/MEK inhibitors can be used to treat BRAF V600 mutation positive (BRAF+) MBM. METHOD: We conducted an international survey among experts from medical oncology (MO), clinical oncology (CO), radiation oncology (RO), and neurosurgery (NS) about treatment recommendations for patients with asymptomatic BRAF+ or BRAF mutation negative (BRAF-) MBM. Eighteen specific clinical scenarios were presented and a total of 267 responses were collected. Answers were grouped and compared using Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: In most MBM scenarios, survey respondents, regardless of specialty, favored RT in addition to systemic therapy. However, for patients with BRAF+ MBM, MO and CO were significantly more likely than RO and NS to recommend BRAF/MEK inhibitors alone, without the addition of RT, including the majority of MO (51%) for patients with 1-3 MBM, all <2 cm. Likewise, for BRAF- MBM, MO and CO more commonly recommended single or dual agent ICI only and dual agent ICI therapy alone was the most common recommendation from MO or CO for MBM <2 cm. When at least 1 of 3 MBM (BRAF+ or BRAF-) was >2 cm, upfront Sx was recommended by all groups with the exception that MO and RO recommended RT for BRAF- MBM. CONCLUSIONS: In most clinical settings involving asymptomatic MBM, experts recommended RT in addition to systemic therapy. However, recommendations varied significantly according to specialty, with MO and CO more commonly recommending dual systemic therapy alone for up to 9 BRAF- MBM <2 cm.

Serial Plasma Cell-Free Circulating Tumor DNA Tests Identify Genomic Alterations for Early Prediction of Osimertinib Treatment Outcome in EGFR T790M-Positive NSCLC.

INTRODUCTION: Recent advances in the detection of genomic DNA from plasma samples allow us to follow tumor DNA shedding in plasma during systemic treatment. Osimertinib is the standard of care for patients with NSCLC with acquired EGFR T790M mutations. We assessed changes in serial plasma cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) genomic alterations to predict osimertinib efficacy. METHODS: We prospectively collected plasma from patients having EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC previously treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy and with acquired EGFR T790M mutation detected by standard methods. Plasma samples were collected before starting osimertinib treatment, 4 weeks after osimertinib treatment, and on progression. ctDNA was analyzed using the Guardant360 assay. RESULTS: A total of 15 eligible patients received osimertinib. Before starting treatment, EGFR-activating mutations were detected in the ctDNA of all patients, and EGFR T790M was detected in 93% of the cases. Osimertinib treatment was associated with an objective response rate of 53% and a median progression-free survival of 7.3 months. A total of 12 of the 15 patients had undetectable plasma T790M and decreased activating mutation allelic frequency (AF) at week 4. None of the 12 patients had disease progression within 16 weeks. For the remaining three patients, with detectable plasma T790M (n = 2) or increased activating mutation AF (n = 1) at week 4, two had progressive disease within 16 weeks (p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC, persistent EGFR T790M or increasing activating mutation AF as detected in ctDNA 4 weeks after the start of osimertinib treatment may predict disease progression within 16 weeks.

Association of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 Expression with Fusion Variants and Clinical Outcomes in Patients with Anaplastic Lymphoma Kinase-Positive Lung Adenocarcinoma Receiving Crizotinib.

BACKGROUND: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression is associated with clinical outcomes of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether PD-L1 expression plays a role in anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive lung ADC is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the impact of PD-L1 in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib. MATERIALS AND METHODS: PD-L1 expression was identified by immunohistochemistry (IHC). Reverse transcriptase-polymerase chain reaction was used for ALK variant detection, and immunofluorescence-based multiplex staining was applied for exploring immune cells in tumor microenvironments. RESULTS: A total of 78 patients with ALK-positive advanced ADC were enrolled in our study, of whom 52 received crizotinib. Compared with EGFR/ALK wild-type tumors, PD-L1 expression was lower in ALK-positive ADC. ALK fusion variants were identified in 32 patients, and those with variant 3 and 5 (short variants) had higher PD-L1 expression than those with other variants. The crizotinib objective response rate (ORR) and progression-free survival (PFS) was better in tumors with negative PD-L1 expression (ORR/PFS in PD-L1 0% vs. 1%-49% vs. 50%-100%: 60.7%/11.8 months vs. 38.5%/6.5 months vs. 36.4%/4.0 months, p = .007/.022). The multivariate Cox proportional hazards model revealed that PD-L1 0% (vs. ≥1%) was an independent factor for longer PFS (adjusted hazard ratio 0.322, 95% confidence interval 0.160-0.650, p = .002). Multiplex IHC in three cases showed a varied extent of immune cell infiltrations in tumors with different PD-L1 expression. CONCLUSION: Positive PD-L1 expression was associated with unfavorable clinical outcomes in patients with ALK-positive lung ADC receiving crizotinib. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Not all lung adenocarcinoma with sensitizing driver mutations experienced durable responses to small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Similar to the negative impact of programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant tumors treated with TKIs, this study demonstrated that positive PD-L1 expression was also associated with worse response rate and shorter progression-free survival of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)-positive adenocarcinoma treated with crizotinib. Among different ALK fusion partners, tumors with short variants (V3 and V5) had higher PD-L1 compared with long variants (V1, V2, and V6). Testing PD-L1 before initiating crizotinib for ALK-positive lung cancer could be a simple method to provide important prognostic information.

Two first-in-human studies of xentuzumab, a humanised insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-neutralising antibody, in patients with advanced solid tumours.

BACKGROUND: Xentuzumab, an insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-1/IGF-2-neutralising antibody, binds IGF-1 and IGF-2, inhibiting their growth-promoting signalling. Two first-in-human trials assessed the maximum-tolerated/relevant biological dose (MTD/RBD), safety, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and activity of xentuzumab in advanced/metastatic solid cancers. METHODS: These phase 1, open-label trials comprised dose-finding (part I; 3 + 3 design) and expansion cohorts (part II; selected tumours; RBD [weekly dosing]). Primary endpoints were MTD/RBD. RESULTS: Study 1280.1 involved 61 patients (part I: xentuzumab 10-1800 mg weekly, n = 48; part II: 1000 mg weekly, n = 13); study 1280.2, 64 patients (part I: 10-3600 mg three-weekly, n = 33; part II: 1000 mg weekly, n = 31). One dose-limiting toxicity occurred; the MTD was not reached for either schedule. Adverse events were generally grade 1/2, mostly gastrointestinal. Xentuzumab showed dose-proportional pharmacokinetics. Total plasma IGF-1 increased dose dependently, plateauing at ~1000 mg/week; at ≥450 mg/week, IGF bioactivity was almost undetectable. Two partial responses occurred (poorly differentiated nasopharyngeal carcinoma and peripheral primitive neuroectodermal tumour). Integration of biomarker and response data by Bayesian Logistic Regression Modeling (BLRM) confirmed the RBD. CONCLUSIONS: Xentuzumab was well tolerated; MTD was not reached. RBD was 1000 mg weekly, confirmed by BLRM. Xentuzumab showed preliminary anti-tumour activity. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: NCT01403974; NCT01317420.

Association between programmed death-ligand 1 expression, immune microenvironments, and clinical outcomes in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung adenocarcinoma patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

INTRODUCTION: Besides being a predictive biomarker of response to immunotherapy in lung cancer in general, programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is not so well correlated with treatment outcomes of lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) harbouring epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations, as reported studies are inconclusive and seldom addressed the issues of response to treatment and resistance. The primary objective is to evaluate the association of PD-L1 and EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) efficacy, resistance, and relevant clinical outcomes. The secondary objective is to further explore the tumour microenvironments of EGFR mutant tumours with different PD-L1 expression. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Using immunohistochemical (IHC) staining, we retrospectively tested PD-L1 expression (Dako 22C3) in the pre-treatment tumours from advanced EGFR mutant lung ADC patients, of whom all were treated with TKIs. Multiplex IHC assay was applied for exploring immune cells in tumour microenvironments. RESULTS: A total of 153 Taiwanese patients were enrolled in our study, of whom a majority of cases were female (58.9%) and non-smokers (75.8%). The objective response rate (ORR) to EGFR TKI and progression-free survival (PFS) were better in patients with PD-L1 expression <50% (ORR/PFS in PD-L1 0% versus 1-49% versus ≥50%: 65.6%/12.5 months versus 56.4%/12.8 months versus 38.9%/5.9 months, P < 0.05). The multivariate analysis showed that PD-L1 <50% was an independent prognostic factor for longer PFS (hazard ratio (HR) 0.433, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.250-0.751, P = 0.003). Furthermore, tumours with higher PD-L1 expression were less likely to develop a secondary T790M mutation (T790M+ in PD-L1 0% versus 1-49% versus ≥50%: 53.7% versus 35.7% versus 10%, P = 0.024). Multiplex IHC tests were applied in 15 cases and revealed a potential correlation between PD-L1, immune cells, and EGFR TKI responses. CONCLUSIONS: Lower pre-treatment PD-L1 is associated with better ORR, PFS, and higher frequency of T790M resistance in EGFR TKI-treated lung ADC patients.

A phase I study of pexidartinib, a colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor inhibitor, in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors.

Background Pexidartinib, a novel, orally administered small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor, has strong selectivity against colony-stimulating factor 1 receptor. This phase I, nonrandomized, open-label multiple-dose study evaluated pexidartinib safety and efficacy in Asian patients with symptomatic, advanced solid tumors. Materials and Methods Patients received pexidartinib: cohort 1, 600 mg/d; cohort 2, 1000 mg/d for 2 weeks, then 800 mg/d. Primary objectives assessed pexidartinib safety and tolerability, and determined the recommended phase 2 dose; secondary objectives evaluated efficacy and pharmacokinetic profile. Results All 11 patients (6 males, 5 females; median age 64, range 23-82; cohort 1 n = 3; cohort 2 n = 8) experienced at least one treatment-emergent adverse event; 5 experienced at least one grade ≥ 3 adverse event, most commonly (18%) for each of the following: increased aspartate aminotransferase, blood alkaline phosphatase, gamma-glutamyl transferase, and anemia. Recommended phase 2 dose was 1000 mg/d for 2 weeks and 800 mg/d thereafter. Pexidartinib exposure, area under the plasma concentration-time curve from zero to 8 h (AUC0-8h), and maximum observed plasma concentration (Cmax) increased on days 1 and 15 with increasing pexidartinib doses, and time at Cmax (Tmax) was consistent throughout all doses. Pexidartinib exposure and plasma levels of adiponectin and colony-stimulating factor 1 increased following multiple daily pexidartinib administrations. One patient (13%) with tenosynovial giant cell tumor showed objective tumor response. Conclusions This was the first study to evaluate pexidartinib in Asian patients with advanced solid tumors. Pexidartinib was safe and tolerable in this population at the recommended phase 2 dose previously determined for Western patients (funded by Daiichi Sankyo; clinicaltrials.gov number, NCT02734433).

Cranial Irradiation for Patients with Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Mutant Lung Cancer Who Have Brain Metastases in the Era of a New Generation of EGFR Inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: Immediate whole brain radiation (WBRT) has been the standard for patients with lung cancer with brain metastases. The study aims to evaluate the effect of immediate cranial irradiation in patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung cancer in the era of a new generation of EGFR inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Medical records of 198 patients with EGFR mutant non-small cell lung cancer and brain metastases at initial metastatic diagnosis were reviewed. Patients were categorized into four groups: immediate WBRT, immediate cranial stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS), delayed radiation upon progression of cranial lesions (DRT), and never cranial irradiation (NRT). Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival related to EGFR inhibitors were analyzed. RESULTS: The SRS group had the fewest brain metastases and fewest extracranial lesions, and the DRT and NRT groups had the smallest brain metastases. Median survival were 18.5, 55.7, 21.1, and 18.2 months for the WBRT, SRS, DRT, and NRT groups, respectively. Patients who had received EGFR T790M inhibitors survived longer (41.1 vs. 19.8 months). In multivariate analysis, the OS of patients in the SRS group was longer than that in the NRT group (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR]: 0.315). Patients who had fewer extracranial lesions and who had received EGFR T790M inhibitor treatments also survived longer (aHR: 0.442 and 0.357, respectively). CONCLUSION: Immediate stereotactic radiosurgery but not whole brain radiation was associated with longer survival. Because of patient heterogeneity and the introduction of EGFR T790M inhibitors, the timing and modality of cranial irradiation should be determined individually, and cranial irradiation may be omitted for selected patients. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Immediate whole brain radiation has been the standard for patients with lung cancer with brain metastases. In this study, it was observed that, for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant advanced lung cancer who had brain metastases, there was no difference in survival between patients who never received cranial irradiation and those who received whole brain radiation immediately. Patients who received immediate stereotactic radiosurgery or who had ever received EGFR T790M inhibitors survived longer. Patients who received immediate stereotactic radiosurgery have fewer brain metastases. These findings suggest that the timing and modality of cranial irradiation should be determined individually, and cranial irradiation may be omitted in selected patients.

Clinical outcomes and secondary epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) T790M mutation among first-line gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib-treated non-small cell lung cancer patients with activating EGFR mutations.

Gefitinib, erlotinib and afatinib are approved for first-line treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) bearing an activating epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation. However, the clinical outcomes among the three EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are still controversial. We aimed to evaluate clinical outcomes and secondary EGFR T790M mutation among the three EGFR TKIs. From May 2014 to January 2016, a total of 301 patients received treatment with gefitinib, erlotinib or afatinib, for first-line treatment of advanced NSCLC with an activating EGFR mutation, based on their clinicians' choice. The median overall survival (OS) was 37.0 months. Although the baseline characteristics of patients were unequal, progression-free survival and OS did not differ among the 3 groups. Multivariate analysis found that gefitinib (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 3.29, 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.15-9.46, p = 0.027), EGFR TKI treatment duration more than 13 months (aOR 3.16, 95% CI, 1.20-8.33, p = 0.020), male (aOR 3.25, 95% CI, 1.10-9.66, p = 0.034), initial liver metastasis (aOR 4.97, 95% CI 1.18-20.96, p = 0.029) and uncommon EGFR mutation (aOR 0.14, 95% CI, 0.02-0.97, compared to EGFR deletion 19, p = 0.047) were independent factors for secondary T790M mutation. In real-world practice, choosing first line EGFR TKI based on the patients' clinical characteristics yielded good clinical outcomes. First-line gefitinib, longer EGFR TKI treatment duration, male, initial liver metastasis and uncommon EGFR mutations may be independent factors for secondary EGFR T790M mutation.

Tumor PD-L1 Expression and Clinical Outcomes in Advanced-stage Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Nivolumab or Pembrolizumab: Real-World Data in Taiwan.

Background: Immunotherapy that targets programmed death protein-1 (PD-1) provides improved treatment efficacy and survival in patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially those with high tumor expression of PD-L1. However, data on this treatment are mostly from clinical trials enrolling highly selected patients. The real-world experience of anti-PD-1 treatment and the usefulness of tumor PD-L1 expression in prediction of treatment response are largely unknown. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed patients with stage IIIB/ IV NSCLC who received monotherapy with nivolumab or pembrolizumab, and evaluated response using RECIST 1.1 criteria. Factors associated with treatment response, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were determined. Results: Seventy-four NSCLC patients out of 116 examined patients were included, most of whom had adenocarcinoma (48/74, 64.9%) and received immunotherapy as a third-line or subsequent treatment (51/74, 68.9%). The median PFS and OS were 1.8 and 7.9 months, respectively. The objective response rate was 32%, but only 47 of 74 patients were evaluable. Through multivariate analysis, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation was independently associated with a poor treatment response. Good performance status (ECOG≤1) and smoking were independently associated with better PFS and OS. Data on tumor PD-L1 expression were available in 43 patients (58%); higher PD-L1 expression correlated with better treatment response and longer PFS. Severe treatment-related adverse events were uncommon. Conclusion: The efficacy and safety of anti-PD-1 medications for advanced NSCLC were comparable in real-world and clinical settings, except in those with poor ECOG scores. Prediction of treatment response from tumor PD-L1 expression seemed practical.

Best Response According to RECIST During First-line EGFR-TKI Treatment Predicts Survival in EGFR Mutation-positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Patients.

INTRODUCTION: The association between the response to first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and survival in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We studied the association between the response to first-line EGFR-TKIs and survival using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and maximal tumor shrinkage. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed data from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC enrolled in first-line gefitinib and afatinib trials. A total of 98 patients who achieved a response or stable disease and had ≥ 1 measurable target lesion were included. The association between the best response by RECIST or maximal tumor shrinkage and survival was analyzed in Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models with the landmark method. The specified landmark time points were 8 weeks, the median time to maximal tumor shrinkage (16.5 weeks), and median progression-free survival (PFS; 56 weeks). RESULTS: A total of 76 patients (77%) responded to gefitinib or afatinib. Of these 76 patients, 49 (64%) and 75 (99%) had achieved a response at 8 and 16.5 weeks, respectively. All responders had achieved a response by 56 weeks. The responders had a significantly longer PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with those with stable disease at 16.5 weeks (PFS, P = .003; OS, P < .001) and 56 weeks (PFS, P = .026; OS, P = .016) but not at 8 weeks (PFS, P = .104; OS, P = .313). Among the responders, greater tumor shrinkage was not associated with longer PFS or OS. CONCLUSION: Those with a response to first-line gefitinib or afatinib had more favorable PFS and OS compared with those with stable disease. A sufficient observation period was required for the response to occur and predict outcomes. Greater maximal tumor shrinkage in the responders was not predictive of survival.

Outcomes of research biopsies in clinical trials of EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer patients pretreated with EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors.

BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Research biopsies (RBs) are crucial for developing novel molecular targeted agents. However, the safety and diagnostic yields of RBs have not been investigated in EGFR mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients pretreated with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). METHODS: We searched the medical records of NSCLC patients who participated in lung cancer clinical trials and underwent mandatory RBs between 2012 and 2014 at our institution. Only patients with EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC pretreated with at least 1 EGFR-TKI were enrolled. RESULTS: Of 140 enrolled patients, 73 (52.1%) and 59 (42.1%) had exon 19 deletions and exon 21 L858R mutation, respectively. Before RBs, 108 (77.1%), 83 (59.3%), and 36 (25.7%) patients had been treated with gefitinib, erlotinib, and afatinib, respectively. Computed tomography-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy was the most frequently used modality among 181 RBs performed (50.8%), followed by ultrasonography-guided (32.0%) and endoscopic RBs (16.0%). The most common RB sites were the lung (69.6%), pleura (8.8%), and liver (6.1%). Pathologic examinations revealed malignant cells in most RB specimens (72.9%). Complications due to RBs included pneumothorax (11.6%), bleeding (6.1%), and infection (1.1%). Only 1 patient required chest tube placement for pneumothorax, and 2 patients underwent endotracheal intubation because of bleeding. CONCLUSION: RBs in this patient population were generally safe. Pneumothorax was the most frequent complication; bleeding, while infrequent, increased the risk of severe events. The diagnostic yields and complications of any particular modality should therefore be discussed with prospective clinical trial participants.

Optimal management of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer with disease progression on first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor therapy.

The first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs), gefitinib and erlotinib, and the second-generation EGFR-TKI, afatinib, have all been approved as standard first-line treatments for advanced EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) based on superior progression-free survival results compared to platinum doublet chemotherapy regimens. Acquired resistance to an EGFR-TKI inevitably develops after a period of effective drug treatment. After tumor progression, many combination therapy regimens that include an EGFR-TKI, or EGFR-TKI monotherapy, have been tested in prospective trials with the aim of extending survival. Third-generation EGFR-TKIs such as osimertinib have been developed with the aim of overcoming the effects of EGFR T790M resistance mutation, which occurs in half of the patients with disease progression on EGFR-TKI therapy. Osimertinib has become the standard treatment in patients for whom tumor re-biopsy reveals an acquired EGFR T790M mutation following EGFR-TKI therapy. Other third-generation EGFR-TKIs, such as olmutinib, EGF816, and ASP8273, are still in the trial phase.

A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data on the impact of the BIM deletion polymorphism on treatment outcomes in epidermal growth factor receptor mutant lung cancer.

BACKGROUND: A germline deletion in the BIM (BCL2L11) gene has been shown to impair the apoptotic response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) in vitro but its association with poor outcomes in TKI-treated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients remains unclear. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis on both aggregate and individual patient data to address this issue. RESULTS: In an aggregate data meta-analysis (n = 1429), the BIM deletion was associated with inferior PFS (HR = 1.51, 95%CI = 1.06-2.13, P = 0.02). Using individual patient data (n = 1200), we found a significant interaction between the deletion and ethnicity. Amongst non-Koreans, the deletion was an independent predictor of shorter PFS (Chinese: HR = 1.607, 95%CI = 1.251-2.065, P = 0.0002; Japanese: HR = 2.636, 95%CI = 1.603-4.335, P = 0.0001), and OS (HR = 1.457, 95% CI = 1.063-1.997, P = 0.019). In Kaplan-Meier analyses, the BIM deletion was associated with shorter survival in non-Koreans (PFS: 8.0 months v 11.1 months, P < 0.0005; OS: 25.7 v 30.0 months, P = 0.042). In Koreans, the BIM deletion was not predictive of PFS or OS. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 10 published and 3 unpublished studies that reported survival outcomes in NSCLC patients stratified according to BIM deletion were identified from PubMed and Embase. Summary risk estimates were calculated from aggregate patient data using a random-effects model. For individual patient data, Kaplan-Meier analyses were supported by multivariate Cox regression to estimate hazard ratios (HRs) for PFS and OS. CONCLUSIONS: In selected populations, the BIM deletion is a significant predictor of shorter PFS and OS on EGFR-TKIs. Further studies to determine its effect on response to other BIM-dependent therapeutic agents are needed, so that alternative treatment strategies may be devised.