Factors Influencing Parental Willingness to Consent to a Survey Study for Patients in the Pediatric Emergency Department.

OBJECTIVE: To identify factors that impact parental willingness to consent to research studies conducted for their children during visits to pediatric emergency departments (EDs). METHODS: Parents and guardians of children receiving care in our pediatric ED were approached and asked if they would be willing to let their child participate in a research study requiring the child to complete an electronic questionnaire. No such questionnaire existed, however, because the primary purpose was to ascertain the parent's willingness to let their child participate. All parents were debriefed and informed of the true purpose of the study and asked to complete a survey themselves to help understand factors that influenced their initial decision of whether to consent. Bivariate tests and logistic regression were used to evaluate unadjusted and adjusted associations between parent and patient characteristics and parental consent decision. RESULTS: We approached 431 eligible parents about the hypothetical research study involving their children, and 386 (89.6%) consented for their children to participate. After the debriefing, 392 (91.0%) parents consented to complete the parental survey. We observed statistically significant associations between shorter length of ED stay to approach for consent for the study ( P = 0.048) as well as longer travel time ( P = 0.03) and willingness to consent in bivariate analysis, though this did not hold in regression analysis. Regression analysis revealed parents of children who have previously participated in research had 79 times lower odds of consenting to participate in our study adjusted for parent race, ethnicity, actual and perceived length of stay, travel time to the ED, and altruism. CONCLUSIONS: A high proportion of parents consented to their child participating in research in our ED with previous child participation in research being associated with lower odds of parental consent even when adjusted for other factors. Our findings may inform future research practices and studies investigating parental perceptions and motivations surrounding research studies.

Treatment of Interspinous Pain With Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: The interspinous region is an atypical source of low back pain, and it can often be difficult to identify. There are many structural components in the interspinous region that can contribute to interspinous pain, including the interspinous ligament, which plays a role in providing stabilization to the spine. Successful treatments of interspinous pain have not been well characterized in the literature. This case presents the first documentation of the use of extracorporeal shockwave therapy as a noninvasive treatment for refractory interspinous-related low back pain. Extracorporeal shockwave therapy has previously been shown to facilitate regeneration and tissue healing in tendons and ligaments but has not previously been used to treat interspinous pain. A 24-yr-old former collegiate softball player presented with 5 mos of low back pain; the interspinous ligament was clinically suspected as a pain generator, and this was confirmed via an ultrasound-guided injection. She underwent a course of physical therapy that improved function but did not improve pain, and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs only provided minimal and temporary relief. Three consecutive extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment sessions provided 90% improvement in pain and function, and she was able to return to exercise and recreational sports. At more than 6 mos after extracorporeal shockwave therapy treatment, she reported no recurrences or functional limitations.

A Tale of Bilateral Rapidly Progressive Osteoarthritis of the Hip-It Is Not Always the Steroid Injection: A Case Report.

ABSTRACT: Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip is an unusual subset of hip osteoarthritis in which a >2 mm/yr rate of joint space narrowing occurs. Rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip has been associated with intra-articular steroid injection, with the incidence of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip after intra-articular steroid injection ranging from 2.8% to 21%. The occurrence of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip unrelated to intra-articular steroid injection is rare, and not frequently reported. This report presents a unique case of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip in the bilateral hips of one patient. The first hip developed rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip within 6 mos after an intra-articular steroid injection. Three years later, the second hip developed rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip within 4 mos without any injection or use of systemic steroid medication. The etiology of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip in the absence of intra-articular steroid injection is unclear, and this case presents the opportunity to observe the development of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis of the hip due to different causes within the same individual.

Evaluation of sleep health documentation and sleep-related intervention by physiatrists treating musculoskeletal disorders: A retrospective investigation.

BACKGROUND: Sleep health is linked to pain, function, and global health. Unfortunately, sleep health may not be consistently addressed as a part of musculoskeletal care. OBJECTIVE: To describe the frequency of sleep health documentation and intervention by musculoskeletal physiatrists. Additionally, patient-reported outcome measures were compared between patients with and without sleep impairment. We hypothesized that sleep health is documented and addressed in less than half of initial patient encounters and that patients with a sleep impairment have worse patient-reported outcomes scores compared to those without sleep impairment. DESIGN: Retrospective study. SETTING: Tertiary orthopedic hospital. INTERVENTIONS: None. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Frequency of provider documentation of sleep health, frequency and characteristics of sleep health intervention provided, and Patient-Reported Outcome Measurement Information System (PROMIS)-10 mental health and physical health scores. RESULTS: Initial visits for a musculoskeletal condition of 39,452 patients from January 1, 2020 to October 1, 2022 were included. Documentation of sleep health was found in 33.0% (13,002/39,452) of patients. Of those with sleep health documentation, 59.2% (7697/13,002) were classified as having a sleep impairment. Only 19.0% of patients were provided with sleep-related education or other intervention. Patients with a sleep impairment had worse PROMIS-10 mental health and physical health scores (p < .001), as compared to those without a sleep impairment. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with sleep impairment had worse mental and physical health scores than those without sleep impairment, and only 19.0% received sleep health intervention. These data suggest that sleep impairment is common in patients presenting for evaluation of a musculoskeletal condition, and advanced provider education and tools to help patients improve their sleep health are needed.